|
You want a sure winning straegy?
Here is one
Deposit 1000BTC into any dice site.
Bet 1 Satoshi each. Using Martingale.
Once you reach 5000 Satoshi profit, quit and never gamble again.
|
|
|
|
Never try martingale, really slow earnings if you go safe(which is not safe after all considering things like Provably fair) and really fast earnings but really dangerous high base bets. My biggest lose was 0.05btc with martingale. Base bet from 1k(cause i don't like to go safe)
I have 0.1 and lost all with martingle iam start from 1satosi, i get more than 20redline, that very high risk you don't lose 0.1 BTC in martingale if you start from 1 satoshi you will need 23-24 bets to lose all your balance. after 20 i think you will lose around 0.01 BTCif you want to try martingale first have an infinite wallet  Its pretty stupid to risk a balance of 0.1 btc for 1 satoshi,i dont recommend this method to anyone just a waste of time to earn some dust LOL! I've seen people risk 1 BTC just to make 10 satoshis or so. Eventually they leave the bot running on auto-bet and in the morning they wake up with a 0 BTC balance. |
|
|
|
|
I think with 50/50 dice, I think I had like a 15 win streak but unfortunately I kept decreasing my bet size after he win assuming the next roll would be a loser.
And same with a losing streak, I think I had a 15-16 lose streak
|
|
|
|
|
That's why I don't understand why people choose roulette over dice. Dice actually has a much lower house edge.
I guess its for the fun factor.
|
|
|
|
|
Losing 5 or 10 times in a row with only 50/50 odds is fairly common. Might not happen in the first 100 rolls but eventually it will clean you out.
|
|
|
|
The problem with these BOTS is that they seem to work really well on demo but in real accounts they can fail miserably. Reason being is that they usually execute trades during periods of high volatility and on demo there is no slippage but in real time there can be huge slippage.
the trades are executed on a real money account, and the performance you can see in the page is the real time performance it had during those trades. I noticed you put it in your signature? Are you the developer of that bot? I never heard of SignalPush, hard to tell if its authentic and the trades are truly verified. |
|
|
|
Why is the next block a far away block and not the next one?
you mean block #360777? Well, we decided to make all promos behind this block ("777"), since it much easier to control as we have plenty of time. On our main website bettingblocks.com we have several other races if you want a fast game  Anyway, thanks for interesting question and check your PM for free coupon Thanks for the coupon, however what does this coupon entail exactly? Is it a percentage off the fees or some faucet ? |
|
|
|
|
The problem with these BOTS is that they seem to work really well on demo but in real accounts they can fail miserably. Reason being is that they usually execute trades during periods of high volatility and on demo there is no slippage but in real time there can be huge slippage.
|
|
|
|
|
PAyment received yesterday.
Thanks again!
|
|
|
|
|
I don't think it will be 50%. Maybe if the miners are in North America or Europe.
But in China or other undeveloped nations, making 50% less is still alot of money for some.
|
|
|
|
If your target is to get a profit of 50%, it is better to play one single x1.5 bet than to play thousands of martingale bets as you will have a better chance to make it.
True. But it's better still to play a single martingale sequence than to make a single bet. Instead of betting 2 units at 1.5x (66%) to get to 3 units, with a chance of success of 66%, try betting root(3)-1 units with a multiplier of (3 + root(3))/2, and if you lose, bet the rest at the same multiplier. If either bet wins, you'll have 3 units. Your chance of success is 66.1768%, which is higher. The single martingale sequence has a lower expected risk, and so has a lower expected loss. But his other calculation was wrong, wasnt it? He calculated the chances to be 66% using the bet at 1.5x vs 50% using martingale, that was wrong. Yes his calculations seem slightly off most likely because he didn't factor in the house edge. |
|
|
|
Anyone who uses this website occasionally can you comment on roughtly the amount of seconds of delay from when you click SEND from your Bitcoin client to when the trade is actually registered as a bet?
I Think They are the fastest among similar sites like luckybit , satoshibones and etc.. Betting processing speed is important But In order to quickly spread the Bitcoin network, your PC performance is important too Yes I agree about the PC performance. I have a fast CPU but my HD is a regular HD and not SSD. Whenever I click to send money on BTC, the client freezes for like 5-10 seconds each time. Huge delay. |
|
|
|
|
I tried that martingale stragegy above with the 0.1 win rate but the problem is that from time to time you get into these huge losing streaks and its cleans you out completely.
|
|
|
|
|
If I recall correctly, learning to play Poker is very easy. Whats very difficult is learning other peoples reactions. That's something that can take years to master if not decades.
Amateurs reactions are different from Professionals.
|
|
|
|
360777 is going to be big.
indeed, hope will be over 1 BTC Looks like its over 1.1BTC already. Its too bad we need to wait almost a week to get the results. |
|
|
|
|
I won a few times last year with buying binary options on the USD dollar. Like selling EURUSD or GBPUSB, it was very easy since the US economy kept growing at a fast pace. Now the trend has slowed.
|
|
|
|
|
No there is nothing wrong with gambling per-se but what most people do incorrectly is instead of gambling for fun and luck they gamble to make their mortgage payments. They get greedy and fearful and lose everything.
|
|
|
|
I tried using martingale for a couple of days in dice gambling, I started with 1 satoshi and gambled all my bitcoins away because I got bored and finally I lost 0.01BTC in total.
the winnings were so small when I started at 1 and the losses were big...
LOL yes the same happened to me also. Be glad that its only 0.01. But thats what usually happens, you get into huge losing streaks and you lose everything. |
|
|
|
|
Yes its very unprofessional and you need to becareful with that large faucet, could be a scam.
Software doesn't seem stable.
Even the main line in the OP isn't clickable.
|
|
|
|
|
Anyone who uses this website occasionally can you comment on roughtly the amount of seconds of delay from when you click SEND from your Bitcoin client to when the trade is actually registered as a bet?
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
