I have got only facebook and twitter bounty. I hope other bounties will get very soon. I have a question. In which exchanger, Meridian token are trading?
forkdelta. Medium should be distributed soon too. Signature should start maybe in a week or 2 |
|
|
|
Both, barrysty1e and Vassilis don't communicate.
Looks like polemarhos888 and other people who suggested to start finding another dev for Mooncoin, were right.
The community has to invite a new, transparent and responsible dev for Mooncoin.
only sharing progress from time to time isnīt that bad i think. but some kind of communication is favorable |
|
|
|
so when will signature bounty distributed?
canīt be that far. maybe next friday or the friday after that |
|
|
|
Try to learn as much as u can from this forum. There is the most important information. Check board for newbies.
Look, do not invest all your money and do not be disappointed later if you lose everything. It happens. Investing all your funds into one asset is indeed a very high-risk move. Any asset including Bitcoin still have risks involved no matter how popular it seemingly is. well Bitcoin is still the less risky asset if youre not willing to diversify |
|
|
|
Great work MDN team! Excited about the project and just saw my reward!!
Hey there, Thanks for the feedback. As a side note guys, once the team @ ForkDelta removes our old contract address and adds the current address you'll all be able to enter sell orders. Currently only buy orders can be placed since the old MDN contract is not compatible with ForkDelta. To those of you who have been waiting to receive your Twitter rewards, we have just blasted out some tokens. Please check your balances.
Thanks for Supporting the Meridian Project!really cool news. Love the communication with the community. Keep up the good job |
|
|
|
"Dear participants of BergmannOS ICO Bounty. Our bounty campaign is finished. All your posts will be calculated and we will inform you about the final results as soon as possible. Thank you for the participation!"
I think they will post some update here soon too. |
|
|
|
Dogecoin is a user-based cryptocurrency.
Excellent! Dogecoin has strong community and it has been used on different services globally, especially on gambling platforms (poker, dice, football, etc.). This one has big advantage due to its cheap price, low transaction fees, and fast transaction speed. I really agree that the community is strong. But they still need to work on it or at least use it |
|
|
|
BTW why i don't see any seele admins activity here? in telegram they are not too active too... they don't like their community?) but there are not community is asking money, and vice versa. so, dear seele admins, if you reading this, let start to respect your investors and community members and start to answer their questions here. of corse if you are not just a couple of school-boys which want to scam people )
I also noticed this problem. It is because of this reason that I changed my mind to invest in ICo. The team did not inspire confidence. Yes, i think i will pass by it too) I don't trust them. And this thread looks like a joke and not like some serious project's thread. absolutely true. i donīt think the team made a very good job in gaining some trust and especially not in the thread over here |
|
|
|
april dogecoin will hit 240 satoshi
Why? are you sure? Look the way it's price happening ignores investors I really dont like it anymore. It stills below 50 sats. So sad. DOGE is the coin of choice for many people trying to build a peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Frankly the price doesn't matter. Mostly the coins right now are not spent or really used, instead they are quite only for speculation |
|
|
|
There was no reason not to accept escrow other than to scam you all.
yes but you even could have paid the escrow to be a part of the scam |
|
|
|
Hey Guys,
Confirming that we will be distributing Facebook & Medium bounties this coming Friday (16/03/18)
This Thursday (15/03/18) we will be updating addresses and etc. that are out of date.
If you need to adjust your information in our Facebook and/or Medium spreadsheet - you can send us all the relevant details and we'll bring everything up to date for Fridays' round of distributions.
Thanks for Supporting the Meridian Project!
great to hear. Really love getting foward |
|
|
|
That's why I voted for making Mooncoin more secure over and over again. But Mooncoin Foundation and some others blocked that - for example my suggestion of making MOON a PoS/PoW-hybrid coin or implementing another - more complex algo or technology - making it a little harder to attack Mooncoin, instead of spending development-power on MoonWord, SmartLikes and other relatively uninteresting things.
I didn't block anything: you were able to find a dev, convince him, convince the community and implement PoS or Hybrid, or Proof-of-Capthas. Why I'm personally against PoS and exotic algos: Mooncoin is a Proof-of-Work coin (like BTC, DOGE, LTC). It's a time tested model, a golden standard. A network hashrate of Mooncoin now is like a hashrate of DOGE and LTC in 2014-2015. Proof-of-Stake is a completely different model. A lot of coins are Proof-of-Stake, but very few are Proof-of-Work. Proof-of-Stake often works like a pyramid when someone who already has a lot of coins, receives more and more. While with Proof-of-Work - miners mine coins, it costs money to mine a coin, they are not made out of thin air and people have equal opportunities. In the future regulators may also pay some attention not only to ICOs, but also to Proof-of-Stake coins with big percentage rewards, they really may have some pyramidal features in some cases. In a Proof-of-Work model - labour, resources create coins. It's mining. It's a different model. Proof-of-Stake and other algos have a lot of their own security issues. It's untrue to say that Proof-of-Work algo in case of Mooncoin is unsecure while Proof-of-Stake or Hybrid would be secure. No. There was a lot of discussing on that, so even without having so much tech knowledge as coinflow, I can definitely say that other algos have their own security issues. Why not exotic algos: without miners (and pools are focused on Proof-of-Work mining which is simple and available for them, and btw miners are not ready to solve captchas or accept other proof-of-human algos like coinflow suggested earlier) - the network will be weak. Exotic algos have their own (often UNKNOWN) security issues. For example, a creator of Balloon hash algo disclosured on his page that it had potential security issues, unknown vulnerabilities. Also in case of Balloon and other exotic (or simply not tested by Mooncoin) algos, there will be a lack of miners and as a result - a low network hashrate, which will lead to security issues. The same would happen in case of selling of frozen coins, the price would be low, which would lead to low network hashrate and to possible security issues (however even in this case if you keep your coins in the normal wallet or on paper wallets, it's safe, a 51% attack cannot steal your coins). I personally have no idea how to transform a PoW coin into a PoS coin technically. I doubt that this could be done without making a new blockchain from scratch and without a swap. Anyway that would be 100% and even 1000% against Mooncoin's philosophy of decentralisation and simply would be rejected by the consensus. Don't forget that even a fork is a big risk (to say nothing about a swap).
Mooncoin needs a stable and serious development, ironing-out of bugs and strong and friendly support of normal investors by a competent dev, as well as strong efforts to get it listed on further, bigger exchanges. Not a new soldier-of-fortune-feature or short-sighted-speculator-candy every day or week. That's all what it takes. If Mooncoin has achieved this, one could think about new features, if necessary. But first of all, serious investors need stability, honesty and a proven record of development. Everyone can write a white paper or a "roadmap", but developing a stable coin that becomes a "classic" or a "no-brainer" to invest in, needs much more than changing the block-reward or burning coins. Why not burn every coin except of 43, to become the brother of 42-coin? Why not do a swap and set the deadline to next week, so that the result is, that all earlier holders of MOON are out of the game? They would recognize months later, when they look again at their wallet, that their coins are useless then.
What coinflow says: hypothetically Mooncoin with 43 coins of total supply as a brother of 42-coin it is simply NOT POSSIBLE. It would be rejected even if someone announced it. As well as any bad dishonest things. Remember: the consensus in a decentralised project accepts only good things. And it's not me who blocks/blocked that. If you want, just try, find a dev, try to convince a dev, the community etc. If people agree, they will support you. Some responsibility is advised though. People should ask experts first and do a good research. Yes, I'm personally against Proof-of-Stake, but my vote is only = 1. We can endlessly say that Mooncoin needs serious developers etc, but did you try to find anyone? If you tried, you knew that's extremely difficult. A dev must be experienced, honest, he must communicate, he must have courage, and finally he must provide his identity when he is going to code and compile wallets. No one, except barrysty1e (James) agreed in 2015-2016 to become a dev on these conditions. But barry had problems with communicating and completing things. After several months of madness of community in 2017 about barry's communication issues, an user polemarhos888 from Crete, Greece (who also contacted Mr. Valamontes but Mr.Valamontes didn't agree), polemarhos888 said that he found a dev in his town, Vassilis Kritharakis, he started to convince Vassilis to join Mooncoin development, and only after his many efforts Vassilis agreed. He provided his identity and started working, fixing issues first and after that he was going (he didn't even start it unfortunately) to implement new features MoonWord and SmartLikes directly into the wallet. We all know what has happened later. Good afternoon ! All these people need to read this post from Mooncoin Foundation. I will try to help again this community about new developer. But in my opinion, we need more people to help us in this section (new developers). Also, I believe that this coin has huge possibilities. Of course, we need winner mentality to highlight them ! congratulations on the great commitment and the reconstruction of what has happened that should be pinned or linked to ever new page. Great one |
|
|
|
I've received little tokens that means you' listed on exchange but I couldn't find any inform. about it?
Forkdelta is the exchange right now |
|
|
|
When is the bounty untill? Please update my stakes I been here every week/
I think it will be done this week as far as I know from telegram |
|
|
|
Now the question is who is better on scamming? is it the one who tried to lie where donations was stolen or is it Stone? hmmm Wow.. Crypto has still a looooong way to go. I for one never ever invest in any ICO, but that is just me.  well those projects here were some special kind of "ico". Not every ico is bad |
|
|
|
NXT and ardor are 2 different platforms, on the NXT platform nxt=nxt in the A Duo platform ARDOR + fire chain + other subchain =nxt  well what about ignis ?  |
|
|
|
hi! why such comments about the skam? what is the reason for doubting?
some people were trying to scam, but nothing by Dragonchain itself |
|
|
|
last post of felix was in march 4, i guess this is the end, u were warned
I can really understand felixando. The thread and BTT can sometimes be depressing I dont find it depressing. At least we are having fun here. Felixando "timely manner" Scammer could add his two cents here for laughs and giggles. Yeah really at this point it would be nice to at least get a message like "Thanks for the money you idiots" or at least "penis" well true thing. that would be much appreciated |
|
|
|
Hey guys. I'm the only one so far has not received my reward for Twitter. What problems?
Spreadsheet No: 104
Hey there, thanks for letting us know. We will look into this for you Meridian team has displayed a commendable attitude towards contributors and promoters. This implies that this project is ready to work in order to deliver it road map. Well done Meridian
That makes sense. Thanks for always answering the questions of the community very quickly.
Hello guys, Much appreciated. We will be moving onto the next campaign shortly. Our next update will contain all the relevant information, dates and etc. To those who have not claimed their Twitter bounty - this is your last chance. Once we move on to distributing the next batch of rewards, we will not be returning to the twitter campaign, therefore you will have forefeited your stakes. You can reach us via PM, or just leave a post in this thread and we'll send your Twitter reward. The Meridian TeamOnce again, I draw your attention to this. The twitter award has not yet been sent. My number in the spreadsheet is 104 Wallet address: 0x7079fcCC7f7926400301088FC46971a62Bd57a47  did you fill out the form ? |
|
|
|
I am repeated, the stolen coins are in good hands (VASSILIS is honest person) now and the situation is better than before (P.VERNON hands). Our dev Vassilis, afraid and without the correct support of some, has left. MF is not active, it is tired ? worn-out, frightened ?by the continuous attacks, also toward the privacy, that is important to safeguard against cybercrimine (MF members are people with at least 1 blns...)
Hi, I am a mooncoin hodler since 2015 and your statement it worries me, because I think the whole idea of crypto is about trust, eliminating the need for a trusted third party. Now, in all this Cryptsy mess if you think the better option is to trust in someone, no matter how honest (Vassilis) or dishonest (Vernon) is suppoused to be, I think is going against the fundamentals of crypto, and I find it contradictory. Why you dont burn all these damn coins? ..... and it starts all over again. I really would love to have some posts stick to every new page of the thread  |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
