Bitcoin Forum
July 20, 2024, 10:33:51 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 [94] 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 »
1861  Other / Meta / Re: Bitmixer Spammers on: March 08, 2016, 06:09:18 AM
What? You don't appreciate a warning given by me to inform the newbies that they are looking at a ponzi? You might say anyone in their right mind wouldn't invest in one, but you'd be amazed.

If you'd like, I won't use that pre-made message. I'll instead  write a warning out myself. How's that?


I would if you will delete your signature right now. I know you have good will in posting those warnings but it is obvious to them already that they are investing in ponzis. There are couple of warnings in there already not to mention the bolded warning on top of the investor-based games section. The thing is you are getting paid with your so called warnings, if it is not your intention then you only have two choice to prove that you are not spamming with your sig. Either remove your signature or stop posting most of your post in the investor based games while you are being paid with it. You can use a different account. What you said is untrue, a newbie account can be taken account if they are actually here to do good inthe forum, tey are not shill account. If you want use to believe you choose. Btw, you can make an alt like Monnt2 or something like that since if you really want to continue the warnings.  Wink
Dude he is a spammer. He is trying to play it off as he doesn't own those accounts, but really he does but they are also for sig campaign spamming.
1862  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: #EarnBitcoin on: March 08, 2016, 06:07:48 AM
I think that it would be relatively easy to incorporate Bitcoin into those companies. People just have to take the initiative to do it.
1863  Economy / Economics / Re: The future of the paper money on: March 07, 2016, 08:49:38 PM
Andrew Haldane said one solution would be for the Bank of England to issue a state-backed digital currency based on bitcoin. Supporting this initiative would be a negative interest rate levied on paper currency relative to the digital currency, with these measures do you think there is more possibilities that sometime:

Paper money will be banned entirely?
How long do you think that happens?
would it work?
What security and privacy risks would it raise?
And how would public and privately issued monies interact?

I don't think that paper money is ever going to be banned. Bitcoin probably won't be here forever and we still need to pay for things.
1864  Other / Meta / Re: Bitmixer Spammers on: March 07, 2016, 08:45:59 PM
What? You don't appreciate a warning given by me to inform the newbies that they are looking at a ponzi? You might say anyone in their right mind wouldn't invest in one, but you'd be amazed.

If you'd like, I won't use that pre-made message. I'll instead  write a warning out myself. How's that?


Honestly. Think about what you're saying here. EVERYONE in I-BG is negged. It's like a community of the exiled, full of scammers. If the negative reps actually worked in that board, do you think there would be as many butthurt kids crying about the board?

Please, there is a reason for most things I do.  Grin
If they are stupid enough to invest is in a scam website, then it is their fault. Make an alt without a signature campaign and warn people. The situation would be very different if you weren't in a signature campaign.

That may be true, kid, but look at the real world. "Newbies" are associated with bad-mannered, grammar-illiterate, noobs. Their opinions are worth nothing. Trust me, ive tried.


Then why don't you buy an alt that is senior member of higher, that is the rank of your current account. Otherwise just stop spamming.

I simply don't go that far, into paying my own good money in the hope newbies don't invest. Also, ~50% of newbies don't even make it into Junior-Member-hood.
Then maybe you should use one of the alts you already own. Like funny or sirlagsalot. Unless those are also for spamming purposes.
1865  Other / Meta / Re: Bitmixer Spammers on: March 07, 2016, 08:40:54 PM
What? You don't appreciate a warning given by me to inform the newbies that they are looking at a ponzi? You might say anyone in their right mind wouldn't invest in one, but you'd be amazed.

If you'd like, I won't use that pre-made message. I'll instead  write a warning out myself. How's that?


Honestly. Think about what you're saying here. EVERYONE in I-BG is negged. It's like a community of the exiled, full of scammers. If the negative reps actually worked in that board, do you think there would be as many butthurt kids crying about the board?

Please, there is a reason for most things I do.  Grin
If they are stupid enough to invest is in a scam website, then it is their fault. Make an alt without a signature campaign and warn people. The situation would be very different if you weren't in a signature campaign.

That may be true, kid, but look at the real world. "Newbies" are associated with bad-mannered, grammar-illiterate, noobs. Their opinions are worth nothing. Trust me, ive tried.


Then why don't you buy an alt that is senior member of higher, that is the rank of your current account. Otherwise just stop spamming.
1866  Other / Meta / Re: What to do when someone tries to hijack your account? on: March 07, 2016, 08:38:39 PM
You should also change the email as well. Chances are the hacker will try to access you email as well. But definitely change the password.
1867  Other / Meta / Re: Why are some of my posts deleted? on: March 07, 2016, 08:36:26 PM
In the last 2 days I have had 2 of my posts deleted by the moderators.  I looked at the posts and they weren't off topic and seemed to make sense to me.  They were maybe 2 sentences long but I see many others that are shorter.  Does anyone else get deleted posts?  What reason could they have to delete them?
You don't decide whether the post was on our off topic. That is not the moderators to decide. And don't worry, everyone gets posts deleted.
1868  Other / Meta / Re: Why don't you moderators let me be? Why keep deleting my posts? on: March 07, 2016, 08:34:28 PM
A "business opportunity" might as well be an "investment opportunity", aka ponzi Cheesy

This spamhole has to have some sort of moderation down here, lest it be a clusterfuck.
You can't jump to conclusions. Give people a chance. But don't give them a chance is they are just spamming.
1869  Other / Meta / Re: Bitmixer Spammers on: March 07, 2016, 08:30:24 PM
What? You don't appreciate a warning given by me to inform the newbies that they are looking at a ponzi? You might say anyone in their right mind wouldn't invest in one, but you'd be amazed.

If you'd like, I won't use that pre-made message. I'll instead  write a warning out myself. How's that?


Honestly. Think about what you're saying here. EVERYONE in I-BG is negged. It's like a community of the exiled, full of scammers. If the negative reps actually worked in that board, do you think there would be as many butthurt kids crying about the board?

Please, there is a reason for most things I do.  Grin
If they are stupid enough to invest is in a scam website, then it is their fault. Make an alt without a signature campaign and warn people. The situation would be very different if you weren't in a signature campaign.
1870  Economy / Reputation / Re: Known alts of anyone: User generated on: March 07, 2016, 08:21:48 PM
Monnt is also an alt of sirlagsalot. Just wanted to tell you that so you can add it to the list.
1871  Economy / Speculation / Re: Bitcoin surpassed $300 USD. on: March 06, 2016, 08:43:33 AM
The price has now surpassed $400. This is a huge milestone for Bitcoin and I hope the price continues to rise for a long time.
1872  Economy / Economics / Re: Bitcoin in India? Not for a LOOOOONG time. on: March 06, 2016, 08:18:46 AM
India is not really good with the technology side of the world. They are better for their factories and industrial stuff.
1873  Economy / Economics / Re: How the Chinese Move Their Money Out of the Economy on: March 06, 2016, 08:17:39 AM
I am quite sad that Bitcoin transfer is so far down the list, but I am happy that paypal transfer is last on the list.
1874  Economy / Economics / Re: Investing Bitcoins? on: March 06, 2016, 08:15:46 AM
I don't really invest in anything with Bitcoin. I have invested in Bitcoin so that is something. Other than that I don't know how to invest Bitcoin.
1875  Other / Off-topic / Re: Will you quit your day job to go full time on bitcoin? on: March 06, 2016, 08:12:57 AM
I am not inspired those guys, I am definitely jealous of them though. They are early investors or miners so why would I be inspired by them.
1876  Economy / Speculation / Re: The future of Bitcoin on: March 06, 2016, 08:11:06 AM
Bitcoin has a long future ahead of itself. The next big thing for Bitcoin is definitely halving. There is really nothing other than that in its future.
1877  Economy / Economics / Re: When do you buy Bitcoin ? on: March 06, 2016, 08:08:18 AM
I buy Bitcoins weekly most of the time. Sometimes I buy when the price drops a lot and other times I just randomly buy Bitcoins.
1878  Economy / Economics / Re: Distribution of bitcoin wealth by owner on: March 06, 2016, 08:05:09 AM
TL;DR:  As a result of analyzing the "Mt.Gox leak", the number of bitcoin holders is likely 1.0 millions. Of these,
* the 400 bitcoin millionaires with at least BTC2,000 hold 40% of bitcoins.
* 100,000 owners with BTC10-BTC2,000 ($5,000-$1,000,000) hold 50% of the bitcoins.
* 900,000 owners have a holding of BTC0.002-BTC10, valued at $1-$5,000, and hold 10% of the bitcoins


This is NOT a largest addresses/wallets -list, we are talking about largest owners here. An owner can have many wallets, and a wallet can have many addresses.



22. Apr 2014

#People#Bitcoins#TotalBitcoins
70BTC10k+3.6M
930BTC1k-10k2.2M
13kBTC100-1k3.0M
85kBTC10-1002.3M
250kBTC1-100.8M
340kBTC0.1-10.1M
230kBTC0.01-0.10.0M
90kBTC0.002-0.010.0M

Total: 12.2M bitcoins (0.5M bitcoins assumed lost)

The changes from previous estimate:

- Total number of holders revised down from 2.0 million to 1.0 million. This did not change much in the distribution of coins. If new users are added, the large holders do sell according to an experimentally derived rate of 17% per doubling in price, but some newish holders also add to their positions. All-new entrants can come to any bracket, because no amount of coins is yet too expensive to buy. The perceived static totals of the analysis hide the fact that Bitcoin trade is quite brisk and the people who consist of a bracket do change all the time.

- Number of 10k+ holders recalculated because we now know better the average number of coins in each bracket (thanks to Mt.Gox data). So the large holders still have the same number of coins in total, but there appears to be more of the holders.

- Same for 1k+ and 100+. More people but approx the same number of total coins.

- 10+ category turned out to be larger than previously estimated. The Mt.Gox data gave us the confidence to use a steeper j parameter, which means a more "equitable" distribution with more coins in the middle brackets.

- 1+ category remained intact, and the fractional categories were significantly sized down. The lower threshold of "owner" was also raised to BTC0.002 because of the decline in price.

- Number of Bitcoin millionaires at this price ($500) is about 400. This means that only 400 people worldwide can raise a $million by selling bitcoins, but about 30,000,000 people can invest a $million to buy bitcoins (without going into debt).

- The Bitcoin millionaires command about 4.9 million bitcoins, which is 40% of all bitcoins. The control of world's gold and fiat currency is more centralized with a smaller number of individuals controlling higher percentage.




Earlier estimate of 27. Jan 2014

#People#Bitcoins#TotalBitcoins
46BTC10k+3.6M
820BTC1k-10k2.4M
10kBTC100-1k2.8M
68kBTC10-1002.0M
250kBTC1-100.8M
550kBTC0.1-10.2M
690kBTC0.01-0.10.0M
430kBTC0.001-0.010.0M

Total: 11.8M bitcoins (0.5M bitcoins assumed lost)

There is less holders than before in the category of BTC70+. The number of holdings smaller than this increased.

The number of bitcoin millionaires, previously estimated 930, decreased to 790 (-15%). Their combined wealth is 5.9M bitcoins, which is 50% of all bitcoins.


Earlier estimate of 3. Dec 2013

#People#Bitcoins#TotalBitcoins
47BTC10k+3.5M
880BTC1k-10k2.6M
10kBTC100-1k3.0M
63kBTC10-1001.8M
210kBTC1-100.6M
350kBTC0.1-10.1M
350kBTC0.01-0.10.0M
210kBTC0.001-0.010.0M

Total: 11.6M bitcoins (0.5M bitcoins assumed lost)

1,200,000 people own bitcoins that are valued at more than $1 (BTC0.001 or more)
280,000 people own bitcoins that are valued at more than $1,000 (BTC1 or more), up from 120,000 last month
930 people own bitcoin that are valued at more than $1 million (BTC1,000 or more)
1 person owns bitcoins that are valued at more than $1 billion (Satoshi, estimated to be BTC980,000)

Changes from previous month:
- Bitcoin total number adjusted to account for increase in money supply
- Thoroughly re-engineered the number of bitcoin users from original data of the userbases of several services + blockchain usage. This shows that the last month estimate was probably too small, and perhaps 50% of the growth in number of users can be attributed to correction of a previous underestimate.
- Corrected the highest bracket a little bit (BTC0.6M Smiley ) upwards because it was over-corrected downwards last time. Number of holders in this category went down a little but we have better estimate of the holdings. As this is a base case model, we do not assume large, completely anonymous entities without at least circumstantial evidence of their holdings.
- Number of people in each bracket behaves according to binomial distribution as found in another data with the parameters: total=1.2 million users, highest bracket=fixed, #of_coins=fixed.

As a result:
- Bracket 1,000-10,000 saw the greatest loss -20%, bracket 100-1,000 lost 10%. Sub-BTC10 holdings gained a lot.


Earlier estimate of 26. Oct 2013

#People#Bitcoins#TotalBitcoins
50BTC10k+2.9M
1100BTC1k-10k3.1M
12kBTC100-1k3.3M
58kBTC10-1001.8M
110kBTC1-100.4M
110kBTC0.1-10.1M
57kBTC0-0.10.0M

Total: 11.5M bitcoins, 350k owners
120,000 people own bitcoins that are valued at more than $1,000 (BTC5 or more).

Changes from previous estimate:
- Bitcoin total number adjusted to 11.5M to account for lost coins
- Significantly reduced the number of bitcoin users to account for the assumption that few people would play with stashes that are <$10 in value, and other evidence pointing to a lower number
- Significantly reduced the number of bitcoins owned by the highest bracket due to the lack of evidence that there are many large holders. As this is a base case model, nefarious premine schemes are not assumed without proof. Sorry for falling into that initially.
- Number of people in each bracket behaves according to binomial distribution as found in another data.


Thread is self-moderated to retain readability; user content will be amalgamated to the table and possibly deleted. If this happens, don't take it personally.
I wish that I was part of that group that owns over 10 thousand Bitcoins. I am pretty sad to be part of the group that owns 10 Bitcoins. Sad
1879  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Best physical wallet? on: March 06, 2016, 08:00:19 AM
My friend has a ledger wallet and he says that it is really good. I would definitely recommend it for anyone that doesn't want to spend too much money on a hardware wallet.
1880  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Why do people use so many Bitcoin wallets? on: March 06, 2016, 07:58:44 AM
I use 5 bitcoin wallets. just don't want to put all of my eggs in one container.
it's too much. there will be no wallet hack into your account if you use a lot of security. useless to use a lot of wallets. but no authentication
First of all, I am very thankful for everyone spamming on this topic as now there is a lot of posts on here and I am very proud of myself for this achievement. There can be a huge wallet hack and even if you have good security, you might lose everything.
Pages: « 1 ... 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 [94] 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!