Currently, the Block History on the Statistics page only displays the last 30 blocks solved by the pool. This can be a problem (and is right now) if the pool has solved more than 30 blocks within a time period that the entire network hasn't yet solved 120 blocks. In this case, you can't monitor whether the solved blocks are being successfully confirmed nor how far away they are from being confirmed.
http://mining.bitcoin.cz/stats/?history=1000 |
|
|
|
Hello, CPU miners.New version of jgarzik's CPU mining software supports long polling now, so you can improve your efficiency by installing it. Please upgrade.
|
|
|
|
Since 2 days my balance is not transfered to the wallet. No contact information at deepbit.net site... ::)
What is your login ? White it here or PM me. Your balance should be transferred each day if it's over your threshold and you have your address configured. I found a couple of users with word "sniper" in login. If the one with ~6.95 balance is you, then you just get 0.01 over your threshold today. Payment is sent.
Currently i'm modifying payment system. Tomorrow there should appear "Pay now" button for that :) |
|
|
|
Возможно так удобнее для рядового пользователя (использовать аналоги mybitcoin.com), но это дискредитирует идею децентрализации и неподконтрольности.
Нет. Изначально такой способ и планировался как основной. Иначе не победить размер кошельков и маленькую скорость транзакций. (в некоторых случаях и то и другое важно, например кошелёк в мобильнике не может быть большого размера а в игровом автомате в казино задержки нежелательны - азарт пропадает по 5 минут ждать блока) Вообще-то нет, как раз способ победить есть - качать только заголовки блоков и необходимую дополнительную информацию. И в гуглевском клиенте как раз так и сделано, возможно. |
|
|
|
2) And you miss one big problem - pps payout model impossible protect from smart cheaters.
Actually there is NO risk of cheating if you are doing PPS-only or you have PPS and sharing pools separated. Only without instant payout. And only for pool operator, not for miners. How, exactly ? |
|
|
|
2) And you miss one big problem - pps payout model impossible protect from smart cheaters.
Actually there is NO risk of cheating if you are doing PPS-only or you have PPS and sharing pools separated. |
|
|
|
А зачем тут инвестор-то ? Ээээ.. инвестор - чтобы оплатить время программиста и хостинг, видимо? Было бы стыдно брать 50 долларов инвестиций на хостинг :) А программист - да, но это и самому можно сделать. Тут же каждый второй - сам себе разработчик :) |
|
|
|
На сколько я помню, сейчас технически возможно выводить суммы
с более чем двумя знаками после запятой, если сумма больше 0.01.
Есть и прекрасно работает со слешевским пулом. Баланс одного из моих кошельков: "7.10318448". Насколько я знаю, сейчас все пулы отправляют с точностью до цента, не более. Да, остальные деньги остаются на балансе пула, но не пересылаются. Если включить пересылку, то потом клиенты завалят жалобами на пропадание денег. |
|
|
|
На сколько я помню, сейчас технически возможно выводить суммы
с более чем двумя знаками после запятой, если сумма больше 0.01.
Вроде, комиссию для таких платежей уже включили, после произошедшего флуда мелкими транзакциями несколкьо месяцев назад Никто ничего не включал в клиенте. Ее включили только некоторые ноды в сети. Сейчас это может сделать каждый, но пока явление не станет массовым, смысла почти нет. Большая часть транзакций с 0 комиссией по прежнему ходит по другим пользователям, хоть и медленнее. Большинство блоков генерируются как 50. Хотя иногда бывает и прибавка. Для пересылки платежей менее 0.01 БТЦ налог обязателен. |
|
|
|
|
А зачем тут инвестор-то ?
|
|
|
|
which is much longer that average difficulty adjustment interval, so you probably won't find a block until next step.
That's fairly irrelevant. Your expected payout from going solo is always higher. If you start mining solo with a CPU doing 1MH/s you will probably never find a block, but that is balanced by the fact that if you do, you'll receive a reward many times what you would have gotten in a pool. Only for that day. On average it would be exactly the same, but with each difficulty step your chance will get lower. Yes. And your payout from the pool will also get lower. You still get the part that was for days with lower difficulty. Of course it's not a strong boundary, but i think that mining with ETA longer that difficulty steps is not funny enough - waiting for days and weeks without any result. I agree with nster about the 0.5~1 GH/s suggestion, though you need to make sure you know exactly what you're getting in to. Even with 2 GH/s there is a chance to get stuck with "unlucky" block for a month or two...
Sure. A chance of 0.000011%. Not quite. Yesterday there was a 524205-shares block in slush's pool and 489991-shares block in my pool two days ago, so it's really NOT that impropable. ~200-300k blocks happen even more often. It really is that improbable, because I've made a *gasp* calculation ( exp(-720/45) ). Meanwhile, the probability that a block is 520000 shares is 0.1%, so I'm not that surprised there was one in a pool that generates dozens a day. Oh, my mistake, was still thinking about 170 Mh/s. When i started mining at ~22k difficulty with 900 MH/s, i didn't get a block for more than two weeks. Luckily i was mining in a pool :) |
|
|
|
which is much longer that average difficulty adjustment interval, so you probably won't find a block until next step.
That's fairly irrelevant. Your expected payout from going solo is always higher. If you start mining solo with a CPU doing 1MH/s you will probably never find a block, but that is balanced by the fact that if you do, you'll receive a reward many times what you would have gotten in a pool. Only for that day. On average it would be exactly the same, but with each difficulty step your chance will get lower. I agree with nster about the 0.5~1 GH/s suggestion, though you need to make sure you know exactly what you're getting in to. Even with 2 GH/s there is a chance to get stuck with "unlucky" block for a month or two...
Sure. A chance of 0.000011%. Not quite. Yesterday there was a 524205-shares block in slush's pool and 489991-shares block in my pool two days ago, so it's really NOT that impropable. ~200-300k blocks happen even more often. |
|
|
|
I would put more like 0.5~1 GH to mine solo... ie: minimum a 5970
Even with 2 GH/s there is a chance to get stuck with "unlucky" block for a month or two... |
|
|
|
The expected generation output, at 170000 Khps, given current difficulty of 76193.9710474 , is 2.24415163496 BTC per day and 0.0935063181234 BTC per hour. You need at least 2 GH/s to mine solo. Many people will not agree about this, but that's my opinion. The average time to generate a block at 170000 Khps, given current difficulty of 76193.9710474 , is 3 weeks, 1 day, 6 hours, 43 minutes, and 23 seconds, which is much longer that average difficulty adjustment interval, so you probably won't find a block until next step. Well, next step will be lower than current, but this is not the usual behavior. Welcome to my pool at deepbit.net :) |
|
|
|
I think that if someone starts providing pps and long polling for a more fair price than 10% they would quickly become the largest pool. Any price is fair if both sides agree on it and pool owner don't lies about it. |
|
|
|
This is a bit risky, so I'm using your pool to keep my variance down. Getting a bitcoin or two every day has really aided my peace of mind (and my relationship with my wife, who was a bit skeptical about the whole affair). It's well worth the expected "cost" of a few bitcoins a month. I'm still running an unpooled miner as well, since the lure of the big hit is ever present, but in the meantime I know I'll mine enough to pay my electric bill and have a bit left over.
You should get more than 1-2 BTC per day with 5970. Even a half of 5970 (~290 MH/s) should mine ~3.5+ BTC daily. |
|
|
|
Pretty sure it is open to new users as I just signed up about an hour or so ago.
However, now I'm getting even more and more annoyed at my incompetence with it. Tried each of the different miners it suggests, but couldn't even get any of them to begin to work, and the Help info given for each of them proved rather unhelpful or nearly impossible to find.
I think I figured out the correct info to put in bitcoin.conf though, and the correct thing to run for puddinpop's to get it to work...
You are doing it wrong. (at least regarding bitcoin.conf) Local bitcoin client is not needed for pooled mining, you don't need to configure it. The only thing you need to configure is the miner application. If you are using CPU for mining then jgarzik's or ufasoft's miners are suitable. |
|
|
|
Nearing 12 hours without a block?!?
No need to worry, it's already averaged out by a run of easy blocks :) |
|
|
|
dbitcoin, с чем связано ограничение на выводимую сумму до 2-го знака после запятой? как я могу вывести остатки меньшие 2го знака?
Во многих случаях официальный клиент будет терять "лишние" знаки, если их не потратить сразу же. Все пулы так устроены на данный момент. |
|
|
|
Now you can really increase effeciency to the level of other pools.
ROFL. You're funny. Please prove that statement and post the # of getwork request and # of submitted shares (which you already do) for each round on your site, and that will show the efficiency of your pool. I'll show you mine if you show me yours....oh wait....we already do show that. :) It's ok, i don't mind if truth is funny for you :) I was talking about mining efficiency, not the getworks/shares proportion (which is not important for miners). Who would care how many times miner requested getwork per one submitted share ? It would make sense only if pool is overloaded by requests. Sorry if you were offended by my statement. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
