If in general, then I think there are different advisers on various issues ....
There is a whole range of ICO advisory roles: from the technical to regulatory, and the creative: business, legal, fintech, financing, accounting, code and technical development, blockchain integration, ICO process, marketing, branding, etc. Look at Wikipedia, who is this advisor ... and in the project, go to the site and check out our ....
Yeah the advisors plays an important role in the success of any project but is this often the case? What happens to those project which eventually collaps in midday up? Is it that the advisors didn't do a great jod advising the team on the best way to handle the project? If a project didn't do well and fails, who is to blame the team or the advisors?
What to say about this. Not all advisors value their name. Those projects that end at noon are pure manipulation. And it is a pity that they are found in the field of the crypt. According to statistics, only about 10% of projects implement their ideas. How to see and understand the project is worth it or not? There is no definite answer to this question, but there are some indicators that help to do this.