This is a completely different assessment than the accuracy that everyone is used to playing on chess.com. As I understand it, this is an assessment of moves relative to existing chess engines. The cheater doesn't have to play as the latest version of Stockfish, he can use a less advanced version or DeepFritz or Rybka etc. This evaluation checks the moves against any engine, so a smart cheater who uses different engines will still be caught.
And the peculiarity is that only those moves are analyzed here where the chess player is obliged to think independently - theoretical opening moves are excluded from the analysis, as well as forced moves.
And so now it turns out that the top grandmasters in their entire career can find at most one game close to 80-90 in their games, while Niemann has a dozen 100% games and a dozen 90% games in a few years.
In terms of mathematics, he is 100% a cheater.

But in the news they wrote that even for ordinary tourists the rules will be soft and they will be able to drink beer. Similarly, girls - all these restrictions concern the Qataris themselves rather than tourists, and even more so football players. If I remember correctly, one of the players is openly gay and he criticized Qatar for homophobic laws, but it is obvious that no one will detain him there or prosecute him for homosexuality. All these restrictions are rather far-fetched and the players will not notice them. As for the rest of the conditions, they are accustomed to a change of scenery and, in general, all the players will be on an equal footing - Europeans, Americans, Africans and Asians.

Today on the news I saw Charrs trash talk who is outraged that Fury will continue negotiations with Joshua's team. Looks too fake, looks like it's just a blowing up the hype(an attempt haha) before this miserable fight. Now I am 95% sure that they will try to sell us this "super" Fury-Charr fight.
However, I was initially skeptical about the fact that the Fury-Joshua fight could be organized so quickly, so no surprise.

Obviously, the meeting of the teams occupying the first and third place is more important than the meeting of the teams from the second and fifth places, so the north London derby is the central game of the 9th round of the Premier League. I wonder how many fans will support such reasoning, haha (personally, I will certainly wait for the Manchester derby).
It's a pity that both games will be played at such an early time, it would be much more convenient if there were a couple of "warm-up" games before these games, plus often daytime games have poor performance (this is my subjective feeling, I did not check the statistics).

By investing in an online casino, you most likely meant investing in a casino bankroll, which was very popular for a while. But that has nothing to do with the investment the OP was talking about. With such an investment, you do not acquire any rights (unlike buying shares of real casinos) but only get a promise to share future profits in accordance with your contribution.
I have doubts about real investing (buying shares) in a casino: when I look at the market, I see that when it falls, all shares fall at about the same rate, and when it grows, innovative companies show the greatest growth. The casino does not belong to the "new" type of business and in fact does not have any innovations - in fact, it is a conservative business and it cannot generate income above the market. In addition, this business is always criticized by a large part of society and always carries the risks of tightening regulation.

Experience is indeed a valuable asset. This oddity amazes me - everyone knows that Martingale does not work, but everyone tries it and only after personal unsuccessful experience they abandon this strategy. It happened to me and it happens to many other gamblers. Perhaps this is due to the fact that people tend to evaluate themselves as "special" and wait for a miracle. After they lose the deposit, they return to reality and no longer give in to dreams (this is in a good case, in a bad case they believe that next time everything will be different and they will be lucky).

If you are judging the shape of the teams by the games in the League of Nations, then most likely in vain. Firstly, no one takes them seriously (except for outsiders and teams that are left out of the main tournament like Italy). Secondly, even if these teams are not in shape now, what difference does it make? After all, it will only matter how fit they will be during the World Cup, which does not start tomorrow.
In terms of climate conditions, hasn't Qatar guaranteed that there will be some kind of super stadiums with fully air-conditioned throughout the stadium? I think I've heard something similar.

Parents should control their children's spending, at least be aware of what they spend money on (although this comes into conflict with children's right to privacy). As for games on mobile phones, I've been completely disappointed with them lately - they consist almost entirely of ads (which give you a boost for every action) and constant begging for money.
As they joke about the developers:
- oh, we forgot to add gameplay!
- вon't worry, no one will notice.

Is this a new tactic for a team run by Mourinho? It is obvious that Roma will play number two, since on paper Inter is a stronger team and in the away game for Roma even a draw will be a good result. It is clear that the ideal scenario for Roma would be that Inter need a win to keep up with the leaders, so they will go ahead with a big force that will allow Roma to have chances in counterattack, but even if Roma fails to score, they will be happy to score a point in this game.

Have you seen this video? The most incriminating evidence against Hans Niemann

I was sure that cheating could not be hidden at a distance and that sooner or later there would be more good reasons to consider Niemann a cheater than suspicion. And in fact it happened. You can watch later clips from this channel - now everyone is intensively checking all available games for correlation with computer moves, but no one has even a close result like Niemann's.

I think that Magnus Carlsen openly accused Niemann of cheating based on these data as well. Now the ball is on the side of Niemann and in the coming days we should expect some statements from him.

PSG ended last season as they started this season - mostly big wins against all the teams in Ligue 1. Of course this happened after they were knocked out of the Champions League by Real Madrid but the fact remains - if we talk about the interaction of players, then by the end of the past season it was at a high level. If the results of the current season are assessed as a continuation of the past, then we can assume that PSG will be more successful in the Champions League this season. But there are no guarantees, because let's say in the 1/8 or 1/4 finals they can meet with Manchester City or Bayern, and then their next relegation will be quite likely.

Generally agree with you and a few pages earlier I described a similar experience that happened to me.
But what does it mean not calculated the initial bet? Whatever initial bet you come up with, sooner or later it would turn out that your deposit would run out. Martingale always works like this.

Judging by the bookmakers' estimates, the Netherlands have approximately equal chances with Spain and Germany. The Netherlands are rated at 12.7 and Spain and Germany at 8.8 and 10.7. These are fairly close estimates, indicating that the Netherlands is in the group of favorites.
By the way, why do you think that European teams will perform badly at the World Cup? The Cup is formally held in Asia, but in fact it is a time zone in Europe. Therefore, I rather expect that Europe, as always, will dominate.

I would like to know the method of calculating this rating. Is Neymar worse than Vlahovic or Kane and not worthy of being in this ranking? Neymar is close (only a few goals left) to surpass Pele's record for goals for the national team, and he is far from old. Another confirmation that all these ratings are subjective.
It would also be interesting to look at this ranking in terms of salaries paid to the player - it is obvious that Mbappe, with his astronomical salary, would be far from the first place. Because the ratio of cost per player to the result that the player generates would be very weak.

Do you think that if players play seriously, they will definitely get injured? But this has nothing to do with reality. And, Ok, let's say Deschamps is afraid for his players, in which case why doesn't he call up the second/third squad to the national team for this unimportant tournament? It would make sense - they could play seriously and since they are not stars they would have the motivation to play very well to prove themselves.
If the players are called up to the national team, then they must show at least some minimum level of skill / game. France actually showed a result that is much worse than the "expected" result, even if we rate these games as friendly.

In general I agree with you, but I did not notice that Ronaldo's efficiency dropped last season - for the Premier League he showed an excellent result even playing at Manchester United. This season he has problems, but everyone knows what caused them - the uncertainty at the beginning of the season and the disruption of the preparatory period when he did not train with Manchester United. It is likely that he will recover.
And I agree that Messi's return to Barcelona would not make sporting sense, but perhaps it would make PR/commercial sense? In the end, he is a symbol of the club and may well play (even if only as a substitute) for at least one more season.

It probably mattered, but it was hardly decisive. Real Madrid's advantage appeared for a reason, but because Real initially invested/spent a resource to get it - Ancelotti built a schedule of team readiness for the season in such a way that Real could get this advantage. And I can’t say that after gaining an advantage in the championship, Real began to play worse there - even taking into account the fact that Barcelona flew out of all competitions and could concentrate on La Liga, the distance between Real and Barcelona did not decrease, that is, Real continued to go in the champion’s schedule.
This season, it seems to me that Ancelotti again brought Real Madrid to the peak of form very early and this again is bearing fruit so far. And this is very logical - after all, from the point of view of the club, it is better to squeeze the maximum out of the players now, because then they will still spend their energy in the World Cup.

In addition to setting limits, even if a person is perfectly disciplined and does not go beyond it, it is sometimes necessary to take a vacation from gambling.
I am familiar with the situation when a gambler plays almost every day, while he has a weekly limit and he "stretches" it sometimes for almost the whole week. At the same time, even if he is not playing at the moment, he is still "involved" in gambling - he plans future gaming sessions, keeps track of expenses, etc. In my opinion, even this is an unhealthy situation, because in life you have to think about many other things. Therefore, in order to clear the mind, it is useful to take a complete vacation from gambling, for example, for a month.

I don't know if you are right about Deschamps' position on the importance of the League of Nations, but if you are right it is a very dangerous position. After a series of failures in an "unimportant" tournament, fans will expect the team to perform not just better, but much better in an important tournament, and it seems to me that if France does not reach at least the semi-finals in the World Cup, this will lead to Deschamps being fired.
Even in an unimportant tournament, such star players, simply due to their level, should have better results than France currently has. This is a sign that the coach is doing something wrong.

My worst day was much less problematic (I don't even remember it, I only remember the general situation) and had no consequences. I think that many people have gone through something like this: I learned about gambling -> "invented" Martingale -> I was lucky for a while, and then I lost my entire deposit.
By the way, I can’t say that it was that bad - I received the necessary vaccination against excessive gambling and after many years (20 years) I can say that I had no problems with gambling.