|
I have been seeing alot of post lately about merits and I Just keep laughing...
Everyome deserves to get merited for reasons the giver decides... It's not something you'd just go ahead and act like you don't need them ...lol.. the thing is; if you need merits, then work for it. Don't let words describe how much you need them, let your actions do so for you.
It's even made easy this days that's we've got alot of merit sharing threads; tbh, when I got registered, I wasn't even lucky to benefit from RATIMOV's thread ( ofcourse it was very active by then), but I came just after he lost interest in it...that didn't discourage me; I just kept seeing myself as a reputable member ( and I did these cus I knew my worth), ...and here I am, three hundred and sixty... whattt? And still counting...
I'd advise you to let yourself into it... Don't try to bypass the system nor it rules, you'll only get smacked... Keep your head up and stay FOCUSED, be CONSISTENT and one day, you'll also advise someone else on how to be like you.
Sandra 🧑🦰
|
|
|
|
In the few period of time I've spent on the forum, I've noticed that most times, people just come to a topic and state their opinions without coming back to add more contributions on such topics, hence discussion seems difficult especially for people in some signature campaigns.
Now my question is,
~Why does it seem difficult to continue a discussion on a topic.
~Why do people just state their opinions rather than continue a discussion?
Let's discuss please
It depends on the board in question just as JACK said ... I use to see a thing like that severally in boards like gambling -- where everyone goes in there to dumb whatsoever shit they've got in their minds, so for the same reason that anything they would say is sometimes just according to the topic sentence, they'll not have to bother reading anyone's opinion -- maybe if someone had said the same thing already? Or if they're really making a point that could revive a discussion? Or if they're making any points at all? ... These questions Don't seem to bother them; all they need is their Post-count, simple. Yunno we have alot of less oriented peeps in here, that operates in a very lowwww perception based on their inexperience ... you'll be surprised to quote someone on a very important question, on their Post, based on their statement earlier but they'll not a make any reply to that ever again!! Sandra 🧑🦰 |
|
|
|
I'm bumping this thread because I've been getting PMs from people who don't meet this qualification: If you've been requesting reviews for at least 3 months and are due for a review, please message me just in case. You seeee... Its appalling -- how some new users had significantly taken advantage of the monthly review.. I know for sure that this man, Chymist won't even dare to look into a dumb profile twice -- talk more of meriting a post outta some petty sentiments, pity or as a mistake -- I could vouch for him. Sometimes, I'll just have to take a quick trip around those profiles and truly, they deserve merits -- so is that supposed to mean that the system is running on a scale of imbalance? Or maybe they ain't enough sources? Or no one cares? When I got registered in here, I could remember how hard it was to get my first merit; all thanks to some eccentric dudes like Fillipone and CHYMIST who've stood firm to swirl the stress (for some newbies) of "posting in mega boards like dev&tech just to get merited " and as a result, they'll plagiarize and will have no choice but to face some witty juries... My whole point is that; looks like this is a designed formula just to curb some incessant circulation ( maybe to some shitty accounts?)? If yes, then that's crazily programmed yunno... Or maybe it'll be more of "Theymos not giving an increase on the source merits" ?? Who knows what's on TSC's mind ?? Sandra 🧑🦰 |
|
|
|
|
Well, I didn't wanna say anything In here ( for some reasons I'm uncertain about just yet) but it's cool.
I love the effort, the creativity and lastly, the presentation... For sure, it deserves some accolades.. kudos dude.
I'll still tell you that you've mixed up things seriously.... This are two different context in one topic, -- I'm not saying it ain't cool like that but, it doesn't commensurate properly -- yeah I know for sure that "knowing which responses to make each and everytime is imperative" .... Knowing the forum rules is too... This ain't no segregation, take note.
I'll urge 'em rookies -- the ones we've got trooping in lately to please adhere to the rules -- that's what has kept everyone you've seen this far...
Sandra 🧑🦰
|
|
|
|
|
it's not for anything but the money ...take note
It's takes a very tedious process to build up a channel and get 'em peeps following, subscribing and sharing whatever content you post as a YouTuber... Infact, when they haven't gotten the fame, they'll post trending things (real or fake) just so they get more traffic... But when they get verified, they'll simply be paid to promote whatsoever, as long as THEY ARE PAID.
You don't have to hold any influencer as being responsible for any misinformation cus MOST of them don't even know too much bout what they promote... It's in your place to be guided by whatever informations you see. This could be collated with signature campaigns in here, right?!
Sandra 🧑
|
|
|
|
Can someone tell me a reason why newbies are not granted access to reply some topics in some places here. For instance, I saw a topic in "serious discussion" side that I would have loved to add some talk to the discussion, but I noticed that although I could read it, there was no option for me to reply. I checked another topic on the same place, and I could not reply still. Then I tried another place to see that I could reply, can someone please explain to me so I can learn, learning is my earnest desire.
Yeah.... What Hosse said is actually true... Newbies have been restricted on these options Cus who knows? anyone could just pop-up and Begin to write some execrably, crappy garbage ( put together). Some doesn't make any sense and could be something totally different from the topic sentence, wack!! You checked another topic and you was able to reply? That should tell you that it ain't getting optimised for every board. Well, on the other hand -- if you were a member -- it's either the thread is locked, you don't have up to atleast 300 post (for some threads),or you have that particular board on ignore (which I don't think it'll show up as an option for you). You just have to keep posting to get your ranks just so you'd participate anyway, anytime you want. Sandra 🧑 |
|
|
|
|
I love these writeup...
It's just impossible to make a good legacy that'll stand the test of time -- and prolly instill wisdom in 'em rookies that'd also enhance Thier proficiency over time; changing their perception inwardly for the better -- in all ramifications..... -- WITHOUT swotting alot of valuables, from some already proven facts, from self thought analysis that are ASCERTAINED, finally from the forum... It doesn't work that way.
I'd advise 'em rookies to buckle up and make endeavours NOW -- now is the time cus believe me; a time will come when alot of knowledgeable gurus would get to discover the forum and "mediocrity won't have a stand"
Sandra 🧑
|
|
|
|
|
It's possible to earn more merits than anyone has; it was impossible since no had broken the monopoly of merit earnings and -- no one would believe that fillipone could go that far when he started -- neither did anyone believe in you but, you proved yourself.... Kudos!
Yunno, this is a BTC site and we'll really appreciate appraisals from users who are technically inclined... Perhaps, that fetches a good some of merits as an appreciation for every idea well proven -- likes of Gloves and n0nce are specifically eccentric.
Sandra 🧑
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah.... You seeee, there was a time I took a quick survey on the forum and, after a long search, I bumbed into a post that Theymos made years ago -- and he's looking for someone that's really compatible to take up a position -- if I could vividly remember, it was a moderator's position in one of the local boards (can't recall the board in question though cus that's been quite a long time) but I know for sure that the moderator had openly denounce the post -- he said he wasn't interested anymore after several years of inactivity and unconcern.
At that point, I felt like shit -- yeah, the system's been beffled over the years just so the unserious ones would slide out and apparently, the profound ones would tighten their grip.... I guess they need replacements though we have 'em GMs on every board ..
Sandra 🧑
|
|
|
|
Betis does not have a bad team, but in Spain you are unlucky that you almost always have Barcelona and Real Madrid that stand out.
I really feel apathetic when it comes to the issues in la Liga; it's now looking less competitive -- even lesser than when puyol left Barcelona. It's now looking Asif the strength of the division were one "greatest of all times". Look at a team like betis; they never had any chance to show up during the days when we had a complete squad in FCB -- when soccer was played According to how it was planned and that, ofcourse needed alot of IQ tested players, which they were themselves. Now it's looking really worse as Madrid doesn't even have a strong competition against them, so they'll just have to win again and again and again ,, ,, ,, ,,..... I miss the good old days. Sandra 🧑 |
|
|
|
|
Twitch remains a subsidiary of Amazon and things are always done properly right? If they had decided to adopt the system of "not allowing gambling streams", then that should not just be a decision made by the staffs or operational officers, it's something that has been pondered about severely from all their affiliates....
As it says, they just made additions to their existing policies and that has always been the core target to keep any firm going... Nothing wrong, Maybe the viewers are just tired of seeing gambling ads, maybe they need some privacy views
Sandra 🧑
|
|
|
|
Come on you can't be serious? How do you enjoy seeing animals fighting and getting killed and you enjoy it ! If you are a real muslim you know that any kind of gambling or hurting animals is forbiden to do without any excuse
Hahaha.... Don't make me Laugh out my ass!! How do you assume peeps in here? Like you really think that everyone is a Muslim? Just as you are? .... having that as a bad take can't justify another person or condemn them either. That's not a legalized stuff; it's just something you get during the southern-fun peripherals and it's practiced in those remote areas, ( not in Urban cities). Don't always have these keen interest of passin' your religious law to anyone, everyone.. except, maybe someone that believes in that. I'm a Christian though but (that isn't to create any diversity though),... Hold firm to what yunno and belief in it. Meanwhile, I enjoyed the last trip for a Scorpio fight ...lol Sandra 🧑 |
|
|
|
|
Hehe...
The whole story is just very funny. How could he show up with a black knife, claiming to be a chef and the performers believed him? Is it that the whites don't take things serious out there? C'mon... to every motive, there's always a reaction prior the happenings... Maybe the dude had her in mind? IDK but that should be something (atleast anyone) noticed on time to evade such brutal injuries.
Do you really think that a security man would do much with that? He's human too and has some bond of fears (as everyone else does), so I think it was just meant to happen.
Nevertheless, I'd commend any casino to deploy security forces just so this won't repeat itself.
Sandra 🧑
|
|
|
|
Those stuffs are just mere coincidence. It could prolly happen ( I'm not disputing that fact) but it has nothing to do with whoever plays the win for the game, talk more of a draw. Yunno, gamblers ain't would always find several ways to maneuver; since they loose alot of funds on the long run, trying to triple 'em -- at some point, it feels as if it'll be impossible to make some big wins without a Means to divert; those thoughts would quickly create a decent atmosphere for different calculative designs, -- the likes of this one  The dude was just lucky and that's it. Sandra 🧑 |
|
|
|
Currently I'm using a site which is promoted by a lot of famous people like Robin van Persie, John Terry, Kelly Smith, Cathryn Li, Wong Yat Fei. Very trusted tho so far i dont have any issue with anything currently.
Why are you requesting a change in site if you don't have any issues with that one as you claimed? ....and (it doesn't have a name?)? Hmm I guess whatever reasons why you've decided to switch up is affiliated with the same reason why different casinos came down here to the forum, to hire alot of reputables, -- with some wonderful posting style/experience -- to help advertise, just so you could choose from the varieties you've got. Apart from recommending a scammy site like 1xbit,( and who the fuck cares if they accept crypto?)? Every other site is legitimate, only that they've got different Ts/C's. Sandra 🧑 |
|
|
|
|
It's pretty obvious that we have alot of casinos without online presence here on BTT, but does that make peeps reject an offer to bet on their platform? The answer is NO!
People don't really care about it.. afterall, organizing a campaign on the forum is just an AFTERTHOUGHT and the whole project needs funds ; so an excuse (to anyone who might Wanna hear) would be that it incures extra expenditures -- after spending alot already on a customer care Bot? Or hiring a representative to attain to any complaints? That'll be too much. Most gamblers don't even consider that as a preference anyways.
Sandra 🧑
|
|
|
|
This is why I strongly believe that Bitcoin will forever keep it's value intact,
Those are just majorly the qualities that Bitcoin posses, that's different from the whole FIAT's monetary policies, yunno. It ain't a reason to keep Bitcoin going dude. I don't think Bitcoin has got any blockage on it's way RN as the system has already been accessed, transaction processes have been ascertained, the Blockchain has been made to serve multiple purposes, including the purpose of a LEDGER, mhannn... Crypto won't replace Fiat, EXCEPT OTHERWISE( maybe several options are made to synchronize like FIAT does) but it's a wise choice. Sandra 🧑 |
|
|
|
|
Don't rush into investing if you're a newbie as you claimed. Most peeps have been driven into their darkest primes just in a bid to try something new without having an idea about anything in it, stay cool.
Meanwhile, if you do already, then this is actually the right time to buy. It's called the DIP, where you'd buy and HODL coins for lesser cost only to bumb into some huge profits at the ATH, depending on whether or not you investing much in it. Don't Rush and don't panic of the market structure stoops lower; it has happened severally and it always finds it way through.
Stay guided...
Sandra 🧑
|
|
|
|
|
I don't wanna quote anyone on this, though I've read alot of annoying, self-centered stuffs...
CHYMIST, you're just cute the way you are...btw, I understand how frustrating it is to tender a request only to get snubbed, for a couple of times that you'd easily manipulate -- that's if you had the Techs --. It's really painful (ain't gonna lie) that you're only gonna limit these for some reasons we all understand, it appalling.!! But you seeee, erhhh.... Sometimes, things are not just allowed to workout the way you'd seem to have it(maybe, getting usual obstructions from some powerful people, which is the case here) ... I'm not here to question Theymos for not seeing in the same spectacles as you did, but I'm not also citing his actions (most especially when he's not even saying a dime)... I just want you to keep it together; if someone would quote me previously, I never wanted this whole thing for myself alone, it was for everyone else and that's a priority to me... It's the fact that I felt maybe MS were some kinda logical when it comes to distribution so I had to awaken a lost thread, that's somewhat compatible, I guess it had a different impact anyways but that's not the point here. I respect your decisions as I don't think Theymos would wanna consider an incessant (as he'd have it) request fr.
@Halab, I mean no disrespect but that statement you wrote; that giving 50 merits in 30 days to a user is the stupidest ?? That's quite unruly. I wasn't expecting that you'd fuel up the whole situation like that.... How you expect CHYMIST to feel?? Yeah, that's unfair.
I'd get even more pissed if it were directed on me.
Sandra 🧑
|
|
|
|
It seems you're promoting Stake.com here.
From your Twitter account from here, we know what's your purpose for posting this but to answer your question here's my opinion.
Oh my days..!!!!! Damnnn, This is it .....!!! I thought I'd be the only one that wasn't deceived by this treacherous act. The user is simply promoting stakes; the idea is to make that review as a rookie but I'm assuming that user isn't a newbie This looks wrong to me; we've got a board for promotions like this, the Ann threads, ... anyone is obtainable but for this, IT HAS CROSSED THE THE BORDERLINE. I read a thread previously about a complaint of Stake users that they were restricted to with their big fund on that gambling casino, if you withdraw it smoothly update us here.
"If they pretend not to know what they're doing, pretend to believe 'em" -- I guess this is what you're adoption though but remember thus; "if a handshake passes the elbow, it becomes a fight" I'm just gonna hit the report button right away,...he could attract a few tags if he keeps persisting. Sandra 🧑 |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
