Not merely "is going to" - is being forced to because of cause & effect. The banks figured out how to effectively monetize debt and until the debt instruments are unwound, it will remain as long-term, illiquid money. For an individual, this would be like having a retirement account - you have an asset, but it's locked up. If the Fed doesn't formally monetize the debt, there's no way it can be reverted back to simple loan structures in a timely manner.
where is the evidence that they're being forced to monetize on a large scale that anyway resembles the magnitude of the outstanding bad debt worldwide? Ben has only pumped a mere $2T. add up the $54T in private debt plus the quadrillion or so of derivatives overhang? they haven't, they aren't, and they won't.
Bank stocks have been cut roughly in half since the highs from 3/09. this has contributed mightily to crimping their balance sheets in addition to the bad loans. so if these guys are the ones responsible for pushing money out into the economy via loans and they're not lending how is everyone supposed to get access to enough money to drive gold and silver to the moon?
Why do they have to loan out money? In order to make up for the crunch, they'll become more aggressive in other aspects. Encouraging the average Joe to deposit funds for trading will bring an influx. Proprietary trading desks are still all the rage. Not to mention the ongoing returns they're getting from gov't bonds. Kick leverage higher to allow for more flexibility.
speculation on your part. right; the avg Joe is about to explode his debt overhang by going out to borrow to open a trading acct? are you dreaming? proprietary desks are NOT all the rage. they have been cut back severely and their trading profits as evidenced in the primary dealers quarterly reports have been hurt badly. why do you think they're having to finally cut bonuses and fire employees just now? right; just kick leverage higher. they can't.
Forget the banks, how much more will the government have to keep paying out to prevent the banks from deciding they can get better, reasonably risk-free returns by unleashing what reserves they can? In other words: if the banks keep being crimped, what is the threshold where they'll be forced to search for cash elsewhere unless the rates paid on reserves rise? How much further does deflation have to squeeze them for that situation to arrive?
i told you this thread is moving away from speculation as to what you
think the Fed/gov't is going to do. what
are they doing.
what does this tell you about consumer credit?
...
with all the deflation occurring around us do you really think this graph continues its upward trend? i don't.
I agree. However, from the
Shillings chart you posted earlier, it's rather obvious that gov't is picking up the slack where consumers are falling off. More recent information might show a different picture. I don't know of a more current data series or chart offhand - do you have one?
take look at this from the FRBNY's summary report. look at bottom right chart. see just how little fiscal support is coming into the economy. in fact its gone negative:
whereas the last graph showed a hook with a small gasp of a rebound, this chart has clearly rolled with no signs of coming back up.
...
if we were threatening hyperinflation, everyone and their mother would be rushing to the banks and borrowing to buy a house (a tangible asset whose loan would inflate away, ie, a free house).
here are those pesky banks again. do they look like they've been lending out debt money to the public? or is there something seriously wrong? we've been inflating uninterrupted for 40 yrs. does this graph tell you we're going to keep doing the same and drive gold and silver to the moon?
ah yes, credit cards. why the hell aren't you bums buying gold with that free Visa card with $50K automatic credit in the mail? oh, you mean they aren't mailing those out anymore?
Again, slack in financials is being picked up by gov't. Also note that lending is still occurring, it just isn't at as rapid a rate as it was at the peak. It isn't as though everything freezes up all at once.
ditto above graph
financial stress is rising once again. do these spikes occur in inflationary or deflationary times like we saw in 2008? more importantly, will the banks lend in this environment? no.
Rising, but nowhere near what we saw in 2008. Maybe that's because the stress is on the European side this time?
don't you have any imagination as to where that upward spike may be headed?
are ppl going out and consuming as if their USD's are going to be worthless? no.
Rehash of consumer slack being picked up by gov't.
rehash gov't consumption graph above.
is money moving thru the economy normally? or is all of it going to magically go into gold?
Yes, there are flow disturbances. This was acknowledged.
It must be kept in mind that the gold market is
tiny compared to most others. Bonds, currencies and equities all dwarf the gold cap. Thus only a very small amount of flow needs to find its way to gold in order for major price moves to occur. There is also an entire
world outside the borders of the US.
2007: "the lines of ppl around every new home model tract waiting to put down a deposit to secure a home scheduled for delivery 6 mo from now is a sure sign that home prices will continue up. God only made so much land you know."
here is a 10 yr gold chart with a hook at the end. now i ask you, how much different is this price graph than the economic data graphs i just showed you? gold is just a reflection of whats going on in the economy with speculation added in i submit.
Pay attention to the increasing volume at the bottom of the chart. Either HFT has progressively gone haywire, or rising amounts of capital are flowing into the sector. I will point out again that a $300 drop from $1,000/oz to $700/oz in 2008 was a 30% correction while the same $300 drop from $1,900/oz to $1,600/oz last month was only a 15% correction.
glad you brought this up. a more sophisticated analysis of the volume show an increasing volume on the days of
selloffs. this means there are more interested
sellers.
The price does not show the supply/demand fundamentals. Those are set up in almost exactly the same bullish formation as in 2008. At that time, price was also the only piece of data that was bearish for precious metals; misdirection.
you've got to stop dissing the "price". after all, how do you measure your wins vs losses? certainly not by volume. this is a classic excuse when
fighting the tape. its for amateurs. i believe the price action is setting up for the next leg DOWN. silver 2nd leg down recently is telling you what gold is going to do very soon.
you also need to read Nicole Foss's post completely where she explains bubble dynamics which you completely ignore:
http://theautomaticearth.blogspot.com/"Changes in supply and demand do not typically occur rapidly, but changes in perception certainly do, and it is perception that drives markets.
If the fundamentals of supply and demand were responsible for setting prices, we would not see price collapses over a matter of months, yet this is exactly what we saw in 2008. "
and exactly what we're seeing in 2011.
how's your income by the way? inflating? i think not. and you're not alone.
you mean you're not going out and buying refrigerators, washing machines, ovens, etc?
Monetary inflation triggers asset price inflation, then wage inflation. Monetary inflation has been held in check, so now the crunch hits. Those are domestic factors. If that was the only concern, I might consider deflation a possibility. There are numerous external factors, so deflation is not an option.
you're right; its not an option, its a fact.
this is precisely why Whirlpool looks as sick as it is. no manipulation of this price chart.
lines up pretty nice, eh?
now look at this 15 yr weekly chart of the S&P 500. stocks lead the economy. see that hook DOWN over at the far right? what does this tell you about where we're headed? we've formed a huge downsloping head and shoulders formation over the last 10yrs which is extremely bearish. again, if the economy and stocks tank, what will happen to gold which is also hooking down?
Maybe a detailed explanation is due, based on more than
price action. Vague and intermittent associations offer tenuous arguments.
there you go again. lots of ppl think that ALL information is embedded in price. why should i believe your opinion? why do you think i call you
misreality?
10yr weekly chart. just to make this argument complete, guess what chart this is and compare it to the above economic charts.
Again, pay attention to silver volume. Magnitude increases in volume suggest increased capital flows from rising demand. There is also a severe drop-off in volume on the second spike down as compared to the May 2011 decline. This suggests that there are very few longs bailing out.
The same numbers behind the scenes reflect another bullish setup, just as with gold. One more time:
price is the
only bearish data.
yes; pay attention to volume on selloffs vs up days. again, the setup is down.
now this ones a little harder. flip all the other charts over top to bottom and what do you get?
A simple strategy is good, but I think you've gotten a bit
too simple. The inverse association is intermittent.
Occam's Razor
For this thread supposedly being about global economics, there sure was a lot of gold-related sentiment in these recent posts.
I have to say, it was refreshing to see all of the STL Fed data sets displayed - thank you. So we've agreed again that deflation is the dominant force at the moment. This series started off very nicely. When it came to the price charts, there was no real explanation for
why the price action in gold and silver are occurring aside from deriving meaning from the price actions themselves. Circular reasoning is a fallacy.
you can't ignore price. thats called denial.
Let's take a look at some technical price analysis versus fundamentals.
What about lumber? It looks like it's in a range, but that's heavy. Deflation is in vogue.
...
Perhaps more paper will be needed for the myriad new legislation and IRS forms coming down the pipe? In all seriousness, there are so many uses for lumber (construction, repair, fuel, paper, etc.) that there really isn't any argument against it.
Still not convinced? Try AT&T on for size. Recession? Depression? Where? Business as usual, go back to your daily lives.
...
Would it stand to reason that the company is consistent because it's part of critical infrastructure?
No? Alright, I think Genesco's price chart looks great. So much for deflation, right? I mean, price is everything.
...
and yet you throw up a series of price charts to prove a point?
Or maybe this is due to the fact that brand recognition still counts, or at least because people still wear shoes.
I haven't seen a reply from you on the issues of:
- Open Interest
- Volume
- Commitment of Traders reports
- COMEX/NYMEX deliveries
- COMEX warehouse inventories
- SPDR ETF (GLD/SLV) trust holdings movements
i have commented on the first two which i think are bearish and i keep track of warehouse inventories which is supportive of dwindling supply. i don't
keep track of the other categories largely b/c i think they're irrelevant b/c they are so opaque. but i know that on the face of it they're suportive of tight supply. i'm not arguing that they are not supportive of your argument but i see enough other data to think we've topped and close to beginning the next leg down in the metals. we could get a small bounce here but its looking pretty weak, esp silver, and i suspect we get another plunge very soon.