Forum Username: FatFork
Rank:  Legendary
BTC segwit address: bc1q4j5rytqzgqx9y9f03ny52y37sprlddqljv9hru

I wanted to be fair, so I sent 0.6mBTC (half of the bug bounty) to your wallet. We both played a role in finding the bug, so I thought it was appropriate to split the reward.


It appears that the issue has been fixed for everyone. Based on the outcome of Game #22, it seems that LoyceV and BitcoinGirl.Club shared the pot. However, upon further inspection, it looks like the second deposit was not taken into account in the total balance. This could potentially be another bug, or at the very least, a flaw in the software that needs to be addressed.

@jackmurray, perhaps the simplest solution to this problem would be to automatically return all transactions that are confirmed after the deadline to the sender (minus the transfer fee)?

In theory, that's the way the game is supposed to work (or at least, that's our understanding of it). However, it doesn't seem to be living up to that expectation in practice. We'll have to see how Loyce's game turns out before we can say for sure. In the meantime, you can check out my review of Game #23 in the previous posts.

It looks like many members have already identified several issues with the game. However, the most concerning issue for me is that I believe I have discovered a critical bug in the gambling mechanics. I'm curious to know if anyone else will experience this problem as well.

In the following part of the review, I will be discussing Game 23, which was a completed game between me and cryptofrka.



Game flow:
cryptofrka funded 8000 sats to this address: bc1qgdh69sd0ldyapk3ux8kztkhfpx25le7lt6fjt0. I was supposed to send a certain amount to the address: bc1qdm8mnf5mfnhw6447dkev6s3fze63333vch5h28, but unfortunately, the transaction wasn't confirmed before the deadline due to a low fee. However, after the game round ended, I received an amount of 7840 sats to my payout address in this transaction.

If my understanding is correct, the system awarded the entire pot amount (minus the 2% fee) to only one participant (me), despite the game being set up for two winners (which is evident from the screenshot). Furthermore, I won the game even though I didn't even participate in it. I'm unsure if this was a random occurrence or due to my address being first on the list, but either way, this is not the intended behavior of the system and I believe it to be a serious bug.


*OP, this is my review, although I'm sure I will contribute to this thread more in the future and express my opinion as the game develops further.

The creator of the game decides how many winners the pot will be divided among. For example, for Game #25 it would be you.


If you create the game and no one else participates, then you will be the winner and win the entire pot (minus 2% fee).


I believe you've created a game for only one player since you haven't defined other payout addresses.


Yes, I think so.

I appreciate the effort you made to update the information on the website. However, I see that there are still some delays. For example, in Game 23 I have a transaction with 7 confirmations, but the site still doesn't reflect the correct balance.

EDIT:
OK, I see now that the balance is updated. I'm not sure if it's because of the 8 blocks after the first confirmation or some unspecified time after the 6th confirmation. Btw, do you really need 6 confirmations for this? Wouldn't it be better if the balance was reflected in real time?

Well, it looks like we've both got three confirmations on our transactions, but the game balance is still stuck at zero. Is this a glitch in the matrix, or just a cleverly disguised feature? Hard to say... Only the developer knows for sure.  

If I understood correctly, to participate in Game 21 created by ETFbitcoin, you need to send BTC to the designated "Betting address" (listed in the left column of the table).

So for example, my "Payout address" is in the right column and my "Betting address" is in the left column:



It's a good question, but unfortunately the instructions are incomplete, so I'm not sure if the address the funds are sent from matters or not. It's possible that it doesn't matter, but without more information, it's hard to say for certain. The only way to know for sure might be to try it and see what happens.


I agree.

Would you like to play with me?
I assume you have already created a new game? Can you confirm that it is okay for me to send my deposit to the specified address?

EDIT:
I'm backing off. I've already found a new partner.

Taj menadžer mi je potpuno nepoznat, a koliko vidim nije vodio kampanje još od 2017./18. godine. Na forumu se aktivirao tek krajem prošle godine nakon dužeg razdoblja neaktivnosti. Možda čak nije ni originalni vlasnik tog računa.

Što se tiče Coinballera, pogledao sam njihovu ANN temu i web stranicu i ne vjerujem da će taj oblik kockanja zaživjeti. Ako se to uopće može nazvati kockanjem...


Da, i ja sam ostavio svoju prijavu. Iznos je dobar za relativno jednostavan jednokratni posao.

I can't help but find it amusing that they tried to rig the competition. It was almost comical to see their shady casino operation come crashing down in such a spectacularly miserable way. 

As LoyceV pointed out, this was a scam waiting to happen and could have had much more severe consequences.


Flag supported.

Forum Username: FatFork
Rank: Legendary
BTC segwit address: bc1q4j5rytqzgqx9y9f03ny52y37sprlddqljv9hru

It's important to note that any scam accusations against a casino should have their own dedicated topic in the Scam Accusations board, with relevant evidence to back them up. Accusations without proper support will not be taken seriously by the community.

It appears that you've already done the necessary calculations, so you should be able to make an informed decision about what will help you achieve your goal. Just keep in mind that exchanging 4500 RPs for only 60-70 WOF spins may not be a good value, as you may end up losing sats in the process.

I'm not so sure that this kind of game mechanics is new, it's simple auction-style bidding in a digital format, and this type of gameplay is something we've seen before. And, you don't have to actually play it to understand it because it's actually very simple, whoever makes the highest bit wins the entire pot.


A strong reputation is a no-brainer for any gambling platform worth its salt. After all, players entrust their hard-earned coins to the custody of the platform, and a spotty reputation is a surefire way to chase them away. The design of the game requires this trust, making the reputation of the platform a vital factor in its sustainability.

It's simple - if you want to show that you're credible, just provide some solid proof to back up what you're saying and add some weight to your arguments. This is especially important when you're trying to persuade someone to part with their money.

For example, it would be helpful if you could specify the sources you use when making statements such as, 'It's not hard to google blacklisted wallets.' ^[1] As you are discussing serious matters, it is important to provide reliable sources, rather than just using a general search engine like Google. However, if you are really relying on the Google to identify blacklisted wallets, it raises serious questions about the legitimacy of your business.

Furthermore, this statement: 'Blacklisted wallet can be found on public lists, provided to the crypto community by law enforcement worldwide' ^[2] absolutely needs a reference to show where the information came from. Without a reference, it is difficult for readers to determine the credibility and reliability of the information being presented, which can negatively impact the perception of your business as reliable and trustworthy.

[1] - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5431878.msg61524064#msg61524064
[2] - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5431878.msg61515830#msg61515830

U HunnyPlay Casino kampanji promijenjeni su uvjeti te su naknade za sve sudionike sada nešto niže. Kampanja plaća po postu, a plaća se maksimalno 25 postova tjedno (od kojih najmanje 5 treba biti u Gambling sekciji). Kampanja je otvorena za sve Member+ članove.

Well, it sounds like you are a supportive partner who takes care of your family's financial needs and tries to be practical about your spouse's gambling habits. I think it's important to respect your spouse's autonomy and their right to make their own decisions, it's also understandable that you might have concerns about the money being spent on gambling. It is important to have open and honest communication with your spouse, as well as finding a balance that works for both of you.

It appears that there may have been a misunderstanding here. From my interpretation of M1cha3lM's post, it seems that he wasn't discussing the process of withdrawing funds from the casino or bookmaker, but rather the option to cash out a bet before the end of the event. This is a common feature offered by many sports betting platforms, and allows bettors to sell their bet back to the bookmaker for a reduced price before the event has ended, rather than waiting for the outcome to be determined.

You can read more about it here:

I agree. This could potentially be a cause for concern, as it's important for an online casino to have active and responsive representative on the forum to address any issues or concerns that players may have. Without an active representative, it may be difficult for the members to get any information or important notifications related to this casino.

However, this does not necessarily mean that players will have problems withdrawing funds from their accounts. It's not clear based on the information provided whether the withdrawal process will continue or not. As far as I am aware, there haven't been any reported instances of scam accusations against Multidice casino on this particular forum. However, it's important to note that the absence of reported scams does not necessarily mean that a casino is completely trustworthy. It's always a good idea to do thorough research and due diligence before depositing money into any online platform, including reading reviews and checking for active customer support.