hey all,
I won't say this is off topic as I feel it pertains to both sides.
First, let me say that we hold DRK as well as XC. Just a lot more XC since we mined it from day 1.
I am glad the garbage over the last couple days has subsided, as there was never a need for it in the first place. I have also said this in the XC thread and on Twitter.
I promote the idea that our communities work together and support each other and move on to even bigger things, not for only our fanboy coin, but also for the crypto world in general. The Coindesk article made both sides look like idiots.
Both of these coins have great promise, and there are real world applications for both. It may be true that DRK is further along than XC, but DRK has also been around for much longer. Kind of like an older brother.
Let's do our best to promote cryptos in general, support innovation, and stop making the community look like a bunch of teenage girls.
Thank you
Exactly how I feel. We need to respect and support the innovation that both coins have the potential to provide. Too bad whatever the XC communities feel and act, it's only one way. The FUD in the DRK thread is still constant and new FUD are being created constantly.... We are gentlemen, they are not  |
|
|
|
GUYS JUST TO MENTION ONE THING....WITHDRAW YOUR COINS FROM EXCHANGES ( UNLESS YOU THERE FOR A QUICK BUCK AND YOU DON'T CARE ) ! ...BECAUSE YOURS STALKING ( POS ) MONEY FEED THE SAME EXCHANGES AND THEY PROFIT ON YOURS COINS - AND THAT SUMS ARE LARGE BELIEVE ME !
ONLY EXCHANGE THAT IS STALKING AND GIVES YOUR POS MONEY BACK TO YOUR WALLET IS BITTREX ( as far as I know ), ALL OTHERS ARE TRANSFER THAT COINS IN THEIR POCKETS !
Agree |
|
|
|
Thanks everyone. Not much to my identity. Just a small business owner in a small town. Gentleman Greetings to you |
|
|
|
good job man  |
|
|
|
“http://www.coindesk.com/darkcoin-duel-xc-demise-mcdogecoin/” I'll collections this article, perhaps in the future it will become “evidence in court”. |
|
|
|
I'm a layman so alot of this tech stuff goes over my head, but what my impression is so far is alot of the FUD flying has been countered very well.
In order this is my experience over the last week
OMG this dev is fake, he'll never have a wallet by Sunday!
- check, wallet on Sunday
then
OMG this guy is not Dan Metcalfe, that is just speculation, he is probably some kid
- check, Dan Metcalfe updates his linkedin
OMG there is a one line mention of fedoracoin, sell, sell, sell!
- check, Mindfox looks at the code and confirms it's not fedora's.
I believe in solid, honest questions but after being inundated with scam coins for months now, this is one of the most transparent devs i've come across and frankly his age and resume give me more confidence than alot of these 20 year-old copy paste kids. Do I still hold out the possibility he can't pull it off? Sure, but I do think if there is ANY coin that can compete with Dark, this is it, no other comes close except MRO which has issues of its own as well.
Agree！ |
|
|
|
How much time does it take to make a testnet block explorer? Make a bounty and get it going if it shuts people up. Let's just do it.
Agreed. But you know what will happen next? "UH we need to see the code for the Block Explorer, we think it is manipulating the results" they need more than more if you give they more. |
|
|
|
|
[/quote]
[/quote]
[/quote]
[/quote]
[/quote]
[/quote]
[/quote]
[/quote]
Teka, the PR rep's job isn't to argue vs others coins.
Your job is to manage this coin.
[/quote]
+1
|
|
|
|
“There were claims that X11 Coin has used parts of the Fedora source more specifically the mixer.cpp section of the source-tree. I have found this to be untrue, as the code is unique to X11” Great！！！  |
|
|
|
I don't think the code should be revealed until XC reaches critical mass.
+1 Feedback noted and passed on but yeah I totally agree. +1 |
|
|
|
|
XC will defeat LTC from market value and not just the price, I think
|
|
|
|
|
“C:\x11coin\x11coin-qt.exe -addnode=162.243.109.24 -connect=162.243.109.24”
|
|
|
|
Just wanted to provide an update, I expect another wallet release on Sunday night, with the updated GUI for the anonymizer technology - only 1 click. Also some other new's will be coming before then - that I'm sure everybody will appreciate...
great |
|
|
|
hope some biggest chinese exchange platform will add XC coin soon. not now  |
|
|
|
1 Bitcoin
2 Litecoin
3 Peercoin
4 Next
5 XC
6 Dark
Soon
ASAP ? how about 1 Bitcoin2 ?think wildly guys...  1 Bitcoin、XC 3 Litecoin 4 Peercoin 5 Next 6 Dark |
|
|
|
Remind for everyone: mining on http://x11.ltc1btc.com/ using a different user ID and password please. because once you switch to a different pool , you may lose revenue. |
|
|
|
 Piss-weak market reaction, thought everyone was millionaire by now
Similar ratio to darkcoin that litecoin has to bitcoin in marketcap. Shows market already priced in anon feature during the nuclear runup yesterday. Also shows first-adopter coins fare better even when similar coins function better fundamentally (won't call this a clone coin if the dev has some unique code). Maybe the future holds more to this coin, but until then gratz to early buyers yesterday on poloniex
if we look at the price of other Anon Coin's price, such as dark and MRo also QCN, we know XC coin still have a lot of potential. And the price is still cheap. XC coin may rank in top10 on coinmarketcap after everything is ready. this coin will take drk's spot,i'm sure of it, Evan is a good coder, but i dn't think he is on the level of ours, the price of XC when it's all said and done will probably shock the shit out of all of us. one thing to think about is DRKsend wasn't enough so Evan is adding ring signatures, but what our DEV recognized that he didn't is that it will bloat the block chain and make useless to mass usage, who is more on the ball? i will let u decide, another thing is Evan, and don't get me wrong DRK is awesome and he has done great! but his past experience was building bots at home, ours has years of experience of not only extensive coding, working for government agency's, he also ran a company, a crypto is not just a currency, it's a business, a company, well it should be, and what we have here is not only a guy who can deliver the product and constantly enhance to compete with the best, but he will know how to manage it when it gets big, who knows if Evan is up to this task, only time will tell The dev seems to know his stuff in the technical department and might even be more qualified for the job (this type of job requires someone with the mindset of Anonymint really - which is highly paranoid on things related to security and holes in the design). If I had to rate them, from what I see, I'd say you are right in the security background etc etc, but keep in mind though that Evan also has a financial background and the economic model of dark is one of the best around. So, a crypto being primarily a currency, is very largely affected by economic decisions and economic design. Stuff like coin number and inflation are critical. If I know that there will be 10 coins more tomorrow per one coin today, why would I buy big with all this dilution? This stuff needs capping and it needs capping yesterday. Being an "infinite" coin through PoS production is also not good for rarity which makes it less valuable - you become something like a DOGEcoin. Arbitrary block numbers like 333 coins per block, 3.33% inflation, 33.3mn coins heavily remind shitcoins even if the technology of the anonymity proves very good. These are stuff that need better design. They are CRITICAL to success. If everything is staked (not likely, but just to illustrate) 3,33% inflation* through interest means that by year ten these 33.3mn coins will be 44mn and by year 30 it'll be 86mn coins. The interest in itself inflates the coin so the owner gets nothing in reality because the monetary base has been ...debased. We need much less coin generation (10m sounds good), much less interest and debasement (for those that could be arguing " oh I bought thinking I'll get 3.33% on my coins, think that if the monetary base expands by a similar amount, you'll only win if someone actually buys the extra coins - which is less likely to happen if they know that the coin will be continuously debasing". The dev must make a decision soon and fix the economic model, no matter what the haters say. No matter what's happening right now in terms of technology, MRO people are clueless in terms of inflation and massive reward as the production can't be absorbed (I tried to tell them about the price stagnation and that they need to do something - but didn't really listen) and X11coin is problematic in its design as an economic instrument, which I'm highlighting right now and perhaps it'll be fixed. * 3.33% = worse than gold's 1.3% (2.500 tons added per year in a 180.000 ton above ground supply). Even if half the quantity is staked then it's again >1.3% which is the absolute benchmark in terms of finance. Consult someone with financial background, see what other cryptos are doing and fix it fast along with the distribution otherwise it will hamper long-term prospects. Then fix the name / brand. And these, all the while working on the anonymity aspect. My 0.02 duffs. EDIT: I made an error above claiming infinity for POS, as the cap is set for 33mn. +1 Consult someone with financial background |
|
|
|
dev,it is Sunday night |
|
|
|
me too |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
