Thanks for the mention! I took down the flag support. Just FYI, I would've taken care of it sooner but I didn't get any kind of message or notification about it.

I used to think that not getting cards, like red or yellow, was the opposite of getting them. I guess I was wrong.


A white flag? Like when the ref is trying to show a sign of peaceful intention or they're cool with a truce or something? 

It looks like you may not have fully read through the initial post and the rest of the discussion in this thread. Just to clarify, the user who started this thread does not have ownership or control over the site in question, so they wouldn't be able to put into action any suggestions that have been made. It's possible that the OP may have some sort of affiliation with the site, but it is unclear.

Well... I think the introduction of a white card in football seems rather pointless. It's unclear what purpose it serves. Is it supposed to promote good sportsmanship? If so, I would argue that there are already plenty of ways for officials to enforce fair play and good behavior on the field or court. The idea of a white card just seems like an unnecessary and confusing addition to the already established rules and regulations of the game.

And judging by the reactions I've seen on social media, it appears that I'm not alone in this sentiment.

I have a sneaking suspicion that they may have borrowed their terms and conditions from another website without fully adapting them to their own. This could indicate that the site was put together hastily and and without proper attention to detail, and could also be an indication that the site may not have the best intentions. Of course, this is just my gut feeling and could be proven wrong.

Sure, soccer may have a broader fan base, but let's not forget that MMA is also rising in popularity. With a dedicated and passionate fanbase, MMA is a force to be reckoned with. And let's not forget, popularity in sports can vary depending on where you are, so let's not make hasty comparisons without considering the context and audience.

Also, according to Roobet's website, their casino is run by a kangaroo, who as we all know, are known for their love of boxing. 

Yes, it might. If the platform offers unique and addictive games, users may be more inclined to use the platform's token in order to participate. But, that's only part of the equation. The game must also be fun and engaging, otherwise users won't stick around for long. There are also other factors that may determine whether a user will be more likely to participate in the platform's ecosystem, or not. For instance, how easy is it to convert other currency (crypto or fiat) into the platform's token? If a user has to go through several steps before being able to use their money for transactions on the platform, it might discourage them from doing so. The token could also be used for rewards, to purchase in-game items or simply to pay for games. For example, if the platform offers exclusive discounts on in-game items or purchases with its token, that could be a good reason to use it.

Ultimately, it's all about creating a fun and engaging gaming experience for people. Whether users will accept your token as a way to interact with the platform depends on how well you execute on that gaming experience - not just the token functionality.

It's not necessarily that simple. The availability of online gambling can certainly make it easier for individuals to access and potentially develop a gambling addiction, but I don't think that is the root cause. There are other factors at play, such as personal financial situation and mental health, as well as regulations and responsible gambling measures that can be implemented to mitigate the risk of addiction. Like the legalization of cannabis, for example. It's worth mentioning that not everyone who has access to cannabis will develop an addiction, as it depends on individual's susceptibility to addiction. It's a complex issue that can not be reduced to a simple cause and effect relationship and requires a multifaceted approach to understand and address.

Oops, my bad. So it only works on blocks that have already been mined, right? I thought the tool was supposed to do something else.

I agree with LoyceV, developing a scraper for the entire thread would be a waste of time. There are many potential issues to consider such as someone posting in a wrong format or someone editing the post while the scraper is running... There are simply too many things that can go wrong. It would be more efficient for the contest organizer to manually prepare the list of participants.

I think you need to come up with a better way for selecting the "Target Block". For instance, if someone wants to organize a contest and announce that the winner will be chosen from Block 773400, your tool does not currently have the option to select a specific target block and can only choose a block offset from the most recent one.

Did you accept the deal? No need to post if you don't accept the deal. 

But seriously, anyone with a brain cell can easily find plenty of options available online. Some of them even offer free options. So, what's the point you're trying to make? Can you explain how your service is different? Are there any features that set it apart? Can you provide an example using a random address for comparison?

Anyway, from what I've seen in your previous posts, I honestly doubt that you have the technical know-how for in-depth blockchain analysis. No offense, but I need some convincing. Show me I'm wrong, I'll eat my words with a side of humble pie.

In another thread, you accuse a member of attempting to scam you in an exchange of your BTC for fiat, but here you claim that you don't have adequate collateral for the loan. It is clear that you are being dishonest in one of these two situations.


The Rule of "No Collateral, No Loan" - IGNORE AT YOUR OWN RISK!

It's good that you did not fall victim to a scam. However, I do not see clear evidence linking your story to the suspected account. Could you provide the video of your chat conversation and a screenshot of the matching Telegram account that was mentioned in the post?

Another thing I don't understand, if you have the funds to exchange, why did you ask for a $50 no collateral loan here?

Technically speaking, he's not banned and can still participate in Tech board. Also, we cannot make generalizations as this measure was only applied once and only for one specific case.

You can read a more detailed explanation by achow101 in this thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5193489.msg52782685#msg52782685

I like reading Franky1's posts (some of them) even though I don't always agree with his opinion, but that doesn't mean that his posts belong in the  Dev & Tech board. I like to think of myself as a technical nerd, therefore my view is that every technical board should be more factual and less about opinions and personal views. Don't get me wrong, I'm all for free speech and all that, but as LoyceV elegantly put it, when does it cross the line into spam?

It's important to note that Franky1 still has the freedom to post in all other forum boards, so there is absolutely no question of censorship or political agenda at play here.

Nova signature i avatar kampanja za Member+ članove:

Kampanja: SellDefi | Earn by selling files - Signature Campaign | Reward up to $75/w
Menadžer: Royse777

Uvjeti: Minimalno 5, a maksimalno 25 postova tjedno će biti plaćeno. Postovi u Local sekcijama se broje u tjednu kvotu (do 5 postova tjedno). Predviđeno trajanje kampanje nije definirano.

Campaign rewards
Hero and Legendary members: $3.00 per post up to 25 posts each week
Sr. Members: $2.40 per post up to 25 posts each week
Full Members: $1.60 per post up to 25 posts each week
Members: $0.80 per post up to 25 posts each week

I gave @MrCrank negative for promoting a fake humanitarian project. Exploiting human suffering and crisis in Ukraine for personal gain is one of the most unethical actions imaginable, and that's why I don't trust such a member. Anyone who disagrees with my judgment is free to remove me from their Trust list.

I recognized @Jawadu from a previous case where he accepted to promote a project that the previous manager had labeled as scam and refused to work with them. Here is the reference. After the QI Scam was exposed for plagiarism, he persisted in defending the project for his personal benefit, as you can see here. A few months later, the token's value to plummet from $0.4 to $0.02. So basically, I'm still waiting for him to prove me wrong. 

As for @Prasagta, I don't know who that guy is and I don't think I've ever tagged him.

Not only the whitepaper, but also the website (and most of the content in the ANN topic) is also plagiarized from various sources, but mostly from the Cypherdog project: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5430836.msg61635556#msg61635556

It's clear from a simple five-minute Google search that this project is nothing more than a simple copycat scheme. They take bits and pieces from other projects without any original ideas or concepts, just to deceive uninformed investors and make a quick buck before disappearing in a month or two.

Yes, this is a big red flag and definitely something to be cautious of. I did some more research and it's pretty clear that this project has not only plagiarized their whitepaper, but their website^[1] as well. A lot of the content seems to have been copied from the medium article of the Cypherdog project^[2].




Original source: https://medium.com/@e.kozera/what-makes-cypherdog-stand-out-a2149ae6e471

This is an unacceptable act and a blatant violation of intellectual property^[3], and raises serious concerns about the credibility of the project. Anyone considering investing or becoming involved with this project should be aware that it has engaged in such a dishonest and unethical behavior.

---

[1] https://memv.net/
[2] https://www.cypher.dog/
[3] https://www.cypher.dog/terms-of-service/

It's been a month since this scam accusation was first made, but nothing has changed. Their website still has a link to the same plagiarized whitepaper and there's still no information about their team, despite what MetaMallVerse promised.


MetaMallVerse, it's been several weeks and it seems that you haven't kept your word. Can you please explain what has been happening with your project and your team? It is very important to be transparent with your community and stakeholders. Your failure to deliver on your promises is a serious concern.