I fixed nonce issue - it was format issue, but the Sign Key issue exists.
|
|
|
I have a problem with nonce too, SHA512 encryption looks ok,I have checked on below calc: http://hash.online-convert.com/sha512-generatorI received this response from BTCE: : Response : "{"success":0,"error":"invalid nonce parameter; on key:0, you sent:"}" : String Could you please take a look into my VBA code? Dim postdata As String Dim Method As String Dim API As String Dim Secret As String Dim URL As String Dim ObjHttp As Object Dim nonce As String Dim Sign As String Dim Response As String
Private Sub Trade() API = "API_KEY" Secret = "SECRET_KEY" URL = "https://btc-e.com/tapi" Method = "getInfo" nonce = DateDiff("s", "1/1/1970", Date) postdata = "method=" & Method & Chr(38) & "nonce=" & nonce Sign = Base64_HMACSHA512(postdata, Secret) Set ObjHttp = New MSXML2.XMLHTTP60 With ObjHttp .Open "POST", URL, False .setRequestHeader "User-Agent", "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0)" .setRequestHeader "Key", API .setRequestHeader "Sign", Sign .send (postdata) Response = .responseText End With End Sub Private Function EncodeBase64(ByRef arrData() As Byte) As String
Dim objXML As MSXML2.DOMDocument60 Dim objNode As MSXML2.IXMLDOMElement Set objXML = New MSXML2.DOMDocument60 Set objNode = objXML.createElement("b64") objNode.DataType = "bin.base64" objNode.nodeTypedValue = arrData EncodeBase64 = objNode.Text Set objNode = Nothing Set objXML = Nothing End Function
Function Base64_HMACSHA512(ByVal sTextToHash As String, ByVal sSharedSecretKey As String)
Dim asc As Object, enc As Object Dim TextToHash() As Byte Dim SharedSecretKey() As Byte Set asc = CreateObject("System.Text.UTF8Encoding") Set enc = CreateObject("System.Security.Cryptography.HMACSHA512")
TextToHash = asc.Getbytes_4(sTextToHash) SharedSecretKey = asc.Getbytes_4(sSharedSecretKey) enc.Key = SharedSecretKey
Dim bytes() As Byte bytes = enc.ComputeHash_2((TextToHash)) Base64_HMACSHA512 = EncodeBase64(bytes) Set asc = Nothing Set enc = Nothing
End Function
|
|
|
PPL hold on - Danny wrote today as below, Ukyo doesn't vanish. I haven't touched anything from a technical standpoint, I'm not sure who Andreas A is to be honest. If it is Andreas Antonopolous then I would be surprised as he hasn't mentioned anything to me about helping Ukyo. I am trying in my spare time (of which I have very little of) to give Ukyo a helping hand with achieving a workable solution, to ensure he can pay everyone back and once complete he can pay me back.
|
|
|
it looks Ukyo is active and in better mood <CoinFarmer> good evening <CoinFarmer> any news regarding WeEx <CoinFarmer> ? <Ukyo> hopefully soon. <CoinFarmer> good <CoinFarmer> so I hope this story will have win/win ending <Ukyo> I hope it has a win+/win+
|
|
|
So any news from Ukyo side?
|
|
|
Date 2013-11-14 08:01:18 Transaction ID 3I4PHGKO0VGqrAiRtnlO0M1C8WkDexWg Type Withdraw Debit 10.00000000 BTC Credit Fee 0.00000000 BTC BTC Transaction Status Processing
Date 2013-11-14 08:00:18 Transaction ID 5sX7MOM6dWcCrmZFvJEWqotknKnGVF6D Type Withdraw Debit 4.26580120 BTC Credit Fee 0.00000000 BTC BTC Transaction Status Processing
|
|
|
It looks that WeEx going back to normal, info from today morning Hello everyone.
I want to start with an apology for my absence. I had a personal issue the last few days. This is not meant to be an excuse but just an answer to why I have not been posting. I do not think anything is a good excuse for this at this point.
I will continue to post through the day and make updates. I have not gone and am continuing to process withdraws.
-Ukyo
This is the proof - over 26BTC payout https://blockchain.info/address/1PyxKKtughgJKZkAv15MW8YgZdiYLviLQu
|
|
|
Update about the miners condition? everything is going ok?
So far no complaints on our side. As you can see on Eligius the miners are running stable. We've updated three miners to 0.97 a few days ago because they ran <500GH. One miner has now been ~520 for a few days, the other two are still below 500. A new firmware is expected tomorrow ( https://www.kncminer.com/news/news-59). We'll be testing that on a few miners first before upgrading all of them. A word on pools then, we've tested p2pool and btcguild in the first ~week after receiving the miners. Both did not give any hopeful results (we use both as backup pools atm). We plan to point a few miners at other pools to see if there is any notable difference. So far it seems that Eligius is by far the best pool around (no fees, tx fees distributed to miners and some nice lucky streaks as well). Eligius is also one of the few pools that offers nice public stats which we find very important transparency wise. How's new FW doing?
|
|
|
BTW. I get verified today on WeEX - Someone was asking
|
|
|
Tyrion and Blastbob
Do you plan to make more GBs in the near future?
|
|
|
its dividend day Maybe they meant next weekend I really appreciate your work tyrion and blastbob! But moving dividends around like this, without giving any hard dates, is really not how this thing should be handled :/ At least an announcement of the exact dividend day should be given. The more transparency - the better. Give them some time to enjoy the weekend with their families.
|
|
|
Today morning speed dropped to 10T#
|
|
|
Ok, Please post screen after new FW upload I'm really interested in it
|
|
|
BlastBob and Tyrion
Did you think about development in future? For example to increase hashing power by 20% every month?
|
|
|
Hey,
Thanks for your input. You seem to be proposing two different options is that correct? We'll try to use this analysis in our decision on where to mine, eclipse and Deepbit are good candidates to, we'll look into those as well.
Thx, My proposal to split hashrate is as below: 25% - only p2pool 25% - Method 1 (pareto split) 25% - Method 2 (Standard deviation split) 25% - biggest pool I think the results should be revised after one month and base on data the final decision should be made.
|
|
|
20% Private P2Pool 20% Eligius 20% BTCGuild 20% Bitminter 20% Undetermined yet, we'll decide that closer to the delivery date. If we can't find a good candidate we'll make it 4x25%
On blockchain we could find the info: http://blockchain.info/poolsFrom statistical approach I would like to share with my opinion: 1) Pareto prinicple solution split: Wiki: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pareto_principle20% of pools takes over 80% of whole BTC distribution and taking under consideration the splitting KNC computing power between pools with the same hashrate to have share in 80% of generated bitcoins: - BTC Guild - 50 BTC - Deepbit - Eclipse MC - ASIC Miner - BitMinter - Slush Then we'll have 80% probablity to get share in every block. 2) Normal distribution and standard deviation rule Wiki: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Normal_distributionhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Six_SigmaWe should have not fixed hashing power, but it should be calculated daily regarding Moving Average and Standard deviation etc We should have a share only in pools which are covered in 0.5 STD Deviation from average distribution to maximize incoming bitcoicoins, taking under consideration probabilty and BTC Value https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B8x7IPjfIwAbUmpkRERSaTE0Z1U/edit?usp=sharingSo to maximize incoming bitcoins we should have share on those 3 pools - Deepbit - EclipseMC - ASIC Miner ===== This is very academic approach and could be little bit different from the real, but it's very good base to start reasearches to maximize incoiming coins.
|
|
|
4. Snowden still in russia. OFFTOP I really don't get why ppl make a lot disturbance around PRISM and NSA. It was entirely known in 70's of 20th century that NSA had an IT and telecommunication systems which allows to intercept, recognize the voice and interrupt phone calls, so why don't internet. For me is quite strange ppl have woken up after 40 years... Snowden doesn't provide any new info just only confirmed that what was completely known.
|
|
|
|