gold doesnt need to be backed by anything cause everyone has known for 6000+ years its valuable, even stupid rappers that make shit music.. it takes capitol,manpower,land and time to produce there for it could never go to zero unless 6 billion people get together and say hey, fuck gold i want bitcoins or paper dollars.
fair point but the world has never seen the internet before either and worldwide communication has never existed btwn normal humans beings as it is today. i could argue that the Bitcoin/gold argument is one of old world vs new world. from what i've seen of bitcoin, i'll go with new world. |
|
|
|
|
when something depends on u not understanding it, u won't understand it.
|
|
|
|
gold doesnt need to be backed by anything cause everyone has known for 6000+ years its valuable, even stupid rappers that make shit music.. it takes capitol,manpower,land and time to produce there for it could never go to zero unless 6 billion people get together and say hey, fuck gold i want bitcoins or paper dollars.
umm... roughly 5.99 billion have said "hey, fuck gold i want... paper dollars" i don't think they had a choice in the matter. |
|
|
|
|
yes, i definitely want one.
its anyones opinion but i think a HUGE yellow Bitcoin on the back should be an option too!
|
|
|
|
Can you make one that says "I am NOT Satoshi Nakamoto" ?
LOL! |
|
|
|
what is Asset ID? UBX returns an error in GUI
Works for me, remember you need to be using FireFox or Google Chrome. i am using FF |
|
|
|
Yes, I already wrote that... I even checked decrypting with wrong password (it failed) to see if there was a error somewhere, and checked the newlines, and checked the CR/LF issue between DOS and Unix file styles...
It just refuse to work.
my login won't work on my Mac Firefox but will on my Win7 Firefox. |
|
|
|
|
what is Asset ID? UBX returns an error in GUI
|
|
|
|
I don't understand what u saying by put up...
I issued 1000 shares as IPO on May 10 2011 & so far only 720+ sold. & the bitcoin i got was 720+ only.
when the new GUI went up yesterday, all old standing orders got cancelled. unless u put those old ipo shares back up for sale right away, other orders could've gotten executed above 1 BTC. its actually pretty cool someone bought @2 btc |
|
|
|
I don't understand what u saying by put up...
I issued 1000 shares as IPO on May 10 2011 & so far only 720+ sold. & the bitcoin i got was 720+ only.
when the new GUI went up yesterday, all old standing orders got cancelled. unless u put those old ipo shares back up for sale right away, other orders could've gotten executed above 1 BTC. |
|
|
|
yes, i am selling for 1 btc. but still there are shares left.
before that my share value increased?
I so far heard, share value increases after they sold out.
But there are ~280 left to sell from my issue of 1000 shares.
did u repost your shares up right away? maybe a share sold for 2 btc before u put up the 280 from the ipo? |
|
|
|
Only Nefario can answer  i fail to see any inconsistencies here? so the last share sold @ 2 BTC. your current bid and ask are just spread around that price. you should be happy about that since as i recall weren't u selling them for 1 BTC? |
|
|
|
theymos, so miners can choose the tx's they want to include initially in the midstate or hash1 to form the Merkle root which is included in the header and then from there forward they can hash away with only the nonce changing until they undercut the target?
No. The transactions are already chosen when you get getwork. midstate and hash1 are used only to make hashing faster. wait, i thought it was a given that miners could choose btwn paying tx's and non paying? |
|
|
|
Brilliant news. I was so hoping he was gonna get it.
credit Stacy. looks like her and Max "got their heads around it". |
|
|
|
|
note that he didn't exactly "recommend" selling silver b/c i'd bet he's busy unloading it at the local coin shop and transferring proceeds to mtgox!
|
|
|
|
1) The network has too much vested-interested. If such an attack were suspected, many would be determined to prevent it.
2) The network being as vast as it is, such an attack would require an enormous investment.
well, clearly what we're talking about here is gov't intervention. they have unlimited USD's to "invest" if they want to shut it down with this method or am i missing something? |
|
|
|
And once more, IT CANNOT BE SHUT DOWN!
what about the >50% network hashing rate argument? Nowhere close to viable at this point. why? |
|
|
|
And once more, IT CANNOT BE SHUT DOWN!
what about the >50% network hashing rate argument? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
