Would you consider adding back www.bitcoingem.com? This site has the most traffic by far of the simple but entertaining chain game sites (there are many knock-offs now). The chances of winning are high, and as you can see many enjoy playing this game. It is a simple gambling game that many understand and play, I think it deserves to be listed on your site as it is the original and gaining a lot of attention on not only this forum: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=138749.0 but on reddit for its unique and creative game play. Thanks |
|
|
|
|
sad to see ignorant prejudice rants still exist. I for one love jewish people and think the commentary in this thread is absurd.
|
|
|
|
Thanks for adjusting the rake  |
|
|
|
|
I do not believe a crash will happen anytime soon. From the market data it appears there is substantial demand and flash crashes are not causing panic selling on a large scale. The small dips are leading to alot of bids, or people trying to get a discount to short term average.
|
|
|
|
Consider maybe adding captcha? It seems its being botted .. I cant get an entry in if I hit F5 fast enough now =(
yeah, there's a lot of traffic these days. I haven't been able to get on in a while. are bots why somebody was able to buy it out from under me today when the counter said there were 73 seconds to go? have a swell day. I do know that there's some automated requests querying the price of the gem. But I doubt that there are bots actually buying the gem. Maybe some people have a form autofill plugin or something similar. Someone suggested making a single "Buy" button and showing the form after clicking this button, I guess that would be a good idea. I think the buy button would indeed be a good idea. Thats also interesting about automated queries. |
|
|
|
If you are going to play a site like this, play bitcoingem.comThis site has the most traffic and is the original. It is the base site that the OP copied everything from (including, layout, format..). There is less risk associated with the site with the most traffic. Bitcoin Gem is the most popular and thus the only one worth playing. |
|
|
|
eleuthria on BTCGuild obtaining 51% - a response from ASICMINER: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=49417.msg1773665#msg1773665I've received a response from the ASICMINER team. They are aware of BTC Guild's growing share of the network, and have told me that their next batches of power will be split among more pools or even solo mining to avoid a pool reaching 51%. They have also identified that selling hardware is on the table if their own share of the network approaches the 51% level. This doesn't mean the 51% plan in place will change, but it hopefully means the pool will not hit the 45% stage, and any increases in fees if we hit 40% should only last for 1-2 weeks. Im glad to see they will split to other pools in the next deployment cycle. |
|
|
|
|
God that avatar is annoying.
|
|
|
|
Well, at least 163,962 shares belong to other people. And from the remaining we can only speculate how many friedcat is holding himself since he has some partners.
Well I know it's not only him... and the shareholders... but still... 47 600 000 USD ? ? ? Have you seen how many bitcoins ASICMINER mines in a day? How about a week or a month? The valuation of the shares price also includes the public's expectation for the future plans for the company. |
|
|
|
|
User 67117 now at 6,826.64 GH/s on BTC Guild. I have been watching this number slowly increase over the past hour.
|
|
|
|
|
Who knows where it will be by the end of the week..
|
|
|
|
|
Just read majority of this thread. This is unreal. Im sorry for your loss
|
|
|
|
|
Just another reason why BitFunder is the best!
|
|
|
|
Questions:
1. If the price rises before we sell these 1700 BTC in inventory - the company enjoys that as profits right? (In essence, the company sees profits from arbitrage between buying-and-selling price as well as commission from sales - correct?)
2. The maximum bitcoins any single person can buy is capped at 10BTC. So the downside is limited - correct? Do you plan to increase these max order value?
3. How many days does it take for the company to receive the money from Google Checkout? One month? Or do they give some % of the funds within a week and keep the rest as deposit against refund requests?
4. Can you talk about security? Of bitcoins. And of the website itself. Whats been done to make sure no hacker can get access to the funds?
5. Will you be sharing the number of sales data every month?
I would be interssted to hear these questions addressed as well. |
|
|
|
|
Will dividend be paid today DeadTerra?
|
|
|
|
|
Got my satoshis as well, im curious to see what this dividend is
|
|
|
|
How I see price of share floating around $56.
The price of the shares shouldn't really be impacted by BTCUSD. While there are operational costs in USD, they are pretty negligible right now. ASICMINER mines bitcoins, not USD. RMB/Yuan, not USD I agree it still should not matter for the most part, but it will impact ongoing expenses and capital costs at least in a minor way (and it SHOULD be in OUR favor, since the fiat is on the expense side, not the income side.) Thats exactly right. |
|
|
|
So it's exactly as I've written it - there are 400k shares, 250k owns Bitfountain and 150k is owned by smaller investors.
Look up the definition of "exactly" and spare us, please.  Introduction
ASICMINER is a virtual identity totally held by investors of the Bitfountain company. The Bitfountain company's business includes mining with self-built ASIC devices, as well as the sales of them. Currently ASICMINER shareholders holds 163,962 shares, while Bitfountain shareholders holds 236,038 shares.
Now im wondering about these numbers. I might remembering wrong but i believe the last stats at glbse showed around 145xxx shares sold. Something around that. Now its 163,962 shares. Are the difference the shares that werent traded through glbse? Then thats probably the foundation of the confusion about the real amount of sold shares. It's amazing how long this confusion lasts. The blame must lie somewhere between the unorthodox nature of this investment (i.e. self-managed) and the fallout from GLBSE. Normally all equity has to be clearly distributed BEFORE fund-raising, and this was stated in the original contract. That's why in principle 200k shares are associated with the founders (bitfountain) and 200k are associated with the equity ASICMINER. The fact that not all shares were sold doesn't automatically upgrade the share holdings of the founders. The 35k shares are unsold equity and owned by the "company" bitfountain and can be used in future fund raising. All dividends payed to these 35k shares goes directly into retained earnings, which may make its way into dividend payments again. (Thus in effect the "dividend" payed to the 35k gets redistributed in a 200k:165k fashion between the founders and the ASICMINER shareholders). The recursion here can be a bit confusing at first, but is only important when dividends are payed. Thus the proper distribution for dividends is 200k:165k, and NOT 235k:165k. However, for simplicity bitfountain may decide to pay dividends according to the 1/400,000 rule, at which the distribution becomes 200k:200k, and the 35k dividends to the unsold equity makes it into the next dividend payment or company financing, because they act as retained earnings... friedcat may want to clearly make a statement on how he wants to implement this (200k:165k or 200k:200k with delayed dividend), before he prepares the next dividend payments and signs off the financial statements. Thank you for this. |
|
|
|
Hi there,
Given that I only use weexchange to get funds into Bitfunder, can I set this to be automated? I.e. any bitcoins credited to my weexchange account get direct transfered into bitfunder after the required number of confirmations?
Thanks.
Myrddin
Its really pretty easy and instant to transfer once you have in weex to get into bitfunder. |
|
|
|
I have paid to Johns Escrow address. Thanks John and Gabit. Now waiting on the confirmation of shares transfered
The tx is still not confirmed according to blockchain.info... I guess you forgot to include a tx fee when you sent it. Paid to John's escrow. Waiting on confirmation.
Confirmed. John my 74 BTC transaction now has 3 confirmations. Thanks! |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
