The Sun is and has always been a hologram, it's a projected image.

Consider the the stupidity of your argument for a minute with this analogy:
   I claim the image of a lemon on the drop-down screen hanging from the wall is a projection i.e. it's not a real object. There's an illuminated overhead projector sitting on a desk in the middle of the room pointing at the screen and you're asking me to explain what the lemon was yesterday if it's just a projection now?

I hope this clarifies how in no uncertain terms y'er madder than a wet hen.

Y'er madder than a wet hen and fit to be tied, I never claimed the "sun were invented 6000 years ago"; that dog won’t hunt. I suspect the Earth and the Sun were constructed about 10,000 years ago, I could be wrong.

You've gone a step beyond "that's not even wrong", that's not even a complete sentence.

Is it the cartoon pictures of Earth that you find the most convincing?

Fake, no I don't claim they're fake. I claim the images shown primarily but not exclusively by NASA are fake. Also, if holograms are fake then you're fake, nothing but a corrupted memory needing a reboot. The robot AI overlords don't take kindly to software corruption you know.

That's a satirical take on Simulation Theory BTW, it doesn't imply you're not a corrupted NPC however. Does Musk actually believe this comedy of errors that is ST for real? He needs to get more comfortable with the idea of an all powerful giant bearded man in the sky. A righteous, just and judgemental bearded man who might not be too happy with his work being hidden away by damned souls.

As for aliens they only exist on the globe of fools, you seem to question all of creation as if it needs your permission to exist.






The frog is not real, it's a toy that creates an illusion. The frog is real, it's a toy that creates an illusion. The frog is an illusion, but it's really a toy. The frog is not an illusion, it's really a toy.

Is the frog real?

Thanks for feigning being a "fellow atheist", I think he knows better folks. Look what he's doing, he's claiming cause & effect and free will are mutually exclusive. Show us proof of your claim mr super-star.



I suspect he's pushing a group consensus on no God because he believes he is chosen by God and his people are are the only ones who can know about the creation of Earth and Man. Everybody not part of the tribe needs to believe in atheism because they're filthy slave animals not worthy of the truth. You and your children need to believe you're insignificant microscopic specs of shit stuck to the surface of a lifeless ball of space rocks hurtling through a cold, empty lifeless vacuum sparsely lit with heavy balls of fire. There's no heaven for filthy goyim like you, just the wrath of heavy balls of fire in the sky.

It could also be I'm mistaken and he's a hardcore degenerate psychopath and the thought of facing consequences for his actions from a righteous, just and all seeing God has him in panic mode; atheism is a way for him to bury his head in the sand. I'm guessing knowledge of an all seeing entity recording everything causes some hardcore "oh shit" moments for a lot of people.

body:





Have the GMOs in your diet modified the bacteria in your gut yet, are you RoundUp Ready^(tm) goy?







"... the court conceded that given the way patent laws are written, even using a small amount of a patented material without authorization could constitute patent infringement. ..." -- https://www.biofortified.org/2015/12/lawsuits-for-inadvertent-contamination/



Point being here you're fucking owned and you don't have a choice in the matter. If your wife believes all the lies and she's making you a total cuckold and she has decision making power with powerful calls to her authorities, then it doesn't matter what you think. Your individual rejection of any brainwashing is a drop in the bucket and you'll be punished for denying group consensus of appeal to some authority.

mind:



I can't help but wonder if Agent Orange (military terminology) a.k.a. Monsanto (now Bayer) RoundUp has any effects that work in tandom with behavioral and cognitive adjustment techniques. Since all goyim (translates to livestock more specifically cows) food now tests positive for this chemical weapon I can't help but wonder if it also targets the mind?





The BBQ sauce is not kosher! -- https://www.reuters.com/article/us-germany-beer/german-beer-purity-in-question-after-environment-group-finds-weed-killer-traces-idUSKCN0VY222





edit:

You may need to get some Chipolata Away because the military industrial complex leads to a bloody asshole. -- http://drbogner.com/glyphosate-autism-2/

The question isn't about who believes it, but who created it and why. That being said it's clear you're full of cow excrement from eating all that straw man and you should feel bad.

"I know they landed a man on Moon because I saw it live on TV" -- Apollo 11 Moon landing witness


Apollo 11 Moon lander (the eagle):


https://i.imgur.com/S1xCLaB.jpg <<-- Hi res image, take a close look!
http://archive.is/8LrYV



Here's an image of the SR-71 for comparison:



https://i.imgur.com/54vgVK1.jpg


Do you notice the distinct lack of tin foil, tar paper, curtain rods, sticky tape and BMX bicycle parts in this image?

Show me proof that's not a composite image.







I'm not the one creating fake images of pineapples in space here. We live on a space rock shaped like a fruit, really this is the truth!

Where's your proof it was made by a flat earther and not by a globalist for use as a strawman?

Earth's axis is on a tilt or crooked, this crooked angle when filmed by a camera on the Moon would cause the Earth to be filmed close to the horizon and that photograph is actually excellent proof the Earth is a spinning globe; angles and geometry prove the Earth is a sphere.

How's that for an explanation? Now you can sleep soundly knowing there will no judgement for your actions from a wrathful God; the big bang, evolution and a spinning ball in an empty vacuum surrounded by heavy balls of fire as far as the eye can see is all the proof you need. Put any thoughts of a bearded man in the sky watching over you to bed.

/s

^^^ Proof those arguing in favor of the globe can't do it in good faith; they resort to concern trolling and strawman arguments.

1.   No, no I don't claim that.^[i] (((they))) do however create hoaxed photographs and videos of the Sun, Moon, Stars, Planets and other celestial objects.

i. Strawman Arguments (I call them Stickman Arguments, sometimes) are arguments in which someone who you are debating takes your points and twists them to get ground on you in order to form a refutation in which they are correct.
Person A: *Signs on to start a topic saying:* For anyone out there who questions God because God doesn't always answer your prayers, the truth is: God doesn't help us because we have free will.

Person B: That's an unsound argument because it has no ground to stand on and it is overused. It's like saying, "What if I'm right and you're wrong and you go to Hell?" to an atheist.

Person A: We're not talking about Hell, therefore your refutation has no grounds.

Person B: Please take your strawman arguments somewhere else

Person A: You're going to burn in Hell for not believing in God!

Person A signs off.

Person B facepalms.

#stickman argument#stickman#strawman#horrible failure debating tatics that make me#facepalm#to death

by Life's Outcast Of Death April 03, 2009



2.   Yes, (((they))) hoax outer space.



3.   Yes, all celestial objects are holographic projections that are projected off of a concave mirrored dome above.

1. In an argument (usually a political debate), a concern troll is someone who is on one side of the discussion, but pretends to be a supporter of the other side with "concerns". The idea behind this is that your opponents will take your arguments more seriously if they think you're an ally. Concern trolls who use fake identities are sometimes known as sockpuppets.
In the 2006 election, an aide to Congressman Charlie Bass (R-NH) was caught concern trolling the opposition on local blogs. While pretending to support Bass's opponent, Paul Hodes, the aide argued that Hodes couldn't win because Bass was an unbeatable candidate. Hodes won the election.

#concern troll#concerntroll#concern#troll#sockpuppet#sock puppet#internet troll

by Weishaupt October 24, 2007

2. A person who posts on a blog thread, in the guise of "concern," to disrupt dialogue or undermine morale by pointing out that posters and/or the site may be getting themselves in trouble, usually with an authority or power. They point out problems that don't really exist. The intent is to derail, stifle, control, the dialogue. It is viewed as insincere and condescending.
A concern troll on a progressive blog might write, "I don't think it's wise to say things like that because you might get in trouble with the government." Or, "This controversy is making your side look disorganized."

#troll#lurker#bloggers#threads#bloggosphere

by thevineyard April 27, 2007

3. In a situation where there exists mutually exclusive positions A and B, a concern troll is someone who supports A but professes to support B around genuine supporters of B. However, they express their "concerns" about aspects of position B in order to sow doubt and uncertainty amongst genuine supporters of B.

Whilst this does genuinely happen, the term is used by some paranoid people to effectively mean "anyone who does not agree entirely with the standard dogma of position B, thus must actually covertly support position A", when said person does actually support B, just only 99%.

Thus: disagreeing *at all* with the standard dogma of B will get you branded by such people as The Enemy, and you will get generally treated with hostility and suspicion and, at worst, forcibly ejected from the B-supporter group. Result: everyone stops thinking about the issues, and discussion descends into not arriving at logical and interesting places but who can most furiously support B.
1: "All Democrats should be hanged, drawn and quartered! Grrgrrrgrrrgr!"
2: "Uh.. that's a bit excessive. I mean, I don't agree with the Democrats, but maybe we shouldn't actually, like, KILL them.."
1: "CONCERN TROLL! CLEARLY YOU ARE 100% DEMOCRAT! BEGONE, SINNER!"
(everyone flings rotten fruit at 2 until he leaves)

#fail#politics#ugh#the death of thought#interwank

by bald_rick December 22, 2011

4. A person who lurks, then posts, on a site or blog, expressing concern for policies, comments, attitudes of others on the site. It is viewed as insincere, manipulative, condescending.
A concern troll commented, "You should be careful about what you write because you might get in trouble with the government." Another concern troll wrote, "This debate makes our side look disorganized."

#blog#politics#concern#webblogs#threads

by vineyard May 07, 2007

5. Someone who raises a false question as a means of injecting a totally unsupported allegation into the public discourse. When challenged on the barely-veiled insinuation, they claim that they were "only asking a question."
A concern troll would say, "I'm not saying Congressman Smith engages in oral sex with farmyard animals, but isn't it awfully coincidental that he has a picture of a sheep in his office and always carries a handkerchief? The public has a right to know!"

#concern troll#mudslinging#concern trolling#lying#birther

by WhatTheHolyHeck October 10, 2012

6. A term of abuse. Mostly used in forums where there is a fairly well-defined orthodoxy, usually political (it could be conservatism, feminism or nearly anything else) that all members are assumed to agree with by default, "concern troll" can refer to nearly anyone who expresses disagreement or skepticism about some aspect of that orthodoxy, while agreeing with other parts of it.

Supposedly, the idea is that the "concern troll" is actually an adherent of some other, opposing orthodoxy, disingenuously pretending to be sympathetic to the goals of the forum in order to disrupt it or sow dissent. Perhaps this actually happens (this longtime forum user is skeptical, having NEVER seen a clear example), but usually, the accusation comes from someone who can't imagine honest disagreement with his or her favored ideology, and thus says more about the accuser than the accused. Basically it's a bludgeon used by people with very black-and-white views on some topic, against anyone more nuanced than themselves.

Accusing someone of being a concern troll is generally a bad idea. Even if you're right about the "troll"'s motives, which you probably aren't, that doesn't make the "troll"'s arguments wrong; in other words, calling someone a concern troll is a basic ad hominem fallacy. The term is used to shut down, rather than to advance, discussion.
I tried to tell them their statistics were discredited decades ago, but they just shouted me down and called me a concern troll.

#troll#internet#politics#conservatism#feminism#ad hominem#fallacy

by Eater of Cheese 2 July 20, 2013

7. A sleazy way to discredit anyone who disagrees with your point of view, especially if that point of view can cause physical harm to others.
So, I read your comment about the 400 pound mother who suffered health complications during pregnancy and I'd like you to know you are a total concern troll trying to push your skinny privilege on others!

#social#justice#tumblr#disagree#empathy#trolling#troll

by RazorEm March 30, 2015

8. A phrase of absolutely no meaning, used by bloggers to shut down debate on their sites.
"Ignore the concern trolls."

#concern#troll#idiots#progressives#blogosphere

by Sherry_M August 14, 2008

9. A phrase used by the progressive netroots whenever someone questions the effectiveness of their activism, or notices that they are acting like fools, and discrediting their causes by incredibly silly gestures.
See: http://www.openleft.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=7501

(Noting that facebook isn't a good vehicle for protest makes one a "concern troll.)

#concern#troll#activism#stupidity#anti-free-speech

by Mr.Eddy August 14, 2008

10. 1. (Noun) The Concern Troll differentiates itself from more outwardly nasty cousins by using generally polite language and claiming to agree with their victims. They then claim that their victims are essentially "doing it wrong," to help, they offer advice which would either invalidate their victims' position, cause an inherent hypocrisy with their philosophy, or render them unable to effectively advocate for it.

Their first known appearance was in talk radio, where they would open up their call with, "I'm such a huge fan, and you're always right, but..." usually followed with statements completely at odds with the philosophy governing the show. They were nicknamed by some as "seminar callers," because progressive groups in the USA had actually funded seminars where they taught followers to use this tactic against opposition voices on the radio in the '90s. These deceptive practices and individuals have since metastasized into the internet.

This is why most Concern Trolls are found on boards or the comment sections of political subjects; they use this tactic to attempt to sow seeds of doubt, and weaken their political opposition. Most are left-wing progressives, although a smattering of alt-right Concern trolls have begun to appear.

The cure for the typical nasty troll is the simple statement, "don't feed the trolls," i.e., ignore them. The cure for the Concern Troll is, "NEVER TAKE THE ADVICE!" (And if you are attracting them, likely you are doing something right)
Concern Troll Example 1:

User: "...and that is how I believe we should publicly advocate for our position on this important topic."

CT: "Hi User, I agree entirely with this topic, and everything you've said, but you come off extremely rude with this, so if you expect to do it right, you shouldn't advocate like you said, instead, stay home and write in a journal. You wouldn't want to hurt people's feelings and be a jerk, right?"
(The advice, if taken, would remove User from the public debate, weakening their side)

Concern Troll Example 2:

Radio show caller: "Hello Rush, I'm a huge fan! I've been listening to you since the beginning, and agree 100% with 99% of what you say; but, you are wrong on this and it could hurt your audience. We should have higher taxes and more government regulation on this topic, and it surprises me you aren't being consistent by supporting this."
(The advice here would completely go against the governing philosophy of Limbaugh, and if taken, would make him contradict his own philosophy, causing listeners to turn him off)


via giphy

#troll#trolling#internet culture#talk radio

by brrrayday July 24, 2017

We've got organized crime running the show, they've lied about everything possible.

Sorry but dinosaurs are a hoax.

What scientific proof do you have that "outer space" is real since you want to claim there's rockets up there pushing against nothing as a means of propulsion? Also you realize gravity is an unproven theory right, do you really believe heavy balls in a shed can prove there's heavy balls in the sky?

You'll find light a lot less mysterious once you stop believing there's waves in nothing, what a crackpot theory; special relativity has been empirically disproven.

Hey, at least you'll have somthing to wipe your ass with after a decade and half a million dollars worth of student debt. It's all worth it though when you get the praise of all your Jewish peers who tell you what a good goyim you are.

I see no evidence he's made any mistakes in identifying the peaks. You're just making dishonest arguments so you have an excuse to act like a rabid dog.