|
...but please do not say I enjoyed Atlas Shrugged and revere it. The book is a horrible read. End of story.
K thx bai.
|
|
|
|
|
Anybody want to get a collection encrypted wallets together and put them on a P2P torrent on PirateBay? Just an idea.
|
|
|
|
Surprising, you actually look pretty sharp in this one, even thought you say you're tired. Just out of curiosity, what are you trying to get out of this? Is it just an experiment to see how it works? The value is science and me having more hours to live. |
|
|
|
Could you explain what you really want and what you will use it for? gpg -ca will convert the input (wallet.dat) into a symmetrically encrypted ascii text block such as this: -----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-----
jA0EAwMCZGu2org4FqJgyVXAHqwktVpZRZhDmGTlVnscUL6bxvPjyjv6cNXzKoCy
DBcr5tH3mBTDnvwSedBdJEI586w8PuahfdbRoritDrMqgT1KAsGMusMcERQh1gpV
V6dpo+ky
=oJ2k
-----END PGP MESSAGE----- gpg with no flag arguments will decrypt it again. In both cases you'll need to provide a symmetric key, any passphrase will do. You'll see in a moment. Thank you! |
|
|
|
$ gpg -o wallet.asc -ca wallet.dat
$ gpg wallet.asc
If it would be valuable to you, could you explain what this does and what every part does? |
|
|
|
|
>can't post video response
|
|
|
|
Mr. Gage, you have my reverence. If there is a god, may he bless with you with all the musty old wood you can muster.
Are you suggesting me getting a woody wooden idol? I suggest you make a wooden idol in YOUR image. |
|
|
|
I've considered this multiple times. Woodland around here is only 900 dollars or so per acre, the trees can be cut and converted into basic houses, the rest for firewood, simple network and VOIP for out-of-camp communication, food can be raised pretty easily once the woods are removed, in the mean-time, could survive via MREs/similar products and in tents for a while, until area is cleared. Taxes would be a reason for money, so we would have to sell off some of our produced products [food/whatever].
1. Register Bitcoin as a religion. 2. Say taxes are against scripture. 3.  ? 4. PROFIT |
|
|
|
|
America incited any violence on Iran's part. If they are going to blow us up, it's our own damn fault. The best thing we can do for our national security and lowering Iran as a threat -- nuclear or otherwise -- is leaving them the fuck alone.
However, a war is what they want and a war is what they are going to get, not from Iran and not from the American people, but the bankers. Wealth destruction on our end is more gold in the pockets of big banking interests. They control the money supply that funds this crap.
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Gage, you have my reverence. If there is a god, may he bless with you with all the musty old wood you can muster.
|
|
|
|
|
I pledge to live and sustain myself in a dedicated Bitcoin community, if one is made and if the love of my life doesn't become a permanent fixture and prevent me from doing so.
|
|
|
|
Yes because accountable regulation would exist as opposed to regulatory monopolies that cannot fail and be easily displaced.
So what you're saying is if another unaccountable private company (with no interested in protecting any of the national and public resources, mind) regulates another private companies dumping of toxic waste in a public and national resource this will be the perfect outcome? Ah but the private company will be accountable assuming its being supported by paying constituents. If people desire clean environments and contract a company to keep said environments in check, a company failing to keep its part of the contract will not be paid and thus be quickly displaced by one that meets the desires of its constituents. I don't remember ever having time to go down to my local slurry pit and asking the regulatory team there to have all the gear provided to me to perform an audit of it's services. Maybe I could hire another unaccountable private company to audit the first unaccountable private accountancy company? Heh if such rigorous regulation for slurpees was truly desirable people would pay for it. Also, said regulatory body would be accountable to the customers paying for its services. If they don't trust them nor desire them , they will not be reimbursed and thus cease to exist. |
|
|
|
Yes because accountable regulation would exist as opposed to regulatory monopolies that cannot fail and be easily displaced.
So what you're saying is if another unaccountable private company (with no interested in protecting any of the national and public resources, mind) regulates another private companies dumping of toxic waste in a public and national resource this will be the perfect outcome? Ah but the private company will be accountable assuming its being supported by paying constituents. If people desire clean environments and contract a company to keep said environments in check, a company failing to keep its part of the contract will not be paid and thus be quickly displaced by one that meets the desires of its constituents. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
