After Liverpool got a lose with 3 goals, I also didn't expect Liverpool in the final round. I think Liverpool has been eliminated, they won't have a chance to win with 4 goals in Leg 2. We should have another team to accompany Leverkusen in the final round. Sure, the winner in the match AC Milan vs AS Roma probably becomes the candidate of the finalist. Because AS Roma could win in Leg 1, I also think AS Roma may be the opponent of Leverkusen in the final round.

Anyway, I'm very disappointed with Liverpool. I predicted to see Liverpool in the final because they are performing very well in EPL. I guessed they will perform the same in Europa league, but they seemed to fail in this competition. Now, it is just to expect a miracle for qualifying in the next round. Atalanta has killed them in Leg 1.

It is impossible to deny that any events in the world of this magnitude have an impact on markets, including cryptomarkets. But OP’s statements that the events taking place between Iran and Israel directly influenced the current fall of bitcoin look a little hasty and not entirely verified (by facts). You correctly noted that it would be necessary to find out what exactly influenced what was happening (bitcoin collapse). Or is this just a coincidence?

I don't think so it'll be a big bull run for BTC again especially because of the problem that major countries are facing due to the Iran and Israel conflict. America and the European union are under a lot of pressure and they are also under a great pressure by the UN approval of no military supply to Israel..
America was exporting about 3.5 Billion $ weapons to Israel. The big investors will now face a backlash and it'll be very difficult to make BTC run again into the market as it requires a lot of capital.

Of course brother, I also thought like you, we know that now everything is improving, so if I make a simple computer now, then in the future if I want to do some heavy work, the simple computer may not support that work, then I need to update the computer again. That's why I made a computer with a good configuration now, so that I don't have to spend any extra money to update it again in the next 4/5 years. I hope no one will think my thoughts wrong.

Before this game u had mentioned the fact that Girona may not be able to penetrate the defense of atletico as they have a relatively fair strength within their defense such that i don't trust girona to be tactical enough to get pass that defense in such a way it will give them victory. They actually tried their best but then they were contending a good team with a better form and good strength so loosing out is actually expected.

Atletico were playing from home and i think it was actually enough for them to see as an advantage because playing from home will gat your morale high since you will be having majority of the stadium filled with your fans and you wouldn't want to perform any less before them , that asides, Atletico has got a better tactical approach as compared to girona and that's why i mentioned sometimes ago that Girona basically uses an advantage of winning smaller teams and then getting to gather points from them while they try to draw or probably loose to bigger team.

This tactics has helped them a long way to the point they are now on the table and so they literally try to maintain it but then it becomes obvious that they are just little above average whenever they get to meet bigger team that has got a better form and strength than they actually do so i still don't actually get to rate them as a strong team yet but just within t he average and are most likely getting to improve beyond average.

Atletico Madrid secured a vital 3-1 victory over Girona, with Antoine Griezmann scoring twice to boost their top-four aspirations. Atletico's victory places them in contention for Champions League qualification, while Girona's fourth-minute lead was short-lived as Atletico staged a remarkable comeback.

Delhi was forced to replace Anrich Nortje with Mukesh Kumar, after the former leaked plenty of runs in the first innings. And their experiment didn't worked well, as Mukesh also went for more than 10 runs per over. Although their pacers failed, the two spinners (Kuldeep Yadav and Axar Patel) returned figures of 8-0-46-3. On the other hand, the pacers (Khaleel Ahmed, Ishant Sharma and Mukesh Kumar) went for 12-0-118-4). Pacers bowled 12 overs and went for almost 10 runs per over. On the other hand, the spinners went for less than 10 runs per over.

I think the buying time is already over. This time is for waiting the selling time (exit). We already have many dumps, most of us must already buy Bitcoin many times. The pump was also happened already, I think everything looks like as you predicted.

A few days ago we had a chance to touch $75k dollars but instead of going to that level, the Bitcoin market went back to dumping after going closer to $73k. If you look at today's market, you will definitely get a lot of pause because the market has experienced a lot of volatility. From the market $71k dollars it turned into volatility and came down to $64k dollars which is a huge bear.  But we should hope that as we have Bitcoin halving waiting next week, the market will bounce back soon. However, since the Bitcoin market is still very low, you can hold on to the investment if you want, and you will certainly have the desire to make a good profit in a few days. Since the market is jumping right now we are definitely going to see it pumping higher in a few days, then surely the Bitcoin market will be in a good position. And if you invest bitcoin now and hold for long time then it will be best for you, and you will get much more when bitcoin fry reaches its peak.

Actually I wanted to build a computer with a good configuration from the beginning, now that I got that chance, I didn't miss that opportunity. Because I thought that if I make a simple computer now, then I will not want to redevelop this computer later or my home will not agree, so I made the computer by deciding to do what I want to do now. I have now made a good computer instead of making a normal computer.


And yes, I haven't sold my entire holding, I definitely have some more holdings (which I will hold for a long time), and I have been holding using the DCA method on a monthly basis for a long time. And I am still investment. I will never close my holdings.

No way, transaction fees weren't that high today, during the time I posted, it was around 6-7 dollars but just right now it's up to $20 based on average native segwit transaction of 140 sat/vByte.
$40 is also still affordable for some people. If transaction fees $100 or something like that and will stay that way for more than two weeks, I think then there will be a major decision made about Bitcoin's block size or other solutions but I think that people just move on altcoins and don't use Bitcoin for daily transactions.

That's why it's really important to explain the volatility of bitcoin correctly so that they can immediately see its risk, and at least in this case you can immediately see if they will invest or not.
But if they see the brighter side of Bitcoin, it is possible that they will invest in the end even if we say that the risk that it has is high.

We also know that Bitcoin is only one of the high risk assets, but even so there are still institutional investors who buy, the question is why?

A few decades ago, the explosion of the internet, information technology and real estate helped many people change their lives, and formed a new generation of world billionaires. Now, Bitcoin is seen as a new asset class that can bring similar, or even greater, opportunities to future generations. Those who can grasp this opportunity can become a new class of millionaires and billionaires.

Not only that, Bitcoin and the crypto market have opened a completely new technology door, which is blockchain, a technology that I think will dominate the world in the future. Any field in the future will also use blockchain as its backbone database. Besides, Bitcoin can be seen as a new value storage asset class besides gold.

I don't dare think about Bitcoin becoming a global currency. This is quite complicated and with an unstable world like today, it is very unlikely that this will happen. I can only predict that Bitcoin will be a valuable asset that any country will want to have in its treasury in the future.

I don't think we will have a situation when Bitcoin transaction fees will only be affordable for large institutions and not for individuals. If that becomes the case, then we might demand for fork to increase the block size.
Network is centralized at some point because centralized exchanges hold the most reserves and have the highest trading volume and secondly, China and the USA own the most mining hash rate. So, bitcoin is centralized at some point.

Greetings,everyone
At this point in time,i was wondering about the opinions of dear forum users
There is a long period of time when the bitcoin price is at a rather high level,compared to the price a year ago
Some users have sold all their bitcoins as soon as the price became higher than the price at which they bought them
But i'm interested in the actions of those who bought their bitcoins more than 2-3 years ago and sold them now or are still hodling them
How did you find the strength and patience to resist this temptation?
Please answer people who hodl not $1-2k,but at least from $20k
After all,the fear of loss from investing $1k is much easier to bear than from investing $20k
For me this is the best indicator of inner strength and patience,because the greater the amount of investment,the greater the scale of his personality

P.S i've personally hedl bitcoins for a few years and it's well over $2k

-Regards

This season, Napoli have no hope of making anything happen, in fact they are having difficulty finishing in the European zone. If we trace it back a little, the beginning of Napoli decline occurred when they parted ways with Spalletti, and his successors Rudi Garcia and Walter Mazzarri failed to manage the club, leading to their dismissal. In the remaining matches this season, Napoli is just trying to finish in a better position, and who knows, they can get a ticket to the European Confederation League. Regarding next season, Napoli will face many challenges, especially keeping their star players from leaving.

~snip

For the first part, you are so wrong, and it shows that you do not understand economics and national security. Without writing stories or mincing words, just research how many times the USA and some other top countries have changed the face of their currencies in the past 2 decades. You should also research the reasons for that so that you will be rightly enlightened about this.

Wrong, blockchain is a useless vaporware, so if you try to combine it with a proven working tech like AI or gaming, you still end up with useless product in the end, because it can't compete with normal solutions. Blockchain games are strictly worse than regular games, you need  to go through all the incoveniences of sending transactions, managing wallets, waiting for confirmations and for what? To play some garbage cashgrab game that no one would ever buy if it wasn't for a chance for making money for poor people?

The way I understand your content or thread. The whole thing is talking about the olden days. Savings is ancient idea and not a modern idea. In this innovative world the teachers and lecturers you mentioned are not aware of this new technology and since they were using that savings method so they continue but when you orient them about this new technology revolution and the investment, they will choose investment to savings because in the university, there are computer lecturers who are aware of this innovation and they are part of the benefit. So if those lecturers tell their colleagues then they will also invest. So in this modern world awareness is needed. There was a lecturer that I meant few months back and I explained everything to him and I showed him my wallet, and instant I made a transaction and he saw everything so he asked me to teach him and I didn't and now he is an investor.

Maintaining physical banks is expensive. You need to pay personnel, building rent, electricity, water, other maintenance expenses, and so on. If a bank can do away with all this, so much money is saved. These savings could, in turn, be used to offer higher interests in the digital savings of clients.

But, other than this, digital banks are becoming more attractive because it provides convenience. And, probably more importantly, they're offering very useful functions. So, not only will you avoid travels going to the banks and long lines, you have also a wallet that you can use for everything. If it's drained, unlike banks, you can easily go to the nearest store and refill it.