Well, the thread is still dead until these gentlemen think it is appropriate to go to serve their investors. Thanks again to Neuthor for his answers, which I suppose in a private and personal way - if he is not a member of the JNT team -. I, anyway, will continue to expose my doubts in this thread opened by the Jibrel Network team. Many of us do not believe that a medium as fast as the telegram is suitable, but rather a forum where exhibitions are more leisurely and are perfectly recorded in time for anyone to access and take advantage of them. It is possible in days, weeks, months, the JNT team reappears with their great words appealing that if things go crooked, they wait for us with open arms in the future, once we change our opinion. Actually, I have no idea how you can be so disrespectful, paint your inattention to the color that they paint. It really is an imposition difficult to assume at the investor level ... but hey, you do not have too many options after having fallen more than 90% from the price reached on its release to the market. It is evident that this position does not stimulate the Jibrel Network team enough to address the doubts that this may generate for those who, trusting in their good work and their project, have entered into it.

Well ... the matter: We have already seen the JCash toy, its solvency test, etc ... now well: Why can we create JCash? Do you accept that token somewhere? Some exchange, financial entity ... something? We go there, we overturn our ethers and exchange them for USEFUL currencies? Is that what we have to contribute as investors, not with what remains of our investment, but with other investors? In the month of AUGUST, a member of the team confirmed in this thread that JCash was ACTIVE. Like entering the link facilitated to make conversions, it only gave options for Switzerland, UK and Germany ... later, before the normal complaints that it was not like that, it qualified that it would be ACTIVE for users of those countries 3 weeks, after which it I would be for the rest. Is it active now? They consider active a token that is not accepted anywhere ... or is accepted in many and we are not well informed

With little hope that this consultation will be taken care of, I leave it in the thread for believing it to be of interest to the community ... appreciating that anyone outside the structure of Jibrel throws a little light on the matter, in case of being able to it. On the other hand, a suggestion: If Jibrel Network is not going to attend your official btctalk thread ... why do not you close it? While it is open, the disregard suffered becomes quite difficult to grasp.

A greeting and Thanks forward.

Thanks neuthor ... everything has been much clearer. This type of indications are very well received here. I'm not used to telegram and the truth is that in other communication channels the pace of this project is almost non-existent. Here very little and discord, nothing.

We hope that the information contributions, as valuable as yours, are produced here more usually.

Greetings and thank you.

Thank you, neuthor...perfect explanation. Really valious for people out of the financial system...thanks.

But some questions,please....where is possible to change the JCash by fiat money ...and receive fiat in a personal bank account ? This service goes actually ? Theres some "official provider"  like a bank, funds company, etc ?

Another : Some JNT Tokens will be burned after the operation to change JCash to fiat ? How much ? That affects the JNT supply ?

The last, sorry : I read some information about backing transfers in 75% of JNT Tokens and 25% of FIAT currency ... is it correct ... at what point in the process does it occur? (between which parts?)

Thank you for your aid. Really.

An explanation for the comunity of this table, please ? https://jcash.network/proof-of-solvency  


What is exactly  in that context : "Solvency Requirement"? Liquidity ? Circulating ? JNT requirement ? Is possible some practical exemple ? Thanks

Then...you confirm that Jcash is active ? ( i have to sign a week ago and the optinos are only for Germany, Switzerland and UK ) And all the rest ?

Hello friends ... I have 2 transactions sent from my Litecoin wallet and are pending the balance ... but they do not confirm nor arrive at destination. I have the transaction ID of the 2 ... but nothing appears in the explorer ( it says something like "after the last block")

  What I can do? it is urgent.

Thank you

After all this time of accidents ... is there any project that is WORSE than DBIX 3 months ago they announced LYKOS in 10 days ... and they continue with this structure of wallets with failures that almost no other project, for shame, would be allowed to take out even in tests ... hacks, fifth division exchanges, 51% attacks , continuous ...

... Being a project that affects the image of the blockchain project in MENA that the UAE wants to lead ... there is no authority to take the reins, expand the budget and a capable team ... or simply, apart from this group of imcompetent of this work that does nothing but muddy blockchian expansion plans in the area? ALREADY, IS ENOUGH! STOP once and for all time !!!

9 years ago that the blockchain, with BITCOIN, began its journey ... you can not present SERIOUS projects with this level of amateurs who seem to have given 4 classes of programming in 4 afternoons, PLEASE !!!

An invitation link to Factom's discord, please? Thank you

I sincerely regret the tone of my previous post, but I am very frustrated with this project ... precisely because I was so excited about it from the beginning. Each year I enter with a solid position in 2 projects, this year, JNT was one of them. My identification with their asset tokenization approach was robust, really strong. An expected approach, as the next crypto step, came at a perfect moment.

His initial image was also very attractive. Reputed advisors and contacts of greater interest.

I know perfectly that technology has its cycles, that dabate does not deserve to lose a minute in it.

But I just do not understand how a wallet, after 9 months open to user testing, and of course, I suppose, a team of technicians, may not have received the study and sufficient level of proof to not be supported and openly guaranteed to esast heights of the evolution of the project. IN 9 months only a product can be contrasted and not having done it gives me an impression of sloppiness or dismissal that leaves me stupefied. Precisely with the technical rigor that an approach like Jibrel requires to be reliable. I do not know how something so elementary can be "overlooked" in a project that shows the HIGH LEVEL of this one in other of its faces ... and for that reason I am stupefied.

I hope that a misunderstanding or a failure of attention has been, although it is not explained enough ... but this project must draw a resounding "point and separate" with this lamentable chapter. My impression is that the image has prevailed abroad rather than the strength and technical consolidation of its proposal - that is why I am seriously assaulted by finding the same line of irrelevant communications that seem there only because I do not break the communicative timeline or that of a image backed by extense factors or reputations ... than another where the solvency and robustness of its technical developments are at the heart of its contribution and more at such absolutely elementary levels as a wallet, an explorer, etc ... My impression is that it has neglected that extension of the project, precisely when without it, the project is nothing. I am not inside ... but that is my sincere impression and as such, I transmit it, as a kind of feedback that could serve as an alert. I hope that someone serves as a reflection (and point of inflection, that what I read, has already been contemplated with the increase of technical personnel).

I am supporting the project, although the months until the first development generate serious uncertainty and I know I am taking a considerable risk for it ... but that is not going to be relieved with twits reminders about saving my private keys, about "imminent and mysterious news-bomb ", nor celebrating the global notoriety of the project will have a few venues here and there ... that notoriety is earned with serious and effective work. Same as the support of new partners in the project, both at the level of investment and collaboration.

I sincerely hope the best for everyone and that all this happens as a bad episode that served as a lesson to know exactly where the important thing is.

With this, I close my contribution on this point, because I do not think that giving a thousand laps will help the least, even to the precise work environment to reset the necessary issues ... and the last thing I want is to disturb.

I hope that helps

I appreciate the invitation, and I do not want to be rude, but I just want to see WORK.

Jibrel Network sells disruptive technology ... but it takes NINE MONTHS to validate something as elementary in a crypto project as a wallet.

As an investor, I am SOLD OUT of cosmetic twits, central banks "in the pocket", glowing futures and words, words and words. And, as it seems, his line of impressing the market through these channels still persists. And personally, it seems to me that they have not understood something as simple as that the crypto market is SATURATED with promises and easy words. And if you, after nine months promising heaven on earth, have not had enough capacity to make your wallet available to the public and now you have added half a dozen workers to your team ... you may have to add another dozen more. This is not about reorienting things as if we were at minute zero, but about recovering lost time, gentlemen. Because they tell us 17 times that Tapscott is an advisor in his project, we will not feel better and we will not have more information. In any case, worse ... and with the same information we had in minute 1.

Have, please, the attention to effectively communicate your TECHNOLOGICAL advances through this channel. Personally, it is enough for me. I do not need more communication, but results.

Good luck in your endeavor. And a lot, a lot of energy.

Despite the fact that whoever does not comply with his temporary commitments, in my opinion, is not the best reference as authority to establish new temporary commitments ... we have already arrived in July (without news of the roadmap, beyond the gap itself. although that's not new in the Jibrel Network project)


From the confusion, severely punished by the market of his famous teaching, and despite our previous conversation, his strategy has not gone beyond maintaining a line of communication with absolutely irrelevant messages, retweets of greetings, simple greetings from prominent people unrelated with the project, carried out previously, etc ... attempts of feedback with the users in an open wallet to use and try it EIGHT MONTHS ago (making it clear that the developments are secondary for you as BASIC arguments of the project). Very negative and worse, repeating the frivolity already discussed earlier here.


Anyway, as part of the investment community of JNT, I continue to receive as a response, marginalization and indifference ... and waiting (resignedly with less confidence in the project) an OFFICIAL AND SERIOUS communication about the current status of the project.

They commented that they delayed something similar to a "new road map" for the beginning of July. Well, we are already in July: when the basic attention to a community plunged in total disinformation?

Without further ado, of my deepening disappointment every day, thank you for your response to having at least certain criteria to remain in the project or not (right, inno, of the most elementary legitimacy) I send you a greeting.

I can not fail to also highlight the splendid opportunity of Jibrel Network to join the positive current evolution of DBIX at this moment, which, even though it is another project, would have an enormous impact on the leading role of the MENA area in the sector ... great benefit for this project. It has been, punctually in recent weeks, a great missed opportunity.

Another reason to solve all this "bad environment" the sooner, the better.

to jibrel team :

I appreciate the explanations.

Personally (and without knowing what implies the closure of work in Jcash regarding entry into action of a bank or another type of possible partner) the situation is very clear: A lot of promotion and no development on the table.

This is a double-edged sword for several issues:

Promotion, talks, stellar agreements that have been able to transcend ... have been a good part of the impact of Jibrel.

But the more you talk without support ... myor is the gap between selling excellence ... and having ... NOTHING. And that is very negative and can mark the value of your word, which is very important in any proposal.

Everything can go from a (possible) great marketing (very positive) ... to embrace a flatly negative image of charlatanism.

The case is that after a year open to the public and 8 months with the announced Jwallet (more than enough time for a product test), the timmings have become distorted and have lost a lot of credibility. Objectively: It has been a long time without getting that product completely closed and guaranteed ... I do not understand all that delay without taking it with more effort.

On the other hand, the Jwallet will be the first review of the developments of Jibrel Network ... in a proposal that, beyond the crypts that move the Jwallet, will move assets of the highest value among organizations / users of the largest seriousness and reputation ... with which the output of this first product can not afford any error or can be definitely fatal to the project.

In my opinion, it is not time to make the gap between "theory" (promises) and real development even bigger. I have already read that more devs have been hired in the last month or two months ... but it may be worth it not only to shorten dates, but to produce above what is reasonable and to hire even more.

The movements of Jibrel, the talks of the 2 members that came out of the AA a couple of months ago, the "suggested" contacts ... were very positive and exciting ... and now, with all due respect, the disappointment is , precisely for that reason, being even bigger and harder.

Equally ... it does not seem appropriate to work with third-row exchanges that may spill your reputation of disability or insecurity. More are worth few ... but serious and reputable.

I do not know when the roadmap and the timmings will come out EXACTLY ... but, as I said in previous posts ... it is information that I miss EVERY DAY. Every day that passes, without a comprehensive and honest explanation, I see that what I have in my hands with Jibrel is NOTHING ... and not because basically it is like that, but because I would not even know how to explain it. As an investor and part of the community, I need to have something much more solid and more assimilated. I insist that I do not know if an AMA or a detailed explanation of the roadmap less "official" than what seems to be announced is ABSOLUTELY recommended.

Yes I can affirm, with no intention of belittling anyone, that my optimism towards the project is seriously altered ... something that, frankly, saddens me greatly. Right now I see things VERY different from a month or two ago (and it is not a matter of pure speculation, but of faith and hope ... currently, I find it very difficult to remain in the project).

Anyway, I do not want to enter into a negative loop around the same issues that would not lead to anything positive and as I believe that, humbly, my positions are clear, I only leave my thanks for your attention, greetings and wishes of the best decisions.

Thank you.


Personally ... the simple cordiality of being attended, help, believe me ... and I reiterate my gratitude. I'm in crypts since 2011 and many of my acquaintances are from that time ... and you can not imagine the expectations that Jibrel Network had aroused among so many irrelevant proposals that appear again and again in the ranking. Nothing would revive me more than to recover the impression of a month ago back ... but you have to be VERY ATTENTIVE to certain things. In my opinion and with all due respect ... but also with some indignation for not treating something "mine" with due attention.

Yes, I would like to point out that trying to minimize "minor" errors sometimes leads to major errors ... so, please exercise diligence in the Jwallet case and stick to the roadmap onwards, because that brings many added problems.

Thanks again for your attention ... and the best of luck for you ... it will be for everyone.

EEA information is only for the ignorant people, simply smoke ... and it has no relevance whatsoever that EEA (whose membership only responds to the payment of the amount of open access to the whole world and not to merit or recognition) or the Ethereum team themselves push for their project to succeed. In addition ... this would benefit both the members of EEA and the rest of ERC20.

What is becoming clearer every day is that Jibrel Network does not fulfill roadmap nor at the minimum level of getting its Jwallet. A lot of talk around the world promising the most splendid future ... but development = 0.

I do not know the grace that the delay with an operative wallet will make the owners of the more than 2 million JNT tokens that have been hacked tonight in coinrail. More than 2% supply of the project.

Meanwhile ... a lot of costume, a lot of fantastic prophecies ... but not a wallet ... that has any blockchain of the fifth division.

A few weeks ago I read that JNT had offered to audit the movement of their repositories of Github to show transparency regarding their activity (something that many blockchains have done). Well, there were four indicators (I can not find the link) ... and the 4 were worst, among the lowest in the ranking.

Then you hear the Jibrel Network conferences here and there and everything is "brilliant team", "hard work" and blahblahblah ...

By the way ... as, at the request of Jibrel Network, "we remain attentive" to the news around the JWallet ... well, "we're still frustrated" ... Are you going to take out the JWallet at once ... or not? ?? Because the illusion and the seriousness that was transmitted initially is breaking up.

The team has to do is comply once and, to begin, deliver your Jwallet . The "visions" and easy talk run two days...and the project exists ONE YEAR ago.

And allude to the independence of the cryptomarket is the most ridiculous at this time: The cryptomarket is severely sanctioning the twitter tricks with which the team has wanted to influence their community ... and in the same cyptomarket.

If I came to know that the news that would happen to the tweets of the week passed was the inclusion in the EEAlliance, which is an open question to anyone who pays the amount ... I turn my tokens and do not return to this project ever. And even in Telegram, the CM of the project calling it "great success" and similar terms ... to impress the ignorant people.

Absolutely embarrassing ... and deeply disappointing.

Thank you very much. I do not know if you are an individual or part of the collective of Jibrel Network ... in any way, I sincerely appreciate your note, thanks to which, I will grant a stand by to my positions in the project.

I came to confirm that my post was still unattended and if so, I was going to settle my positions in Jibrel network, despite being the project that has attracted me most since last autumn.


The truth is that I am quite tired of the discourse of "great effort", "talented team", "long distance race" etc etc ... it is the most adopted resource in a crypto-ranking where the intrusion and the low quality of the projects, unfortunately, every day is more abundant and does not contribute more than outstanding topics of good faith on the part of the investor, so every time I find it, I start to tremble. But I guess it would also be the case of the commitment of who is really moving in those terms and as such I will accept in this case (pushed by the special attraction I found in the JNT project, everything is said).

Regarding twitter, not only do I refer to the disappeared, but to the succession of them, along with the first alluding to the JWallet that you also comment. They are superimposed strategies that I did not expect to find in a project that, imo, would be more based on the diligence and discretion that preside over the areas to which Jibtrel is directed ... and away from the "cosmetics" so recurrent in projects of low category looking for free time or shine. And from there, personally, my disappointment at that point, because marking the timmings artificially does not show much respect for those who, with the full legitimacy that the free market provides, analyze the evolution and compliance of the roadmap ... and also, I understand that Jibrel Network must be rigorously away from this type of low-risk practices that is identified with the huge group of charlatans that exists in the bloickchain and to which I sincerely believe that it does NOT belong ... so much attention with it.

Likewise, I knew the Jwallet and I have not even tried it, because, with tokenization of bonds and other assets in perspective, I understand the handling of cryptocurrencies as the most affordable challenge of that wallet ... and if it is not even able to guarantee its perfect working in this first scenario, I'm not interested for now ... since it would not clear my biggest doubts about the impeccable and non-negotiable security that the operation that Jibrel proposes (and must) make available to the public in such a delicate objective yours. I am waiting impatiently for that final version of the wallet and that its departure marks after it the required rigor in the points that, on their own initiative, they establish in their roadmap.

Likewise, I hope with the greatest interest that this stand by allows me to continue joining a project so promising in its exhibition and that is the face we see in the future at each step of this project. I leave here sincerely my best wishes for it.

Greetings and many thanks again for your explanation.

good morning

Can someone explain to me how to find the operational wallet? Because apparently, it is not yet, only in the trial period (and it was announced for the use of the community almost EIGHT MONTHS ago!)


Next, developments exhibited in your official ROADMAP:

November, 2017
jWallet Release

The official CryDR wallet is released under an open-source license for community use



Q1 2018
CryDR Explorer

A dedicated CryDR block explorer is released to facilitate closer / more detailed tracking of CryDRs on the network

-----------------------------------------


On the other hand, mediated last week he made an announcement of ATTENTION for some important event. Three nights ago, they REPLACED the call, with more imminent ... and at the hour, THEY DELETED: Network of Lords of Jibrel ... I do not know how I can use my HUGE DISAPPOINTMENT to avail myself of this type of practices, already seen in projects of low category ... and that I NEVER thought they had anything to do with the Red Jibrel project. Actually, I'm stupefied.

Are the facts worthy of attention and how to confirm compliance with your ROADMAP? ... And, in case there have been no news in it, you have noticed that people who are interested in a community that had in Jibrel Network the image of a project of the MAXIMA series and meet with this type of attitudes, so common among the least recommended projects in the sector I never thought that Jibrel Network mixed with this kind of bad habits ... and I tell you with immense sadness, precisely because of the special specialty I had in this project ... before which I am completely and, before receiving a convincing explanation , neatly surprised.

Please ... could you answer these questions clearly?

thank you