Do not forget, Bangladesh was the team who won recent home series against Australia and New Zealand. Today also Scotland should have been bowled out for less than 100 runs as Scotland was struggling by losing 6 wickets for 53 runs. But, T20 matches are mainly known for extreme swings like this; from 6 for 53 runs to winning the match in the end definitely a rolls-coaster ride.

T20 matches are anybody's game. Best batting or pace attacks may not be sufficient against a smart team. I guess West Indies are another team which must have better odds than India but unfortunately most of the talented WI players are not into their national team for some reasons.

I do not think that it will be appropriate to underestimate the powers of stock markets of USA kind of country. Bitcoin ETF will enable people to buy/hold/trade bitcoin like any other stocks with the same margin which meant for their usual stock related activities. So, there would be definite impact we could expect when we get bitcoin ETF hits live markets.

(Gold ETF should be considered here for good example, even gold is limited by 250k metric tons, we could buy/trade more than that with the help of ETF; similarly bitcoin ETF will help more than 21 million people to buy and hold more than 1 bitcoin each, theoretically).

I agree, still consider this scenario: bitcoin already got 1 trillion marketcap hence it does not need any individual investor who are going to buy 0.001 or lesser BTC. I strongly believe we still need them and the same applies for bitcoin ETF as well.

I believe that with 61k+ price right now we are going to get a correction soon. People will assume that it is a bad thing while I will buy from that price and I would be making a good profit from that level as well. I do not get why people are worrying about corrections. Depending on the result of that correction we may see something like 70k or even more or we may end up dropping as well.

The problem with corrections is that it needs to happen so that people who want to take their profits out will have a place and time to sell and get out and if you do not really understand that and get a panic sale going from too many people after that correction (or during) then you are going to end up with something like a start of a bear run. If that happens then we are going to have a problem but if not then we are going to break 70k a lot before Christmas for sure.

I believe that you need to be more precise about what is "uncensored".

Usually uncensored means not suitable for family viewing due to various obvious reasons like foul language and adult scenes. But, I just wonder what you mean by uncensored in gambling perspective.

Do you mean no license requirement is uncensored?
Do you mean non-existence of any resolution platform or authority is uncensored?
Non-enforcement of provably fair environment kind of situation is uncensored?

If you refer regulation is gambling industry is censorship, then I would say it is the most needed one for the welfare of both the parties. Yeah, casinos also need protection against abusers and a regulation is not usually working for only one party.

No, there would be very thin possibilities for bitcoin-only gambling sites to be existing. I mean not just poker gambling offering site, but in general with all types of gambling also, we cannot find a services to be accepting only bitcoins as these days altcoins have become a prominent options in gambling industry. I am sorry, I could not recall a gambling site which is accepting only bitcoins and offering poker.

Probably, you may look for a casino which is not accepting any kind of fiats including different payment processors. Because, when a casino handles fiat then it may start enforcing us to clear KYC at any time and most gamblers still hate it.

Do you ever feel like there is a good chance that we get to see Axie becoming worse while other games go up. I understand that bitcoin blockchain is not the best blockchain and bitcoin is not the "best" coin thinking how there are so many that improved on it and made better stuff but bitcoin is still the first one at the top with biggest marketcap. However axie is a game, and let's be honest it is not a good game neither, it is a mobile app level of game and not a good proper computer game.

There could be SOOOO many better games, the gaming world could provide us with AAA game that could be worth 200-300 million dollars to build and then we would have an NFT game that took 100+ coders and 100+ other people total of 200-250 staff, and 200-300 million dollars (marketing included) and you would have something that would be literally 10000x better than Axie. I am not saying that will happen, but what if? What if it happens? What will happen to crypto world?

Do not look at the signals because you are not going to be making a lot of profit by doing something like that, you would be making profit by buying and holding. If you end up trading constantly then you are not going to get the situation you should be getting with the amount of returns. You are going to end up with something like a loss in the end (or just not a big up) if you do not hold for a long time.

If you keep on trading short term then there will be times when you end up with losing money, trading has loss in it and you are going to be losing a lot of money and making a lot of money and hope that you are making a profit overall. However if you are hodling then you are going to be making a lot of profit as long as you end up waiting you need to.

Just because of this, I come to know there are lotteries are being offered in those decentralized exchanges. I am into very few centralized and decentralized exchanges but never got chances to experiences any such lotteries. Only on few cryoto casino, I have bought lotteries still never won anything in all my attempts.

Are you sure about this? Are referring only about the place what OP had mentioned or in general. I am regularly rolling on one famous crypto site and I getting regularly around 100 lottery tickets for last 4 to 5 years still never got chances to win anything. So, probably you are right with respect to most places.

I would assume that there will be a black female lead as James Bond next time around. Not just because it is hip to recast a white male role as a black female one which Hollywood has been doing for a while now, no idea why they are trying to do that and I am a progressive, but to move away from politics of it, they did mention something like this.

So, this means we have wide open list and not just age related white males anymore, we could be talking about literally everyone. From Jackie Chan level of action hero Asian to black female lead like Tessa Thompson or similar. When you have that many options that literally "anyone" can become James Bond, then we have no idea who it will be.

They are not low cap, they are quite high cap right now. When people are talking about low cap stuff they are not talking about stuff that are in the top 10 or even top 50. When we are talking about small cap stuff we are talking about stuff that are not even in the top 500 stuff. However, if you want to hold SOL or Shiba then it is on you and you can do whatever you want, they could still go up, just because they are in top 10 doesn't mean that they will not go up, they can still go up a lot.

SOL is a bit better, they are a great ecosystem building project, they stopped their blockchain when there was a problem and that is a horrible power to imagine, it is centralization so I am out of it now, but I understand people who are in. However I do not get the people who invest into Shiba, that is made as a memecoin that was on a hype and nothing more, why would you care about it?

There are ways too many people who never heard of bitcointalk and still made millions on crypto as well. I have a few friends like that, they did not know what bitcointalk was and they made a good return from their investments as well. I am not saying that it is easy to make a million dollars or you do not need bitcointalk neither, it just could happen.

Bitcointalk is a very famous forum and there are millions going back and forth here constantly each month, we have so many bounties and so many ads and so forth that it is definitely something 1+ million dollars changing hands here, so it is a great forum. However just because it is a great place doesn't mean that we can't make a profit by never looking at here neither, you could make a great profit by just focusing on learning how to trade and then you can use what you learned without looking here.

I believe that demo and the real thing would be great if you could understand that demo is what you would do in real life if you take it seriously. However many people do demo like it is a game and they do not care about it and that is why they end up earning so much in the demo part but then end up losing money in the real trading.

I do demo so seriously, in fact I try to beat everyone in the leaderboard which I end up failing so far, I am in 113th place in 9k+ people which is fine for me but I need to be in the top 100 at least in my mind. I have been doing it for a while. Plus if you do demo first and do great then do not jump in with all your money, test the real thing with small amounts and you will be doing fine.

I would say that they are doing so great that they are actually doing worse. What I mean by that is the fact that they are getting to a level where they are so famous and have so many new people (stunna said 10x more players) that results with worse results from what made them so popular in the first place. You become amazing, and then people come in and because there are so many people you slowly start to give less support and have less staff per gambler number and eventually you are not going to be getting something that is profitable for you and stake will start to lose customers again in the future.

This is a fact, if you do not offer what you used to offer people in the long run then you are going to be able to not get the same results and eventually people will not be able to get that great thing anymore and they will start to leave and you are not going to be getting that many new customers anymore because of the high number and you are not offering the same thing anymore.

I do agree that there is a good chance we could end up with 00000 being a thing as well. They have been offering 200 bucks for 10k for a long time, and we know that it does sometimes hit, there was a whole topic about it as well where mostly newbies wrote because freebitcoin offers money to people who share their 10k win, so people are willing to even open an account on bitcointalk and share their win, which means not only they win 200 bucks, but they get something on top of that just to share their win as well.

I would say that if they are rich enough to do something like this then they are probably rich enough to get something to the winner of 00000 as well. Maybe not 200 bucks but it should also not be same as getting all those 9k+ available options as well, should be something bigger. Maybe 20 bucks is better? Even 2 bucks would have been better to be fair.

I really feel the same. We had so many people shorting that eventually it turned to something that is a very big trouble and that is why I am very relieved that we are doing fine right now. Yes it is still not good enough and there are times it has corrections and that is why there is always a situation where we are going to not know what is going to happen.

I understand that we are not going to have any situation that we would know beforehand. However, it is cool to finally see it doing fine, yes it is not going to be like this forever and we are going to have to live with the situation where it is not going to be good so we are going to have a bad situation eventually but it is basically good right now and I am looking at the good part for now and not the horrible part that may come up in the future. Let's hope that this continues for a long time.

I understand that everyone wants it to be listed on Binance but it is really difficult to get listed there. First of all, the token itself should be a strong one, and the price doesn't reflect that at all, it loses power instead of gaining it, it should be something that people want to buy, and not only sell (of course they may want to sell too, everything is sold, it should also be bought though). However, even if we remove that, listing this would not be profitable for them, there isn't enough volume to make it profitable for Binance either. So, why should Binance list a token that has low volume and mainly gets sold? They could pick one that gets hyped and has huge volume.

It is not just about paying, it is not about bonus neither, it is about him being this late each time and then paying a bonus to make it look like it is fine. First of all they are already paying less than almost any place, I do not want to say lowest because maybe there is any lower that I do not know about, but I have never seen any lower before. On top of that they keep the money for 2 months and then they end up saying they will pay with bonus.

What did he do, gambled with it himself? Invested it? Made profit from what he should have paid 2 months ago and now putting it back with some profit on his pocket? We have no idea what he did.

If you are not paying on time, it is fine for the first few times after you pay, but if you are doing it all the time then it sounds like there could be a problem that will not be fixed, how do you know he will not be AWOL again for 2 months?

Depending on something could be a problem if it is something that is bad for the world. Oil is bad, fuel is bad, it hurts the world we live and that is why we are having so many fires all around the world whenever summer approaches. This is why we can't really have anything that is decent in the world because all the things that profit people are also things that hurt the world as a whole as well.

All in all high demand gets covered with high supply instead of alternatives and that causes the problem. Oil prices reached literally under zero at some point, during the start of the pandemic, and now its high, this could be avoided with alternatives getting more attention so that oil is not the only thing we depend on.

Sticking to the basics of trading is not easier unlike how it sounds theoretically while everyone learns from books or videos. This is the reason, most traders do break the rules of trading by taking too much or risks and then start gambling with the markets. So, there will be no shocking on seeing traders are approaching addiction helplines. I have seen people who got addicted to trading in exact similar manner to how gambling addiction ruins one's life.

I am not seeing any big differences on what usually gamblers do after losses from what traders do after losses. Losses->nerves->more losses->chasing losses->keep trying->addicted.

I do believe that there is a middle ground somewhere in there. I do believe that fiat will always stay in power and nothing else (even crypto) will pass it. However, I also believe that there is a good chance fiat will not be as powerful as it is right now. So, while devaluing and becoming less important, it will still be seen as the most important one anyway no matter what.

This is why I believe that there is going to be some sort of power struggle between crypto and fiat but not for the top, top will always belong to fiat, the struggle will be for payments. We do not have use payments in fiat to make fiat valuable, we could still calculate everything in dollars, but the payment could be done with crypto, that is what we are doing around here, and it could grow so much bigger to include the rest of the world. That is at least what I believe is possible, but it could be different of course.