Yeah....
Information is paramount. I always say; it's very important that anyone who's tutored on crypto currencies and it means of operation should be told that it turns out badly sometimes.... (I've watched my stocks reduced intermittently and sometimes, it feels painful and frustrating though but, any new toddler in crypto would simply begin to panic and prolly, withdraw 'em funds)
I believe that if anyone is told about the sweet times, they should also be told about the bitter and awful times too as that will create an awareness in their minds about how it works. I'm currently doing the same thing but, she's haven't posted proves to that anyway : I'd always try to make them understand that it's an influx many atimes but, - a huge loss many more times too.

Sandra 💇

Could it mean that they conspired to hack and claim such huge value of cryptocurrencies? - that's how I see it. I'm not gonna assume that as "mismanagement of resources". How could Alameda research file for bankruptcy too? along side with FTX? Well, the reasons could be that there are affiliated and owned by the same person, Sam.
CZ doesn't really have a hand in the whole situation. Centralized platforms that are basically trading cryptos are experiencing a bad turn over this period ( this could be where the whole problem came?)? But how bout the bankruptcy deal? Are there any plans to settle everyone that had 'em stocks with them? I'm yet to know that.

Sandra 💇

You see ... It's simply one the little de-merits in decentralization. Since your stocks are not floating, and you have them totally in your control then, securing them is another ball game.
TREZOR One could cut a life time security deal as it's one of the safest hardware wallets - AFAIK. Since crypto is digitally designed, we all really need to keep our eyes on 'em. I'm sorry that you fell for FTXs scammy projects already; you've really learnt it the hard way...yeah, and lessons like that are indelible as it'll simple get plunged in your blood -- and make itself a part of your perception during your crypto tour.

Sandra 💇

I didn't get that straight; did you come here to taunt me or what? You never understood the little - hidden point in there so how's that my fault?? Okay, I see how helpful your post were....it really did helped alot  
I'm I supposed to be amongst the selected people, to whitelist other users? No? Then what did expect from me? I only told him my overview and that's prolly what every user had taken; tbh, I have heard of users getting whitelisted to bypass 'em proxy bans but I'm seeing a post like this (putting up a request) for the first time.... What do you mean by "writing professionally"? You just mixed up the whole point and it looks messy.
Hey Igehh, make sure you learn-up on how to use words -- words that'll fit in properly in whatever description you're making... avoid such irrelevancies next time; a type that's spearheaded with hostility.
Peace ✌️

Sandra 💇

Reserved

Hehehe.....
It's kinda like, working in pari Passu and anyone can't be left out. Crypto is hugely depending on FIAT's flexibility, inelasticity or fixed point as the case might be. Fiat affects the market structure almost predominantly Which means, the advantage it has over Bitcoin is "being a legal tender"...but that's even impossible as it's made to be a "store of value"
The whole feature wasn't made for that, or even if there's an adoption to change its original plan, how'll that be? When Sir SATS' gone into hiding, following his rule of pseudonymity, which hasn't done any harm but rather, it's had atleast 40% change- course over FIAT. So my whole point here is that; Bitcoin undergoes a "renaissance", every single time it trys to grow.
Carefulness and tenderness is a virtue.... a sort that anyone wouldn't simply get used to the p.r.o.c.e.s.s, Most especially if they lost their self-control. Don't put cash on centralized wallets/ platform...whatever.

Sandra 💇

Not a damn soul should feel left out.
We've emanated into a time we'd rather not speak much 'bout what we know and sure of..... Bla bla blaaa
If anyone should feel apathetic about crypto, then it's because they don't just wanna get involved with any cryptographic stuff ( reasons best know to them) but to deny the fact that they haven't heard the term "crypto" and - atleast, understood a bit of 'em is a "no no" for me.
Inflation isn't something that anyone should enjoy. If you look at the world's economy today, you'd realize that things ain't moving smoothly, the way it were -- ain't even desiring a chance if a revamp is impossible, just yet. So I'd urge anyone out there to "dance to the lyrics of his/her/ their days" ... Get yourself into the system and feel the essence of having the knowledge in the first place.

Sandra 💇

Yeah,
This is actually gonna happen in reality. You Know what builds my confidence top-notch? It's the fact that some investors that were against btc, in the days when it was worth nothing, it couldn't reckon as a durable tender (yeah, it's durable now.... Wavering on the price rate due to the market structure isn't happening for the first time and, atleast -- for several years -- it has proven that, with some voluminous pages of TURN UPs, in every ATH; the latter which could have been made to recover lost involvement and accumulate profits, that's been due, overtime.), It was even used to purchase a pizza and yeah? How's that supposed to make much sense to 'em by then? But look at it now.... They keep turning away from investing on/with their so-called Fiat and, they keep seeking for the least slots to have. If this uncommon transformation has been consistent, then it came to STAY.... I mean, if y'all keep doubting, believe me, you're just gonna suffer the same fate, as those willy-crafted investors.

Sandra 💇

First of all, welcome on board...
You've located the right platform. You're gonna be given some orientations to stay-put; all of these below are rules that have been enlisted severally, pinned on Meta and this board as well....
* Don't plagiarize ; I'd take this as the first rule to keep in mind. Avoid copy pasting in whatever you do in here.
*Spamming ain't allowed, account sales are frowned upon.... Lots and lots of rules to keep you grounded. Remember, a platform won't survive a day without 'em rules so, they're just fine.
We're very ready to answer your questions and guide you through 'em; we have alot of scammy projects around us. This is something you shouldn't wanna liverage upon, thinking it's real -- one by one, you'll get to know 'em and get used to the usual manipulations, also the search engines. Follow those links for utmost guidance and feel free to ask any questions, crypto related.

Sandra 💇

Fivestar....
It's actually a nice idea trying to convince someone who doesn't even have any fore-knowledge 'bout the forum.. yunno that's gonna be a bit turgid as every effort you'd put it, just to let 'em know it ain't a scammy site ..and that it's the nearest possible platform which you could acquire any information about crypto, as Long as we have diverse sections to express ourselves and get their inquisitive minds, lusty for thirst and unnecessary fault-finding --filled up satisfactorily.
It's good that you made 'em request publicized; so anyone could Just pick an interest on that.... But is that the least possible way to convince someone out there? What If they ain't cool themselves? I'd believe that I wasn't dragged in here by some kinda, sophisticated bypass technique... What's meant to be, will be.

Sandra 💇

This is exactly the same praises that anyone would outrightly give to this insane cycler 😚 as being an -- "outrageous" sounds a lil weird yunno ☺️ -- benevolent giver; how he does his job profusely makes me wanna change my mind when I Said otherwise in a thread 'bout merit sources, 'em being paid for their job well-done, which I have almost, incompletely.
DMR has created an impact that's marveled merit sources like himself, isn't he Worth the time to celebrate? Yeah? He is. He's got limits and has boundaries to post he merits; I've checked his history and I realized, him, giving out merits massively isn't just a rough circulation to get recognized -- sorta like what the thread's created for -- No! He sticks to his meriting habits and that's done a whole good for 'em merits and the circulatory system as well. Kudos buddy!!!

Sandra 💇

I think it's one of the rules of posting here; most especially, newbies like you that just got registered and haven't been known to which perspective the essence of your registration lies.
Why should you bother about an account that hasn't made any name yet? Maybe that's your preferred moniker? Okay I'd reconsider things to your favor but, I'm afraid, it's unnecessary.
I remember a time I tried to post a reference Link, in a bid to site my post but, the link was rejected simultaneously, every single time I tried. I haven't really had time to vet through those links but from BA's points, they smell fishy and anyone could be banned for the same malicious act.... anyone.

Sandra 💇

Yeahhhh ...
Actually, a user could have some difficulties in deciding whether or not to exceed their budget for a casino on that level....the could prolly make fast decisions if it entails the exact preference they'd always long for, alright?
Like, if I'm looking at getting odds on my ground stake but it becomes a combo game entirely, when bonuses are added.... The odds increases and ofcourse, your potential winning increases too. If I'm being given a condition not to deposit below $10 in that casino, which I already have as my target -- then I'll have to decide if I'd wanna win big or not.
Another thing is the PASSION; this matters alot and it's what thrives them...(some will say it's GREED, yes but remember, you'll need to be passionate about gambling and how it works -- in the first place) after all, we have a thousand and one ways to make easy cash.

Sandra 💇

This is sounding - rather too harsh on 'em buddy. They' fucked up, that's undisputable but, things could still get better next time -- as it hasn't happened before which clearly could be a reason why they'll have to gear up, just to make 'em lagacies? It could possibly work that way.
This wasn't necessary at all.
No one would summon a bunch of courage to belittle Ghanaians..lol ..those guys can make a quick reformation in pitch and , that'll simply be the win for 'em. It's always a tough one when they both meet -- on which ever platform it is -- but I guess Nigerian has lost the race even before the sound came from the clapper, already.

Sandra 💇

Ofcourse, peeps are always looking for ways to cheat; that's why you see cases like 'someone depositing funds in his sports account then, using the cash out button simultaneously, just to get those bonus and the little tip on whatever was funded' ...a case like this popped up in Meta a couple of weeks ago.
Yeah, but the most important thing you should learn is that " you can't outsmart a programmed system, which you have no control over...it's that simple. They'll always have their T/C's , and if you try to be smart just to bypass some protocols, you're just gonna get your ass logged outta the damn account..
Ofcourse, I won't support anyone to cheat as you won't be pleased if you won a game, after a long time but you were refused your funds .

Sandra 💇

IMO, it's not everyone that feels all this ...just something that negates the mindset,-- that loosing is a criteria in gaming. Some peeps don't even feel anything; you know Why? They don't even hope to win, it's that simple....so if you aren't hoping to win, how then do you get bothered?
Mind you; some peeps gamble - not just to win cash but it's sometimes -- recreational ( this is something a gambler affirmed and I don't think that's fabricated). You seeee, when you have enough to spare, and you stake this games heavily, you won't even feel 'em cus even if you loose, it doesn't affect your worth - per say... Just imagine using your last cash to stack a game? You'll understand why you become nervous every single time .

Sandra 💇

No.
It's ain't possible to win consecutively from free spins -- until it becomes something you can stick to, that's to totally impossible.
That's the big question there. I would doubt anyone would hope to earn anything from free spins. Those wins are intermittent and uncertain based on the how the are programmed. You won't expect a casino to program something up that anyone would just go ahead and spin without even patronizing.
When you talk about faucets; we have 'em alot out there but that's really a waste of time and energy. I once wanted to try that out but.. carrying out task for some few cents is not worth the times Spent. Nothing is free on the net.

Sandra 💇

I don't know what you mean but, I have seen a couple of times -- how  games in the middle ticket plays against the bet even before the last games are played ( this doesn't happen usually, it's in cases of extension games).
If you have observed that for quite a number of times then, why can't you simply edify some means to use the "cash out" button, if it permits you? I'm not really seeing it as it's being programmed to make you always keep losing on last games... After all, those casinos don't program or control the players; all objections are based on unleveled speculations.

Sandra 💇

This is a nice speculation.... A sort that seems really truer -- as an illusion -- than the main events itself 😂
I mean, why should we underated any national team? Most especially when they're hosting this whole shitt? Uhhuuu... It's something that has happened and history could possibly repeat itself...but it's not just the same team, so that'll only be a coincidence if it happens.
I'd bet on Ecuador to win or draw, just to be on the safe side .... that's a combo, instead of risking my whole stake for a draw and then it ends 0.1 lol. Well, we done have an option but to sit tight and watch the whole gameplay.

Sandra 💇

Yeah...
Actually, it's pretty cool to have an uncommon luck like .... Playing the same sport games (because is it VIRTUALS? Every fucking casino has a different interface and program entirely)in different casinos and you'd end up winning in some and loosing in some? How come when you booked just the same options like the ones you lost and you're winning in the latter? Hmm
Well, my take is ; I don't think any gambler would wanna keep trying out everything on the net... especially If they get a good one that pays off maybe, 20 minutes after their winning and includes some fringe bonus that'll not get sentimentally-trapped by their T/C's, then I think they're good.


Sandra 💇