Thanks! That really saves me a lot of time and reading.

I detect the aroma of "buy" coming from the crave thread.

Can someone say what has been completed on the road map? I lost track of this one.

This has all been talked about ad nauseum here. That's the devs wallet and they are pretty unapologetic about it. You may want to look at the staking guarantee they put up if you are worried about staking.

There is a whitepaper about turbostake also. I just looked it up on your post. It doesn't matter if the blocks are consecutive. It's how far apart in time they are that matters.

No one was selling on yobit.

Wallstreet traders don't screw their investments by throwing baseless accusations at those very investments.

I've got a feeling that makebelieve is a do-gooder, lying to do "good".

I see a dev here helping anyone and everyone and asking for help himself.

Some helped in the end, but if anyone burnt this coin, it's that lying makebelieve.

I get to the bottom of EVERYTHING and it looks like you are a chronic liar. I found it investigating where you asked the dev if his staking worked "multiple times". I only found one and he didn't answer you. But look at his post, he was interrupted by his own work on the coin and didn't get passed your accusation. You have screwed yourself my friend. If you stuck to helping, things would go better on you. You are part of the problem, like so many little pissy trolls.

Check this out (in chronological order):

Makebelieve complaining about something: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1070124.msg11482421#msg11482421
Dev asking for logs: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1070124.msg11482503#msg11482503
Makebelieve making accusations and more complaining: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1070124.msg11483055#msg11483055
Dev thinks he found the problem responding to Makebelieve: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1070124.msg11483383#msg11483383
Makebelieve LYING that he didn't provide a log because the dev said it was fixed: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1070124.msg11495582#msg11495582

YOU DIDN'T PROVIDE A LOG. It's your fault. Try to help instead of bitch next time and you won't screw yourself so badly.  

AND DON'T DELETE YOUR POSTS YOU LIAR. THERE ARE PLENTY OF COPIES, QUOTED AND OTHERWISE.

They did a lot of sending to themselves in chunks. This is the only send from that wallet that I can't trace back:

http://cryptobe.com/tx/293724c7a156ac2858a7a1fbc0a47df2dc2e6f66e822a760045c0f41cb884c4b

It's only about 10 SNRG and it's still sitting at the same address. I don't think it's an exchange.

I'll admit that I didn't look at every transaction because if they were clustered and I tracked a couple back to the same address then I wouldn't look at every transaction in the cluster. And there are a lot of transactions in that wallet. I could have easily missed some.

I really want to get to the bottom of this. If anyone can find any transactions permanently out of the wallet, let me know and I'll try to figure out if they sent it to an exchange.

Right now the devs look clean by my limited searching.

I think these devs know what they are doing too. They tweaked their minter to not split transactions, but sometimes they split. I never even thought about this before looking at this coin and I try to maximize staking all the time.

I'm all for weak hands dumping early. And it is still early. The roadmap could be more exciting, but it seems real.

This is some crazy stuff. Especially considering the timing. In chronological order, the events were

1. Devs stop mining at 2:17 AM on Block 5405
2. Roadmap released at 2:42 AM
3. Makebelieve posts with questions at 3:13 AM

Read that list again, the devs stopped mining before makebelieve posted and even before the roadmap was released. And they didn't do it to move coins because none of their coins went anywhere. And from the timing of the buys they said they were going to make, they already had BTC sitting at yobit.

I also quickly looked through all the transactions for the huge wallet and could only find staking transactions. You can spot those because they have one (unusual) or more amounts not in parentheses then one amount in parentheses. The amounts in parentheses are the stakes and the amount not in parentheses are the mints. The difference is the reward. Can anyone find any sends? I can't. If they didn't sell, then they didn't use SNRG profits to make their buys. That was their own BTC.

I mined a good amount because I stumbled on this coin right after launch. I haven't staked as much as I liked because of obvious problems. I haven't seen anything that makes me think the devs are less than honest, although they have peen pretty hard core about grabbing coins. I can't say I blame them. I'd rather devs go for big money than start dumping on the market right away. The more money devs make the more I make.

There are too many weak devs out there. I think here we have some real players who seem to be honest too. Sign me up.

Go here to the first post of this thread and scroll down the heading "Downloads" and pick the one that's right for you.

I'd link it, but it's becoming practice to delete posts with links in them because of malware, so you have to hunt it down for yourself.

I think he means that the Qt project file is a mess. It does not work as is. Not that I care because it's too much trouble to compile Qts for everything if you do it yourself. I run daemons because they are usually easier to build than Qts. The makefile for unix daemons works without alteration, though, so at least the devs did that right.

Yup, that's what happens when "devs" make a post telling everyone that they can't code.


"Hey Left Dev, we could have a $250,000 cap coin if we figure out how to get this done."

"Hey Right Dev, fuck it, let's tell the world we don't know what the fuck we are doing!"

"Hey Left Dev, sounds like a plan! I'm happy with my 2.5 BTC I made on this, let's go buy a video game!"

"Hey Right Dev, Me too! I'm a 19 year old virgin and I want to stay that way!!!"

I reach out to devs all the time. I know devs that can get things done. Usually devs that make the "we are incompetent" post are too weak to continue. They crack under the pressure of having to produce and the embarrassment of being incompetent, so they never get back to me. I'm not like this. I'm nice by PM, but really, you begin to spot the weak ones. I could be wrong about these graph weaklings, but probably not. I'm not going to bother to play the nice game with them. If they want help with their bot, they can put what they have on github.

If you guys want your graph to be worth anything, I suggest you demand this of the devs.

If they don't post their code, then you will know that they are the embarrassed devs I claim them to be. If they post up, then I have to eat my words.

I already know who will be right, though.

Here's a roadmap these devs can handle:

1. Get up from bed.
2. Pat self on back for not wetting bed.
3. Need poo-poo; go.
4. Attempt to wipe own ass.
5. Make mess.
6. Don't realize need to clean up ass wipe mess.
7. Ask mom for cereal.
8. Eat; make mess. Mom clean up.
9. Cartoons.

You give them too much credit. I've seen this 1000 times. "Boo hoo, we can't code and lack the intellect to learn."

I think they just have weak personality disorder.

Commit what you have to github, and then I'll find some real devs to help.

But one thing, why do the incompetent devs always make a "we are incompetent" post? Just get your shit done quietly. Don't advertise incompetence.

Stop your client, delete your peers.dat, put rescan=1 in your conf, and start again.