|
to vote for someone to be a delegate, is needed to pay a fee 1 LISK?
|
|
|
|
OK I gave it a try, used Paypal so I'm covered. Can't see it working. Lol how should that be working ? 1000 ETH for 178 $... Clearest scam ever  Clearly a scam... no doubt... But someone may claim it works so more people can get scammed... Is scam, but probably is testnet coins, and then can be open a dispute .... with arguments on both sides |
|
|
|
|
Lisk interest is huge, and after launch will be a success, but with DPoS system, value of LISK will decrease in time, this thing with delegates is not proven to be a success (is an example somewhere?) - a small group will produce coins and a large group will buy? I don't think so. In a POW system everyone can produce some coins (small miners for ex.) and is involved in coin. DPoS is energy efficient indeed, but for who? for a small group? DPoS will become like a closed group. DPoS is not attractive to masses. I like LISK and i want to succeed, but this is my opinion.
|
|
|
|
|
When mainnet is launch will be a GUI Wallet available?
|
|
|
|
ico is finish but my coins keep on being less everytime i check .. why?  ? No way. My coins are constant at the site. for now mine is constant, bonus % is included? |
|
|
|
|
For now I stop mining diff is too high, Congratulation FreeTrade for this interesting coin
|
|
|
|
something is messed up again
since the 17th diff and pool hash rate hasnt gone up much but im about 10% down on shares per hour plus the % of the round is about 25-40% smaller
normally ill delete dag and restart and it will somewhat get better but now its just staying the same or getting worse
since shares are less effected but the actual payout per hour is dropping significantly
I haven't seen that myself, getting about the same 24hr as usual. only thing that is different that i can tell is now im on dwarf2 where as all my payments were coming from dwarf1 but my daily payout is down and the share chart is showing a drop in shares With every DAG change it increase in size, so more memory to GPU and hashrate decrease when DAG is changing. |
|
|
|
|
I think shares is ok, but no payments ...
|
|
|
|
|
Alcurex is fine, indeed a large exchange is better but YAC don't have great volume in last year, and now with Bter issue is almost no exchange for YAC. (initially MRC was scrypt jane)
|
|
|
|
|
LISK ICO is doing well, and is still time to grow, investors have great expectations
|
|
|
|
|
So many accusation of scam .... I admit leocoin is a bit controversial, and in current situation is not doing well, price is source of scam accusation? or what? but someone personally lose money on leocoin? And in what circumstance?
Is a link of stories about people complaining of LEO with concrete facts (not general or what they think)?
|
|
|
|
I am not a LEO member and i am for POS! I have over 20 friends who own LEOcoin and all are for POS!
For me POS will be fine if this will save leocoin, but I have doubt .... |
|
|
|
|
Botnet not caused decision to switch to POS, to avoid botnets is sufficiently to change N to 13, 14, or 15 ..... POS sounds good only in theory....
|
|
|
|
I am indeed entitled to my opinon.
However if you switch to POS only right now, it is a FACT that this turns into a 70% premine, not merely an opinion.
First, it is not me that changes to a POS only system, but LEOcoin developers are changing LEOcoin's algo. Second, the premine is spread between a large number of persons, third parties and very many individuals who are not the ones that did the pre-mine. When you would say that there is a large group of LEOcoin owners who is also a part of the LEO community, you are right. But imo, you err in your assertion that it is a fact that LEOcoin would turn into a 70% premine. The fact is that Dan Andersson stated in this thread that the 50m. premine is distributed mostly amongst members of the LEO community. 10m. have been donated to the LEOcoin Foundation, so yes, we will have a decent stake interest. Leocoin community (members) should to be able to vote to change algorithm.... if community and miners not switch to POS wallet what happen? |
|
|
|
now it became fine that even BTC address is not known, fucking hillarious.
I think at this point everyone is pretty tired of answering the same questions over and over, plus the way you were screaming none felt the need to point out that the reason (as it was stated more than once) that there is no btc address is that they are using a coinbase multisign account. They posted screenshots of this account, but as coinbase don't provide an actual btc address they can't give it to you. Your fear is not unfounded, at I myself will want to see a verifiable account at some point, I'm not that worried about this. Simply because to the ICO intake to not to be true would be too shortsided. It would come out within a few weeks, and even if they'd want to cheat us, there are much better and safer ways long term, some that can never be proven. So screaming scam about this issue is pretty pointless IMHO. If now BTC addresses is unknown, after ICO is over, BTC can be transferred to a new address and make public this fact. |
|
|
|
After ICO ends all BTC is available to devs. at their discretion? Or is a roadmap to spend ICO value?
Someone can answer? |
|
|
|
|
DAG file is changed at specified #block? (or date?)
|
|
|
|
|
After ICO ends all BTC is available to devs. at their discretion? Or is a roadmap to spend ICO value?
|
|
|
|
|
In current situation can't uncheck withdrawals email confirmations because: "Email send to confirm deactivation of email confirmations" and of course no email .....
|
|
|
|
|
Signature added.
Lisk will be an great project.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
