It means that your transaction hasn't been confirmed yet. There are currently about 3000 unconfirmed transactions so it might take some time for your transaction to get 1 confirmation. Exchanges usually overpay the transaction fee so it should get confirmed soon.
|
|
|
Loyce bumps his thread often to remind users of the benefits of consolidating coins. Most of the online wallets are very limited and don't allow their users to control coins. They don't have to worry about consolidating coins but they pay more for each transaction.
|
|
|
Which other wallets would you suggest?
Bitcoin Lightning Wallet used to be recommended a lot because it was possible to receive Lightning Network payments in it since it has been released. I wouldn't recommend it right now because Eclair is much better alternative (better UI, free backup of channels to Google Drive). You might find Olympus server interesting but it's a paid feature.
|
|
|
I've already come across the wallet while searching for Lightning network apps. I will give it a try even though I'm more of dark themes fan.
Why not use Eclair mobile? It can act as a normal Bitcoin wallet and accept Lightning Network payments since the last update. It lacks some advanced features such as coin control and adjusting settings related to the change address. However, I didn't have any problems with fee estimation and on-chain Bitcoin transactions so far.
|
|
|
The bitpay invoice are still on blockchain or they have version for lightning network?
BitPay does not support Lightning Network payments and probably they won't implement them anytime soon. As far as I remember, their receiving addresses are legacy but you can send your coins from both nested and native SegWit address without any problems. If anyone here is looking for a decent payment gateway then I would recommend BTCPayServer. It supports SegWit and Lightning Network payments.
|
|
|
ACINQ has released a new update for Eclair Mobile. Users are now able to receive payments over the Lightning Network on the mainnet if their node has enough space to accept the incoming funds. ACINQ has started offering a similar liquidity service to Bitrefill. More information can be found here.
|
|
|
Nie możemy już nic więcej zrobić poza podbijaniem tematu od czasu do czasu. Gdybym miał jakiekolwiek wiadomości związane z moją aplikacją to od razu bym się nimi z wami podzielił. Niestety, ale teraz będziemy zmuszeni poczekać nawet do kilku miesięcy.
|
|
|
Is Bitrefill starting a fractional reserve in Lightning? Is that possible? Or is franky1's gaslighting getting better? Hahaha. ![Cool](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cool.gif) Bitrefill started offering liquidity service just like ACINQ in their recent update of Eclair mobile. Maintaining a node costs a bit so they charge you extra for that. Many people have been complaining that no one is willing to open back a channel to them. Now, it will be less problematic. The only risk here is that Bitrefill or ACINQ can close their channels any time so you don't know for how long exactly these channels are going to be active.
|
|
|
Prace dawno się zakończyły.
Oczywiście, że prace się nie skończyły. Masa osób pracuje nad nowymi funkcjami, które sprawią, że korzystanie z Lightning Network będzie łatwiejsze. Za jakiś czas LN zostanie wzbogacone o m.in dual-funded channels, splicing (dzielenie jednej dużej płatności na kilka mniejszych), RBF dla transakcji otwierającej kanał i o wiele wiele więcej.
|
|
|
Myślę że przeważylo szalę zwycięstwa na jego korzyść wysokie zaufanie jakim się cieszy (40+).
Taka drobna uwaga: podejrzewam, że nie dokonywałeś zmian w swoim Trust list więc ten wynik pewnie jest domyślną wartością. Moja lista jest dosyć mocno zmodyfikowana i dla mnie ten użytkownik ma trust na poziomie +153. Przydałoby się żeby ktoś stworzył nowy temat i opisał działanie systemu trust uwzględniając także ostatnie zmiany w sposobie wybierania DT1/DT2. Polecam wszystkim dodanie do listy, nicków użytkowników, których ocenom ufacie. Tutaj możecie zobaczyć komu (nie) ufam i kto (nie) ufa mi. Bardzo dużo osób nie ufa mi ze względu na to, że dodałem użytkownika Lauda do zaufanych. Wszystkie te konta mają ujemną wartość trust przy domyślnej liście.
|
|
|
Can you post more detailed information regarding the update?
1) Are users able to generate invoices in order to receive payments over the Lightning Network or their wallets can be used only for spending coins?
2) Are users restricted from connecting to any other LN node than yours?
|
|
|
Take a look at OpenNode if you don't want to bother with setting up and maintaining your own Lightning Network node. Here you can find the documentation. You might find it useful.
|
|
|
As far as I know TREZORs are not delivered with working firmware now. You have to do an update and you should not trust your new TREZOR if it is pretending to have the newest firmware. Wouldn't that take care of the backdoor?
Theoretically, it should take care of it, but I am quite sure that there were a lot of users who didn't know that the software would get downloaded directly from TREZOR servers. There were some cases of people using hardware wallets with already generated seed included in the box by malicious sellers. I have no idea how the device would behave in case of hardware backdoor.
|
|
|
Warto też dodać, że do tej kampanii można dostać się poza rekrutacją. Dokładna informacja znajduje się na samym początku pierwszego posta. Skontaktowałem się z managerem kampanii i wytłumaczyłem w jakim sensie mogę być uważany za "trusted exception", i jak widać udało mi się dostać. Widząc te wartości trochę się przestraszyłem że to nie miejsce dla zwykłych ludzi, ale cyborgów (no może poza naszym ziomkiem @BitCryptexem który wydaje się być istotą żywą...).
Bardzo mnie tym zdaniem rozbawiłeś. Jestem istotą żywą, o dziwo ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Taka drobna uwaga, staraj się nie odmieniać niektórych nicków. Bot, który powiadamia mnie o wspomnieniu, wyłapuje tylko jedną dodatkową literę po X na samym końcu.
|
|
|
Trezor released a security update a few days ago for both Trezor One and Trezor T. According to this article, 3 vulnerabilities submitted via the responsible disclosure have been fixed in that update. Does Trezor offer a way to check their devices to make sure they are genuine?
Beside holograms on the packaging, Trezor should check the integrity of the bootloader which is responsible for checking the firmware. Here you can find more information. It's a bit different for each model.
|
|
|
I would like to thank everyone for showing their support for my application. I really appreciate it. It looks like more and more Polish users are becoming interested in posting in our local section. This topic can serve as a good example. As some of you suggested, I started spending more merits and it seems to have a positive impact on our section. Since malevolent appears on the forum from time to time, I have also messaged theymos and Cyrus about possibility to apply for the position of moderator of Polish local subforum.
|
|
|
|