Bitcoin Forum
July 04, 2024, 11:28:57 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 [856] 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 ... 935 »
17101  Economy / Exchanges / Re: Bitfinex - Verification just for withdrawing USD? on: September 28, 2017, 10:12:10 AM
Just to weigh in on my experience, I was able to deposit and withdraw crypto (Bitcoin mainly but also a few other alts) without any verification request. I know that as recently as last year, you were even allowed to withdraw fiat (bank transfer or other payment processor) as long as it was below the limit of a a basic account. That's different now and any fiat withdrawal requires AML/KYC verification with personal documents. This was the exact same experience across exchanges I've used, including Bittrex, Poloniex.

The newest exchange I used was ViaBTC when it opened around the time of the fork, and I was also allowed to deposit and withdraw without document verification. But you can't even enter a bank account now without document verification.

Note: at all sites I did opt to verify Phone Number, which elevates you to Basic Verified account, higher limits basically.

AFAIK, there isn't any exchange that will send you fiat without doc verification anymore. Even if you manage to find one, wouldn't recommend you try if you're not prepared to disclose your identity.
17102  Bitcoin / Press / Re: [2017-09-27] Vitalik Buterin Explains Flaws in ICOs and Scaling Issues in Eth on: September 28, 2017, 08:33:43 AM
Looks like there is something wrong with the link as I can't open it.

First time I heard Vitalik making some sense. LOL. Its not his usual self promotion of Ethereum. So an extent I believed that having a inexperienced company handle to much money to really put forward the projects their offered, may not be a good idea. That's why a lot of ICO never became successful or have scam its investors. So that's a clue for those who are willing to put their hard earn cash, check the team behind if they have the right tools to really bring the project to the next level. Younger people with less experience rise to positions of power. That combination will lead to the downfall of the company behind the ICO's.

Despite what you might think of the guy, he actually is a lot more sensible than most of the company he keeps... and good journalists/editors have a way of leading interviews into good reports, which is the treatment I believe the South Koreans gave here Wink

While I can't wholeheartedly support the way Ethereum is managed, I suppose ongoing development is, after all, focused on mitigating the issues that Buterin can foresee with the network. All these apps jumping on, especially from states and corporations, it seems to unsettle him and the other developers  he brought on board, in a good way that's forced them to rethink their direction over the years.

But he must be also thinking inwardly about how these centralized ICOs are a projection of projects like Ethereum. And no, I'm not the radical libertarian here to think everything must be decentralised.
17103  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Genesis Mining Bitcoin Case Study Week Five on: September 28, 2017, 07:19:34 AM
Cloud mining, at best, returns your capital after many months. The best ones I've seen are from Genesis and ViaBTC's ones, but only when you get the pre-ordered contracts. Those get you at break even after 7 to 8 months.

Prior to end of 2016, you will see that a lot of users complained that they lost money: mainly due to the halving as a poster experienced, but also because Bitcoin price fluctuated. A lot of those "profiting" from cloud mining since are really only benefitting from the price increase. Coin for coin, the ROI is still projected after 7 to 8 months. In other words, you'd have made the same or more if you'd just bought coins and held.

The recent sharp drop in mining difficulty also probably earned a lot of coins for contracts. In other words, you'd have made the same or more if you mined it on your own.

The risks are too high for a relatively small return. I made up my mind about cloud mining a long time ago and I'm still as convinced that it's not worth it. Nevertheless, good luck.

I hope you manage to keep this til the very end - when your contract is terminated or expires. At the very least, this experiment will add documented evidence (lacking on the Internet).
17104  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: Europa League/Champions League Lounge on: September 28, 2017, 05:24:27 AM
I still got a nice parlay on Spurs, Real and City winning quite comfortably as it turns out but I'm going not going to risk another one tonight. However, I still think it's a good bet on tonight's trio of Chelsea, Barca and Old Lady... and top off any parlay with Roma too. Can't see Qarabag winning or even drawing any of their games.

So it looks like the 4-match parlay above would have proven to be a very nice win, but all narrow ones. I am either not confident enough in my own assessments or I just keep getting luckier when I don't bet Wink

I have three single bets and a small parlay for today(PSG, Anderlecht, Benfica). I'm skipping the other matchups I feel like they'll end on a draw or the odds are not worth. My reason for taking Anderlecht over Celtic is because they conceded less goals 3 to be exact on their previous match compared to Celtic's 5 against PSG.  Picking PSG to win is already self explanatory home advantage and Bayern haven't won yet on PSG's home turf. Benfica ML last pick they're slightly favored because of their better form than Basel that's also the reason why i'm taking them today. Single bets Parlay

Edit : Damn 1 for 3. The parlay slightly saved me from the losses.

It looks like we chose completely different match ups on last night's games! Always trying to learn from other players' picks. I felt PSG were worth the money too but thought wrongly that Bayern would end their PSG hoodoo finally. I also thought Basel would lose but then the result swings completely to the other direction
17105  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: NEXT GAME IN 8HOURs -Sportstips - Basketball/tennis/soccer🔥Wins 122- Loss 26🔥 on: September 27, 2017, 04:50:35 PM
Yeah, I couldn't find that option on my sportsbook either, so looks like I'm going to sit this one out. Was quite lucky last night on a parlay but something tells me I should just relax and enjoy the games tonight.

Edit: Qarabag just scored their first ever CL goal too, and I was so sure Roma would thrash them. Maybe I was right to sit on my hunches Wink
17106  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: Europa League/Champions League Lounge on: September 27, 2017, 02:58:36 PM
Didn't expect to get Champions League deja vu so quickly, but last night threw up a few surprising results, just like Tuesday night last week. My poor Liverpool served up quite the expected unexpected draw so maybe that's not going to be a surprise after a while if they keep suiciding like that. Monaco though? Didn't watch that game so can only imagine a lot of luck in that score.

I still got a nice parlay on Spurs, Real and City winning quite comfortably as it turns out but I'm going not going to risk another one tonight. However, I still think it's a good bet on tonight's trio of Chelsea, Barca and Old Lady... and top off any parlay with Roma too. Can't see Qarabag winning or even drawing any of their games.
17107  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: Helperbit P2P Aid - natural disaster and bitcoin on: September 27, 2017, 12:10:05 PM
Read the first post and then decided to look a bit down the path, the idea was probably very original at the time of posting. Must admit I'm surprised to see how far it has come. From website, I see a lot of awards but not a single organisation mentioned? Perhaps these partnerships are yet to begin?

What is most interesting was the blog post regarding your work in the wake of the recent Italian earthquake. My commendations, by the way! But what I would like to know more here.

Are you able to provide more information on the Legambiente case study? I come from a non-profit career, working especially in natural disaster and conflict. Especially directly on the ground in the early days of the emergency, most organisations suffer from poor accountability. This is most painfully apparent months and years after the operation, when donors are demanding for accurate and transparent accounting and reporting - which most local standards fail to meet.

Are you someone I could contact for more info? We can follow this up in PM, if you prefer.

17108  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Mining Operations - MGT Capital Investments on: September 27, 2017, 11:53:06 AM
Been a year this week since MGT's launch and rather surprisingly, no McAfee style update on their news section or even a Happy Birthday from Bitmain. Can't say if the edge that MGT purportedly has is really any better than what others have. Unfortunately, the burden of proof is on them. If I were curious enough, I'd wonder what kind of hashing power they have now, especially with the reported expansion last month. Doesn't seem like they've opened up McAfee pool yet?

I've seen some early work on tech that (on paper, at least) looks like it might rival or even surpass MGT's claimed advanced and secure UI. easyMINE is one (and no, I don't buy theirs either).
17109  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: How average Bitcoin users are getting rich online by helping money launderers. on: September 27, 2017, 09:37:52 AM
Sadly, this is a great example of subtler marketing for ponzis masquerading as businesses. Definitely a paid article. You can either frown on Bittox for helping promote scams but then you'd have to go after all these news/media portals and force them to have stricter screening, since any number of ICOs have done similar "news" stories to bait users. This is an extreme level of shadiness, though. Should just dox the people who paid for this article, I bet you'd open a whole can of ponzi sites.

I have checked this article, actually it directs to different site called bitpetite.com it seems a regular wallet to have your bitcoin and nothing more special. Since, it is a shared private key online wallet, it might be scam us like bit.ac
This is giving giveaway information to start the investing with the benefit of money launderers. Since, risk is completely depend on your own risks.

Yes, it is an article about bitpetite, and that's the whole point. It's masquerading as a news article purporting that people are getting rich by investing their money into bitpetite, allegedly a bitcoin tumbler. People think "wow I better take this chance to earn easy money. It's illegal but untraceable, what a find!".

What really happened: bitpetite runs a ponzi HYIP script, it pays to have that article published. People get clickbaited. So they get "legitimate" marketing instead of advertising themselves as a HYIP.

No decent tumbler will open public investments like that, and give fixed interest. And as someone pointed out, there are referral links with commissions so that's something like 15% on day 1 including commissions.

P.S. Malwarebytes blocks bitpetite.
17110  Economy / Securities / Re: LoyceV's Hero Small 10 Month 10 Person 10 Altcoin Investment Experiment: DEPOSIT on: September 27, 2017, 07:34:48 AM
Hello again Loyce, thanks for the PM! I'd almost forgot about this to be honest. Anyway, I've just made the spend to the deposit address assigned. Shouldn't take longer than an hour to confirm. Checking on Peercoin (my pick) now, I guess there isn't a better time to buy them. In fact, most of the picks look ripe for buying, even your GBYTE!

The "pot" we are about to start with is worth some $390 right now. Good luck, everyone, and thanks again for hosting Loyce Smiley
17111  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: CarlesPuyol Sports picks and reviews. 536W - 120L. Join the winning team on: September 27, 2017, 05:53:49 AM
Nice calls on Tennis and Champions League, Carles! I made a risky 3-match parlay myself on Sevilla, Man City and Hotspurs. Spurs were the risk actually, as they've got a terrible history of ruining themselves in Europe. But they did OK and now Liverpool look like the ones to make it tough on themselves this season.

Anyway, hope you've got a nice parlay for Wednesday Champs L... if possible, try not to post them too late! Wink
17112  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Japan’s Regulators Are Putting Bitcoin Exchanges Under Heavy Surveillance on: September 27, 2017, 05:25:31 AM

This is not good... South Korea, US and EU could follow Japan and this will lead to serious price drop.
They are just trying to ruin all alt-coins and collect taxes under the 'protecting customers'. I guess I will transfer all my coins to Monero and DeepOnion.
I don't really think this would be a problem. How could they "Ruin" altcoins by collecting taxes because the trading fees would be the same for all the coins. Unless they increase the trading fee and withdrawal charges I don't think they will be ruining any coins. Japan would surely be the largest bitcoin exchange as the Chinese have shut down exchanges. Japan is taking a step towards rectifying any future bugs through its active inspection and that wouldn't cause any increase in price. If there is an increase in price then whatever you said might be true. Let us wait and see what the result would be.

You have to trace back the history of Japan's Financial Services Authority (FSA - the agency responsible for monitoring bitcoin exchanges) attention on Bitcoin to understand the rationale of this move. It all started in 2014 with the Mt Gox debacle. Japan was caught offguard. Culturally even, this was a slap to their face, a deep embarassment for it to have happened right under their noses. That's when regulators started putting together this idea of regulating exchanges.

The main items on the early draft is evidence of this. Aims to ensure separation of client and company assets (Mt Gox stored bitcoins haphazardly, the CEO even later "found" a USB with a stash), protection against cyberattacks (Mt Gox claimed it was a hack), auditing (MtGox had terrible accounting).

Of course, it's not just all about preventing another Mt Gox, but that was what started Japan's move down this path.

In that context, it cannot be bad. If anything, this restores confidence for those burnt by the scandal. Japan also has insurers now offering cover for bitcoin exchanges, thanks to this regulatory action. Nothing is ruined.
17113  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: [ASK BITCOINTALK] How many of you would use this service? on: September 26, 2017, 08:22:28 PM
Now isn't it nice how you sorted out your own problem - and now have a solution that benefits an important part of this forum? I've seen a couple of sites and/or services now offering automated campaign management but this is the first time I've seen evidence of it actually existing. I am certain a lot of managers wouldn't mind paying a small fee if it cut down their time on manual checking.

I'm not sure I would advocate for campaign participants to use this service as well... applicants who fill in incomplete forms or don't follow rules should just be excluded by "natural selection". On the other hand, it can be helpful to avoid not meeting requirements (unintentionally).

Could even extend the service with more sophistication to normal forum users to screen post history and inform of possible violation (wrong section posting, wrong format used, etc.).
17114  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Which marketing companies were used by the biggest ICO projects? on: September 26, 2017, 07:48:56 PM
Here's how you find out: follow the news/media trail.

1. Choose the biggest ICOs you want to track.
2. Use a search engine to look for news articles talking about their ICOs. Follow the links to these news articles. If they're on a news portal or media site, then look on the main page for Press Release or Marketing or Promotional or PR services. You'll find some charge per article, others have an entire package to promote projects/ICOs.

Alternatively, search google for "marketing campaigns X project/ICO". Might throw up some interesting partnerships Wink

I want to say some names but I don't like giving PR people free PR Wink
17115  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: How average Bitcoin users are getting rich online by helping money launderers. on: September 26, 2017, 06:53:14 PM
Sadly, this is a great example of subtler marketing for ponzis masquerading as businesses. Definitely a paid article. You can either frown on Bittox for helping promote scams but then you'd have to go after all these news/media portals and force them to have stricter screening, since any number of ICOs have done similar "news" stories to bait users. This is an extreme level of shadiness, though. Should just dox the people who paid for this article, I bet you'd open a whole can of ponzi sites.
17116  Bitcoin / Press / Re: [2017-09-24] SegWit: First Steps To Ecosystem on: September 26, 2017, 04:48:49 PM
I suspect that doing it via Lightning just makes atomic cross-chain transfers easier and more efficient to do.  But as long as you can lock funds, it's possible to do it in a slightly clunky and rough way like they did. 

LN isn't needed, but Segwit does remove a form of DoS attack, transaction malleation could be used to wreak havoc with the atomic transfer transaction (I believe the transaction hash, the target of malleation, for the time-locked funds is used as an input to the swap transaction. Segwit disallows that form of malleation).

Lightning just makes it faster and cheaper, as far as I'm aware, and that would open the doors to.... p2p exchanges that can trade at the sort of speed needed for a real time price. That could be a genuine game changer, and illustrates the pointlessness of the "you can't replace Coinbase" nonsense. Governments and regulators could ban Bitcoin altogether, worldwide, and still BTC exchanges would thrive without centralised pressure points. I kind of hope they do, Bitcoin was always about the free market anyway. Detractors might say "gonna be slightly slow getting your Tether USD onto your OKPay account..." but I seem to remember fiat withdrawals from the centralised crypto exchanges being pretty slow also. Plus ca change. Cheesy

Thanks for that guys, as usual a lot more helpful than the article itself. my initial SW and LN interest was because of the possibility for rapid and scheduled p2p exchanges, especially between parties that do it a lot.

I thought of it in the context of a personal example, say, as a freelancer with multiple fixed clients, some of whom pay a quasi-fixed rate on time count and on product count. Both sides still manually keep track for bookkeeping purposes, including scheduling and rates. But because of accounting, we have to fix the rate retrospectively (after txs are confirmed) and that is a huge pain during network bloat. Blockchain.info now stamps the value at time of confirmation so that's very helpful but an indefinitely open p2p channel would be "my dream".

Why this news was interesting was I didn't know this could be done cross chain. This addresses another part of my problem as different clients use different alts (hence current need for clumsy DEX)! Exciting times!
17117  Bitcoin / Press / Re: [2017-09-25] Forbes: Why China's Ban On Bitcoin May Be Temporary on: September 26, 2017, 03:29:56 PM
I don't think that this is the very reason to shutdown ICO and closed its local exchanges. Its more deep rooted as I speculate. Its probably that bitcoin has really threatening Yuan and they have to do something about it. I don't think that they just want to appease the Communist Politburo.

Quote
At present and in the immediate future, however, the size of the Bitcoin economy is far too small to be a real threat to the Beijing government and the banking system it owns and manages.

I have to disagree with this. Bitcoin economy is booming in China. You could look at the sheer number of trading volumes per 24 hours, so its not that small to really not affect their economy. They need to move fast to stop all of this before its too late.

Well, let's see if this just just a temporary in nature and they will made a U-turn to let everything back to normal once more. But I seriously doubt though. We already withstand the test of not having China at our back so its better be like that.

Yep! These old-school commentators really need to catch up with the times. China is not that slow, overbearing Communist regime the West would still like to think it is. This was not a knee-jerk reaction, but a swift series of events that just caught the market by surprise. The broad and over-arching capital outflow reasoning is far more rational, even if that alone is unlikely to be the sole mover.

Also, if 2017's Bitcoin (should we say crypto, though?) economy isn't a threat, this doesn't explain similar reactions from the Chinese administration as far back as 2014.

Things won't return to the way they were for sure, but whatever new environment China wants its economies to operate in will be the new normal.
17118  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: Bitcointalk English Premier League pool betting Discussion Thread on: September 26, 2017, 12:27:01 PM
https://talkimg.com/images/2023/11/16/FmYv2.png

Haha, Nah. I was close to the cyclone zone. Got busy there. Will need to make a comeback next week. I think you are doing really well too Smiley


Just keep safe, buddy, I'm sure you can do it next week. And yeah! 2 correct scores and it hauled me back up to 100. I think more than half of us took the right score on Arsenal, though I was sure it was all over when Jay Rodriguez was chopped down in the box. No penalty and shot saved by Cech, and we all got our 2-0 win. These are the margins of football, eh?

Anyway guys, a reminder that BBC Week 7 is up, so enter all your picks now to save heartache. I still got Liverpool on a 3-0 win away at good old Rafa's Newcastle!
17119  Bitcoin / Press / Re: [2017-09-26] Bitcoin Trading Premium in Zimbabwe at $7,200 on: September 26, 2017, 06:07:43 AM
At first, my reaction was "poor guys, they have to cough up almost double the money just to get something that everyone should be able to get at the same rates. Then I came to my senses and realised that these guys buying Bitcoin at that price were probably loaded with cash anyway (hence the willingness to buy so costly). And not to play to stereotypes but in countries like Zimbabwe, if you were super rich, then you probably got there through status or some less than honest way.

Isn't there an international exchange accepting Zim at the moment? I thought Western Union was there.
17120  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: Bitcointalk English Premier League pool betting Discussion Thread on: September 25, 2017, 03:04:31 PM
@ajax are you sure you just didn't have a bad week like I did? Wink
@toke come on, there are 32 games left and plenty of upsets and surprises, don't throw in the towel yet.
@unyil man you got some balls to come in and play after missing 6 weeks, but welcome to the BCT league!

And hey, there's still tonight's final game of the week to throw up 40 points. Maybe tonight's the night overtake you, hilarious.  Tongue
Pages: « 1 ... 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 [856] 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 ... 935 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!