|
For information, Dumont has been banned for 60 days..(complicated story but not sure of this future situation...)
btcltcdigger, his methodology is not really clear but he’s serious and relevant
An excellent Spanish BM: rigghodler
Dentit is also a good choice
|
|
|
|
Guys, I sincerely hope you’ll find a good Bounty Manager (it's essential for the perceived quality of the project) On the other hand, take the opportunity to redesign your signature... the current design is particularly ugly!  |
|
|
|
|
In fact, during last year's hysteria no one was wondering about any of this.
But today, the abiance is gloomy so this kind of practice becomes even more unbearable (as well as something else like the Bounty spam campaigns)
When everyone makes money it doesn't seem that bad. But it is.
|
|
|
|
No matter how much it actually is (Well, if it's $10,000 it's much better!  ) What matters is the pleasure of seeing time and work transformed into Tokens, without spending real money (oh wait...like real life in fact !) |
|
|
|
|
For the quality and the reputation of a bounty campaign, the trust is a fondamental point
(For the ICO team, the bounty hunters..).
-You’re red-trusted
-Some members asked you to illustrate your experience with example of “successful campaign”, we’re still waiting
Not really reassuring..
|
|
|
|
|
Again, KYC is not a problem in itself.
(And this will probably be the rule for 90% of projects in a short time)
On the other hand, ICOs (and Bounty managers) MUST take the confidentiality of the data they receive seriously.
|
|
|
|
|
This is the first time I've seen this...
And you?
I did not get an answer to my remark in the Bounty thread, I will insist a little to know the position of the BM
|
|
|
|
|
It’s not really a team problem, maybe the project is strong and legit and the team reliable.
But actually, because their participation in bounty campaign, dozen of members of the forum posted their personal informations on a PUBLIC spreadsheet, included name, surname, email, Eth address..
And Internet never forget !
|
|
|
|
|
In a few hours, already several dozen people who did not hesitate to post their identity "in clear" on the web...
And we are in the field of cryptography normally!!
|
|
|
|
About the “practice” in this field, this post is terrific... https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4964816.0Dear forum members, Today I am going to discuss here a very important matter. Little earlier I see something unusual here on a scam ICO ANN. With valid proof I post on their ANN to put everyone stay away from them. After my post "icoholder.com"post there that they have listed the ICO on their listing site . How its possible a listing site list scam ICO on their listing category?  Its a trick to blackmail ICOs here on bitcointalk. First they list ICO without any cost on their website & after somedays start forcing to develop ratings with a big fund.Even they don't investigate well is it a scam project or Not. Its really disappointed after seeing my post that its a scam project they post there  Just see how they are using multiple account for spamming:Hello! Your project https://icoholder.com/en/travelus-24934 was selected among others and was added to our listing - icoholder.com. Congratulations! At the moment your project is unrated (N/A). You can edit your Page by adding more information about your ICO after verification and also verify team members. If you have more questions, please write to @m_holder ( https://t.me/m_holder) In my opinion perhaps this kind of listing sites blackmail several ICOs by following this rating techniques. They also using multiple bitcointalk Account to make spam on forum. I have already given proof above. Please take a look below how they doing this here : Hello! I am editor from icoholder.com. Your ICO was added to our listing and now is available to investors: https://icoholder.com/en/hive-power-20465 You can edit your Page by adding more information about your ICO after verification and also verify team members to improve ranking. Hello! Your project https://icoholder.com/en/qlear-protocol-24894 was selected among others and was added to our listing - icoholder.com. Congratulations! At the moment your project is unrated (N/A). You can edit your Page by adding more information about your ICO after verification and also verify team members. If you have more questions, please write to @m_holder ( https://t.me/m_holder)  Hello! Your project https://icoholder.com/en/coinbates-24940 was selected among others and was added to our listing - icoholder.com. Congratulations! At the moment your project is unrated (N/A). You can edit your Page by adding more information about your ICO after verification and also verify team members. 
"Hello! I am an editor from icoholder.com. Your ICO was added to our listing and now is available to investors:https://icoholder.com/en/ico/simple-token-4080 You can edit your Page by adding more information about your ICO and also verify team members to improve ranking.
If you need any help - feel free to contact me!"
Hello! I am editor from icoholder.com. Your ICO was added to our listing and now is available to investors: https://icoholder.com/en/vicoin-vic-18955 You can edit your Page by adding more information about your ICO after verification and also verify team members to improve ranking. CoinFi with a rating of 4.05 on our ICO list https://icoholder.com/en/ico/coinfi-16199The ICO and project team has been verified. We interviewed the team members. Our rating is one of the most objective and rigorous, it is independent and created to assess the investment attractiveness. Rating checks your idea and project for vitality it is based on more than 70 different parameters. We are monitoring the ICOs on daily basis. Sincerely, ICOholder
"Hello! I am an editor from icoholder.com. Your ICO was added to our listing and now is available to investors:https://icoholder.com/en/ico/dehedge-16176 You can edit your Page by adding more information about your ICO and also verify team members to improve ranking.
If you need any help - feel free to contact me!"
All these accounts are connected with "icoholder.com" They are using these multiple accounts to blackmail ICOs here on bitcointalk.Even they don't care about fake ICO, fake team or whatever. They just need money.  please everyone be careful about "icoholder.com". If this is an official ICOHolder strategy, it says a lot about the habits of the sector... It's spammers' behavior, it violates the rules of the forum but above all it messes up the rules of trust that should exist in the community |
|
|
|
I’ve just let this post in the Bounty thread of the REMCO campaign https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4989188.msg45033426#msg45033426Guys, I can understand the Bountys asking for a KYC now, why not after all...
But your spreadsheet is PUBLIC!
It is an extraordinary database for hackers with real identity associations and full of information
For bounty hunter security, pass this table in private access!
It’s me or it’s really scary ?? |
|
|
|
|
Guys, I can understand the Bountys asking for a KYC now, why not after all...
But your spreadsheet is PUBLIC!
It is an extraordinary database for hackers with real identity associations and full of information
For bounty hunter security, pass this table in private access!
|
|
|
|
|
The real question is: what is a trusted advisor? I still have the impression that the selection criteria are questionable...
Btw, how does one become an Ico advisor?
|
|
|
|
Thank for this listing, can I know your criteria ? (Trust, fair, reliability, other ?) Not so easy to have an website list really updated, every day, a nez site is launched |
|
|
|
|
Everyone agrees: ICO's ranking sites are mostly used as a source of information but are NOT (or rarely) considered as fair sources...
That's a real problem, isn't it?
|
|
|
|
|
Okay, for you a good way to get general information but you can't trust them.
You evoke the Bounty, the publications of the sites of ICO can be integrated to Bounty campaign to your opinion (As publications on steemit or Medium for example)?
|
|
|
|
|
Nauticus seems really cool...but we are in September in few days, and the Exchange was Should have been launched mid-August...
A little worrying, though.
|
|
|
|
|
Try to have a qualitative approach: BMs have this logic, rather than having 100 individuals doing tweets mechanically, it is better to have quality articles on specialized websites.
It's longer but more profitable, logical
|
|
|
|
|
Hey, guys,
you know how ICO rating sites work (ICOHolder, ICO Ranking, etc...)
I'd need your opinion on these sites. Do you use them?
Are they important in your investment decisions?
Do you find their operation effective? Do you trust them?
There is currently a debate about whether ICO actually buy good ratings. What do you think of that?
If you work for these sites, I'm interested too! Don't hesitate to come and present your point of view
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
