Bitcoin Forum
June 23, 2024, 10:51:42 PM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 [905] 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 ... 970 »
18081  Economy / Economics / Re: Gold: I smell a trap on: August 11, 2011, 04:35:54 AM
clearly the PPT has stepped back from ramping the stock mkt for the past 2.5 yrs.  why?  they're plunging and will continue to do so.  i think this reflationary ramp of 100% and QE2 injection was to allow the banks to dump their toxic assets and brace themselves for phase 2 of the decline.  its here.  debatably, everything has rolled and i think continues to plunge; not in a straight line but to deep lows, perhaps below 3/09.  do you really expect gold to survive this?

i'm still skeptical of the one world currency.

I expect gold to continue acting as it always has as money. If markets recover and we somehow come back to stability I expect it to drop heavily, if we continue to see bottom barrel interest rates on top of 'QE3' and beyond without a new global monetary policy, I expect it to continue to climb to new heights long term - along with the usual dips and rallies.

don't have everything in btc but it is a big chunk; more than most i presume.  i expect volatility since its so new altho it hasn't been too bad considering.

i'm comforted b/c its new and in my estimation undervalued.  i can afford to wait 10 years altho i expect it to only take around 5 to become a major player.  this comes with lots of study and i'm convinced the technology is sound and longlasting.

I agree with you that the technology is here to stay, but I'm not quite so convinced that it will find its natural conclusion in its first major experiment. We have seen how incredibly fragile this currency is over the last month and I don't expect that to change unless it comes to be backed by something more than an idea. The idea may remain, but nothing says that it will be fueled exclusively by BTC.

fair enough.  your opinion is just as good as mine.

but what does the last months volatility have to do with bitcoin?  the exchanges were the problem.  mtgox seems to have stabilized its security thank god and i only expect that to be worked out over time with the others.
18082  Economy / Economics / Re: Gold: I smell a trap on: August 11, 2011, 04:20:46 AM
You're trying to protect against volatility by investing heavily in Bitcoin? I mean I see investing as a risk that may pay off very well down the road, but how is BTC possibly protecting you against volatility right now?

i don't have everything in btc but it is a big chunk; more than most i presume.  i expect volatility since its so new altho it hasn't been too bad considering.

i'm comforted b/c its new and in my estimation undervalued.  i can afford to wait 10 years altho i expect it to only take around 5 to become a major player.  this comes with lots of study and i'm convinced the technology is sound and longlasting.
18083  Economy / Economics / Re: Gold: I smell a trap on: August 11, 2011, 04:17:54 AM
good article.  however, no one trusts the Chinese to supervise a reserve currency; heck they're communists and don't believe in human rights.  also all the harsh rhetoric makes it doubtful you could get them all to share a one world currency.  i sincerely doubt the US Fed will want to destroy itself to let this happen.  USD hegemony is legendary and who would willingly give up that power esp. when your members billions of wealth is stored in USD's?  don't dismiss whats happening to the Euro lightly.  look at the animosity and mud slinging btwn Greece and Germany.  now btwn France and Germany.  memories die hard.  you cannot unite monetary policy w/o fiscal policy. as long as you have borders, armies, and ppl of different color it won't work.  plus the Internet has made the entire planet aware of the shenanigans of central bankers.  there will be revolution before this happens.

I'm not quite as optimistic as you on the prediction of revolutions against central banking. While there has been a degree of "awakening" in this regard, the movement is still very much a small niche in mainstream politics with a majority of people across the western world still very much stuck in, and dependent upon, the left-right paradigm. Those in conspiracy circles who think that the agenda for a world currency will be spontaneously announced in a grand ceremony or even put to the public for their opinion are lacking in knowledge of how modern central banking systems were introduced.

Of course the US won't give up power overnight, but the insane economic policies, massive debt and state crackdown on the last few productive sectors of the US economy are going to force it to pack up its role as the world's policeman exactly as the spent British Empire did post-WW2. Once again, this won't occur overnight and none of these opinions are intended to influence short term investors as I don't play the same game you folks do; however, in the mid to long term the US is absolutely losing its status as the world's superpower and manager of the reserve currency. This is already occurring with nations looking to move towards "baskets" when trading in big commodities: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/the-demise-of-the-dollar-1798175.html

Take a guess where the clustered regional currencies and basket currencies are intended to lead? http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/currency/5796892/Russian-President-Dmitry-Medvedev-pulls-new-world-currency-from-his-pocket.html

i read those 2 articles back 2 yrs ago in 2009!  nothings happened yet and we still have lots of talk. 

clearly the PPT has stepped back from ramping the stock mkt for the past 2.5 yrs.  why?  they're plunging and will continue to do so.  i think this reflationary ramp of 100% and QE2 injection was to allow the banks to dump their toxic assets and brace themselves for phase 2 of the decline.  its here.  debatably, everything has rolled and i think continues to plunge; not in a straight line but to deep lows, perhaps below 3/09.  do you really expect gold to survive this?

i'm still skeptical of the one world currency.
18084  Economy / Economics / Re: Gold: I smell a trap on: August 11, 2011, 04:10:27 AM
i'd like to point out one thing to bullion holders since this is the form that has been pushed heavily by the bulls here on the thread and since i just went thru the liquidation phase of 90% of my bullion.

its alot harder to liquidate than you think. if i'm right and gold bursts from its parabolic ramp, by the time you realize whats happening everyone else will too and the rush to liquidate at your local coin dealers or wherever is going to be very very hard with a large haircut i guarantee.  this is a very dangerous situation which is why i moved out now and b/c of bitcoin.  this is the age of volatility and bullion holders assume that everything is going to go to hell with your fiat USD's being burned in furnaces for heat and you being able to sit in the corner of your house guarding your gold coins and somehow being rich for it.  this won't happen.  i see it more likely that there is a panic induced in the gold market much like there is right now in stocks and you won't be spared.
18085  Economy / Economics / Re: Gold: I smell a trap on: August 11, 2011, 03:50:54 AM
another argument gold bulls like to make is this supposed push for a one world currency in which gold will play a central role and the USD is extinguished.

i would submit to you whats happening to the Euro experiment is evidence that this concept cannot work.  its impossible to have diverse separate sovereign entities with a unified currency.  the laggards like Greece just doom the project.

in this light how's a one world currency going to work?

You will never have a one world currency announced overnight but the plan has long been to cluster regional currencies and "basket currencies" as a stepping stone towards a world currency. The decline of the Euro is arguably bad news for this agenda, but just as the climate zealots never step back neither will the global economic planners.

I don't think many people can still deny that we are, in nearly every aspect of politics, being herded towards international "governance" and away from localized decision making. If you question this, do a quick read on Agenda 21 or the mass of other "biding treaties" that every developed nation on the globe is signed up for. With centralized policy comes centralized economics and this is already leading to many calls for a new world currency. The eventual Euro and US$ crash will only add fuel to the political fire that has already begun: http://www.thenewamerican.com/economy/markets-mainmenu-45/8517-china-calls-for-global-supervision-of-dollar-new-world-currency

All that said, will this occur in the short term? I highly doubt it. We will need a much higher degree of chaos before a majority of national leaders begin echoing China and Russia in calling for a new global standard.

good article.  however, no one trusts the Chinese to supervise a reserve currency; heck they're communists and don't believe in human rights.  also all the harsh rhetoric makes it doubtful you could get them all to share a one world currency.  i sincerely doubt the US Fed will want to destroy itself to let this happen.  USD hegemony is legendary and who would willingly give up that power esp. when your members billions of wealth is stored in USD's?  don't dismiss whats happening to the Euro lightly.  look at the animosity and mud slinging btwn Greece and Germany.  now btwn France and Germany.  memories die hard.  you cannot unite monetary policy w/o fiscal policy. as long as you have borders, armies, and ppl of different color it won't work.  plus the Internet has made the entire planet aware of the shenanigans of central bankers.  there will be revolution before this happens.
18086  Economy / Economics / Re: Gold: I smell a trap on: August 11, 2011, 03:39:14 AM
Interesting analysis. I'm still not entirely clear on how you see these insane rounds of "quantitative easing" in the world's reserve currency resulting in deflation long term (short term I could see), but I will keep this in mind while watching the crash roll on.

As a long investor, I have bought into the notion that metals are money and the only hedge against worst case scenarios such as stagflation, but I am also keenly aware that these bubbles are built up and popped by money powers - just as they were during the GD.

the US did not announce any further QE yesterday but did imply they might keep interest rates at 0 until mid 2013.  chumps to steal our hard earned money.  yes, the ECB has indicated they want to monetize Italian/Spain bonds but the Bundesbank is screaming.  Japan has been doing it for decades yet the Yen keeps strengthening as the Nikkei has dumped 75% since the 1980's.  the same could happen to us; pushing on a string yet get persistent grinding deflation and a rising USD.

gold is going parabolic ignoring the deflation all around it.  UST's are soaring also paradoxically.   i took my shorts down today just to get out of the way but am ready to add back on the slightest sign of weakness.  no one knows exactly whats going to happen but i am cautioning that its possible the Fed is targeting PM's to try and get the USD back up.  why wouldn't they want to do this?  its their franchise and they lead the world with the reserve currency.  they're in control i argue, not Congress whom they own.  Timmay and his Congressional buddies all want their IB corner offices you know.

and if you don't believe the conspiracy theories then i argue the parabola is a sign of a bubble blowoff and will pop of its own design.  of course as has been argued quite effectively on this thread it can on for a long time.

look at the other commodities.  most had blowoff tops and then have dumped hard esp. cotton.  silver is lagging and arguably rolling.  gold is the only bull.  stocks have doubled since 3/09 and was the biggest ramp since 1930.  we just had our reflation and it clearly hasn't worked.  its time for deflation.
18087  Economy / Economics / Re: Gold: I smell a trap on: August 10, 2011, 11:02:33 PM
the USD increased in value today.  still consolidating.  no breakdown.

gold is rallying like it intends to be the reserve currency of the world.  or is it just the end stages of a parabolic blowoff only to do another 1980?
18088  Economy / Economics / Re: Gold: I smell a trap on: August 10, 2011, 10:58:13 PM



Be careful not to mistake velocity of US dollars for demand; volume (quantity) does not equal quality. Again, ensure that you understand the concept of bad money driving out good money.


money velocity is in the tank.  this is deflationary.

i'm familiar with Gresham's Law.  bad money forces out good from gov't enforcement.  whats your point other than that gold and bitcoin are being hoarded b/c of the prospect for higher valuation?
18089  Economy / Economics / Re: Gold: I smell a trap on: August 10, 2011, 10:22:26 PM
We both have an interest in Bitcoin (my main hobby at the moment) and I offered a suggestion regarding precious metals based on years of experience.

well i do too since 2005.  i asked you before and i'll ask again.  when did you start?

would you care to bet 100 BTC or $1000 that the Dow will be lower one year from now than it is today?

Why? I already told you I'm not interested in a pissing contest. When I trade, it's generally for the long-haul and on my own terms. Being right and doing nothing until the market shifts can be extremely difficult, as it involves ignoring the noise.

its just a simple bet.  i don't think equities can be propped up like you do and i do think they'll be lower one year from now.  no insult intended.

If you're feeling threatened or intimidated, reply to some of the detailed comments I've made on a rational basis instead of making challenges and wild speculation. For instance, your first post for this thread included a good rationale and enumerated your reasoning. Let's get back to the economics of the matter before this gets moved to the speculation sub-thread.

heck no.  i'm learning alot. no need to get personal.  

No printing necessary for monetary inflation
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=35956.msg443739#msg443739

i don't agree with your thesis.

http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/h41/current/h41.htm#h41tab9

there is only 2.8T worth of FRN's and required/excess reserves out there.  compared to orders of magnitude more debt/virtual USD's.  60% of world debt is denom in USD's.  sovereign debt has hit the wall.  we are now getting defaults.  this will decrease the total amt of USD's worldwide.  on top of that, foreign denom debt is defaulting as well and they are reserved in USD's.  this increases the demand for remaining USD's whether they desire them or not.  these 2 factors should force the value of the USD up.  the recent swap lines are evidence of this.

Paper vs. Physical
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=35956.msg444903#msg444903

After whatever temporary correction occurs, gold is going to continue higher to breach $2,000/oz. Obviously nothing goes in a straight line and there's going to be unbelievable resistance, but that doesn't change the long-term uptrend. I don't know how much farther it'll go beyond $2,000, but I assume that it'll be about double from the prior channel breakout of around $1,600-1,650. Meanwhile, I'll be glad to sell you Silver Wheaton when you've had enough red and decide to cover at a real high.

how can you be so sure?  in fact i doubt gold will ever become the world reserve currency like it was in the past.  its an artifact of the past.  the last couple of decades has seen the advent of the Internet.  i believe it has changed the world as a disruptive force.  never before has the avg American been able to peer behind the curtain see what its gov't/Fed have been doing to rob all of us.  the awareness of Americans is at an all time high.  Bitcoin is an extension of this and in my opinion stands a better chance of eventually being the reserve currency.  you're better off investing in an undervalued currency like Bitcoin than a parabolically moving hunk of metal near a top.

how do you buy a loaf of bread with gold?  how do you transport it around the world to balance payments of countries?  its weight alone is prohibitive for any practical use.  you have to build forts to store it.  how do you weigh it to buy a pencil?  who cares that its been money for centuries; the Internet has only practically been around for 10 years.  computers, servers, and cell phones dominate our lives.  what did i used to do?  oh yeah, go to the beach, take walks, talk to my wife.  instead i'm here banging away.

Please provide an exact quote regarding the statement of foreigners being "less dependent" on dollars. I'd like to know where I wrote that; I believe my statement was that the world has shrinking desire to hold USD - nothing to do with dependency. If anything, the US is dependent upon the rest of the world to keep the game going.

as i said above, if they're dependent that all that matters.  who cares if they don't desire them?  

There is no definitive profit incentive with the established swap lines. They are necessary to facilitate liquidity and an attempt to reduce volatility in exchange rates occurring due to large capital flows from one region to another. If you see this differently, please elaborate.

in the case of TARP and most likely June 2011 they're meant to prevent insolvency; a much more serious situation.  they keep the foreigners dependent on the USD and will sustain demand.

Whether you view the USD-based global economy as an inverted pyramid or bubbles on top of bubbles, either way failure above leads to increasing deflationary pressure further down. Think about the implications of a collapse - the US has the most to lose and would be severely crushed, hence the strong incentive to prop the entire world up. This is being done by monetizing debt without actual realization of the expected value, so the entire system will become incredibly fragile. I find it very improbable that a system of such magnitude will be able to hold together with a skeletal support racked by osteoporosis.

The consequence of monetization is inflation even as many tangible goods experience deflation. Be careful not to mistake velocity of US dollars for demand; volume (quantity) does not equal quality. Again, ensure that you understand the concept of bad money driving out good money.

i agree but i don't think the gov't/Fed can stop the implosion and deflation.  i think they've come to this realization and are stepping away from the markets by no QE.  as the collapse unfolds, the demand for cash/USD by everyday Americans will overwhelm the price of gold.  debt defaults will accelerate shrinking the money supply.  the scramble for cash has begun and the margin calls are going out.

All you're looking at is one year? Are you aware of seasonality? For the past few years, the start has been marked by a decline and slow rise to the middle of the year. During the latter half of the year, the precious metals tend to take off without looking back. Are you suggesting that the world's problems have gone away and that this pattern is irrelevant? I don't see how anything has changed - in fact, things seem to have gotten worse.

Since you're analyzing charts, it should be obvious that the high at the end of April was followed by tests of support around $32. After that, there was a higher low followed by a higher high. It could also be argued that the consolidation pattern is in a rising channel. I don't see any long-term trend lines to mark major support points, nor moving averages. Where is the 50-day moving average, or the 200-dma? MACD? Fibonacci levels? Negative divergences? Index ratios?

Are you taking into account anything behind the scenes? Capital flows? Warehouse supply levels? Cost of manufacturing or mining? Corporate hedging on future returns? Political environments, worker strikes and nationalization efforts? International demand outside of the US and Europe?

things have gotten worse.  seasonal patterns don't always work out.  you don't always have to have a parabolic blowoff to end every bull.   look at the Dow.  i stripped off the indicators you mentioned to make a specific point.  yes i do use them.

you are good at the fundamentals.  i used to rely on them much more than i do now b/c no one can know everything and sometimes things aren't as they appear.  i've learned that the charts tell a much bigger part of the story IMO.  i'm trying to identify a top to the longest bull market in existence today.  no question it'll be tough going when everyone around me is onboard this train.

do you have any idea how ridiculous what you just said is?  

Take ten deep breaths and go grab a beer.
[/quote]

since when is potentially losing 100BTC or $1000 not a consequence?  i wasn't even talking to you.
18090  Economy / Economics / Re: Gold: I smell a trap on: August 10, 2011, 05:42:59 PM
mea culpa, with the gap over the top of the inverted hammer from yesterday i did cover my pm shorts this morning from a few days ago.  luckily not too much damage.  picking corners is difficult.

edit:  i'm still a deflationist.  its a matter of timing.
18091  Economy / Economics / Re: Gold: I smell a trap on: August 10, 2011, 05:05:22 PM
I am still expecting a correction in gold, possibly to the $1,650-1,680 range. Also of note is that Bitcoin seems to be holding correlation with equity indices, dipping a little below $10 today as the markets swoon.

There are factors that need to be taken into account. As I said, a correction is necessary but this might preclude the drop for a while yet:
London Trader - Many Gold Shorts Wiped Out, Lost Everything!

Either way, I'd rather buy the dips during a short squeeze. It helps to know whose blood is in the streets when you're buying.

this is how sentiment is during parabolic blowoffs.  no bad news anywhere, the skies the limit, nothing can go wrong.  bulls get pedantic and arrogant and scoff at caution.  the inflationists extrapolate from the past and expect more highs. 

miscreanity:  i am at my day job now and will attempt to answer your post in detail tonite when i have more time to concentrate. 
18092  Economy / Economics / Re: Recession Imminent on: August 10, 2011, 02:26:25 PM
your statement about the Fed surprised me b/c most economic ppl on this forum have come to the realization that the Fed is "privately" owned.  so i dug out my copy of "Creature From Jekyll Island" pg. 591 bottom paragraph:

"it is not a gov't agency and it is not a private corporation in the normal sense of the word.  it is subject to political control yet, b/c of its tremendous power over politicians and the elective process, it has managed to remain independent of political oversight.  Simply stated, it is a cartel, and its organizational structure is uniquely structured to serve that end."

The Fed is neither a 100% government government agency neither a private insitution. I guess is a matter of opinion which side goes more, but if you look at its structure you will see that is mostly government controlled. Anyway its a useless debate, whether more government or more private it does what it does and its a problem. And the Fed is indeed a banking cartel. For me the best way to define the Federal Reserve system is: a government created cartel of private banks.

The supposed independence of a central bank is that, supposed. Its undoubted that if the Treasury was in direct control of the printing press it would be even worse (think Zimbawe), and that the structure the government has created has a certain balance of political power, but still the central bank panders to politicians and does what they want (at least in part). Otherwise the politicians would do away with the central bank. As an example, you can go and check the Nixon tapes, where you can hear Nixon preasuring the then chairman of the Fed, Burns, to inflate the money supply to create a bubble that would reduce unemployment temporarely and help him win the election regardless of the consequences (then, surprise surprise, stagflation came). http://www.businessinsider.com/any-theory-of-political-independence-of-the-fed-was-destroyed-by-the-nixon-tapes-2010-11 <- check the pdf with the actual conversations, I read it and its quite entertaining (if you are a bit of a economic-political freak of course Wink ), how the president talks and all that, its curious.

it seems to me the balance of power has shifted to the Fed.  as far as i can tell, Bernanke does whatever he wants to do to enable the banks to survive at limitless expense to the rest of us.
18093  Economy / Economics / Re: Recession Imminent on: August 10, 2011, 01:05:30 PM


this is ugly.  this is the "speed" at which money circulates in the US economy.  miserable.

Just so you know, this is not the speed of money circulation, but the money multiplier. They are different things.

And the Fed is not private and its not owned by the banks. The Fed is a mix of government and private institution, but mainly a government institution. For example, the majority of decissions are taken by the Board of Governors of the Federal REserve system that is a federal government agency. Ben Bernanke is the head of this board.

"speed" was used as a metaphor.  perhaps a poor choice.

your statement about the Fed surprised me b/c most economic ppl on this forum have come to the realization that the Fed is "privately" owned.  so i dug out my copy of "Creature From Jekyll Island" pg. 591 bottom paragraph:

"it is not a gov't agency and it is not a private corporation in the normal sense of the word.  it is subject to political control yet, b/c of its tremendous power over politicians and the elective process, it has managed to remain independent of political oversight.  Simply stated, it is a cartel, and its organizational structure is uniquely structured to serve that end."
18094  Economy / Economics / Re: Gold: I smell a trap on: August 10, 2011, 12:42:10 PM
An interesting audio interview: Why are people so eager to make predictions?  because there's no consequence for making wrong predictions.

http://marketplace.publicradio.org/display/web/2011/08/09/pm-freakonomics-why-are-we-so-bad-at-predicting-the-future/


did you not notice that i'm willing to bet him 100 BTC or $1000 to be held in escrow that the Dow will be lower one year from now than today?
I noticed. yes, it's a prediction. I don't bet on coin flips.

yes but it has a consequence. and i didn't ask you.  the offer was to miscreanity.
it's not a "consequence", statistically you got 50% chance to be right.


do you have any idea how ridiculous what you just said is? 
18095  Economy / Economics / Re: (I think) Bitcoin value needs to stay at at least $10 for the next 2 weeks on: August 10, 2011, 12:40:22 PM
yes, this can only be a positive.  it will be very educational for the news attendees who will get a multitude of positive opinions from a variety of bitcoin evangelists.  specific questions and concerns will be addressed in a private relaxed manner.  new technologies will be demonstrated firsthand to guests, attendees and the press in a nice, professional atmosphere.  the BTC price is already rising and will probably ramp during the conference as attendees will frantically be calling home to loved ones to buy BTC or they will themselves steal back up to their rooms to buy BTC.
18096  Economy / Economics / Re: Gold: I smell a trap on: August 10, 2011, 05:32:07 AM
An interesting audio interview: Why are people so eager to make predictions?  because there's no consequence for making wrong predictions.

http://marketplace.publicradio.org/display/web/2011/08/09/pm-freakonomics-why-are-we-so-bad-at-predicting-the-future/


did you not notice that i'm willing to bet him 100 BTC or $1000 to be held in escrow that the Dow will be lower one year from now than today?
I noticed. yes, it's a prediction. I don't bet on coin flips.

yes but it has a consequence. and i didn't ask you.  the offer was to miscreanity.
18097  Economy / Economics / Re: Gold: I smell a trap on: August 10, 2011, 05:23:08 AM
An interesting audio interview: Why are people so eager to make predictions?  because there's no consequence for making wrong predictions.

http://marketplace.publicradio.org/display/web/2011/08/09/pm-freakonomics-why-are-we-so-bad-at-predicting-the-future/


did you not notice that i'm willing to bet him 100 BTC or $1000 to be held in escrow that the Dow will be lower one year from now than today?
18098  Economy / Economics / Re: Gold: I smell a trap on: August 10, 2011, 05:16:32 AM
sorry for the size of the photos.  anyone care to tell me how to downsize them?  they're screenshots from my computer.
18099  Economy / Economics / Re: Gold: I smell a trap on: August 10, 2011, 05:14:16 AM


this is the silver daily chart for the past year.  as i've said, i think its rolling over to the downside.

i'm not your financial advisor and i'm just a voice on the internet and i wouldn't want to be responsible for any bad advice.

what i can tell you is what i've done.  i started buying bags of junk silver back btwn 2005-7 btwn $9-$12.  i sold them 2 mo ago btwn $38-$48.  for me it was a nice profit and i think i pretty much top ticked it.  i took the funds and started buying BTC at $1.60.  this has REALLY worked out well for me.

you gotta make your own decisions man.
18100  Economy / Economics / Re: Recession Imminent on: August 10, 2011, 04:36:40 AM


consumption peaking.
Pages: « 1 ... 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 [905] 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 ... 970 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!