there IS NO ATTACK.
Lauda, this is a gentlemen's club. You need to stop frightening the guests, gather your Alanis Morissette tapes, and leave the premises. |
|
|
|
realr0ach
Our local CVS has a big sign advertising *FREE* flu shots now. Free, huh. Hmmm.
Yea, I think I've seen CVS employees post complaining about this before saying they're encouraged to try and get as many people as possible to take it and they lose money on every shot. Sounds like a totally legit business to me. If there actually was too little resources to go around and some people need to die somehow to keep the world spinning, it should be solved entirely in a free market monetary manner by going back to physical metals as money and having whoever was dumb enough not to own any starve rather than trying to kill people off with flu shots. |
|
|
|
and have no real interest in segwit at the moment
There's no reason for anyone to have interest in segwit now that everyone can see how LN actually functions, which is why the second person to reply to the Satoshi mail list - James A. Donald - says virtually the same thing I do, that it's garbage. Bitcoin is already designed to turn into a permissioned ledger because tokens are non-fungible and transaction validators are designed to centralize, and Lightning Network is even more of a centralized, permissioned ledger than Bitcoin is. If the original Bitcoin whitepaper stated what modern day Bitcoin actually is - "I envision the system having a multi-sig of only 1-10 block producers at most at any given time - he would be LAUGHED OUT OF TOWN. That's basically the definition of Solidcoin for fucks sake. In the very near future, it's 100% inevitable you'll need to ask permission from a US govt or Chinese communist controlled AML/KYC regulated mining pool in order to do anything with Bitcoin. Physical metals do not have built-in, rent seeking middleman that you have to ask permission from to do anything while also attempting to extort you for fees at the same time to move coins you supposedly own. Bitcoin post-regulation is an even worse version of Paypal. It's like Paypal but with higher fees and a permanent record of all transaction history for anyone in the world to view, so it abolishes the 5th amendment making it so you're tracked and audited in real-time, and any tiny mistake will have the book thrown at you like receiving an automated traffic light ticket. The only thing propping up this bullshit now is people pretending this regulation is not going to happen and that they'll somehow make Ponzi scheme profits off artificial scarcity, Keynesian, halving events. |
|
|
|
this is similar to asking Sipa (Peter) to debate vaccines causing autism rather than work on the protocol.
If you think vaccines don't have detrimental side effects, go get yourself a whooping cough/tetanus combo vaccine right now - the #1 most dangerous vaccine of all (at least for cognitive function). You probably won't even be able to concentrate to read this forum for a day or two after. It's also rather hilarious how they run commercials specifically for this vaccine trying to get people to take it and seemingly none of the others. Just like they recently started running commercials trying to get old people to take not regular, but EXTRA STRENGTH flu vaccines every year, even though the flu vaccine isn't even effective vs the flu. It's obviously part of a eugenics kill off plan. The central planner technocrats don't want 100 year old boomers sucking down resources for eternity being a burden on the state. But it seems they're also negatively impacting young people too. You can argue about whether eugenics is necessary or not given a lack of natural selection to govern human genome and overpopulation, but the real issue is that the eugenics seems to be targeting 1st world, K-selection white people who don't reproduce out of control as much or more than 3rd world, brown people who do, making the eugenics totally pointless. We essentially have anti-white, pro-brown people eugenics with a bunch of evil Jews cheering for it due to their murderous hatred of white people. |
|
|
|
Tried Terminator Resistance. Not very good gameplay. It uses Unreal Engine 4 - a laggy as shit, high overhead, low performance engine. Going to try Borderlands 3 next which uses the same engine. I have a theory all Unreal Engine 4 games are crap. The engine doesn't even really feel suitable for real-time video games. The UE4 render pipeline is just too convoluted with bullshit more suitable for rendering a movie than a game.
Unreal Engine 3 was also bad, and most of it's games were crap as well, but there were a few decent ones like Borderlands 1-2. Having said that, even it's good games had a total lack of physics, which is pretty inexcusable considering HL2 engine had amazing, perfect physics YEARS ago near the same era utilizing barely any overhead at all. Now I'm seeing Unreal Engine 4 games with the same bullshit total lack of physics in 2019 - totally insane. EA's Frostbite engine was considered 'not optimal' for making games like Dragon Age: Inquisition, yet it's lightyears ahead of Unreal Engine 4 in performance, input lag, and everything else you can imagine.
My sentiments are more or less same as you when comparing UE4 to Frostbite. But i wouldn't say Frostbite is light years ahead. if you want to do case study then forget Dragon Age : Inquisition and check out "Anthem", visually spectacular game but performance wise not so. This discussion going on for quite some time now and i don't see any change in status quo for next decade or so. Frostbite's engine is tough nut to crack for their devs, even experienced devs finds its difficult to work with, Plus they don't get much help from community as compared to UE4 when it comes to bugs etc. The problem with all these new engines is no form of post processing belongs in ANY real-time game WHATSOEVER. UE4 has stacked post-processing and other garbage to the moon resulting in the most bogged down render pipeline ever. Frostbite began as an FPS engine, so they had somebody on the team to tell idiot project managers and noob programmers that you cannot have 100ms input lag in a FPS game resulting in Frostbite being a more lean, higher performance, and less laggy engine. Frostbite games like Dragon Age: Inquisition also look as good or better than any UE4 game. All UE3 games had the same generic look to them, usually with lots of specular highlight abuse, lens flares, and such. I thought UE4 would change that, but UE4 games also seem to have a similar, easily noticeable blah to them. This is not to say Frostbite is perfect, it's definitely worse for real-time response than pre-id Tech 4 engines. Id Tech 3 marked the last of the actual decent real-time engines, and just about everything Id Tech 4+ was straight downhill. IW engine is based on Id Tech 3, so it might be good, but I haven't played any Call of Duty games to really try it out. I imagine they've probably bastardized it to a sluggish response, pseudo-non-realtime engine after numerous Call of Duty iterations over an entire decade, but maybe I'm wrong. |
|
|
|
NO PANIC!
Listen, Bitmain shill. Tell your Chicom leaders in Beijing anyone flying a Jewish hammer and sickle flag is the enemy of mankind, and unless you consider yourselves to be Jew slaves, you should probably get a new flag. Make some new flag with a panda or dragons on it or whatever, just get rid of your stupid, Jewish slave flag. Communism is not a Chinese invention, it's a Jewish invention - more like a method of attack on other civilizations.  |
|
|
|
we are likely in for a flaccid season
I would describe it more as a lolocaust. |
|
|
|
|
Also, why does nobody in this stupid impeachment hearing ask to be shown where in the god damned constitution does it allow American citizens to have money stolen from them and sent to Ukranian Nazis? Funding Nazis is great and everything, but I'm pretty sure the founding fathers did not create a system to physically steal money from you, put it on a truck, and send it to other countries 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. The government is stealing from you and sending trucks full of money to Iran, to the evil Jews in Israel, and to Ukranian Nazis all at the same time. How does that possibly make sense?
|
|
|
|
Do you know why god created a devil or the sub-sistem? So that your mindset goes out from the paradise. Do you know why it's not good to be in paradise? Because you don't evolve. Because you don't need to. So there is a negative force pushing you to think, to evolve and to find a solution. To get some experience before your consciousness evolves. We will reincarnate until we evolve enough to reach the next levels. So the president does not have to be picked from the god directly because there are sub-sistems created to manage the lower areas.
Well, if we're getting into some fundamentalist shit:  |
|
|
|
|
Tried Terminator Resistance. Not very good gameplay. It uses Unreal Engine 4 - a laggy as shit, high overhead, low performance engine. Going to try Borderlands 3 next which uses the same engine. I have a theory all Unreal Engine 4 games are crap. The engine doesn't even really feel suitable for real-time video games. The UE4 render pipeline is just too convoluted with bullshit more suitable for rendering a movie than a game.
Unreal Engine 3 was also bad, and most of it's games were crap as well, but there were a few decent ones like Borderlands 1-2. Having said that, even it's good games had a total lack of physics, which is pretty inexcusable considering HL2 engine had amazing, perfect physics YEARS ago near the same era utilizing barely any overhead at all. Now I'm seeing Unreal Engine 4 games with the same bullshit total lack of physics in 2019 - totally insane. EA's Frostbite engine was considered 'not optimal' for making games like Dragon Age: Inquisition, yet it's lightyears ahead of Unreal Engine 4 in performance, input lag, and everything else you can imagine.
|
|
|
|
An unusual incident happened tonight
 |
|
|
|
Lets ask Andreas  Citing Andreas Antonopolous as a Bitcoin expert is the ultimate noob indicator. Nobody working on Bitcoin even respects him. Go ask around if you don't believe me. Even Gavin 'the betrayer' is more respected than Antonopolous. Antonopolous is a literal paid shill, used car salesman pump and dump scammer like that Pomp guy - an absolute useless retard. Go look at an actual semi-non-biased voice like Peter Todd. Many of his 'tweets' are Bitcoin negative - potential game breaker security or economic problems that might cause Bitcoin to collapse to zero. Go look at a paid shill like Antonopolous or Pomp - 99.9% positive pump and dump scam coverage. Did I also mention he's a fucking male feminist that cries if you claim civilization should be a patriarchy to avoid collapsing? His (Andreas) social views are ANTIFA-orientated, while he attempts to trick the goyim into using cashless society slavery systems instead of physical metals. Not suspicious at all there. |
|
|
|
|
For all the retards, noobs, and scammers in this thread, there was a 4 year time span between last $1k top to the $20k top. As market cap increases, the cycles in ANY market typically increase in duration, and the same thing has historically happened in Bitcoin. Therefore, even if you believe Bitcoin is not a bubble and would continue to increase, you would likely need to add OVER four years to the last peak of Dec 2017.
Marcus of Tel Aviv was attempting to scam people in the thread yesterday by claiming the market cycle doesn't increase in duration with market cap and that there would be a peak four years from Dec 2017 in the year 2021 - 99% chance wrong even if you believe Bitcoin was going to go up and not collapse due to being an artificial bubble. Even if you believe Bitcoin is not a valueless scam compared to physical metals and the pump and dump can somehow be manipulated higher, even 2023 for attempting to break old ATH would be more of a dream estimate and not really a conservative estimate.
|
|
|
|
As for any of the other economic analysis Anonymint does, 99% of it is just plagiarized from Martin Armstrong, who is 100% undeniably a lying conman as I talked about in this post: I've never liked Martin Armstrong. Virtually all of his calls he gives some obscure "well, if X happens, then Y will happen, and if it doesn't, then Z will happen," then claims he was 'correct' whichever way the market goes when he never even made an actual call in the first place.
Of the FEW calls he actually does make, his last call that really stuck out to me was when he claimed gold was going to "collapse below $800 to the abyss". When did he make that call? LITERALLY AT THE VERY BOTTOM of the gold market. I forget which, but it was either at the $1050 or $1150 point.
People like Harry Dent are paid government shills whose only purpose for existing is to try and get people to buy into the stock market Ponzi, the dollar and bond Ponzi, and to try and trick them into not buying metals. When it's so obvious Harry Dent is a paid government shill, why are virtually ALL of Martin Armstrong's sayings concerning the dollar, stocks, and metals identical to Harry Dent? Because he's also a low-life, Zio-shill, duh.
So what is Martin Armstrong's latest platter serving of bullshit? "While our computer shows he should win (Trump), it also shows he may not finish out a second term."
So now instead of trying to fool people into believing he has an all-knowing, computer algorithm that can flawlessly predict any financial market on earth - even though such a thing would make him the richest person on earth and he's a financial peasant - he now claims his magical computer algorithm (based on Pi mind you) is specifically reaching out into the void with completely non-financial data - data that is impossible to have access to because the variables are endless and have nothing whatsoever to do with financial cycles - to claim Trump will be re-elected but somehow arbitrarily kicked out of office in his second term.
Trying to claim a computer algorithm TOLD HIM that is completely laughable. This is obviously complete bullshit. He makes up random things and claims a 'magical computer' told him it will happen. |
|
|
|
|
You picked the wrong place to find any objective analysis of Bitcoin. This forum is composed 99.9% entirely of dishonest, retard, pump and dump scammers shilling in at attempt at personal gain. The simple fact is that it's not even possible to create a decentralized digital currency because transaction validators are always designed to centralize, so all you have is some semi-distributed, but not decentralized, Rube Goldberg machine with no actual fundamentals.
Then you have issues like Bitcoin being a currency and not even having the traits to qualify as money in the first place, and all currencies are Keynesian, confidence game scams based on artificial scarcity that start at a value of zero and always return there on a long enough timeline. Things like physical metals - you know, actual money - resist entropy, because money is supposed to be a constant. Bitcoin facilitates entropy, the exact opposite of what you want money to do. Just like all currencies from Federal Reserve notes to Delta Airline miles and Chuck E Cheese tokens, Bitcoin is complete garbage compared to physical metals.
|
|
|
|
Guys, I've been reading this crazy stuff posted by someone called "Shelby Moore"
The anyone can spend attack is very legit for anyone with historical perspective on how governments work. In the same way that governments attempt to confiscate gold, if they believed Bitcoin would continue to exist in some manner and not die off, they would love to confiscate all Bitcoins in the same way by invalidating all coins on the segwit fork while having purchased all BSV coins (the now claimed 'real' fork) for pennies on the dollar beforehand, giving themselves and the Zio-bankers more of a monopoly ownership. I would say this is not really even a malevolent banker attack, but the responsibility for this lies solely on the people who pushed segwit through while pretending it was not a hard fork when it really is. You see, a change in the security model of Bitcoin makes coins non-fungible no matter how seemingly trivial the change is, and a change in fungibility is a hard fork. All that matters is if the change exposes one chain to an attack vector the other one is not exposed to. They pretended that fungbility doesn't matter at all because Bitcoins were already non-fungible in the first place, and this could be their eventual downfall. |
|
|
|
I actually stopped to look to see if anyone reported that one of the oldest and largest crypto exchanges was a front for Russian intelligence.
I’m 99% sure the Bitfinex rabbit hole is deeper and more twisted than BTC-e.
After zero people went to jail like Karpeles did, and not even a single person was really even minorly inconvenienced by questioning after Bitfinex stole all customer deposits in broad daylight while lying and claiming they were hacked, it was blatantly obvious Bitfinex has some sort of ties to the ESF, TBTF banks, or other government entity in the US or China that just calls off all investigation because...they have no desire to investigate their own financial crimes. If you're in the camp that believes the government is attempting to suppress the price of Bitcoin, then obviously entities like the ESF would just take over exchanges like MtGox and Bitfinex and manipulate the price directly. If you're in the camp that believes Bitcoin is a government created scam to try and distract people away from physical metals and trick them into a cashless society slavery system, they would do a similar thing but just rig the price up instead. What evidence do we have to support either of these hypothesis? Well, a single entity has controlled the price on Bitfinex 99% of the time all the way from $200 to $20,000, and that entity has artificially rigged the price upwards and not down. That entity also seems to be completely above the law and immune to any type of prosecution no matter what they do, so draw your own conclusions. |
|
|
|
topping out 95k early 2021?
 |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
gogogoooo!!
