Problably Stellite network has a problem, just wait one day and see again.
|
|
|
I dont know if then 50% network loss from monero is good beacause stopped all asics or bad because asics 'till up and the cripto heavy do 40% less hash than "normal" criptonight
|
|
|
Guys,
How can i calc a fix difficulty for mining?
20*hashrate is ok?
My understanding is it is 30*hashrate. But best just let it run and once it stabilises you can get a rough idea I will try with this way, thx
|
|
|
Tá com algum problema a rede ou o pool do 4miner?
estamos perto do fork porém houve mais um ataque de nicehash, por isso o próximo bloco está demorando Entendi, então o pool está passando por problemas, vou minerar outra coin e volto após o fork A pool não mas a moeda como um todo, estamos com um hash médio de 1Mh, mas um cara chega com 6Mh fazendo a rede subir para 7Mh, a diff sobe, então ele desliga a nicehash, sobra pra gente resolver um bloco com uma dificuldade de 7Mh porém com apenas 1Mh na rede distribuído em várias pools. o fork vai acontecer no 73731 Entendi meu caro e sou grato pela explicação. Existe alguma maneira de vcs se protegerem dessa situação?
|
|
|
Tá com algum problema a rede ou o pool do 4miner?
estamos perto do fork porém houve mais um ataque de nicehash, por isso o próximo bloco está demorando Entendi, então o pool está passando por problemas, vou minerar outra coin e volto após o fork
|
|
|
Tá com algum problema a rede ou o pool do 4miner?
|
|
|
I've read the entire reddit thread and some others on this subject. All I can say is that there's nothing new at all, all this things are happening since mid-january, as a (small) pool owner I've noticed it soon and posted it, but nobody cared... 1/ https://etn.nanopool.org/ + https://etn.spacepools.org/ > 50% 2/ A block can only be added at the end of the blockchain, so they are always mined in order, that means the dates are simply wrong. A blockchain has no time consensus, so the dates dont need to be accurate, the only "time consensus" a blockchain has is the heigt. Thats why updates will be released at a block height X and not at a time X. Im not sure how they measure the timestamp on a transaction but i asume the miner just puts his server timestamp in, which dont has to be accurate at all. I assume you thinking about 51% attacks. With those attacks you can replace the block by mining with more then 50% hashrate, but you keep them secret. So you wouldnt see the increased difficulty anyway ,because the solved blocks would not be released to the global blockchain. After time X you will always have the longer blockchain (because you solved more blocks) wich is accepted by the global blockchain, so you would just suddenly see the end of the blockchain removed and replaced with something else. But even these added blocks will be in chronological order. So lets say a big company which owns a lot of hashing power makes a deal with nanopool (or they get hacked by the company). You would first see a huge decrease in difficulty, because nanopool would be not releasing their blocks, but they could keep the miners in the dark about it, give them all the money they want, because its gona be reversed anyway. Then they make their scam deals and release the longer blockchain, which would be accepted globaly. Not to easy but since their is a lot of centralization with ETN mining (most of it because of lack of knowlege) it is not impossible. In the beginning of ETN mining one pool even had 97% of the hashing power. TL;DR The timestamp is not reliable, only the block height is and its impossible to add blocks inbetween 1/ Well most of the time it is barely >50% or <50% 2/Ok that make sense. But what I also find disturbing is, from what I saw, these blocks with a wrong timestamp never have any user's transaction in them... Small pool? probably is one of the biggest or the big one
|
|
|
Guys,
How can i calc a fix difficulty for mining?
20*hashrate is ok?
|
|
|
I started getting socket errors in the last 12 hours and when it did log in. I was getting mostly rejected shares.... I am running the latest xmr-stak on the v7 algo option I think I might need to reset the config to "cryptonight" instead of "Monero 7". I didn't have time to mess with it and just threw it in another coin for now. I had been running that config for a day or two with no problems until last night.... So maybe it is the pool? ? I used the old version (2.2.0) and i got it the same error.
|
|
|
Too much socket errors on support.ipbc.io. This server maybe operate idiots! Maybe you need experts for administrations. Really 1% fee? For what?
Too much socket errors on support.ipbc.io. This server maybe operate idiots! Maybe you need experts for administrations. Really 1% fee? For what?
Socket errors because of poor server I think. Just look at the share accepting time. I even wasn't able to mine with xmr-stak Same problem here, its happened in last 7 days, now i'm mining in http://cryptoknight.cc/ipbc/ ... none errors till now
|
|
|
Someone know news about the attack?
there is no any problems - I withdrew my etn coins, which was purchased on Cryptopia, and got them in my cli wallet very soon Someone know news about the attack?
The 51% attack is over, it failed. There is some tx pool spamming, but it does not effect normal operations. Many thanks guys, i will try to transfer a little ETN to test the network.
|
|
|
Someone know news about the attack?
|
|
|
From Reddit thread: https://youtu.be/2KzLveNmWkI"Richards statement on ASIC miners: They are working on ASIC resistance, Richard said this is a high priority at the moment. ASIC resistance and empty blocks update in relativity near future. And large blockchain update coming at the end of may. I'm glad we now have a clear statement from Richard addressing this issue."
|
|
|
Como devo proceder para atualizar minha wallet? Estou na versão 1.2.3
|
|
|
I have had one that took 24 hours before. Some thing normal at electroneum blockchain. My first time with this problem, i ll be wait more.
|
|
|
Poderiam atualizar o post inicial removendo pools que já não existem mais e acrescentando novos pools do NBR ? Edit: Aparentemente a rede está com algumas instabilidade, os pools estão com informações divergentes quanto o Hash Rate da rede e o seu Hash Rate atual, tem pool com mais poder que a rede toda ( http://niobiopool.com.br/ )
|
|
|
O que me anima nesse cenário é que o Monero está indo na contra-mão desse fluxo todo. Dos 0,27 BTC da semana passada pulou pra 0,34 hoje Espero que até o dia do fork (14/03) ele suba mais um pouquinho. Esse "fork" do Monero é golpe. Já foi cancelado. Agora vai ser lançado dia 30 de abril. Quem disse que eu tô interessado nesse fork FAJUTO? eu disse que tô animado é com o Pump do XMR, fiz bons negócios com ele negociado a 0,32 BTC. Perdi a onda dos 0,34 por não ter esperado mais, mas tudo bem.... não me arrependo. Voltando ao assunto do BTC, o mercado parece estar recuperando. Quem sabe se tivermos mais umas 5 notícias boas na semana que vem ele sobe 1k de novo Impressionante... começamos com várias notícias boas e uma alta tímida do BTC, aí vem duas notícias ruin (se bem que relevantes) e esse Dump caótico. Assim não dá. Acha que após o "fork" o preço do XMR vai cair?
|
|
|
O que me anima nesse cenário é que o Monero está indo na contra-mão desse fluxo todo. Dos 0,27 BTC da semana passada pulou pra 0,34 hoje Espero que até o dia do fork (14/03) ele suba mais um pouquinho. Esse "fork" do Monero é golpe.
|
|
|
|