What's up? I can't draw lines?  It happens from time to time. I never met drawing related issue. The drawing function is offline function, it should be always work or never work. The most possible is user double-click the canvas to lock the cursor. |
|
|
|
I noticed RSI lacks the overbought/oversold parameter tweaks. Any chance they will be added?
Do you mean the 30/70 line? The chart is filled the canvas, the line is only showed if the highest and lowest value out of 30 and 70. |
|
|
|
Love the product, just subscribed for a year... I am having a problem at times with drawing Fibonacci Retracements and Extensions... Most of the time, they work great, but from time to time, I can't draw them.
Thoughts?
Thank you! Could you provide more details about the issue, It would be better if the issue could be reproduced. Here are two situtations it the line won't be drawed. User double clicked the canvas to lock the cursor. The cursor moves too quick when drawing. System consider it is "drag" instead of "click". |
|
|
|
There seems to be another misleading detail in the order book summary computed from a truncated order book: the accumulated volume of the last line displayed may be incorrect.
Suppose that the ask summary has price increments of 10 dollars starting from 450, i.e. 450, 460, 470, etc.. If the book returned by the exchange is trucated after an entry with price=461, it seems that the last entry printed on Bitcoinwisdom's summary will be "up to 470", but the total shown for it will actually be "up to 461" only. Traders will then draw the wrong conclusions about the liquidity of the market.
If this is indeed the case, please consider printing only summary lines that are known to be correct. In that example, the last entry in the summary should be 460, not 470. More generally, an ask line with price X should be printed only if the order book returned by the exchange has at leat one ask entry with price strictly greater than X.
With this rule, at least one entry from the returned order book will be omitted. Then it would make even more sense to print "..." after the last line, if there is space left on the chart.
The issue was noticed for long time. I didn't change it because For some exchange, API return only a few orders, when remove the lastest accumulated volume will decrease the orderbooks a lot. Use accurate price(the highest or lowest price) replace the last accumulated data. It will make the orderbook untidy, such as 470 460 458 Add extra symbol is not needed. Expand the orderbook to fill whole depth. Sometimes the bids has much long range than asks, it won't work well in that situation. The last accumulated volume is not accurate obviously, and the inaccurate is allowed. |
|
|
|
I noticed that if you try to make a line from a longer time interval chart then view it in a lower time interval chart, the line isn't accurate..
Like this one...
I used the 1W chart then connect 995 to 548... When I convert to 12hr chart, this is what I get:
And here's the view from the 1hr chart:
Currently it could not be avoided. Draw in lower interval and switch to higher interval. It looks like draw the point out of candlestick(some place between two candlestick). Draw in higher interval and switch to lower interval. It looks like draw the point on incorrect date. |
|
|
|
This is the most awesome site ever created for bitcoin/cryptos.
I just bought 1 year premium to support your work, thanks a lot!
Just curious, is there a way to bookmark favorite markets in HOME or something?
Thank you! We are working on that. |
|
|
|
When viewing RSI, it looks like the indicator scales out of the box and into the volume box.
Which market? ---- I see, the label is out of the box. The bug is fixed now. Is it possible to add a feature where we select if we want the green candle(also known as bullish candle) to be filled green inside, like the red one instead of being hollow? Or perhaps make it be filled green by default if the option will be too difficult. Usually candles on most platforms are filled inside regardless of type. Like so Because filled candlestick is not friendly for red green blindness and print, so it won't be changed until new theme added. For dark theme, hollow green is not good enough, especially when user zoom in the charts, I have plan to add a filled theme too. I am sorry, you didn't make much sense here. I use the dark theme primarily, so the hollow stick sometimes doesn't look good. You may be right about the red-green color blindness, I myself can't differentiate very specific red colors, but the bright red isn't a problem. In MetaTrader 4 one can change the candlestick however he likes, maybe you should add something like that? Actually at very beginning the charts is filled. Make candlestick hollow needs extra code. Also I wrote a filled version for comparing hollow and filled theme, finally I used hollow version and hide the filled version. Replace hollow theme is not possible as I expressed before. Add new theme, it will be an useless option for most of people. So the filled theme still won't be added currently. |
|
|
|
So fuck me if Dogecoin is more serious than Darkcoin... My opinion is that you should offer all of them, as much as possible and let the public decides which are crap.
Dogecoin is added some earlier. After added it won't be removed until it is proved as scam coin or nobody interested in them anymore. At least Dogecoin still has highest active people in reddit. To keep site and charts fast, it could not be "as much as possible". Also to keep "MARKETS" clean, it only list which is worth to list. System structure and policy is the things in parallel. when system improved, the policy will be changed after. |
|
|
|
All new altcoins is not listed, the main reason is it is difficulty to distinguish the altcoin is a valuable coin, pure speculative coin or even scam coin. So the altcoin charts is mainly for the people who has already known or interested in the altcoin. The policy is not always stable. All altcoin would be listed when system structure and policy changed. |
|
|
|
pretty cool chart, looks good..
but, in the time interval why the maximum interval is just 1 week?
Because the interval is different from month to month. It cause several compatible issue, such as caculate future days, OHLC. It maybe supported in future. |
|
|
|
When viewing RSI, it looks like the indicator scales out of the box and into the volume box.
Which market? ---- I see, the label is out of the box. The bug is fixed now. Is it possible to add a feature where we select if we want the green candle(also known as bullish candle) to be filled green inside, like the red one instead of being hollow? Or perhaps make it be filled green by default if the option will be too difficult. Usually candles on most platforms are filled inside regardless of type. Like so Because filled candlestick is not friendly for red green blindness and print, so it won't be changed until new theme added. For dark theme, hollow green is not good enough, especially when user zoom in the charts, I have plan to add a filled theme too. |
|
|
|
When viewing RSI, it looks like the indicator scales out of the box and into the volume box.
Which market? ---- I see, the label is out of the box. The bug is fixed now. |
|
|
|
When viewing RSI, it looks like the indicator scales out of the box and into the volume box.
Which market? ---- I see, the label is out of the box. |
|
|
|
By the way: when drawing lines on top of a line-o plot, one should be able to use one of the "o"s as anchor for the line. It seems that now the anchor must be one of Open, Close, High, Low. (or just High, Low?)
The issue was noticed long time ago. But compare the importance and code amount I didn't fix it. Now VWAP or Median Price could be set as anchor. |
|
|
|
This is a simulation of the suggested style:
2-pixel stride:
5-pixel stride:
The real thing should look a little bit better because the simulation above did not do proper antialiasing of the blue line-o on top of the spikes.
EDIT: In the 5-pixel-stride version, the spikes could be 3-pixel-wide bars, as in the Candlestiick style.
EDIT: CandlestickHLC and OHLC are not an alternative, because the point of using Line-o is to see the weighted mean price, arguably a more informative value than Open or Close.
It has no advantage to 'Area' line mode, Also it will implement new option to area or not. so it won't be supported. |
|
|
|
A visual suggestion: in the "Line-o" mode, show the high and low prices in each interval as light green and light red line segments extending up and down from each point, instead of filled polygonals. I believe that they will be easier to read that way.
Do you mean make the shape looks like o----o----o o----o----o o----o----o No, I mean
|
| |
o-o
|/| |\|
-o | o-
| |
| |
|
I will try to edit an image and post it here. I'm afraid it looks not well too. You could try CandleStickHLC or OHLC instead. |
|
|
|
A visual suggestion: in the "Line-o" mode, show the high and low prices in each interval as light green and light red line segments extending up and down from each point, instead of filled polygonals. I believe that they will be easier to read that way.
Do you mean make the shape looks like o----o----o o----o----o o----o----o ? I don't think so, it would be too many cycles, especially for the price is closed, the cycle woud be overlapped. |
|
|
|
Hey again
Could you maybe consider adding "," as a delimiter for large numbers? Price isn't high enough yet to really be a problem, but with volume(BTC) it's hard to read sometimes which number it is, and with volume(USD) it's almost impossible sometimes. So "1000000" should become "1,000,000".
When the volume is more than 10,000,000, it will be coverted to 10M. If the volume between 100k to 1M maybe some harder to read, but it is not really hard to read and not happen often. I tested volume with comma long time ago, but finally I didn't apply them and use current setting. |
|
|
|
Forex pair is different from price unit.
BTC/USD => 1 BTC = 600 USD
NXT/BTC => 1 NXT = 0.00009544 BTC Doesn't it bug you that these are upside down? / usually means something like 'per', so BTC/USD should be BTC per USD If they were up the right way, you could get, say, NXT in USD by looking at NXT/BTC*BTC/USD and the untis make sense (cancel the BTC). Trivial i guess, just bugs me.  Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #K2pbAaclwHTka7qHForex currency pair defination http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Currency_pair |
|
|
|
Hey, BitcoinWisdom
Any chance you could add one or two more of the most common indicators? Chaikin Money Flow (a very useful volume based indicator) and RSI (as opposed to Stochastic RSI that you already have, but which can be a bit too "nervous" sometimes).
I know you try to keep your site fast and efficient, but those two seem worthy additions if you ever chose to add something to the set of indicators.
CMF and RSI is added. Holy crap, you are fast  Thanks! (as before, I won't forget a tip) EDIT: Can you maybe check the implementation of CMF? It gives slightly different results than for example bitcoincharts (example: April 30. Your site 0.099, btcharts: > 0.1), but more importantly, it seems to graph the values wrong at times (example: April 30 value is 0.009, but graphed higher than the May 1 value of 0.25) Sorry, after one day using. I feel there are too many indicators in "SETTINGS" menu. So CMF, RSI, OBV is temporarily removed. Currently, there is new design moving the indicators options to the bottom of page. They will be readded if the new design looks well. -- Updated after several hours. Now the indicators is readded to SETTINGS menu. but I still think the menu need be cleaned up. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
