|
Обще признанный факт что Крым это Украина. Россия захватила эту территорию, но долго она ее не удержит. Пока русские будут бороться за Крым они лишаться Дальнего Востока, а потом и Крыма. Нельзя безнаказанно грабить и воровать.
|
|
|
|
We need to study history well, and not trust people. If Ukraine is a separate state, then why do most of the population speak Russian? Where is the deception?
Not just that. The so called "Ukrainian language" actually evolved as a fringe dialect of the Russian language, heavily influenced by Polish and other West Slavic languages. In short, it is an artificial language. It is possible to argue long. Considering that Kievan Rus was born earlier than Muscovy can be assumed that this is the different dialects of the same language. Both languages evolved in parallel. |
|
|
|
I dont believe in god, I believe in God. he is my creator, the reason i'm alive,infact without him I'm nothing.
And now you're with it all? Tell me what makes you better than someone who doesn't believe in God? For example, I. I have as many arms and legs. I do not accept injustice and cruelty. What's the difference? |
|
|
|
i think you should read the origin of america
we are all immigrant in america..
and american are not racist......imaginate if obama was rusian or french? do you think he could be a President..?
In fact, if you study American history, you will find out that first immigrants came to America in order to find religious freedom and to build ideal society, centered on God. They really was very idealistic in the beginning and open to receive people from all over the world. Gradually, such attitude changed and it seems today many Americans don't welcome new immigrants any more, specially if they are Muslims. Immigrants build America but today, American government is not willing to give chance to new immigrants, what is sad. I think that average Americans are not racists, but of course that in every country, including America, you can find racists organizations. You can't judge whole country based on it. When there are problems that politicians are the easiest to blame it on the arrivals of migrants. Unfortunately people don't want to think for themselves it is easier to believe the corrupt politicians. Is born a racist. |
|
|
|
I have lot of question and confusion about third eye. Does it really open? And makes us like a superhuman .What's its function? What happen after someone open their third eye? Is there anyway to open it? Or it's just a rumor or some kind of psychological beliefs.
Google Neil Slade and Project Avalon. You'll find exercises there that will help you understand your brain and how you can control it. Its the first steps to opening your third eye. Popping you amygdala is better than drugs.  You want to control the mind? What? The human brain manages not only his actions, but also the livelihoods of the whole organism. You offer a way when the egg will teach the hen! LOL! |
|
|
|
In short, wikileak mentioned that CIA can look every move if they intend to find your information.
WikiLeaks on Tuesday said it had obtained a secret trove of hacking tools used by the CIA to break into or circumvent the security of phones, communication apps and other devices, and published confidential documents describing those programs.
Among the most noteworthy WikiLeaks claims are that the Central Intelligence Agency, in partnership with other U.S. and foreign agencies, has been able to bypass the encryption on popular messaging apps such as WhatsApp, Telegram and Signal, by hacking phones that use Google Inc’s Android platform to collect audio and message traffic before encryption is applied.
Reuters could not immediately verify the contents of the published documents, but several contractors and private cyber security experts said the materials, dated between 2013 and 2016, appeared to be legitimate.
But relax,
It is illegal for CIA to do those stuff right? and apple company says it fixed the bug.
Anyway, as one who don't do evil stuff will not become a target for CIA.
It very hard to chose between 2 things in our lives, privacy and security. It seems today, with so much terrorist attacks everywhere, that we need more security and less privacy. If we wants more privacy it usually means less security because security service can't monitor all communication channels and find potential threats to our society. Before 2001 we didn't have such dilemma and we was pride about our privacy and freedom. Unfortunately, now we have to give up from our privacy in order to be safe. Regarding this news, only important question is not if CIA can watch our every move (I'm sure they can do even more!), through popular messaging apps such as WhatsApp, Telegram and Signal etc . but if they had legal permission for such action. The problem is that in order to get official permission to listen to need to have evidence linking this man to terrorism, and how to do it? Easier to listen to all and choose from all the terrorists. I don't mind. |
|
|
|
If muslims are making the world more wrost then why they need to be live in this world ? There are more terorist who will destroy town because of they belief i don't understand why muslim loved to make war than making peace? Is because of the money they get from the goverment who are using them to make more money?
It seems to me that those Muslims who commit terrorist acts, or religious fanatics either in their country there is no other way to make money. |
|
|
|
@ Masha Sha, I presume you'll be amoungst the first to sign up for some front line action? or just a keyboard warrior   Keyboard warrior is well said. Unfortunately, I know of another warrior's Twitter is Trump. He also says that make America great, but effective strategy he has no. |
|
|
|
|
I believe that electric cars are the future. I hope soon to be upgrading batteries and the movement will become cheaper. I think that the ethanol and gas do not solve the problem so in the future people will abandon this type of fuel.
|
|
|
|
|
Now in the far East in Russia for almost all residents Chinese. I don't believe in the war between America and China. Rather China has any territorial conflicts with Russia. When China was already a conflict with Russia over the Taman Peninsula. The conflict is still not resolved.
|
|
|
|
From what I've read, they seem to be sending money but they don't want those people in their countries. Probably afraid that they would also cause problems there. The Middle East already have a booming population and it's easy to see why they don't want more people in (three words: BREED LIKE RABBITS). Their way of living is starting to become unsustainable, the drop in oil price last year made that painfully clear to them. The monarchs are probably fearing that having their population see these people living on welfare would make them more resentment of the privileges of the royals. the new president of america doest like the muslim and the muslim country
so there is no islamic refugee in us i think sooo
What's the difference. In America many immigrants from Mexico. America is a country of migrants. Now in the US of course nationalistic sentiments, but I think this only happens because the government pays little attention to migration policy. I am sure that if you send this thread in the right direction, then America would be even greater. Trump does not understand. First of all, you need to differentiate between legal and illegal immigrants. Legal immigrants contribute to the society, while the illegal ones drain the state treasury. That is the reason why Trump has said that he will prioritize the legal immigrants over the illegals. I disagree with you. A lot of legal immigrants do not contribute to the development of the state and primarily live through benefits and donations from benefactors. Believe me, a lot of these cases. Image of man living of the welfare his wives and children are receiving is the first thing that came to my mind when I saw your comment. If we take the situation with Europe, the current migrants hope for the benefit and at the expense of this they want to live. If truth be told, then in Europe such a benefit that in some countries, wages are lower. And the charitable organizations help with everything necessary, so nobody really intends to work there. But this is a boring exception to the rules. Most people go to another country for a better life and work there to live, not to beg from the state or engage in crime. This does not apply to immigrants from poor Muslim countries. To live at the expense of people with other religion in Islam is considered to be good because they don't consider infidels for the people. |
|
|
|
Definitely yes because I always praying with god, when I have a problems or even without a problem I always because I know he can help me to solve my problem.
And how to help you God to solve the problem? I am sure that there. People are just trying to shift the responsibility for solving problems on God. In the end, it still all depends on you because there is no God and no one will help you. |
|
|
|
Killing of Givi probably was ordered by Moscow. And he is not first important separatist who was killed - Alexey Bednov, Yevgeny Ishchenko-Malysh, Roman Voznik-Cygan, Alexey Mozgovoy and some more was killed already. I wouldn't surprised if soon Zaharchenko and Plotnicky will be killed. I think Russia want to replace these leaders due to bad reputation of them.
Pure rubbish. All of these leaders enjoyed a good reputation among the local population, and they had tens of thousands of followers. Why should Russia kill them and thereby antagonize the local population. They had good reputation in local area, but not worldwide. Maybe Russia want to replace by people, who are responsible for many deaths. It's also possible that they are killed by other separatists due to fight for authority. But I don't say it as pure fact, it's speculations. I do think that Russia is preparing to place Plotnitsky and Zakharchenko Nadia Savchenko. Now her PR in those territories and when the time comes the Russians will destroy the bandits who have blood on their hands and try to put it. |
|
|
|
|
United States deploys ballistic missile systems near the borders of North Korea in response to the test service.
On it informs Agency Reuters. In South Korea deployed THAAD military after North Korea has tested four ballistic missiles and launched them towards Japan.
"The continuing provocative actions of North Korea, including yesterday's launch of several missiles, only confirm the wisdom of our decision to deploy THAAD in South Korea," explained the US action, us Admiral Harry Harris.
But the extra arms might have negative consequences in the international arena. Such a move by the US is likely to strengthen the conflict between South Korea and China. The Chinese authorities believe that the deployment of THAAD missile systems will upset the balance of power in Asia and, accordingly, will affect the overall security.
|
|
|
|
It depends if you want to avoid the mainstream media just get your sources on the USA from other countries where objective reporting still exists. Nhk Newsline from Japan, the BBC at times in the UK they are far more bias to Brexit , CTV or CBC from Canada, RT is pretty honest despite all the US fear mongering about it being the Kremlins shouting point from Russia, Al Jazeera from the Qatar,Dubai or CCTV from China to name a few. The point is as long as it's not from the USA it probably is ok to watch news related to that country through it and not feel like being hit by endless propaganda waves. Just be careful not to do the safe-space logic where everyone lives in filter bubbles that is a scarier thought than 1984 and the thought police, it would be the self-created thought police. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filter_bubbleThanks for the link to that Wiki page - it gives me a name for what I am trying to describe, my 'filter bubble'. I'd like more control over my own filter bubble. I'm cool with being in an isolated culture if the alternative is being overloaded with junk. I'm in the UK, I do pick through a few of the news sources you mention but I can tell you that the BBC are always pushing their narrative. My favourite news source is probably the Financial Times, because they attach less emotion and/or fear mongering to the stories. Don't have much experience with US news outlets.... It is necessary to make a selection of the sources of information that you can trust, and this issue needs to be very good and adequate analysis. And the main merit of good agencies that is their objective. I think it will be very difficult for you to do. A lot of the media print on the pages of comments of experts which can be biased. Nowadays, any information should be verified in different sources and to analyze. |
|
|
|
we must join hands to promote unity for every religion
What about eradicating religions altogether from the face of the earth? If there is no religion, then a lot of good things can happen to the human civilization. During the past 2,000 years, religion has brought only sorrow and heartache to the humans. It has certainly brought a lot of happiness to the humans also. Well I guess losing all religion in the world won't necessarily do us any better. There would be weaker sense of control for everyone. The control freaks in the populations would just find another avenue to oppress people with. I do not see any methods of control over man. It seems to me that under the pretext of combating terrorism will soon be asked to put the chip to all migrants. Then this rule will apply to other people. Actually before the migration was a very positive thing and not even particularly could be resent. Of course America has long been faced with migrants from South America, and this adds to the problems even crime. But what is happening today in Europe, then it is beyond normal understanding. It's chaos. In this way it will destroy Europe. I agree with you. The Germans did not appreciate the consequences of the fact that the majority of migrants cannot and does not want to work. They go to Europe to sit on the Dole and not work. Even if they receive a third of the benefits they will earn more than in their own country. This could weaken the EU economy. |
|
|
|
|
Are you an anti-Semite? At what here a nationality? A lot of Jews left their mark in history. This is because there are many intelligent and educated people. The same marks could well think of his teaching for good purposes, and people use it for evil.
|
|
|
|
Don't want to be rude here but I feel pity for those posters here who doesn't lived in the Philippines but still have lots of shit sayings. How come they will know the situation here if there only reference is the MEDIA? Come on, everything you read in the internet is not always true.
What if drug addicts/users/pushers fights back when being arrested? Police will just watched even they are receiving lots of bullets? How heroic.
What about the drug user victims? Is it ok to kill innocent people, raped girls randomly at any age, do hostages and robbery because the person involved was addicted to drugs? Does it have a consideration because the suspects are drug addicts?
Other people have no idea how big the drug problem here in the Philippines prior to Duterte's occupancy at the Presidential office so stop saying non sense thing which people really doesn't have an idea. You are just one of the people who just uses media news as references without thinking outside the box.
People here are into human rights but for years passed they didn't even see or being read in a news that a Commission on Human Rights or UN are doing investigation of drug related victims. Can't even sees them saying they condemn the activity. Random rapes, hostages, robbery, killings, just for fun killings etc. Right now that drug users are being the one that killed they are spending too much time to investigate. How pathetic.
We have addicts in America too, love. We have gotten past the crack cocaine epidemic, the synthetic cannabinoids/stimulant epidemic, and are in the grips of the largest epidemic, opioids, as we speak. We kill our citizens, but mostly because they are poor or Black, not because they are addicted. You were saying something about not understanding addition...? And the reason there is a drug problem is because the economy is fucked up. Drugs only become an issue when people start killing each other to get them. Usually, that's a poor thing. I can afford pot, I don't have to stab a motherfucker to get my fix. And you don't need to be on drugs to commit crimes. It's pretty easy. Rape happens when people are sober. Just like murder. And theft. Humans don't need special states of mind to be shits. It's apparently pretty easy. If a person uses drugs it is likely that sooner or later he will commit a crime. The constant craving for drugs leads to the fact that people simply do not have the money to buy them and they commit robberies and murder. |
|
|
|
|
The coexistence of different scientific, moral, social and other provisions with atheism not make it an independent world, as well as the coexistence of Communist ideas in your head with blond hair on it makes blondes a political party.
|
|
|
|
What an utter nonsense. And then to back it up with a picture that proves nothing.
I don't know if there are any studies backing up your claim but as far as I can recall a similar study was conducted regarding arabs and thanks to their incestuous behaviour in the past 1000 years they are in fact the weakest link as a 'race' on this planet. With IQ's averaging between 75 and 85 they can be considered dumber than an average Western mongoloid.
It seems to me that IQ of a person is a very primitive study of mental health. There are so many additional factors to consider in such studies. Education, circle of friends, even the level of education of parents are important. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
