Bitcoin Forum
June 28, 2024, 06:39:14 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 [87] 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 ... 243 »
1721  Economy / Services / Re: Looking for someone to create/modify software for this forum [3600+ BTC] on: October 27, 2012, 05:04:16 PM
Impex FTW
1722  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Blockchain.info acount hacked while using yubikey.... on: October 27, 2012, 05:03:18 PM
Using the MTGox Yubikey on a site other than MTGox is not Two-Factor Authentication.  It's two password authentication.

http://us.thedailywtf.com/Articles/WishItWas-TwoFactor-.aspx

It's no different than the stupid banking sites asking for "mothers maiden name" as their "2FA."  It's a joke and not any more secure than using one password.  It's basically the TSA of Password security.  Elaborate, complicated security theater that accomplishes nothing, except to give you a false sense of security.

Don't do it ... get a real Yubikey or Google Authenticator.
1723  Economy / Services / Re: Looking for someone to create/modify software for this forum [3600+ BTC] on: October 27, 2012, 03:32:14 PM
I think that we are all getting tired of the limits of SMF.

I think SMF works pretty well now. I fixed the most pressing issues. (This is one of the reasons I haven't been too motivated to get this job done.)

OMG you have got to be shitting me.  

Fixed most of the pressing issues?  What issues have been fixed?  There's no mobile support.  There's no moderator support. There's no subscription support.  There's no advanced editor support.  There's no useful search feature. There's no reputation support.  There's no auction support. There's no classified support.  There's no spam protection.  There's no image gallery.  There's no attachment management.  There's no streaming/AJAX thread updates. There's no advanced profiles.  There's no anything, except a forum built in the 1990's.

I can't seriously believe you just said you fixed most of the pressing issues.  Use modern forum software.  All of the above is included in modern forum software either out of the box or with simple plugins.  Stop this silly nonsense about reinventing the forum wheel and creating software from scratch.  Pick a modern package and go with it.  

Heh... "SMF works pretty well now."   It's like saying "My horse and carriage work pretty well no, we don't need those new fangled 'automobiles'".

1724  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: is butterfly labs mining with those ASICs at the moment? on: October 26, 2012, 08:07:45 PM
Aw screw it, I see how this is going to play out, so let me just take care of it now:

while ($bitcoinINV['proof'] == "") post("Still waiting on proof...");

Ok, that should cover the rest of your posts in this thread.
1725  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: is butterfly labs mining with those ASICs at the moment? on: October 26, 2012, 08:02:02 PM
And we're still waiting on the proof...
1726  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: is butterfly labs mining with those ASICs at the moment? on: October 26, 2012, 07:53:33 PM
Here's my prediction for BitcoinINV's "proof"

1727  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: is butterfly labs mining with those ASICs at the moment? on: October 26, 2012, 07:44:12 PM
Still waiting for the proof of the "facts."
1728  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: is butterfly labs mining with those ASICs at the moment? on: October 26, 2012, 07:31:38 PM
No, we are waiting on our ASIC chips right now, as I've stated in a number of other places, though it's understandable if you have missed the posts, since they are spread out everywhere.

1729  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: is butterfly labs mining with those ASICs at the moment? on: October 26, 2012, 07:14:11 PM
Quote
Everything I have stated as a Fact can be backed up

Then do it or shut up.

Quote
My opinion is that BFL took users funds and used it as a capital investment.

Wait, I thought it was fact, not opinion?  Which is it?
1730  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Avalon ASIC Development Status on: October 26, 2012, 06:46:51 PM
Heh.. if you say so!
1731  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: New Mining Pool on: October 26, 2012, 04:53:18 PM
It's not about competition.  It's about two things:

1. (Are) You are scamming your users.
2. Are you screwing your users.

If you don't know what you're doing, you are doing one of the above.  If you've actually read everything there is to read about running a pool and you are still doing proportional, you are both scamming and screwing your users.  If you haven't read everything there is to read, then you are screwing your users. 

A pool is not a website.  You can't run it like one and you can't treat it like one.  You are dealing with peoples money, as such, you have both a higher level of responsibility to operate the pool properly and a higher expectation of ability on the part of the users.  Generally speaking, you can't run a pool on a shared host, it won't scale.  Again, a pool is not a website. 

Here's the first warning sign that the pool is going to fail:

Quote
I'm in business to stay in business. so everyone gets treated fair.

You don't even know what "fair" is in this context, so how can you treat people fair?  Of the many pools that have come before you, every one of them said basically the same thing and they all failed because they simply did not understand the requirements of running a pool or even what "fair" is.  You need to understand the terms, you need to understand the meaning of "fair" in the context of Bitcoin (hint: It's not proportional), there are many things you need to understand and from what you've written you do not understand any of them unfortunately. 

Good luck with your endeavor, but I can tell you it's bound for failure given everything that's been said here so far. 
1732  Economy / Digital goods / Re: WTS Amazon GC - 20% off. - not a permanent service. on: October 26, 2012, 04:40:55 PM
I have purchased the two codes listed above and a 59.90 code from him.  So far, so good. They all worked fine, and assuming no charge backs after 30 or 45 days, I'd give him an A+. 
1733  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: New Mining Pool on: October 26, 2012, 02:58:18 PM
Quote
PPS - yes Proportional Payout sharing...  yes - I have done lots of reading and testing... Yes - I'm not afraid to fail as there are some strong feelings here that I might.

1734  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: New Mining Pool on: October 26, 2012, 04:19:27 AM
How exactly is your pool a PPS pool that "only pays out when we get paid?"  That's not PPS.  Also, what happens if a block runs long, how are you going to pay the PPS shares when you only receive 50 BTC and you have 75 BTC worth of shares?
1735  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Avalon ASIC Development Status on: October 26, 2012, 04:15:56 AM
That would not be true.  EMC, BTCguild, Slush and Eligius are all ready and waiting for ASIC.
1736  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: is butterfly labs mining with those ASICs at the moment? on: October 25, 2012, 08:55:46 PM
Quote
I did you missed it, people wanted to attack me for my post so I took it down. You can not pressure me to do nothing. Inaba knows what i'm talking about. Let see if he will admit it.

Yes, I know what you're talking about.  I know that you have lied to government officials in a signed document.  It'll probably never come back to haunt you, but dang man... risk vs. reward is pretty crazy on your false statements to the AG, and for what?

People attacked you because it's clear you are lying and it's clear that everything you post is essentially crazy talk.  Ya can't argue with crazy!
1737  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: is butterfly labs mining with those ASICs at the moment? on: October 25, 2012, 06:46:56 PM
What myth would that be?  On another note, you said you had more than one pre-order.  Please give me the pre-order numbers so that I can get you refunded.  As I said in other threads, you have *NEVER* requested a refund.  Not once. 
1738  Economy / Goods / Re: [WTS] Angel Paintball Marker (03 Speed) on: October 25, 2012, 04:43:58 AM
You young'uns... back in my day we played in half masks and short sleeves.  I still play in short sleeves, but I do have a full face mask now.  Also, what's with modern fields limiting FPS to 250 or under?  What ever happened to 300 FPS as the standard?  250 is for cats.

1739  Other / CPU/GPU Bitcoin mining hardware / Re: BOUNTY: BFL SC die size (20BTC) and process node (20BTC) on: October 25, 2012, 01:05:54 AM
Damn, my plans to collect the booty are foiled! 

45%... do I hear 40%?
1740  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Avalon ASIC Development Status on: October 25, 2012, 01:03:51 AM
The difficulty will be 10x within four weeks of the first ASICs that start shipping, be it BFL or Tom's offering.  After a month, most of the back orders of both companies will be well into consumers hands and the difficulty will rise.  6 months?  It will be a lot more than 10x by then.

How is this any different then? Avalon will be also shipping around that time, and we are bound to finish shipping before you simply due to our much lower volume, are you saying you(BFL) and Tom will ship 150+TH before we ship any of our Avalon units out? then I suppose I do not want to compare my oranges to your imaginary apples.

Either way, I'll be providing a ASIC web based comparison tool within the week and people will decide for themselves.

Forgive me if I am mistaken, but aren't you scheduled to ship in January?  Assuming Tom is on time (and there's no reason to think he isn't) between Tom and BFL, yes I expect 150 TH to be shipped by the end of January.  If you're shipping in December, then I retract my statement.  We should have our entire pre-order backlog cleared in January, assuming all goes according to plan. 

As far as the "barely any profit" per month goes, that only applies to devices with GH/w ratios.   The more efficient devices should remain profitable for a very long time.
Pages: « 1 ... 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 [87] 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 ... 243 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!