|
You should enter in your motherboard bios and find an option like "Memory remapping" and disable it.
That it worked for me is all I know.
|
|
|
|
|
I finally solved that problem disabling "Remap memory hole" in the bios.
But that will suck about 700 MB of ram per vga card.
|
|
|
|
|
A backup pool in the client could be designed so that it kicks in just when Bitminter is down. That's what I was thinking and proposing.
Additionally the developer could gain from it in several ways (either using a single account for the backup pool to get his slice, or by an agreement with the backup pool operator, or other ways, like letting use it only users who donate above a treshold).
|
|
|
|
OK.. maybe I'm missing something... can someone point me to one of his posts where he actually adds BTC to the gold/silver/oil triad? from looking at his site, all I'm seeing is that he has a bitcoin donation address... Sill a plus, but not exactly the ringing endorsement I was hoping to see...
Title just says he got a wallet! Gotta have a wallet to get BTC donations  I think the OP is just assuming, and now I'm just assuming. yes, in fact I asked him to elaborate on it in a comment on mine on his blog. Anyway asking for BTC donations is quite an eloquent endorsement I'd say -no assumption needed. |
|
|
|
|
I think it's time to consider to implement the option of a backup pool in the Bitminter client.
I would be happy to pay a fee when I use it.
|
|
|
|
So the need for the privacy & security feature of a currency can grow less OR more if the society grows better OR worse.
You are right, but betting on the WORSE is a no-brainer. But on this regard, the privacy features of BTC are actually much lower than cash and precious metals, especially for not-geeks. |
|
|
|
|
I just bought a kilo of junk silver coins and will buy moar in case of further dumps.
So much for my bet.
|
|
|
|
|
Who is using the bitminter client has no backup pool though (it would be nice to have it). I found that it was down after a while when I perceived a lower temp in my room.
|
|
|
|
|
Il mio dubbio sulla diffusione nell'economia formale e' dovuto al carattere fortemente deflazionistico dei BTC. Potendo farne a meno, chi li spenderebbe sapendo che sono fatti in modo per crescere di prezzo continuamente nel tempo (e lo fanno)?. Sarebbe come fare shopping pagando in monete d'oro. Meglio spendere piuttosto la "moneta cattiva" fiat che invece si svaluta e tesaurizzare i BTC.
Per fortuna esiste un'enorme economia sommersa (che pure e' in crescita e puo' solo crescere quanto piu' si (s)"regola" quella emersa), dove i BTC sono di enorme utilita' e praticita'. Se non fosse per questo penso che il progetto sarebbe rimasto allo stato di esperimento.
|
|
|
|
Dov'č citato Bitcoin?
e' implicito  nella logica conclusione che si dovrebbe trarne (che e': +incentivi x usarlo in arrivo). ma se e' troppo OT lo cancello. |
|
|
|
If someone can help me out with physical silver prices, I will add another bet as promised for physical Silver prices.
How about: http://www.apmex.com/Product/156/default.aspx? edit: 3 years, 11 months is a way too long wait. I would bet in a shorter term, 8 months max. |
|
|
|
I am open to other suggestions that you may have. Please let me know.
Get a scammer tag if you don't pay accrued dividends. |
|
|
|
For me it implies that they were just gays.
So anyone who does not discriminate against gays is gay? Very poor logic there sonny. I am disappoint. No: for me anyone for gun "control" (ban) is "gay" meaning illogical, emotional, brainwashed sheeple. So you've decided that no one has the right to tell you what to do. That's rather egotistical of you, isn't it? You do belong to some society? Or are you a unibomber-esque loner who enjoys only his own companies and does not care what society thinks of him?
Or, more likely, is it that you're happy to be regulated by laws you agree with, but not by laws you disagree with?
You are mixing social and legal norms, making a mess and trying to be specious again. So its better to leave you trolling by yourself. For the record, are you anti-homosexual?
No. Neither I am pro gay (I don't care if that is that mandatory according your politically correct party line). |
|
|
|
|
For me it implies that they were just gays. Anyway, I find very unintelligent to be "regulated" by anyone -of the gay lobby or not-, especially if the "regulation" is based on illogical and specious arguments.
|
|
|
|
The term "pro gay" is mentioned nowhere in the article. Is it a term you made up - are you afraid of the gays?
In a 1994 research paper titled “Sex and Guns: Is Gun Control Male Control?” Canadian sociologist H. Taylor Buckner documented three surveys he conducted of his undergraduate students concerning their attitudes on guns and gun control. He concluded that: …students who were pro gun control were also pro homosexual, pro censorship of pornography, and not experienced with guns. |
|
|
|
"Pro-gay" doesn't mean anything. "Anti-homophobe", on the other hand, does. I am of a different opinion: "pro-gay" seems just a politically correct way to say "gay". But I am anti-semantic. But that term is used by the author of that research. So you can go to argue with him. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
:
