I do like that 105 wall now
|
|
|
Long term yes, but short term is a different story, it points downwards, together with other indicators.
Really. Firstly, what's your definition of short term? And then, can you please sufficiently elaborate on your claim? Otherwise it's just noise amongst the other guys (more often than not with relatively new accounts) doing the exact same thing you're doing.
|
|
|
Or a simpler answer. MtGox's Fiat is worth less as they cant be withdrawn [without delay]. Thus the coins seems to "worth" more on Gox
|
|
|
what a waste of resources. what kind of consumerist bullshit world is this just to create something to destroy later that also doesn't even decompose well. we neeeeed to realize our costs to society better.
|
|
|
If it hasn't been mentioned a bounty for a professionally designed logo/graphic profile would prob be a good idea. Maybe a designer would let this thread vote on a few suggestions. I mocked up a few ideas and fleshed one design out. Let me know what you guys think. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FBpUKHlc.png&t=664&c=EuUmng_UQ8hFxQ) ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2F7BXiuyf.jpg&t=664&c=OGwDhlSHg5yVkw) ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FzDd1mBQ.png&t=664&c=0qKUzUIHSrO1vA) ^ ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) is that mastercoin in binary? although, I would like a logo, professional but alludes to the biblical book of exodus some how. IMO, those designs are a bit too sterile for my personal liking. Regardless, they look cool!
|
|
|
2) I shared all the insights and even my template with you when you were about to start your service. At that time, you said that you will only cover other markets excluding bitcoin. Then you started it and added bitcoin , competing with us against your initial plan. If I knew you would cover bitcoin upfront, I would have never helped you getting your business off the ground. Now you may say that you wouldn't have needed it, but I am disappointed about the lack of honesty.
there happen to be a boatload of ppl who currently or in the past have subbed to both our letters. there is not one of them who could possibly step forward and substantiate your claim that they are similar in any way or that i stole something proprietary from you. stop being ridiculous and delusional. I subscribed this month to S3052's just to see what the newsletter had to say, and though I do like it, I don't think you can say that you can say that cypher stole such a generic template. Yeah, you guys cover stocks and PMs, and yeah, you guys cover Bitcoin. They're all interconnected, how can you blame cypher for covering bitcoin too? Why not get mad at Waveaddict then? Honestly, we'd all be better off if we worked together, no need to be unconstructively competitive by bickering at each other. It's not like any one of you guys is stealing the other guy's material and insights. In the end, what the hell are we all here for if not to help each other? All in all, I think you'd benefit from subscribing to each others newsletters every so often and trying to improve your own newsletter because you each have certain strengths and certain weaknesses, you all have something to learn from each other. I know I've learned something from each of you. Here are my impressions: cypher, you're usually not very ambiguous, which I like. You stick to your decisions and back them up with solid reasoning, and you tend to be right, though timing is usually a bit iffy. Also, for some reason, maybe because you get tired of tooting the same horn over and over, to not keep up with the same quality you had when I first subscribed. I politely request that you cover non-bitcoin markets more than you do now. I know you sort of dropped off on that because you felt that your readers only really cared about BTC, but I do like watching the stock, bond, and PM markets and would appreciate more coverage of that like you did every so often throughout the day. I also get really confused when you say your all-in leveraged shorts were up for the day, yet I have no idea what those were. I think what I like best about you though is that you're conversational and I know you're another human being on the other side of those emails, and you do talk in a simple manner sorta like a doctor to his patient who has his patient's best interests at heart. It's a a nice feeling. s3052, i like your analyses, but you do play both sides so you can't ever be "wrong". Is this wrong? Nah, I don't blame you. You keep your readers aware of both sides of the card, and it helps you have your personal probability for each scenario. Even so, your analyses have been more detailed then cypher's to date and you assuredly emphasize technical analysis more than he does. Like WA's newsletter, you keep up a sort of summary newsletter you update as needed, which is really cool and easy to keep track of. Very professional. On average, quality wise, I'd say that you definitely best cypher at this point, especially for your price. I don't think cypher really cares about the number of subscribers he has though, as his sub service is something done out of amateurism (in the literal sense of the word). He does not need that as a source of income, though it's an appreciable amount I'm sure. That is not to say cypherdoc's newsletter isn't worth the premium over your price however. Like I said, you all have different strengths and you all have at least something to learn from each other. waveaddict, I'm not very partial to your newsletter but there are other things that have been immensely valuable to me, things that have already paid itself over multiple times my sub cost of $210 over six months. You have a fantastic handle on wave analysis and I appreciate that you have indirectly provided me the means to learn how to myself. Perhaps coverage of good opportunities in imminent wave 3 movements would provide more value to your newsletter. Otherwise, to be honest, I don't even read your newsletter every time you update it.
|
|
|
silver over 22... long way from 4
btc slowly moving up as well it seems
As I said below 10 $ will probably happen between 2014-2016, not now. Patience Man, are things really that bad?
|
|
|
In that case I'll set my limit order for $51 :p
|
|
|
Interesting conversation with my wife this morning:
She's not willing to trade my vacation/weekend/evening time for ANY amount of money. The poor woman hasn't learned to be materialistic, and is satisfied with what we have. She just wants my time and attention for herself and the kids.
However, she IS willing to trade very small amounts of that time as an investment in my project and in our future. For instance, she might take the kids to her parents' house for a weekend at some point to give me time to work on this.
Consequently, our burn rate using up project funds is going to be very slow, which is good, and progress will be painfully slow, which is bad.
Once I have the basic code in place, I should be able to set up some bounties, which should speed things up a bit, but it looks like I won't be paying myself directly to work on this unless I start doing this full-time.
I'm pretty happy to hear this! Tell your other half that I very much appreciate even that much! This really could change her life forever and her children's lives for the better, and though she might not realize it yet, the point is she kind of gets it. And hey, the longer it takes the more time bitcoin has to gain in adoption! Win-win situation I think
|
|
|
every time the price jumps up people ask me whether or not they should buy i always say, yeah
positive feedback loop??
|
|
|
Meahnwhile, BTCUSD moving up.. stone throw from 113.25$, once comfortably above it, the next stops are 130's and 160's.
choo chooooo
|
|
|
Bitcoin
![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) ![Kiss](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/kiss.gif)
|
|
|
Disclosed paid representative =/= shill, reading this bickering is annoying and totally inconducive to the real questions being asked here, which is the purpose of this thread. Take your accusations to the Scam Accusations board.
Anyways, what can we expect in the power department, any special preparations we need before delivery we should take note of? Will I need to call an electrician to run dedicated lines to the rig?
no. 4-5 Babyjets per residential household outlet. even more if you don't OC it. Well, I was wondering about the denser 2TH rigs they probably will roll out later. 5 chips in one case would approach normal outlet limits, correct? I'm trying to balance my concerns of space and outlet limits, while maximizing hash rate. I prefer not to 20 individual boxes strewn around the house, and would rather have 4-5 rigs that are easier to keep my eye on. Preferably, whatever configuration that would best balance typical outlet loads and hash rate would make me happy. If that means 5x 4 chips overclocked per rig on one outlet I need to know, if that's a greater cumulative hash rate than what 4x 5 normally clocked chips per rig on one outlet can do (assuming it's limited by outlet power draw). my electricity cost is not so much the concern, but the maximization of a balance of hash rate and power draw per outlet whilst minimizing space usage is my goal.
|
|
|
Love the smell of progress in the morning
|
|
|
Disclosed paid representative =/= shill, reading this bickering is annoying and totally inconducive to the real questions being asked here, which is the purpose of this thread. Take your accusations to the Scam Accusations board.
Anyways, what can we expect in the power department, any special preparations we need before delivery we should take note of? Will I need to call an electrician to run dedicated lines to the rig?
|
|
|
Some parameters will be changed so that escrow funds are never under-funded That is impossible. Unless you simply mean closing any fund which becomes underfunded. I feel we must settle this once and for all before moving on, it's clearly the biggest point of controversy that we've had thus far. While I trust Willett's resolve will solve the problem, most here are not so convinced. We must think this through to a logical end.
|
|
|
AFAIK all QE money supply goes directly to repurchasing US bonds....which then goes into infrastructure etc. just like regular government spending. (The govt gets to spend it the first time into the economy.)
This is how it is "filtered" in, the US govt doesn't just hand it to banks (other than bailout money which is a small amount of QE).
Basically the fed is purchasing around 90%+ of all US Treasury bonds issued...no one else wants them anymore.
Nope, it's going into mortgage backed securities to prop up the housing market. any chance of QE failing soon? my mom is imminently buying a house and I'd rather she didn't, for various reasons.
|
|
|
|