Like all other previous matches on Dubai DSC, the batting first side continues their struggling. I guess toss alone going to play the deciding role one more time in this big tournament. Honestly this Dubai pitch is seeming like not at all fit for hosting a T20 match especially for a big tournament like T20 worldcup.

I was unable to predict a winner for this match hence I have not placed any bet (same for today's first match as well). Still, I guess we can enjoy a thriller if Starc and co make any big impact within powerplay overs.

Even machines need much more time to feed and equip with all needed programs . I am sure a beginner must dedicate at least 4 months of time for learning phase but within that period of time, they may check in live markets still that is only for gaining real time experience by risking least capital; moreover we have demo accounts and backtesting tools for exact same purposes.

Yeah for the ever-changing market conditions and volatile nature, we must need continuous learning. Traders who stop after certain period of time, may need to get ready to retire from trading career. Traders must need to update their trading knowledge and strategy so that they could have enhanced skills to make profits regularly.

You nail the traders who buy the peaks. I mean bitcoin being into strong bull run got nothing assured about our profits. Unfortunately I am seeing people losing their hard earned money even in this bullish trend.

There should be 2 main reasons why they are suffering:
1. No technical part involved with such traders.
2. Randomly buying by trusting the overall trend.

Timing is very important in every market which means we could make profits even in bear market in spot trading and the reciprocal is also true which is the reason we see people losing even in this bullish markets.

Different people must not need to be having same opinion and this way as per my own experiences stoploss is definitely a handy tool to save ourselves in order to get ready for another encounter regardless of how worst our prediction went in previous trade.

Unlike many people do assume, that without stoploss they could recover from losses, I feel like accepting your losses at minimum levels will help you to come out of frustration which will definitely help us to plan better for future trades. There will not be any restrictions on number of trades we may make per day then why should we worry on closing one order and then may make a new trade if our signal favours.

Definitely something to congratulate on. We have seen so many casinos that come in and go, it is a very big achievement to stay and do all of this. I personally believe that if I ever started a casino, even with 100k capital, I would be unable to run it for 2+ years. It is not a simple task, from marketing to bankrolling to many other things there are so many things that you need to take care of, and when it comes to something like a casino, someone could win a big reward at any time.

It is a costly job that you may earn a lot if you are lucky as a casino, but if you are unlucky you are leaving the door open for a huge loss as well. There is also the fact that the moment you stop improving and promoting, you are going to get less and less customers, in gambling world everywhere gives so much that if you stop for a second, people may leave for another place that gives them something.

But, I have different opinion. I am not seeing Pakistan performing well today. By the end of the 18th over, it seemed Afghanistan got better chances to win today but unfortunately the 19th over was bowled by Karim Janat who was lagging with intent finished off everything in favor of Pakistan. I was not expecting Pakistan to be struggling against Afghanistan like this. Even 6 balls are to spare, I would say it is not a comfortable win against an associate team.

Pakistan will finish up top on their group hence they may not play England in semifinal hence they may play Australia/South Africa/Sri Lanka as I am expecting England to finish top on group-1.

House edge is just the edge house has, doesn't mean that you will lose 1% each time. You can gamble 10 bucks and have a 1000 capital, by that logic after 100 bets you should have 990 dollars, but we all know that it doesn't have to be like that, sure if you keep on gambling in the long run that "may" happen, but we know that after 100 bets you could have zero or you could have 2k, anything is possible. House edge is not the result, it is the potential. We have seen people lose 10+ times in a row in martingale and lose all of their bets, that is just 10 bets and all of your money will be gone, that is not 1% house edge, it is whole bankroll gone.

We have also seen people win millions as well, which is awesome. All in all I have to say, you could keep on losing until you have nothing left, that is what gambling is about, focus on having some fun instead of trying to force a profit.

I live in a nation that has free healthcare, as free as it gets, we pay a very small ($2) fee for each visit but that is literally nothing, that is basically just rounding up number for the government and not for profit at all.

I can tell you that you can have both of these situations together, which I know looks silly on paper but works very well. We have both private hospitals where you pay a ton of money, and also government hospitals that are just 2 bucks. Do we have waiting periods? We do, not queue actually, because you just take your date and leave and come back in your date and you are ready to go see the doctor, there is nothing really wrong with that, or if you want to, pay 100 bucks instead of 2 bucks and see a private one and get checked.

My mother in law is sick these days, and she spent nearly 4 thousand dollars total, all private, just like American system. So, we both have that 2 bucks free healthcare system that allows us to get healthcare if we are poor, but we also have those insurance company loving high priced ones at the same time. It really works and it is a good compromise.

I am not active into altcoin announcement board these days hence I am just wondering that ICOs are still in existence? After lots of complaint about failure projects and intentional scams I totally started avoiding ICO contributions otherwise I might have been into bounty participations with my social media accounts. My humble advice to you is, just look for potential projects which are into market for at least 2 years rather than going by all new projects and their ICOs.

When we are investing into reputed projects but relatively new projects then we are getting some 50% assurance than what we do risk 100% in ICOs. Moreover, after leaving off ICOs, I invest only with bitcoins and I am happier with my returns compared what I earned from ICO contribution and bounty participation.

Why do you believe about socialism to be something that is only happening in the bad parts of the world? I mean yeah China, NK, USSR, and the likes all had dictators and communism and it was a bad situation. However if you look at Europe, they have way more socialism than USA and even UK to an extent and they are doing fine? It is not even about countries like Norway or Sweden anymore because they have been miles miles ahead of everyone else in politics, they are literally the best nations when it comes to politics.

However nations like Germany, France, Italy, Spain and many others are still doing it better than USA as well. They have free schools, free healthcare and many other things and they are surviving. Ones like Italy and Greece have national debt and near bankrupt levels, but they are using euro currency and saved, USA has tons of debt, more debt than any other nation AND not have free education or healthcare.

It is clear to me that socialism does work, just in small doses. Does France have McDonalds? starbucks? Sure they do, they are semi-capitalist that way, but they have free education and healthcare as well along with it. Just because you have one doesn't mean you suddenly become USSR.

My nation basically fits the description, we didn't actually have a law for it for years and people started exchanges when there was nothing and that really worked amazingly as well, it was really something that I liked and I used that situation to make a lot of crypto profit as well because there was no law. I didn't even pay taxes for a while because there was no taxes for the crypto profits and that was a great situation to be in.

Right now, we have supportive laws and it does require me to pay taxes and that is something that I can be fine with, as long as they support it then there is nothing with it, taxes are the reality of the crypto world and all of the business world. If you are making a profit then you are going to pay a tax and that's fine, as long as they support it and suggest that there is nothing wrong with it then I am fine with it.

I do believe that there is a bit of a difference between them. Polkadot is a whole ecosystem worth of thing, whereas uniswap is a swap and that's about it. Both of them are in the defi world and that is why you may think that they are similar in nature but the differences is that there is a good chance you may end up with something much bigger with dot. I am not saying that it will happen, as long as there is community behind it and the developers do deliver then there could be a difference but if not then there won't be any.

So, the situation is this: uniswap has a promise and it is doing it awesomely and there is nothing wrong with that, on the other hand dot has something that has a lot more potential, if that potential is filled and they reach that, then that could be a lot better but if they do not reach that potential then it will drop very quickly.

Trading and investment are NOT two different things in my perspective but if you want to allocate your capital for these two then you can manage your portfolio with respect to these and then you can calculate your profit/loss accordingly. When you are talking about an industry, I guess trading and investments are same but with slight different timeframe.

Yeah, when we are talking about whole industry level then we cannot talk about simple applications like gambling. But as per OP, it seems that only exchanges and gambling are the sectors we got after cryptocurrencies but in practical whatever we can do with fiats, can also be done with cryptocurrencies.

Yeah, you seem like a reliable source and I am also not ready to agree that India is starting poorer all ICC tournament. I remember Australia started 1999 WC with low form but won that and then remained stronger till 2010. Usually Mumbai Indians start all IPL editions poorer but they are the highest number of champions. Pakistan started 2017 ICC champion trophy with poor form but ended up wining the trophy.

---

Yesterday I lost my bet so I am in plan to double my bet amount today to recover some of my losses. Today I am going to bet on Afghanistan by considering their spin attack. Even Sharjah pitch is batting friendly, I guess Scotland cannot escape against Afghanistan's deciding spin attacks.

You cannot get such a guarantee from a licenced gambling house as they need to bind along with all government and regulations then when government insist for new strict norms on KYC then any casino which promised you for never asking may chance their stand.

As of now, the only house which is not asking me any of KYC is, freebitco.in. They are only crypto based casino hence they never need any licence which again lead them not to insist on any KYC. They have enough coverage on various sports so they might be the end of your search.

Unfortunately most of the traders are adapting long-term trading only after they are finding themselves not fit for day trading. This is because they are assuming that they could make easy money from day trading on daily basis then why should they go for long term trading which may get them profits only after weeks or month long holding.

If you study then you can find some similar pattern among all people how they are getting into trading. Because, we are all human and we are all hunting for money making opportunities which is the reason we are getting into trading and in trading we are all again failing due to our emotions. This way that we are having same kind of reasons and similar patterns on how we are getting into trading.

Getting everything ready before starting must be a valid suggestion for all beginners here but practically it is not easy for anyone to make all ready before engaging in real market. This is the reason we are having demo account and with the help of it, anyone could get ready for trading over the time. When you are having time along with practicing in the market then you can slowly make yourself ready for real market challenge.

Trading must be a highly challenging one because if you're not careful then you will lose all your capital still many people are preferring it because they are assuming it as an easy money making method. When people are not getting into trading without proper preparation but with big dreams, usually turn greedy and then losing all their capital by not booking at proper targets.

It is not about having that on ToS or not, it is about the fact that they only specifically do it to people who win a lot. I mean this is not even just the case for betfury only, it is the case for nearly every single place. We only have places that either ask beforehand or ask it after you win big, there is rarely any good places left that doesn't ask it at all. Which is why I honestly believe that there is a good case to be made for KYC to be asked beforehand if they are going to ask about it later on anyway.

What is the point of not asking it, if you are going to end up asking it anyway, what do they want, to surprise us? I mean this is not a birthday, you are not going to suddenly come behind the couch and yell surprise!! This is a casino, leaving it to shock factor makes zero sense to me. Either not ask it at all, or ask it beforehand. That's just what I feel about it, maybe people could disagree with me.

By considering yesterday's match on this same venue, I hesitate to call India is scoring very slow. Still, I agree that Pakistan's bowling attack is too fierce and it collapsed up Indian top order. I guess anything above 140 definitely dependable by considering the Indian bowling attack. I have my bet on India winning as India have never lost in WC events against Pakistan and I am optimist about continuation of that streak. In my experiences, my superstition belief are more profitable than my analytics.

If you have fixed Fighter A to be defeated by that underdog then you can simply bet on underdog to multiply you money by 3x. Lol . Yeah, this is how match fixing are working. Bookies will not wait for their luck to favor them but they will spend big money to make any champ to lose. (I know it is illegal in almost every country but for understanding purposes I am stating these here and it does not mean I am urging anyone to go for match fixing or does not mean I am into that kind of practices).

This is why unexpected results in any sport might get us big profits if we would have placed bet on "unexpected result". But, honestly I do not have any such gut to risk by betting on underdogs.