|
XIP ID: voucrait01
XIP ID: bedutouw01
XIP ID: thiomiou01
bitcoin address: 13UXDrKaSe3khcR7S7avBPNfbeTithpWos
|
|
|
|
|
and another one
XIP ID: chouhost01
Bitcoin address: 13UXDrKaSe3khcR7S7avBPNfbeTithpWos
|
|
|
|
|
Good thing im bored..
XIP ID: souliaph01
Member Since: Dec 23, 2010
Bitcoin address: 13UXDrKaSe3khcR7S7avBPNfbeTithpWos
|
|
|
|
|
Seems they don't mind same IP's signing up, or set cookies or whatever...
XIP ID: stouclae01
Member Since: Dec 23, 2010
Bitcoin address: 13UXDrKaSe3khcR7S7avBPNfbeTithpWos
|
|
|
|
|
Well then, one for my gf
XIP ID: aniway01
Member Since:
Dec 23, 2010
bitcoin address: 1GwbrYBN149MbVYNcgaHkMBhmqaPr9xuM9
|
|
|
|
|
XIP ID:
kwukduck01
Member Since:
Dec 22, 2010
bitcoin address:
13UXDrKaSe3khcR7S7avBPNfbeTithpWos
|
|
|
|
|
Anyone still playing poker on betco.in?
I just discovered the site today.
I tried to play today but all tables were empty.
|
|
|
|
|
afaik bitcoin gets more ip's from other bitcoin nodes, we have to prevent the client from fetching those IP's somehow and maybe even prevent the server-node from sending them aswell.
|
|
|
|
|
It would be very nice if bitcoin would show the addresses a transaction came from, maybe not by default in the mainwindow, but by doubleclicking a transaction to see it's properties for example.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the GPU list, very helpfull!
I hope ArtForz won't go thru with this, a lot of people get interrested in the first place because of the mining, ofcourse, thats silly and not the point of bitcoin, but it gets the attention for people to look into it and learn more about it.
And ofcourse to keep the network balanced this wouldn't help.
|
|
|
|
|
The pool has been running for over 90 hours now, found 5 blocks in that time with a speed of well over 2000 Mhash, sometimes getting close to 3000! At this rate the average time to find a block is 4-5 hours.
With this in mind i was suprised to see the pool so far has an average time of over 18 hours to find a block.
Maybe it's too early to determine a true average on this 'short' runtime, but the difference is prety big. Is there a reason for this? (except for randomness)
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the answer slush, indeed i received them now  |
|
|
|
|
I started my old pc a lot later then the fast one, but the slow one already has the full reward, so it seems a block was found in the meantime...
|
|
|
|
|
How are the rewards calculated?
It shows my reward is 0.00237 BTC
But if i calculate my share it should be about 1.8 BTC, thats quite a difference...
I'm calculating this with (myshare/totalshare)*50 (as according to the website)
This is on my fast pc 60.000khash that has been running double the time compared to my slow pc.
My slow pc with 20.000khash has a 0.63 BTC reward, which is correct according to the same calculations...
Am i missing something?
|
|
|
|
Works fine Slush i used double suffix, my bad |
|
|
|
|
Soo... How do i actualy connect the miner?
I'm using DiabloMiner on windows i tried using --host=mining.bitcoin.cz and --port=8332 arguments to connect to the server but it gives me a NullPointerException
|
|
|
|
Oh, mine is running for ~1400 khash/s, several orders of magnitude slower than your systems. I thought I could spare a laptop crunching some numbers since it doesn't draw a lot of electricity. But dedicating a power consuming gfx card for the crunching would lead to a noticeable cost. So I'm out for now and wish you good luck with your crunching. Perhaps I'll use your monetary system some time in the future though, even if not generating any new coins personally. Thanks for your explanations!
The idea of bitcoin is not to generate money and get rich... if you want to use bitcoins you can just buy them, like you buy currency on paypal or any other online system |
|
|
|
I added the line to the remotebitcoinmineropencl.cl file build LOG:C:\Users\Administrator\AppData\Local\Temp\OCLD5E9.tmp.cl(20): error: can't
enable
all OpenCL extensions or unrecognized OpenCL extension
#pragma OPENCL EXTENSION cl_khr_byte_addressable_store : enable
^
the rest of the log is the same, still resulting in 0 khash/s |
|
|
|
The OpenCL client seems to run but it reports back 0 khash/s i tried changing -gpu- value, didn't change anything this is what it tells me: Client will start 1 miner threads
Attempting to connect to 173.255.205.10:8335
Connected to 173.255.205.10:8335
1 OpenCL platforms found
OpenCL finding best kernel configuration
1 OpenCL GPU devices found on platform 0
Setting OpenCL device to first device found
Create context rval=0
Create command queue rval=0
Creating program with source
Building program
Got message 2 from server.
Server version 1.2.1
Build program rval=-11
build STATUS:■
build LOG:C:\Users\Administrator\AppData\Local\Temp\OCLCADE.tmp.cl(19): warning: type
qualifier specified more than once
__constant const uint f1=0xFF000000;
^
C:\Users\Administrator\AppData\Local\Temp\OCLCADE.tmp.cl(20): warning: type
qualifier specified more than once
__constant const uint f2=0x00FF0000;
^
C:\Users\Administrator\AppData\Local\Temp\OCLCADE.tmp.cl(21): warning: type
qualifier specified more than once
__constant const uint f3=0x0000FF00;
^
C:\Users\Administrator\AppData\Local\Temp\OCLCADE.tmp.cl(22): warning: type
qualifier specified more than once
__constant const uint f4=0x000000FF;
^
C:\Users\Administrator\AppData\Local\Temp\OCLCADE.tmp.cl(23): warning: type
qualifier specified more than once
__constant const uint f5=0xFFFFFFFF;
^
C:\Users\Administrator\AppData\Local\Temp\OCLCADE.tmp.cl(74): warning: unrecognized
#pragma
#pragma unroll 1
^
C:\Users\Administrator\AppData\Local\Temp\OCLCADE.tmp.cl(269): error: write to < 32
bits via pointer not allowed unless cl_khr_byte_addressable_store is
enabled
metahash[(myid*loops)+it]=((uchar *)&A)[0];
^
1 error detected in the compilation of "C:\Users\Administrator\AppData\Local\Temp\OCL
CADE.tmp.cl".
Dcl_khr_icd=1 -Dcl_amd_fp64=1 -Dcl_kh
Create kernel rval=-46
Done allocating OpenCL resources for (16,16)
Finding best configuration step end (16,16) 5ms prev best=9223372036854775807
Done allocating OpenCL resources for (16,32)
Finding best configuration step end (16,32) 1ms prev best=9223372036854775807
Done allocating OpenCL resources for (16,64)
Finding best configuration step end (16,64) 2ms prev best=9223372036854775807
Got message 4 from server.
Done allocating OpenCL resources for (16,128)
Finding best configuration step end (Address 1MVUHYbcuuR5Dx6D9A6BzxsE9wtHqJRChx
not found in block being solved
16,128) 1ms prev best=9223372036854775807
Done allocating OpenCL resources for (16,256)
Finding best configuration step end (16,256) 2ms prev best=9223372036854775807
Done allocating OpenCL resources for (32,16)
Finding best configuration step end (32,16) 1ms prev best=9223372036854775807
Done allocating OpenCL resources for (32,32)
Finding best configuration step end (32,32) 1ms prev best=9223372036854775807
Done allocating OpenCL resources for (32,64)
Finding best configuration step end (32,64) 1ms prev best=9223372036854775807
Done allocating OpenCL resources for (32,128)
Finding best configuration step end (32,128) 1ms prev best=9223372036854775807
Done allocating OpenCL resources for (32,256)
Finding best configuration step end (32,256) 3ms prev best=9223372036854775807
Done allocating OpenCL resources for (64,16)
Finding best configuration step end (64,16) 1ms prev best=9223372036854775807
Done allocating OpenCL resources for (64,32)
Finding best configuration step end (64,32) 2ms prev best=9223372036854775807
Done allocating OpenCL resources for (64,64)
Finding best configuration step end (64,64) 2ms prev best=9223372036854775807
Done allocating OpenCL resources for (64,128)
Finding best configuration step end (64,128) 2ms prev best=9223372036854775807
Done allocating OpenCL resources for (64,256)
Finding best configuration step end (64,256) 3ms prev best=9223372036854775807
Done allocating OpenCL resources for (128,16)
Finding best configuration step end (128,16) 2ms prev best=9223372036854775807
Done allocating OpenCL resources for (128,32)
Finding best configuration step end (128,32) 2ms prev best=9223372036854775807
Done allocating OpenCL resources for (128,64)
Finding best configuration step end (128,64) 2ms prev best=9223372036854775807
Done allocating OpenCL resources for (128,128)
Finding best configuration step end (128,128) 3ms prev best=9223372036854775807
Done allocating OpenCL resources for (128,256)
Finding best configuration step end (128,256) 4ms prev best=9223372036854775807
Done allocating OpenCL resources for (16,16)
Got message 10 from server.
Server Status : 113 clients, 208372 khash/s
1 blocks generated since 2010-12-09 23:03:20 UTC
Server reports my khash/s as 0
|
|
|
|
|
I'm trying gpu mining with my new gtx 470 on win7-64
but i get only 77 khash/s
i tried changing -w and -v, doesn't change much on -w, changing -v crashes the process.
i'd estimate this card would generate about 300000khash
any idea what could be wrong?
[EDIT]
Issue resolved, seems nVidia just has realy bad OpenCL performance
[/EDIT]
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
