I very much doubt that. If you were really an expert, you'd have a steady job already and wouldn't be trolling the Internet looking for new victims to take advantage of.

And you're assuming that someone who gets ahold of bunch of seeds won't be able to access all the wallets generated by those seeds in one batch process? That's a very bad assumption, especially if you're risking your money.

Yeah. It seems that the guy has been posting a lot of low-value, zero-effort topics recently, which warrants at least a temporary ban.

---

You didn't copy his format but the content. But the bigger issue, in my opinion, is your lack of respect for the community as shown in your post history. If you want to earn anything from this forum, the least you can do is show some respect and follow the forum rules.

Sure thing. Is that why you use your alt account to post this?

Of course, it's quite possible that your Neodice account may be mistakenly flagged as a bonus abuser, similar to what happened with iv4n. However, there's no need to dust off that old alt account that's been inactive for two years just to voice your complaints on the forum. Why not just use your main account to address the issue? It may be more effective to do so.

It's understandable that you wouldn't want to participate in a game that has the potential for abuse. However, it's important to note that both SatoshiAuction and Coinballer appear to be in the early stages of development. This means that they may still be in the process of addressing issues such as potential abuse and implementing safeguards to prevent it. Well, at least the dev is off to a good start by acknowledging the game's shortcomings and working with the community to make it better! Here's hoping he can follow through and implement some effective safeguards. After all, no one wants to play a game that causes more headaches than fun.

I completely agree. While it is unfortunate that organ transplants often rely on the tragedy of someone else's death. However, it is a selfless and noble decision to choose to be an organ donor, and, as someone who has also made this decision, I can only hope that my donation will bring hope and a second chance at life to others in the event of my own untimely passing. It is important to remember that receiving an organ transplant is not something to feel guilty about, but rather a way for an individual to survive and live the life they deserve, made possible through the generosity of the organ donor and their loved ones.

I think he was referring to the no deposit bonus that Neodice announced a few weeks ago.


I don't think $9 is a particularly "juicy" bonus, but I'm sure there will still be some people who try to take advantage of it. If the requirements for earning the bonus are not too strict, it's likely that there will be a fair number of people who try to abuse the system. For example, if you can get a $9 bonus by simply signing up for and verifying your account, then it's not too hard to imagine how people could game the system by creating multiple accounts and getting paid over and over again.

Well, that threat always exists, just like with any other software. A software developer might sneak some malware into an upgraded version of their software, but with open source, software will always have a bit more transparency than closed-source, since any user can see the code and check for potential issues. That means other developers and users can check the source code for any potential issues or malicious code and alert the community. That's the benefit of open source software. Not only does it allow any programmer with the ability to improve upon the source code, it also means that there are many people looking at the source code for vulnerabilities and flaws to report. There is strength in numbers, after all, and open source projects are no exception.

Nova signature i avatar kampanja za Member+ članove:

Kampanja: [OPEN] 4cryptobet.net Casino & Sports Betting Signature campaign | up-to $75/w
Menadžer: Royse777

Uvjeti: Minimalno 5, a maksimalno 25 postova tjedno će biti plaćeno (od toga barem 5 postova treba biti u Gambling-u). Postovi u Local sekcijama se broje u tjednu kvotu (do 5 postova tjedno). Predviđeno trajanje kampanje nije definirano.

Campaign rewards
Hero+ members: $3.00 per post up to 25 posts each week
Sr. Members: $2.40 per post up to 25 posts each week
Full members: $1.60 per post up to 25 posts each week
Members: $0.80 per post up to 25 posts each week

I also received the same message and was unable to claim my free WoF spin from the newsletter. It's possible that this issue is related to the system maintenance that's been happening recently. I would recommend holding onto the email and trying again at a later time.

Forum Username: FatFork
Rank:  Legendary
BTC segwit address: bc1q4j5rytqzgqx9y9f03ny52y37sprlddqljv9hru

I wanted to be fair, so I sent 0.6mBTC (half of the bug bounty) to your wallet. We both played a role in finding the bug, so I thought it was appropriate to split the reward.


It appears that the issue has been fixed for everyone. Based on the outcome of Game #22, it seems that LoyceV and BitcoinGirl.Club shared the pot. However, upon further inspection, it looks like the second deposit was not taken into account in the total balance. This could potentially be another bug, or at the very least, a flaw in the software that needs to be addressed.

@jackmurray, perhaps the simplest solution to this problem would be to automatically return all transactions that are confirmed after the deadline to the sender (minus the transfer fee)?

In theory, that's the way the game is supposed to work (or at least, that's our understanding of it). However, it doesn't seem to be living up to that expectation in practice. We'll have to see how Loyce's game turns out before we can say for sure. In the meantime, you can check out my review of Game #23 in the previous posts.

It looks like many members have already identified several issues with the game. However, the most concerning issue for me is that I believe I have discovered a critical bug in the gambling mechanics. I'm curious to know if anyone else will experience this problem as well.

In the following part of the review, I will be discussing Game 23, which was a completed game between me and cryptofrka.



Game flow:
cryptofrka funded 8000 sats to this address: bc1qgdh69sd0ldyapk3ux8kztkhfpx25le7lt6fjt0. I was supposed to send a certain amount to the address: bc1qdm8mnf5mfnhw6447dkev6s3fze63333vch5h28, but unfortunately, the transaction wasn't confirmed before the deadline due to a low fee. However, after the game round ended, I received an amount of 7840 sats to my payout address in this transaction.

If my understanding is correct, the system awarded the entire pot amount (minus the 2% fee) to only one participant (me), despite the game being set up for two winners (which is evident from the screenshot). Furthermore, I won the game even though I didn't even participate in it. I'm unsure if this was a random occurrence or due to my address being first on the list, but either way, this is not the intended behavior of the system and I believe it to be a serious bug.


*OP, this is my review, although I'm sure I will contribute to this thread more in the future and express my opinion as the game develops further.

The creator of the game decides how many winners the pot will be divided among. For example, for Game #25 it would be you.


If you create the game and no one else participates, then you will be the winner and win the entire pot (minus 2% fee).


I believe you've created a game for only one player since you haven't defined other payout addresses.


Yes, I think so.

I appreciate the effort you made to update the information on the website. However, I see that there are still some delays. For example, in Game 23 I have a transaction with 7 confirmations, but the site still doesn't reflect the correct balance.

EDIT:
OK, I see now that the balance is updated. I'm not sure if it's because of the 8 blocks after the first confirmation or some unspecified time after the 6th confirmation. Btw, do you really need 6 confirmations for this? Wouldn't it be better if the balance was reflected in real time?

Well, it looks like we've both got three confirmations on our transactions, but the game balance is still stuck at zero. Is this a glitch in the matrix, or just a cleverly disguised feature? Hard to say... Only the developer knows for sure.  

If I understood correctly, to participate in Game 21 created by ETFbitcoin, you need to send BTC to the designated "Betting address" (listed in the left column of the table).

So for example, my "Payout address" is in the right column and my "Betting address" is in the left column:



It's a good question, but unfortunately the instructions are incomplete, so I'm not sure if the address the funds are sent from matters or not. It's possible that it doesn't matter, but without more information, it's hard to say for certain. The only way to know for sure might be to try it and see what happens.


I agree.

Would you like to play with me?
I assume you have already created a new game? Can you confirm that it is okay for me to send my deposit to the specified address?

EDIT:
I'm backing off. I've already found a new partner.

Taj menadžer mi je potpuno nepoznat, a koliko vidim nije vodio kampanje još od 2017./18. godine. Na forumu se aktivirao tek krajem prošle godine nakon dužeg razdoblja neaktivnosti. Možda čak nije ni originalni vlasnik tog računa.

Što se tiče Coinballera, pogledao sam njihovu ANN temu i web stranicu i ne vjerujem da će taj oblik kockanja zaživjeti. Ako se to uopće može nazvati kockanjem...


Da, i ja sam ostavio svoju prijavu. Iznos je dobar za relativno jednostavan jednokratni posao.