My wallet also doesn't want to sync  Everything's working, just be patient while it catches up. It will never just simply catch up, tested it on a fresh sync & the only way to get it working would be to upload the blockchain data. There are only 2 peers, tried to add a .conf & am thinking that maybe cryptonote doesn't use .conf. I do see a .cfg that looks like machine code for a configurations file, but haven't tried to edit it with commands & just uploaded the 2 .dats + .bin files that are already sync fully. That worked, so maybe add to Github a file with the 3 files needed to sync (blocks.dat, blockindexes.dat, p2pstate.bin) one a week or month? //the GUI for Linux & Windows FYI, but will check the simple wallet also for a fresh sync working Need good community.
Dev, what about airdrop? I think this can help.
I will help with the airdrop if dev would like, mined so many now & am all for faucets or give a ways  // Signature and Avatar Campaign |
|
|
|
Dev doesn't actively given updates, but you (Testing Crypto) give some more detail news updates
Honestly, I am amazed with you!
Thank you, the main reason why I learned to BBcode & do my best to keep all the info in the simplest form. Since the main point of mining, buying or selling these applications coins or tokens account for what knowledge the user has on them & with enough points of information on what the user can understand about it as a whole. I've watched, tested 1000's of alts over the years, tried to help many & even the smallest point of data can be useful to the miner, buyer or seller & or investor. I still make mistakes, as we all do & only try to make sure other don't do the same. |
|
|
|
Thanx both
Your welcome, for future problems of being on a fork (or other peers broadcasting one) & not having to delete the entire blockchain (lucky it's small database size now for a full resync) you can just use rescan=1 to fix it. chicks.conf //only if on a fork rescan=1
connect=149.56.154.75:10123 chicks.conf //normal configuration rescan=1
addnode=149.56.154.75:10123 { "addr" : "91.90.235.216:53786", "services" : "00000001", "lastsend" : 1493825394, "lastrecv" : 1493825225, "conntime" : 1493824043, "version" : 60013, "subver" : "/Satoshi:1.0.0/", "inbound" : true, "startingheight" : 17, "banscore" : 0 }, I will to try this tutorial, thanks @Testing Crypto You are welcome, also see that https://www.tradesatoshi.com/Vote has reopened voting @ 1 Day 8 Hours 2 Minutes 10 Seconds & now CKS in 2nd place? They were #1 & VirtacoinPlus wasn't even in the list (the one with 54 votes was #2 then?), now they have 177  Not that another exchange would help CKS anyway, nothing gets traded there & satoshi does not even like to trade Just find it hard to believe that 177 honest votes without multiple VPNs or TOR were used, thought those days were past in the crypto world & guess that would be wrong. |
|
|
|
Not synchronized wallet what are the problems
mybe you need node, cek in official thread I do not understand you can be more simply I updated the nodes but the wallet is not synchronized  getpeerinfo: piecoin.conf: rescan=1
addnode=[2a02:180:6:2::a2]:31415
addnode=107.170.196.135:31415
addnode=149.56.154.75:31415
addnode=195.74.52.227:31415
addnode=82.165.162.27:31415
addnode=62.138.3.214:31415
addnode=81.89.100.38:31415 |
|
|
|
I agree with you but there is no community here. I sent a support ticket to get the nodes updated. I wasn't going to do much more unless there is a demand for it. I'm thinking about launching my own coin, might be better to have a fresh start. anybody working on this coin or is it done?
the wallet and staking is working good
That's the biggest flaw in altcoins, just abandon & start a new one leaving a wake of defunct coins? I don't mind new alts, but leaving one to go defunct & starting a new one that might be bound to end the same exact way? Very strange that anyone would think it would be easier to launch a new one with all the work getting listed on sites & building another community? They do though, but most of those types of developers can get listed anywhere very easy & others either spend crazy amounts of BTC or spend months getting a community voting. Either way, just seems like people like ghost towns in this forum & would rather abandon to build new than build upon something working? Don't get me wrong, some of the alts did have broken chains & or had to many faults. Just don't see that with most of them, some chains work & don't have to be abandoned. It would be a lot easier to build with a fully distributed coin having two markets already, just add a block explorer & a few social media updates to it. There would be no messing with pools & or PoW dumps on the market, but with 100% interest it does create inflation depending on how many in circulation are staking. 401165.79 FCH on CCex & 38962.54232498 FCH on Coin Exchange = 440128.33232498 FCH on the market. So that would mean 904339.17673064 FCH are either staking or just sit idle in wallet from the air drop. getinfo shows 1,344,467.50905562 FCH (need a block explorer) The air drop was August 26, 2016 & as of today the blockchain runs 395 MB @ block 392,819 with a PoS diff @ 0.00467376 + network weight @ 278,000 The account FashCashTeam created & only used 2 days, so it's a tough choice of leave it abandon or build with what was left behind? I'm only able to test the apps + BBcoding of the original post updates, so yeah it would need to gain community & or online presence. As for the code of the wallet, I think that there are a few sites now where you can hire a Dev to implement certain things for a fee & that would be much simpler than starting from scratch? |
|
|
|
I sent a support ticket to get the nodes updated. I wasn't going to do much more unless there is a demand for it. I'm thinking about launching my own coin, might be better to have a fresh start. anybody working on this coin or is it done?
the wallet and staking is working good
That's the biggest flaw in altcoins, just abandon & start a new one leaving a wake of defunct coins? I don't mind new alts, but leaving one to go defunct & starting a new one that might be bound to end the same exact way? Very strange that anyone would think it would be easier to launch a new one with all the work getting listed on sites & building another community? They do though, but most of those types of developers can get listed anywhere very easy & others either spend crazy amounts of BTC or spend months getting a community voting. Either way, just seems like people like ghost towns in this forum & would rather abandon to build new than build upon something working? Don't get me wrong, some of the alts did have broken chains & or had to many faults. Just don't see that with most of them, some chains work & don't have to be abandoned. |
|
|
|
It's very interesting to see that this coin is still alive after all this time. Think I still have coins in an old wallet. Will probably have to get the newest version and see what the state of things is. Is there any sort of rough roadmap of the future for any new features etc. Not gimmick stuff, just improved tech features.
I wish there was, but unfortunately there are no Developers & or anyone available in the community to update any features. Anything could change @ any time though, one thing that has been seen in many altcoins (community or developer take overs) & or could just drift into a defunct state of the altcoins over the years. Fire Coin (FIRE) has been with only a few nodes for months & without a block explorer as well, but 100's of alts have good functional chains in the same status. Will just have to watch, wait & see  Well that's not encouraging. I will say though that IMO POS coins often go this route as they tend to result in people hording their coins for staking and with nothing new coming in via mining, interest slowly evaporates. I went back and even many of the really high % PoS coins are pretty much dead as well. I personally like the idea of a PoW/PoS coin like Peer but that's just me. So it's based on Bitcoin->SifCoin->Quark->Dark->BitBlock->Fire What would you think should be done with it? It would be badly in need of some core updates I would think but once you start on that you have to begin asking if it wouldn't be less work to fork some "new" updated coin and then work from that. Course that opens up a whole can of worms with having to do swaps and stuff. The real question though would be what is it's "purpose". The coin itself is almost immaterial unless it has a real purpose and of course a plan for it's adoption. I would like to see it get updates also, many developers out there just copy & make new coins for a quick profit. Would be nice to see a developer that could help FIRE get the chance to have a real purpose, being the name Fire Coin (FIRE) made me think of many possibilities & good purposes of the name Fire Coin (fire fighter use & charity news was my first thoughts). Am only a BBcoder tho, don't have any wallet coding ability & have been trying to learn to read it over the years a bit. A developer would cost BTC & there wasn't a premine or ICO to keep building upon, don't really see a developer just offering to help for nothing (only the name maybe)? Not trying to be less encouraging, but have just put a lot of time & some BTC already into Fire Coin. Even tom14cat14 + many others have tried a few routes to build Fire Coin, just tough with all the new coins & no funds to build it into a name worthy Fire Coin. The chain should be good the way it is for years though, so no worries here & will keep updating the BBcoding when needed + supporting Fire Coin where I can. |
|
|
|
It's very interesting to see that this coin is still alive after all this time. Think I still have coins in an old wallet. Will probably have to get the newest version and see what the state of things is. Is there any sort of rough roadmap of the future for any new features etc. Not gimmick stuff, just improved tech features.
I wish there was, but unfortunately there are no Developers & or anyone available in the community to update any features. Anything could change @ any time though, one thing that has been seen in many altcoins (community or developer take overs) & or could just drift into a defunct state of the altcoins over the years. Fire Coin (FIRE) has been with only a few nodes for months & without a block explorer as well, but 100's of alts have good functional chains in the same status. Will just have to watch, wait & see |
|
|
|
The Windows RC 6.2 tested good, but am unable to test a Mac O.S. (should really get one to test with in the near future) & wonder if there would be a Linux compile for the top distributions of Linux (.deb & or .rpm {if}) possible in the near future. The Android x86 6.0-r3 was just released also, but haven't tested it yet & have only tested the 4.4-r4 ISO build. I don't have an IOS phone either to test with, but am sure that there will be many Apple testers in the forums or via social media to test it on that platform & or send GIVE or GIFT to ISO user then ask them if the app worked good. |
|
|
|
Hi everyone
I'm leaving TechCoin after almost 3 years.
I've written a lot here in this forum since 2014. I fought a lot, buying and selling to prevent delisting from Bittrex. If you see my posts on Bitcointalk, Twitter and Slack, you will realize that I fought a lot.
I gave a lot of opinion about the site and asked for updates and news.
I registered the official domain of TECH (Expiration Date:22-Sep-2017) because it is this address that appears in the few references to the site, including the Wallet. So we could not be without. If you want, Chris, I can transfer with zero costs to you.
I did everything I could to include TECH at TradeSatoshi. Not because it is a good exchange (so far I have nothing against it) but because we needed an alternative to YoBit, as it always seems to be in the eminence of a closing due to the amount of complaints against the exchange. But since TechCoin is at TradeSatoshi, I'm alone buying and selling.
I helped financially that TECH had its blockexplorer again in CryptoID.
For many months I did Wallet installation and recovery tests. I had a lot of trouble because I do not understand anything of this procedures. I still try to leave the wallet open to help the network.
I even created a blockexplorer for TECH but, for lack of technical help, I took it out of the air. I spent about $ 40 (I paid a friend to install and Amazon server payments).
That pump that happened at Yobit, even though it was totally artificial, made me recover all the financial investment in TECH. I sold many coins but bought again almost the same amount. I still have almost 20,000 coins.
The coins I still own will go on sale at YoBit. The few that I have in TradeSatoshi will transfer to YoBit and also go on sale.
I have investment in several currencies. But in TECH's case, it was not just about money. I've commented on other occasions, I sympathized with the currency and how things worked out in 2014. Wallet at RaspberryPI caught my attention because I had just heard about RasPI for the first time.
In this struggle of trying to help organize the house, I learned some things that will stay for my life.
My time is too scarce to keep fighting alone.
Again, I'm ask sorry for my bad writing in English.
I wish you luck, guys.
Thank you
José Luiz
I fully understand, also having helped Tech Coin (TECH) since 2014 & spending 1000's of hours doing everything to build it into something. Just tough without a strong community & 10,000's of altcoins over the last few years didn't make it an easier, as most move with new developments. I am only a BBcoder , tried to help with many other things for TECH & just as you say it is not easy to be few in an altcoin world of many. Takes a lot to keep a stable altcoin, without an ICO or huge premine & funds to build with. The altcoin world, just like many things in the marketing world, has become very tough & what was once easy to get listed on outsourced sites or keep everything running without lots of funds has changed over the years. I have helped with block explorer funds many times, as has cecilbdemented & a few others over the years. Even looked into building one, but also lack of enough experience to get one up & running @ the time to save TECH a little overhead budget. Although 3 party block explorers are more trusted, as TECH did have a simple abe block explorer in the start & then better 3 party ones started to be built. Also having learned many things along the way of TECH, which I didn't know from the start & will always be remembered. The software world is fast paced & changes so often, but open sourced creates many lessons. The Internet has changed many things around the world, like the winds of time & ways of the old to new. I see so much potential in what can be built here (these applications in general), but also know that it takes much time or & money to build anything. I gave my time & btc to also help from what happen in 2014, but also because of the name TECH. Watching the 10,000+ altcoins with random names start, tech seemed right at the time & not fully understanding then the universal rules on names or being able to research enough. Who knows what will come of TECH, maybe someday it will be build upon again & or maybe it will get left with the 10,000 other altcoins. I would love to see it get more development, but am not able to do anything other than BBcode & don't have lots of btc to help it right now. Will just continue doing what ever I can, if the time for hardware ever comes into play & or support needed. I will help, but also see that without community or development it will be quite slow years. |
|
|
|
BitDirect v1.3.1-Linux update from yesterday tested on Linux Mint, works great & looks great with the new update. //unable to open in Ubuntu 17.04, the previous Linux build does work & or I could have had it open? Will retest it again to see Edit: also sending a tip to both lukless & epicfailman |
|
|
|
Thanx both
Your welcome, for future problems of being on a fork (or other peers broadcasting one) & not having to delete the entire blockchain (lucky it's small database size now for a full resync) you can just use rescan=1 to fix it. chicks.conf //only if on a fork rescan=1
connect=149.56.154.75:10123 chicks.conf //normal configuration rescan=1
addnode=149.56.154.75:10123 { "addr" : "91.90.235.216:53786", "services" : "00000001", "lastsend" : 1493825394, "lastrecv" : 1493825225, "conntime" : 1493824043, "version" : 60013, "subver" : "/Satoshi:1.0.0/", "inbound" : true, "startingheight" : 17, "banscore" : 0 }, |
|
|
|
Can anyone now tell correct correct addnodes? So it doesn sync properly to main chain and YoloBit.
On my side, the chicks.conf file connect=149.56.154.75:10123
Don't miss to delete the blockchain is you are already sync on the bad blockchain. We are still waiting for a developer fix.  There are no more nodes on the forked network, you don't want to keep connect= & that's only for the sync. Also rescan=1 will solve without having to delete the blockchain, but a developer fix isn't going to fix anything & that's just a simple fact. Sure a coder could code in checkpoints, but without a change to the staking limit from unlimited to say 30 days & then spend weeks trying to get everyone to update. The network is stable now, pushing updates & trying to get everyone on the new update would just cause more problems, but setting a reminder for a few months ahead would work. rescan=1
addnode=94.23.102.99:10123
addnode=90.225.61.229:10123
addnode=149.56.154.75:10123
addnode=50.83.4.208:10123
addnode=13.93.84.61:10123
addnode=88.88.166.130
addnode=75.72.134.175
addnode=90.225.61.229
addnode=86.184.84.190
addnode=178.121.121.90
addnode=148.251.54.6
addnode=185.11.195.45
addnode=169.0.231.41
addnode=98.115.147.74
addnode=217.175.119.125 |
|
|
|
Can anyone now tell correct correct addnodes? So it doesn sync properly to main chain and YoloBit.
| | {
"addr" : "94.23.102.99:10123",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1493822149,
"lastrecv" : 1493822357,
"conntime" : 1493822111,
"version" : 60013,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:1.0.0/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 57442,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "13.93.84.61:10123",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1493822357,
"lastrecv" : 1493822357,
"conntime" : 1493822124,
"version" : 60013,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:1.0.0/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 57442,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "90.225.61.229:10123",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1493822357,
"lastrecv" : 1493822357,
"conntime" : 1493822281,
"version" : 60013,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:1.0.0/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 57444,
"banscore" : 0
},
| {
"addr" : "50.83.4.208:10123",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1493822357,
"lastrecv" : 1493822357,
"conntime" : 1493822315,
"version" : 60013,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:1.0.0/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 57444,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "149.56.154.75:10123",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1493822615,
"lastrecv" : 1493822615,
"conntime" : 1493755278,
"version" : 60013,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:1.0.0/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 57273,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "86.184.84.190:60158",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1493822615,
"lastrecv" : 1493822615,
"conntime" : 1493755306,
"version" : 60013,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:1.0.0/",
"inbound" : true,
"startingheight" : 57273,
"banscore" : 0
},
| {
"addr" : "169.0.231.41:21341",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1493822615,
"lastrecv" : 1493822112,
"conntime" : 1493755314,
"version" : 60013,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:1.0.0/",
"inbound" : true,
"startingheight" : 57273,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "88.88.166.130:52378",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1493822615,
"lastrecv" : 1493822370,
"conntime" : 1493755338,
"version" : 60013,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:1.0.0/",
"inbound" : true,
"startingheight" : 57273,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "178.121.121.90:8771",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1493822615,
"lastrecv" : 1493822217,
"conntime" : 1493755365,
"version" : 60013,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:1.0.0/",
"inbound" : true,
"startingheight" : 57273,
"banscore" : 0
},
| {
"addr" : "98.115.147.74:47010",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1493822615,
"lastrecv" : 1493821697,
"conntime" : 1493755382,
"version" : 60013,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:1.0.0/",
"inbound" : true,
"startingheight" : 57273,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "75.72.134.175:28685",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1493822615,
"lastrecv" : 1493822615,
"conntime" : 1493755619,
"version" : 60013,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:1.0.0/",
"inbound" : true,
"startingheight" : 57274,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "148.251.54.6:46702",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1493822615,
"lastrecv" : 1493822612,
"conntime" : 1493755684,
"version" : 60013,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:1.0.0/",
"inbound" : true,
"startingheight" : 57274,
"banscore" : 0
},
| {
"addr" : "217.175.119.125:21995",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1493822615,
"lastrecv" : 1493821697,
"conntime" : 1493756677,
"version" : 60013,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:1.0.0/",
"inbound" : true,
"startingheight" : 57278,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "90.225.61.229:54151",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1493822615,
"lastrecv" : 1493822370,
"conntime" : 1493807372,
"version" : 60013,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:1.0.0/",
"inbound" : true,
"startingheight" : 57284,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "185.11.195.45:56996",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1493822615,
"lastrecv" : 1493822371,
"conntime" : 1493819048,
"version" : 60013,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:1.0.0/",
"inbound" : true,
"startingheight" : 57432,
"banscore" : 0
},
|
|
|
|
|
|
Great to see that the testnet wasn't a waste of time or resources, thanks HCLivess & testing the mainnet for 24hr+ so far. Do we need to do anything for the testing development reward, or just sign an alias registration on the mainnet?
|
|
|
|
have you tried to download the missing dll-file manually? maybe this will solve the problem
No, not using the GUI anyway & was just testing the Windows GUI & Linux GUI |
|
|
|
http://chicks.acc-pool.pw///any chance the block explorer could update a few points? 1. "proof-of-work" : 1.05937409 < to > "proof-of-stake" : 0.00024414 2. add the network staking weight to the "Network (GH/s)" api 3. add the BTC Price with YoBit, Nova, or Tradesatoshi (or add a new tab Markets like other block explorers have) "1. "proof-of-work" : 1.05937409 " - but it looks like POW is over, can not mine this coin any more, correct me if I am wrong. so we got 123799.714 CKS coins in circulation for now, and inflation is coming only by POS with percentage 25% per year. Yes PoW ended a while ago, but the block explorer still shows that for stats & should be updated if possible. |
|
|
|
I'll recompile the windows and linux gui wallets this week. What dll is missing?
MSVCP120.dll //maybe a 32bit compile & need a 64bit? Windows wallet works fine for me.
Any plans for exchanges soon ?
I just checked the windows wallet. it works on my desktop and laptop...yeah the linux wallet should be updated
32 or 64 bit O.S. both systems are 64 bit. do you have the error on a 32 bit or 64 bit windows? hmmm, a 64 bit Windows 7 & it shows that error. I've seen the missing MSVCP120.dll error before, but it's been a while & forget why? |
|
|
|
I'll recompile the windows and linux gui wallets this week. What dll is missing?
MSVCP120.dll //maybe a 32bit compile & need a 64bit? Windows wallet works fine for me.
Any plans for exchanges soon ?
I just checked the windows wallet. it works on my desktop and laptop...yeah the linux wallet should be updated
32 or 64 bit O.S. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
