Bitcoin Forum
July 03, 2024, 12:26:34 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 [89] 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 ... 557 »
1761  Economy / Gambling / Re: 🦊 Betnomi.com | Sportsbook & Casino 🎲⚽ on: January 23, 2023, 07:32:42 PM
I warned many times to stay away at this scam site.
Your way of labeling every casino as scam site is the reason no one takes your claims seriously. Your history tells that you have a tendency of hating the forum members and hating casinos which ultimately earns no value for your voice even if it is correct. People just don't give attention to you. May be before anything else you want to work on your own personal development first.
1762  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: Doxxed team can help a new gambling platform? on: January 23, 2023, 07:16:52 PM
All owners and partners do KYC, just not to you or any of their clients. They do it to the government agencies that register the business and give it a license to operate.
As far as I know you need to do KYC when you need the license for the casino. So with the licensed casino at least you know that you can file a complain against them to the license provider. It's up to the license provider how they judge the merit of the competence. Most of the time they don't care about hearing clients because the casino is important for them not the clients. After all the the casino is giving them the money they need.

Indeed, a doxxed team doesn't guarantee that they won't do anything to screw up their investors or players.
The most legit and profitable business with most transparency today can bankrupt tomorrow. When you are letting others to handle your cash it's not yours until you have it in your wallet.
1763  Economy / Reputation / Re: Trust setting replica with reasons on: January 23, 2023, 07:01:48 PM
Quote
~icopress // Not nice use of feedback to another campaign manager who was a victim.
Removed. Good to see you did the right thing.
1764  Economy / Gambling / Re: 4CryptoBet New Online Crypto Casino and Sports Betting! on: January 23, 2023, 06:54:17 PM
Update
Welcome bonus for Forum members is now 150%!
I logged in your site other day and could not understand how the sports section works. I was looking for football matches especially premier league but it all was confusing to me. There were like three section or something. May be you need to improve the user friendliness.

For the record, my intention was not to gamble but to check the system.
1765  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: This Smells Like Hypocrisy on: January 23, 2023, 04:01:16 PM
To me, this seems hypocritical. You claim that gambling is illegal, but you may bet on horse racing, Pachinko, bicycle racing, boat racing, and Mahjong, which baffles me. I do not seem to understand. Why is that so? You claim it is unlawful, yet wagering on games that are overseen by the government is not unlawful. Is this not hypocritical? What does the government fear?
It's beyond the understanding of what the fear but it's hypocrisy. I think people who bet on horse racing or greyhound are the actual gamblers. They don't do it for fun but to make money. May be these are the sports they watch and do more than the regular sports like Football, Rugby, Boxing, Tennis etc.  

but Japan is interesting and unique with how they deal with money. Their saver culture is basically the opposite of what we have in America, and I could see how gambling runs contrary to that saving culture.
Add China, Korea. They all have very different culture, economical view and perhaps political view hen the West. China is obviously above them all. They don't even want to merry someone who is not from their race LOL (No offense Japanese, Chines and Koreans 😉 )
1766  Economy / Gambling / Re: Stake.com - The Leading Crypto Casino - 🦉 Drake, UFC, Everton Main Partner ⚽ 🥊 on: January 23, 2023, 03:41:28 PM
Unfortunately, this is not 100% correct information. RTP can be adjusted and that is why different casinos have 1-2% difference for same slots by same provider, casino can decide which option is best for its own advantage.  Negative thoughts is caused by house edge which is unbeatable in the long term, as explained before players can't beat the casino but player can.
Not entirely sure but when a casino is using a game provider then RTP and such things are not in casinos control. The provider adjust it depending on the game. The casino is only responsible to bring clients in their platform and let the clients to play. Bet history and everything else except customer management are done by the provider.

These days unless you are a big casino, you can not afford your own system. You are just using others API. I guess bet365 are big enough to have their own game engine and sports engine. I could be wrong.
1767  Economy / Reputation / Re: A theory, DT in/exclusion and eventually the DT network on: January 23, 2023, 03:27:38 PM
Default Trust should sense as default trust not something earned easily by just being scam buster or alt hunter.

this statement can be the opposite of itself. if someone has become a good scam buster and tagged suspicious accounts, is it not desirable to add such a member to DT, if nothing for better visibility of his feedback?
You are probably right that it is too easy to reach DT status, it certainly happened that a DT member did not leave a single feedback while at the same time opening new alt accounts to make a scam accusation. or they even wait for older members to express their position in order to adapt to it.

isn't the DT system overrated? what does DT power bring and why is there so much drama about it?

I wanted to bold that just to be a scam buster and alt hunter may not deserve a place in DT system. DT should be more than that. I understand the point of their feedback visibility but it also makes it easy for them to manipulate it. They know scam busting and alt hunting is easily earning them a DT status and the result is so many of them made it a profession while it was supposed to be a hobby. The full concentration seems to be in earning inclusion and receiving feedback.

Send 10 positive feedback to 10 users who you think is good for you if one of them send you a feedback back and include you in their trust list. Continue it for several cycle. You have good number of users who have you in their trust system and you are going with so many green feedback that you look like a highly trusted user in the forum. But ultimately it was earned by execution of a good plan. Forget about to be in the community for 5 years, a six months or one year old user is doing it easily. Do we remember the user theyoungmillionaire and some others who eventually scammed but they were looking like the future figure of the community.

The drama? My guess is, it will reduce dramatically when ignore list and trust list will never be accessible by the user himself. I think most of the drama is around for these two features of the forum. However I think we can not do anything about it. It's a thing we need to enjoy.
1768  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: Sportsbet.io's English Premier League Football Pool Discussion Thread on: January 23, 2023, 03:08:30 PM
Indeed, since Mane's departure from the club, Liverpool has struggled to generate the usual goalscoring chances and win-win situations And he couldn't achieve that. However, Liverpool is able to return to compete for titles in the coming seasons.

Today we have a match for the city against the wounded wolves; if the wolves continue to lose, they will fall further down the standings. The city is also threatened by United and Newcastle; if Pep fails to win today, the indicators will shift.

Mane was lucky for us I guess. I don't know if you noticed but we used to get lucky all the time. Last minutes goal or goal before few minutes ago was a regular thing for us. In sports skills does not always works, luck play a vital role too imo.

City had 3 - 0 win, Wolves were not a threat for them.
1769  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: Doxxed team can help a new gambling platform? on: January 23, 2023, 02:26:53 PM
Hi friends, I am still on the matter of helping a friend who wants to build his own gambling project, the question of the day is about KYC verification, why are popular crypto gambling platforms are not KYC verified themselves? I mean the team behind the online casino why are they not KYC verified and they ask for KYC instead?
It's the question you need to ask who are providing license to them. May be they are KYC verified. There is also the fact of trust too. Normally popular Casinos have already built their trust in the industry, they are paying gamblers for years so no one question the team behind them.

Anyway fast forward to my second question, will a gambling platform be more attractive for users if the team are 100% doxxed?
It surely will be but when you are in crypto it's not always a good idea to public your identity. Crypto is not still officially legal to many country. Law will change and it will effect you. That's the risk.
It will affects the likes of Vitalik Buterin, and others that come out to the public like Cardano CEO for example? Or that's because these projects are Centralised projects?
Not everyone feel safe to talk about crypto in public. It's a choice they make, most of us on the forum made the choice. Others should be respectful to it.
 

Quote
Can a crypto gambling project be centralized? If a crypto gambling team decides to remain anonymous then why are they requesting KYC from their users? They understand what anonymity means and users wish to remain anonymity as well. They remain anonymous only yo collect users KYC details. Well thank you all for opinions.
They are not asking you to gamble with them. You are going there by your choice. You have options to avoid them.
1770  Economy / Reputation / Re: A theory, DT in/exclusion and eventually the DT network on: January 23, 2023, 01:09:43 PM
I think that the bigger problem is laziness together with the fear of offending. Pus maybe also the hopes for inclusion (back-scratching is real). Many people should watch closely their trust lists and adjust it. But this means some work to do, this means that some people may get offended because they notice you no longer trust them or even distrust them, this means that your own DT status may suffer.

Laziness : I am guilty of it too. I do not update my trust page very often. Don't know if updating it often will do any difference too. Well obviously when something happen like Yogg did then you remember that you have something to do or when you notice someone is highly abusive and it's an obvious without any doubt.

Fear of offending: I never felt that way. I think none should do. When anyone cares about the other then instead of only ~ him/her, have a discussion with him. Let him know that you are doing the ~ and when you will see he is improving in the matter then you will remove the ~. The receiver should not be offended if the attitude is correct.

The hopes for inclusion: This is evil and I think these are the ones who have plans like I said in the OP. We need to be careful from them who has good plans to have a place in the DT system. Unfortunately many if not all (of course not all) who were effected by the merit introduction and then found a way from the Default trust change, started to use the system in hope for inclusion. The theory.

Your own DT status may suffer: Once we will not think about what we are gaining from it, I think that time we will enjoy the best benefit from the current system.

Quote
Plus, and I feel this important: there is (currently) no tool that could allow one trust certain people's old trust ratings without giving them the same powers from now on. And this, together with the laziness I've said about, create some sort of vicious circle.
May be the whole trust and ignore list should not be accessible even by the member himself. Have button like ignore. Trust/Distrust. When you feel you want to add someone then press the Trust button, when you feel you want to ~ someone then press distrust button. But don't give the list like right now we have trust list and ignore list. Unfortunately we all know Theymos is not going to do anything sooner so let's leave it out from the discussion.

Oeleo (i can't really type his name on mobile) gave a nice summary: DT is a mess! I try to do my share in educating people, and once in a while point out the worst use of inclusions, but it doesn't change the bigger picture because the system itself is flawed. If too many people use it in the wrong way, the few users who use it correctly don't matter anymore. Maybe that's just how democracy works....
DT is a mess but the whole point I am trying to finger is, we need to be careful when we are adding or removing anyone in or from our trust list. When anyone is very keen to be in the system and seems like planning for it then give them time. Also check their history like when they joined the forum, what motives they have when they are engaging in conversion, are they genuinely saying whatever they write in different topics and many more indicators which could only can be felt.

Default Trust should sense as default trust not something earned easily by just being scam buster or alt hunter.
1771  Economy / Reputation / Re: A theory, DT in/exclusion and eventually the DT network on: January 22, 2023, 11:07:16 AM
Why don't you explain the names? To avoid drama?
I can tell that they don't know about it at all and it's clear on my description that I don't want anyone to think it's a personal discussion or attacking an individual. I understand your reaction as by theory you are one of them. But my justification is not for an individual rather it's for a group. Do I think you are in the group? May be yes may be not. The same way the individual who sent me the PM should also understand that it's not addressing him personally nor it's about the person addressed in the PM.
1772  Economy / Reputation / A theory, DT in/exclusion and eventually the DT network on: January 22, 2023, 10:43:24 AM
Quote
Do you think you're any different from the people who put a neutral tag on any chance they get? You're doing the same thing with your ~

Good luck on your quest for a flawless DT.

Quote
Good luck adding everyone who adds ****** to their trust list to your ~list. Hahaha, everyone knows what you're doing, so no one cares... Your ~ is a drop in the ocean.
It's about the topic Trust setting replica with reasons and complain (or may be it's a demand) from a user who have ~ from me.

I don't want anyone to think it's a personal discussion or attack to someone. It's not, I had to asterisk the user mentioned. One of the forum member left me (so far two) the above PMs questioning my motive to have him ~ in my trust list. It turns out he is upset about it. Clearly the politeness is fading behind the upsetness.

There are many members I noticed lately too serious about their DT status. They look at every single inclusion and exclusion as if their DT status is in stake. They feel they have nothing left in the forum when someone just added a ~ for them. Many may call me crazy but I noticed this habit to the users who joined the forum from 2017. I have a theory about it.

In January 2018 we have merit system implemented. When it did, the members from year 2017 were mostly effected. Many of them were at Member or Full member rank but a sudden change in the ranking requirement gave a break to them. A totally new idea. Before it used to be making post and earn activity, rank up. No one cared what they were posting. All they needed is the activity to become high rank. But when merit system introduced these members started thinking how to get those merits.

Then the change of Default trust system. A new motivation for some members. It's easy to become a default trusted member. Hence some easy and simple strategy they adopted were/are:

1. Scam busting : They made it full time job. There were not a single day you would not find someone is not posting a topic against an ICO or a website or anything they found in internet because some website have fake photo, white paper copied, clone of other websites. All were just in a nice format. Just change the name and new accusation posted. Good scam buster.

Result is quick. They earn merit and they started to get attention from the members. Many of them started to add them in their trust list.

2. Merit hunting : Again a full time job for some users. Constantly stalking users to find merit abuse. Usual or unusual, whenever they saw someone sent merit to others they started questioning about it. New topics, arguments, divided into two or more groups. Earn merit and get into the DT system.

3. Alt hunting: Two indicators they use mostly for it. Merit sending and wallet connection. Another daily job for these group of member. Result is awesome. Earning merit and added each others in their trust list.

While these users were doing all merit hunting and DT status planning, they basically isolated themselves in a group. A group of people who support everything they do between each others and justify it. They also set up a dangerous mindset that they like to think in everything there have a fishy reason. Harassing newbie to old OG members as if they are some sort of powerful authority in the forum now.

One thing is common to these users now and you can easily find them. When they rank up to their desire rank they slow it down. A newbie or a full member who used to create a scam accusation topic almost daily or fair to say 3 to 4 times a week, she/he does not even make posts in scam accusation board that frequently. Looking at their post history you will easily realize they are making 3 to 5 lines of one paragraph and posting it everywhere.

Those members from 2017 and later who are in the DT system, they care too much about the DT system, result is all these drama when we see someone is distrusting. You distrust someone for some reason, you are in their hunting list.

I agree with nutildah in a topic where he wrote something about users from few years ago to be in DT do not look good or something. In my opinion the batch we created from 2017 are mostly the ones who are harming the current forum environment. They are now too hostile to members that we now do not see many brand new face joining and staying in the forum. All those brand new accounts who made it there are mostly alt accounts of a spammer with a new identity.

May be the Bot can have a statistic to demonstrate the users behavior before and after 2017?

May be we need to be more careful from today before adding anyone in our trust list especially if they are too quick to have their DT status. The good one takes time to earn rewards but the one with good plan makes it easily. We need to be careful about those who have good plans.
1773  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: Sportsbet.io's English Premier League Football Pool Discussion Thread on: January 22, 2023, 09:18:51 AM
In a single season we managed to turn from one of the most exciting teams to watch to one of the most boring ones.
Today was unbearable, so many mistakes and a general lack of courage, tempo and flair.

Whoever we put in midfield doesn't do a job for us - we will have to revise that part of the team in the summer.
You are talking about Liverpool? I guess so.

I lost my excitement from the season. Liverpool is losing their chances to be in the CL, forget about to be in top 2nd or top 3. Good thing that I don't gamble these days or I would lose a lot of money and would be in more frustration.

My collection from yesterday is 3 points and I missed to pick a winner in the Liverpool vs Chelsea. Even if I would then I would go for Liverpool so the result does not change anyway.
1774  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: Doxxed team can help a new gambling platform? on: January 22, 2023, 08:33:07 AM
Hi friends, I am still on the matter of helping a friend who wants to build his own gambling project, the question of the day is about KYC verification, why are popular crypto gambling platforms are not KYC verified themselves? I mean the team behind the online casino why are they not KYC verified and they ask for KYC instead?
It's the question you need to ask who are providing license to them. May be they are KYC verified. There is also the fact of trust too. Normally popular Casinos have already built their trust in the industry, they are paying gamblers for years so no one question the team behind them.

Anyway fast forward to my second question, will a gambling platform be more attractive for users if the team are 100% doxxed?
It surely will be but when you are in crypto it's not always a good idea to public your identity. Crypto is not still officially legal to many country. Law will change and it will effect you. That's the risk.
1775  Other / Meta / Re: Some Newbie ~ Membar got nice rank through pumpkin contest on: January 22, 2023, 08:26:07 AM
But overall what do the numbers look like, how was the merit distribution for all that participated on average?
None does not matter. There are some system loss, some people abused it, they found a way to earn merit but they gave some efforts don't they? Merit is to appreciate the efforts you make to contribute to the forum. It could be by writing good posts, helping someone when they need some information or even just posting a meme which can entertain others.

A spammer will not receive more merit if they do not improve their post quality. Whatever they received they will stuck there forever. In Wall Observer you will see many merit hunters. Before noticing they earn a lot of merit but it does not mean we stop meriting everyone.
1776  Economy / Service Announcements / Re: Sell your files for Bitcoins on: January 20, 2023, 06:29:20 PM
Your system scans for viruses etc and that is good but there is no grantee that we will get the product we paid for.

The note that files belong to seller, and we must trust them, makes no sense at all. Anyone can upload a fake file or nothing important at all and once we buy them , we will find out that we have been scammed.

You should provide the escrow Servies and protect the buyers interest otherwise it seems that you are only interested in the commission you get from these sales. Huh
Let's be honest. In themeforest or other marketplace how do we trust the files or products listed there? Let them do how they want to run their business. Over time depending on the service they will provide either they will flourish or they will disappear. I don't see there are anything negative to talk about them right now.

@bnbstorm for your marketing my recommendation will be Royse777 or julerz12. They are one of the few who can do your job well.
1777  Economy / Services / Re: Charity Signature and Avatar Campaign - Auction for ColdKey victims on: January 20, 2023, 05:57:00 PM
Thank you for everyone who want to be a part in this campaign Smiley
I don't think you will receive many interest. It's hard to swallow what yogg did, utterly disgusting but that's between him and the people who trusted his business. If we really need a charity awareness then do it for members who need blessing or even support with money. The situation of yahoo deserves something to show from us. Have a campaign to show love and support for him.

There are many members, right now who need money may be for medical expense, food, shelter including all basic needs. Give them a platform to take help from us.

We lost many members, may be have a wall of fame in their memory to show them love and respect of whatever they earned from the community.

Yogg scammed a group of people. There are many members who are scammed by others. If you think yogg's scam effected people need this awareness then what about those who were scammed by many others? It's not proven, I mean we can not verify but what about julerz12, he seems to be a victim too. Don't you think he needs some support from all of us?

Obviously there will be always some people who will abuse everything you will do.
1778  Other / Meta / Re: Gambling discussion board needs a child board? on: January 20, 2023, 05:39:15 PM
Most of these get trashed or locked if reporting. I'm getting tired of the really stupid ones though: Does your wife/child/dog know you gamble. Do you gamble with your right hand or left? Have you ever gambled on the toilet? Have you ever gambled on an aeroplane? Have you ever gambled on the toilet of an aeroplane etc. I saw there's a thread in there for Miss Universe now.
My dog, wife and child none know I do gamble 😂
I am a right handy. when clicking I do use my right hand sometimes I use my toe of the right foot. What do you conclude LOL
Have you tried gambling when you are having orgasm 😜?
I am always busy flirting with the air hostage but I guess next time I will give it a go.

Most of them are signature spammers. I am guilty of it too, I try my best to reframe myself not looking too odd. When I visit the boards I barely see a topic where I can have a good discussion. No one cares for a discussion there.

Back to OP, I think first we need to take care of the redundant topics of the whole gambling board before doing anything else.
1779  Other / Meta / Re: Binance pays Google Ads with the word "bitcointalk" on: January 20, 2023, 05:23:31 PM
After hustling over 5 minutes with the Google captcha, I finally was able to see a result on my browser (Firefox with TOR connection, Incognito window so safe to say Google had less data about my interest)



Google search results is not plain. It depends on many factors. Your browsing history, personal interest, the place you are living, login and logout state in your gmail and many more. What we are seeing for OP is shown only to him or the group who has similar activity and interest. Others don't necessarily need to see the same result.




Some of the suggestions are interesting, aren't they?
Bounty hunters are at the top even before satoshi LOL.
Chipmixer is not doing bad at all, this must be a huge benefit of advertising the product for long period of time 😉
A lot of people indeed search for Satoshi's first post.
1780  Other / Meta / Re: Know who ignores who on: January 18, 2023, 03:23:02 PM
In some cases, users try to use trust feedback is their tool for their personal notes (I don't want to judge it as personal attacks but it is likely) and I disagree with this use. Even a trust feedback is neutral, if it is unnecessary, it should not exist and should not be abused.  Cheesy
Those who do, it's personal that I came to know lately. It was not the same before. Example: Actmyname.
TryNinja's personal note extension is a great tool to avoid the drama. But they will not use it.
Like how many neutral these days you see not inspired with negative value? The sender can not send a red feedback because it will directly question their trustworthiness so they use the loophole.

Public Ignore list is like Public Trust list of forum users. By default, it is private lists (Ignore and Trust lists) but there are some third party sites make it public (Trust list) like BPIP, Loyceclub and people looked at it to find who distrust them and it is one of reasons for drama.
Trust list was always public and it's fine that way. But ignoring someone was never meant to be public that's why in the system you do not see others ignore list. For the same reason Bot and TryNinja or BPIP can not scrape the data of someone's ignore list.

Pages: « 1 ... 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 [89] 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 ... 557 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!