Pep really got it all wrong this time. I sort of get an idea of the game he was trying to play though, to play some psychological game with the Spurs team but, Conte wasn't there due to health issues and left the job to his assistant, such an important game and Pep was supposed to capitalise on all that but, the game he was trying to play just turned out to be a said one. Trying to put Spurs in a space where they would try to figure out what trick his got under his sleeves and then, make KDB want the game more than anything, watch and figure out what the teams aren't doing so well and delivers it when eventually substituted but, taking Mahrez off was just not it.

Mahrez has been a power house for the team, his runs, his crosses and he gets to go for the goal when his seen an opening which makes him vital to play a 90minutes in this game. Besides, the team was a goal down and R. Mahrez is definitely a player that could have changed things. Good enough, Spurs wasn't hoping to let City best them for a second time after having a lead start and somehow, Pep did let it happen. Not to mention the whole financial situation going on with City at the moment.

I've been hearing about this Manchester City and financial issues from yesterday and I don't see a specific direction to which the whole financial thing is point. All I get is they are being investigated of financial issues and it doenst talk about bribery, league manipulations and stuff like that. Although, contracts as per 2previous managers before Pep and players are to be subject to investigations and Pep is of the notion that, of the board haven't been telling him the truth, he would leave the club and won't be friends with them but still, I don't get the whole thing.

Points deductions, removal from the league and other punishments for this would affect the City team badly and Prp would be specifically off on this. His already stated his point and that would be something else as all his worked so hard for would be flushed down the toilet.

Both jobs have got to have certain advantage and depending on the lifestyle an individual is willing to level by, you would decide on which to go with.

For those who likes a salary job, you've got to be ready for a drawn line kind of lifestyle. There is always going to be a point where the lines are drawn and your activities gets defined around those points. Also, the level of freedom it might grant you. Salary jobs are often not at advantage of the organisation in the sense that, a staff might be sloppy on the job and still get paid but often, staff get paid as much as they work and that's the hard to accept part.

The commission job is one that rewards the hardworking and so its always a perfect job for someone who has got the tike and contacts to make the numbers count. Definitley something i would like as you get to define your pay grade which ain't going to be regular and you have your time.

A most ignored fact that keeps messing people up.
When individuals thinks of cryptocurrencies and picking an investment, they often tend to look at it from the price of today or the ATH of 2021 in comparison with those of the genesis years in 2009/10.
Apparently, those are long lost years and long lost opportunity to have taken advantage of that price.

The market is bearish now, bitcoin investment is good and promiscuous but, it would always have risk enveloped around it and should you not approach it with a possibility of a lose, you might eventually lose and it would hurt.

When investing, have a plan for your investment and try not to panic sale through all the FUD that is been promoted. Bitcoin often comes through.

It's might seem clever trying yo coin simarities in this way but I don't buy it. Saving fiat money and hodling bitcoin aren't the same thing. One of the reasons is the fact that, bitcoin isn't just money or a currency but, an asset. For people we buys assets, invest in real estate, you can't exactly term that as saving. Same way you shouldn't really refer to hodling cryptocurrency in that regard.

You save faith money with the purpose of just making it available for use in a few days, weeks, months or even years but, you hodl bitcoin because you have in mind that, it would appreciate in price/value which makes it some good investment.

The greatest limitation to how much wealth an individual might be able to archive or command to himself is based on the knowledge, level of information that individual commands and his ability to convert. What a man thinks is eventually what you are able to bring to your reality but, the know how is where most of the difference lies. If your not able to profound a solution to a situation in your head or perhaps be able to get others do it for you, your likely going to have stagnated growth or no growth at all or even decline from your level of financial growth.

We've developed languages and media's to serve a means through which, we can pass knowledge from persons to persons. Seeking just the right kind or being aware of its existence has been the limiting factor for most and would continue to be.

I think the better question is,
Is cryptocurrency or bitcoin should I single that out, I it dependent on institutional investors or should I say the whales?

I think the answer would be very much no and if that be it then, we really ought not to be discussing this. Surely, institutional investors have got there influences in the sentiments that they create and bring to the market but that too is based on individual perception of the message they've received.

Before they started hodling large amounts, some of them tested the shores with as little as they could afford to lose and later went big. There are those who came in big as well but, they kept adding over time. Them backing out won't stop investors from investing. It would only mean a bearish session that would be later accompanied by the bulls.

For the first time in our history way we dey suffer 2 very devastating things at once. Way person go get money and e no even fit use am satisfy want because of e no get access and fuel just dey sky rocket. E con dey like say, we go back into the middle ages but even then, difference dey pass now. At least then, of you get money, you go enjoy but now, even royal highness dey fine filling station way e go buy fuel cheap. People dey naked for bank with plenty plenty display them.

E no good o, e no good to dey push people go extreme like this and we Nigerians too, make we no over react con do watin go stand wait for us in the future.  We gats dey apply caution and reason to the way we tale dey follow up the matter.

Na why centralised system no be the best way for our current civilization. Person fit trample om people and nothing go happen. When they aren't feeling the effect, it's not regarded as an issue.

Arsenal was clearly off today, they weren't at there game at all and I think there is a reason for that. They underestimated the Everton side, for a team that has just got a new manager, is yet to harmonise there team and are at the relegation zone, they could bite very little. I think that's what there thoughts were and when I heard Arteta in a prematch interview, he said, Sean Dyche is good and would improve Everton but that, would be after they play Arsenal. What he didn't know was, it was going to begin with Arsenal. This the effect of underestimation, they forgot the zeal to win that could come with a new boss and being in the relegation zone.

Everton wanted it and they did it. Its just unbelievable but, Arsenal records its second lose for the season and there grip on the league released by some points.

Is this the same team Lampard had under his management that got fans protesting! See how better they are playing. The team right now is on another level of energy with the employment of a new manager in Sean Dyche and you can tell Arsenal is frustrated. There have been lots and lots of chances created but the finishing has been the only thing keeping them from goal.

A. Onana created a very good chance for Calvert-Lewin and all was needed was just to slide it in but, he was inches away from the ball. Abdoulaye Doucoure had his chance with a header that went wide. He ought to have done better with that ball for sure, a no contested ball and he was right there in front of the post. Calvert-Lewin again had another chance with a header but couldn't direct it on target.
B. Saka had his chance but Conor Coady was right on the line to bak J. Pickford up with the clearance. Nketiah had his chance sent wide with an attempt to roof the ball.

The game has been nothing short of a excitement in the first half, let's see what changes to the game the managers would make both tactically and substitutes in the second half.

I don't quite get you,
Your saying, we are in a bull run but the bears will stop soon! If am to go by your statement, I means we are still very much on the bear market an that is what it is. We are not in the bull as you earlier proposed. The market for this bear season dipped at $17k and with the market now around $23k being a $6k difference, that's not much which means, we are still in the bearish zone. If you get to look at the ATH around $65k+ you would agree more that the bears have still got the market and the bulls haven't go much momentum to push for a bullrun.

When I read the part of your comment that said always take profi and projected it for a good strategy, I was just about objecting. Apparently, I've tried that a couple of times with bitcoin and ot was the exact opposite as I ended up regretting most times. In the events of my trier, the price kept appreciating and and felt bad watching watching rise when I knew I could have hodl and have it all. I was trying to maximise profit with the strategy but after a long wait most times, I couldn't leave my money in stable coin and so, I often buy back and surely, its usually less.

Taking profit has been most useful for altcoins but not so much for bitcoin. Altcoins for most of it haven't been a commodity that you invest in with a long term intent given that, even the best or promising altcoins can dip in a vear market and never rises again. Why not that? Its mostly because, investors have taken profit and it becomes really risky to keep faith with such project.

When it comes to bitcoin, it's entirely different as, its got some securities on its part by promises of a future usage. Bitcoin being the one truly decentralized currency stands out as one whom is sure not to fail. Has history on its side and keeps growing no matter what. An asset to own for sure.

In all that is mentioned or listed above, only one stands out and that is, the fear of loosing money.
You know, if you don't make the profits in the market, it might bother you but, not as much as loosing your money would be. In loosing your money, you develop the zeal to win it back and what you want mots of all is to make profit and no losing so, the concern drives your every thought and moves towards accurate analysis.

The vest way to avoid this is by building confidence in your tasting patterns and that comes from testing the market with several trading strategies until your certified with one to work just okay. Other than that, its just trier and error or more of gambling.

The fact that you look at diversification this way, in terms of having your portfolio spread out amongst altcoins leaves yo think that your not even 50% on this particular idea. I mean, it should have been a well observed occurance fir you on market behaviour that, whatever affects bitcoin has a some worth direct relationship on altcoins as well. It's rather common that way, the bear of bitcoin is very much as well the bear of altcoins. They are all coins and that's a single umbrella. Diversifying within doesn't make no difference except when you take other investments outside the field. That way, we could say you've Diversified appropriately.

Been beaten once doesn't mean much but, been beaten twice is the very an act of subjugation. For a team like Tottenham, at least they've got to go there and get a draw, to share points with Pep other than let him tide on them and get all 6 points from there two meetings.  It's not going to tell well of Conte's management or the team they've got now in there squad. Am hoping it won't be an easy game but, Spurs remains what they've they've from there previous Manchester City meetings and they surely don't look like a team that can beat Manchester City but, getting a draw won't be asking too much or out of place.

Your so sure because of some post you see on the forum? Have you ever used one or have you seen them come back to post repeated evidence of some periodic payment as to how they are doing and the response of there customers to this new means of payment... I guess not. I might just have to remind you that some although I can't tell which are just phony. Wth that being said, I'll get right in to your subject.

Is there a reason to make your customers want to pay in bitcoin? I think not. What the point in giving discount?
Providing the means is good enough for the customers to have more than one means or only fiat means of payment hence, they've they've the leverage of choice and you've got the opportunity not to lose your customers to other competitors.

Discount on a means of payment isn't a thing but when it comesvto products or services, that's where it could matter.

I don't think you really get the picture @OP. Huobi is a crypto innovated exchange and they can't promote what would mean no business for them . They are out for the money yes but, they aren't gonna get one just to rub put of business later.

What you've got there in OP is a Irony. The definitely mean the exact opposite.
What we've got there is just some simple comparison for you to see how better we've got these new innovations, how easy and better it jas made things as opposed to the traditional. It's just as clear as that and it's really upto to spot the better and tag along.

I guess its all I'll be talking about today because, I just saw a thread that focused on loan just a while ago although, it came with another context that centered on having to invest with loaned money.
It's okay to take loans, besides that's what the facility was provided for, to help you archive that which money serves as a limitation but, you ought to pay it back and with interest if it does come with one.

Well, in my nation, loans have been really popular and we've got lots of loan apps or firms out there and these guys have been cheated of there money many at times. The few that have got it right is the banks. They've got BVN  (Biometric Vertication  Number) to link accounts and it doesn't matter which bank was used to taking a lone, agree to the terms of deduction and you would get deductions whenever its credited.

For other financial firms, its just different. There terms are sly and people just ride on them all they want.

That's so youths youths in country. I guess its not just in my country but for one speaking out of what I've experienced, It's just so annoying when they have that attitude towards loans. It kind ofakes me ask myself,

Do the credit score thing works?
Do this loan companies, banks inclusive even chats with themselves?

Am saying this becuase, your credit score is supposed to designate some individuals as credit worthy and others as not based on existing database but, you keep finding these guys getting more and more loans without paying anyone up. It's just crazy!

Worst is, these loan companies have just made taking loans so easy. You take it without any collateral and handing down any vital documents. I feel sorry for them both parties though.