Not a dumb idea, just, I don't see how this could work out realistically the way actual exchanges are set up with third parties.
The only way I could trust this, is if Mt Gox were to make GoxBay, already having a built in system of confirmed/trusted btc exchanges that can be tracked in some way. Now I joke saying Mt. Gox based on the public trust in the site, but it would take something, maybe not that level, but pretty big to make this work imo.
|
|
|
Smart. Rather than pools compete with other pools, give the illusion that the users are in packs of pools with themselves fighting it out on smaller, more 'winable' levels. So f'n smart. If you have a pool and are not implementing this system into your pool, you will get left behind guaranteed.
|
|
|
I hope so, because my store will be opening during the week (if not sooner) with that model in place until I find a completely trustworthy e-commerce solution or at the very least going with a start up who is trying to make their systems work at the same time I am getting my store up I have been working out the kinks to make it as easy for the user as possible. btw, love the I am Satoshi design, amusing lol
|
|
|
To sum up this thread, people are using Dollars, backed by Bitcoin, choosing to do that instead of using the Dollar backed by Gold. However, we all should just switch to Bitcoins backed by Gold, hoard the Bitcoin, spend the Gold, the USD is now completely useless?
Actually, isn't that what a lot of people want out of Bitcoin. I prefer having many forms of currency lol. I am fucking around, but I see some interesting points here and will now just go into lurk mode, the way the daily/hourly/by the minute (multiple) exchanges of Bitcoin works makes old school way of thinking on currency a little different imo, so older theories and maybe even things that were known as true are adjusting.
|
|
|
yup i'm jamie thanks, hopefully this is a good platform to get it heard. i'll work on getting a better audio copy online..
Sweet, again, I dig the track (actually heard it on YouTube last night, so neat seeing you posting on the forums). Something I have found to be really neat, and I think makes for a good place to host your audio on top of YouTube is http://soundcloud.com/bitcoinporn it's cool where people can comment on anywhere. Lots of musicians use the service already if you browse around the site. I would also consider just dropping your whole blogspot and putting on tumblr for the userbase may appreciate your music more than a blogspot person, and then you can have all your sites link to that page as a way to contact you or whatever, or at the least just clean up yoru blogspot page a little bit.
|
|
|
Can I use it freely myself?
Good question, I was wondering if this was royalty free as well.
|
|
|
Are you Jamie? What do you mean by "out there" ? If yes to those two questions, then if you want people to listen, they just have to know it exists, don't try to push your wares too hard, nobody likes spam and you don't want people to think negatively of you work without hearing it first. The right people who are into Bitcoin and good music will find it, it's the Internet, where even though something is always going on, it ends up actually taking people longer to find the cool shit If you are not Jamie and you did not mean this by "out there" .. then what the fuck are you asking? jk lol. I would highly suggest making a better quality than youtube mp3 available.
|
|
|
TorrentLeech is such a shit site lol, it's like charging someone to use kickasstorrents or something. Just stick with ThePirateBay if the best type of invite you have is a Demonoid or something like that.
|
|
|
Oh fuck, it's on.
Bitcoin users will help push this just because not only does it get people using Bitcoin, it will kind of get them away from Facebook lol
|
|
|
tim, the set up it seems like you have, means that maybe there is a way to do a mini-pool of mining over just the computers you have, I believe that can be done and people in the forums would help with that.
|
|
|
It was funny, I didn't see that other thread until this one, but already had Woz in mind because I know his sick obsession and amusement with them, even carrying uncut sheets to give them out to people.
|
|
|
Oldminer is the fucking man, like damn Santa Claus.
In fact, something is fishy here lol
|
|
|
Yeah, I like Aida/Home better, but if I am installing or setting up a computer for someone, speccy is the default program to just carry on a usb key when I need a quick bit of info. I have not found an answer, hopefully now enough info is out there to assist someone in getting you help. Otherwise, it seems the company actually assists with their products http://forums.lenovo.com/t5/ThinkPad-Edge/Edge-13-SU7300-Keyboard-Issues/td-p/370905 or at least their community does, so no matter what, I think you will fix the problem within a week somehow, good luck
|
|
|
Now how do I become an anonymous affiliate? I would just need a unique referral tracker tied to a wallet id and email for you or something? How exactly could that be worked out I'm guessing depending on where you are located and laws and what not this might not be as easy as I would hope
|
|
|
Tons of "vanity" addresses in the outputs... ie -
hahah, that is great
|
|
|
The people at reddit have been on this http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/ieqli/mtgoxed_again_captcha_behaxq/09:41 <MagicalTux> both sides were balanced 09:41 <iamboxxy\yousee> so why the $2.99 value? 09:42 <MagicalTux> because someone sold at 2.99 09:42 <MagicalTux> the matching system did a mistake however, and didn't process at the right price 09:42 <__doc__> MagicalTux: can you confirm that my understanding of the bug is correct? I understand that somebody entered a sell order selling 0.47btc@2.99$, and then the wrong bid was picked to fill that (the lowest one) first. 09:42 <MagicalTux> this was fixed now 09:42 <MagicalTux> __doc__: exact
09:51 <bittwist> __doc__: so if it continued for every trade, it would of been all over then eh 09:52 <MagicalTux> bittwist: except in this case it's an edge case, that happened because of a specific user's specific trades 09:52 <MagicalTux> and it's a specific case which is now handled & fixed The issue is the following: A sell order for 0.47btc@2.99$ should have executed high, not low. This is because the standing buy orders close below 15$ should have caught it long before a buy order @ 2.99$ would've been executed. That being said, we're going to panic now about 0.47btc. Really? Some matchmaking bug caused two orders to meet where they should not have, and you're all panic wombats again. Why can't mtgox detect sudden drop and suspend trades temporary?
While you can detect specific types of anomalies, you can't really detect all such behavior. You have to take into account the accuracy of the detection, and the scale at which it needs to operate, and how much delay there will be before it is noticed.
|
|
|
|