Looks like the classic nodes are stalling, will be difficult to achieve a majority of classic nodes.
Hopefully the discussion will lead to an upgrade of core to bigger blocks as well, and preferably before the segwit introduction and more importantly soon...
Will the classic and core be able to co-exist? |
|
|
|
There is a whole little section that you are missing in this. Quantum, being probability, is always only probability. Probability can be very precise, depending on how much probability a scientist wants to put into it. The interesting thing about probability is, you can prove anything with quantum. Let's say that you set out to use quantum to prove that evolution is true. You could do it. At the same time, let's say that the scientist in the next room set out to prove that evolution could never happen because of cause and effect. He could do it as well. Quantum can prove anything, even very precisely. Quantum can even be used to prove the likelihood of evolution to be higher or lower, depending on the way the scientists uses quantum. At the same time, the scientist next door can use quantum to prove various levels of evolution improbability. Essentially, quantum gives a scientist direction for testing his ideas and theories, and the encouragement to not give up until he has proven that his ideas are true or false... proven through other methods than quantum/probability, since probability alone proves nothing.  DAMN YOU'RE SO IRRITATING!!!!!!!!!!!! For the last fucking time: Quantum theory is NOT probabilities! It's a very precise and simple explanation of how the world works!!! From THIS explanation, we can conclude that any observation on a very tiny little part of our universe (nanoscale) is IMPOSSIBLE because when it gets too small the only thing you can get are probabilities! Can't you see the difference??? I am not trying to be irritating or to upset you in any way. The fact that quantum is probability is not my idea. It is the idea of scientists that work with quantum. However, tiny is what quantum is all about. And your explanation of tiny becoming probability is probably correct, except where you say that it is impossible. In fact, this is exactly what quantum is all about... tininess that gets so small that all that is left of it is probability. But don't take my word for it. Listen to Brian Cox . 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fcfQkxwz4Oo. Yeah sure listen to the 60 seconds of Brian Cox where he can explain correctly for sure!!! Here is an article summing up the thing correctly. And please next time you try to get a point give a REAL proof, not the only time where a scientist had so little time (60 seconds IS short) he couldn't make the distinction between the theory and the application. "In 1900, physicist Max Planck presented his quantum theory to the German Physical Society. Planck had sought to discover the reason that radiation from a glowing body changes in color from red, to orange, and, finally, to blue as its temperature rises. He found that by making the assumption that energy existed in individual units in the same way that matter does, rather than just as a constant electromagnetic wave - as had been formerly assumed - and was therefore quantifiable, he could find the answer to his question. The existence of these units became the first assumption of quantum theory." http://whatis.techtarget.com/definition/quantum-theory |
|
|
|
...
Or take a car for example. The car is complex. But the people who made it are way more complex.
There are so extremely many of examples of less complexity coming from greater complexity, and no examples of greater complexity coming from lesser complexity, that this is a law of the universe... at least until someone proves it wrong. They need to start by finding even one example.
...
That is why paying attention in biology class pays off. I have two questions for you: Do you know we are mammals? yes or no, please? Do you know that we have a common ancestor with chimpanzees? yes or no, please? I'm assuming you acknowledge the evolution since you are claiming God programmed it. If you accept that live evolves from simpler live forms, you accept that life becomes more complex over time. These are not necessarily yes or no questions. We are considered mammalian by many. Nobody has scientific proof that we have common ancestry with chimpanzees.Life changes in some ways. The definition of evolve or evolution has only been assumed so far, but has not been given. You mean apart from genetics and physical caracteristics? Well what do you want as proofs. We've got all the evidence you need you just have to ask! The evidence can be interpreted in other ways. Because of this, it is not really evidence. LOL! Ok how do you interprete the fact that we got all those similarities with Chimpanze? When you look at the fossil record, there are even more, that are extinct today. Yet none of them is a crossover. Each of them are distinct in their DNA, with no DNA showing both of them. In fact, when you try adding DNA from one group to another, the added DNA is gradually "weeded out" of their system in their descendents. This is another great evidence for the fact that God made all the various kinds of plants and animals to be their own distinct species. Wtf are you even talking about? That's totally wrong! DNA is deeply shared between species! We even have 45% of DNA of common with a banana >< You have missed some of what we have been saying cross-thread. Sameness in DNA is more like 97%. But the parts that distinctly determine a species, never cross over to another species. However, this talk about DNA is going away from much of what we were originally talking about... that it is frustration with atheist stupidity that Christians mostly have. It only looks like hate. Yeah frustration of atheist even if YOU'RE the one talking about it in the first place... And that's dumb of saying that what is nto common... Is not common.... That's obvious! The parts of DNA that are unique of one specie are... Unique for one specie! Here is your logical fallacy: https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/appeal-to-nature |
|
|
|
They don't give a fuck. They don't want to see the truth they just want reasons to accuse the Arabs and Muslims of everything. That's all they want because they're too dumb to see the big picture ^^ Since science has proven that God exists, nobody can get rid of religion. We need religion to find out more about God than the simple fact that He exists. Since the stupidity and misunderstanding of science by Badecker, he thinks he's proven something while it's flawed as hell. Well, that's where you are mistaken. I am not trying to prove anything. Nor do I think that I am trying to prove anything. All I am doing is showing you folks how science proves that God exists. Scientific proof for God is self-evident once you see the science involved. What I think is irrelevant. Yeha sure. Maybe you could think that as you're the only one in the world thinking that, you might perhaps maybe be wrong! |
|
|
|
Extendable batons would work pretty good, but really, you should always bear in mind they can and will try to nail you for assault with a weapon if they catch you in the UK or Europe, I really hope the U.S gets nowhere with gun control as Europe is what you'll be looking at if these kind of laws get in.
The good point of gun control is that bad guys don't have guns either... The vast majority of agression are made without a gun. Which means you're less likely to get killed. After that I totally don't understand why the non lethal defense weapons are not allowed... |
|
|
|
Well, I like those expandable batons. Very handy and very effective if used correctly. But if the security situation in Europe gets much worse I guess people will simply get themselves handguns.
Nah don't think so. Handguns are really not in European culture you know. And let's be honest, a handgun is not really more efficient that a taser for example. I'd rather have a taser or a pepper spray you know, less chance to do anything lethal and same chance to defend myself (more or less) ^^ Simple is best. One blow from a baton and an attacker loses all interest in you. To the head and all his interests are most likely in the afterlife thereafter. I don´t have a baton myself but know someone who does and trust me this is a very effective weapon for defense and offense if needed. What is this baton your talking about? Can we have a picture or a link or something like that cause I can't see it ^^ It´s an expandable baton. It was mentioned on page 1. First time I saw one of those was when i visited my friend in London last summer. He insisted that I take one with me when I went out at night, even though I´m not exactly a choice victim for attackers. And I did, but nothing happened. I did demolish a wooden board with it though to see how it worked.  Seems pretty cool. Is it allowed? It should be but well it's not because it should that it is... |
|
|
|
Xapo is the best i think, not for many bitcoins but for small and daily transactions its the best, because it has no fees on transactions.
But for me xapo is the worst online wallet for me i can't login there fast after 2 factor authentic they send the code to my number but it take long time to receive your verification code.. its better to use coinbase or blockchain as online wallet than that wallet.. I never used coincase, i know blockchain is quite faster then xapo but it has fees on transactions, i think blockchain charges 0.0001 btc for each transaction and that is too much if you keep sending bitcoins everyday. The only reason Xapo makes sense is if you do faucets with it. That is only reason to really go there I think. And those doing faucets... look at your time your getting paid cents per hour's in most cases. Blockchain is the number 1 used hot wallet. It has a HUGE following. But people need to treat it like a hotwallet, don't put all your eggs in one basket. It should be a daily spend amount in it. Yeah Xapo developped itself on the base of faucet. They have partnerships with faucets and is very practical for that. Otherwise I don't really see why you would use it as a Hot wallet! |
|
|
|
There is a whole little section that you are missing in this. Quantum, being probability, is always only probability. Probability can be very precise, depending on how much probability a scientist wants to put into it. The interesting thing about probability is, you can prove anything with quantum. Let's say that you set out to use quantum to prove that evolution is true. You could do it. At the same time, let's say that the scientist in the next room set out to prove that evolution could never happen because of cause and effect. He could do it as well. Quantum can prove anything, even very precisely. Quantum can even be used to prove the likelihood of evolution to be higher or lower, depending on the way the scientists uses quantum. At the same time, the scientist next door can use quantum to prove various levels of evolution improbability. Essentially, quantum gives a scientist direction for testing his ideas and theories, and the encouragement to not give up until he has proven that his ideas are true or false... proven through other methods than quantum/probability, since probability alone proves nothing. DAMN YOU'RE SO IRRITATING!!!!!!!!!!!! For the last fucking time: Quantum theory is NOT probabilities! It's a very precise and simple explanation of how the world works!!! From THIS explanation, we can conclude that any observation on a very tiny little part of our universe (nanoscale) is IMPOSSIBLE because when it gets too small the only thing you can get are probabilities! Can't you see the difference??? |
|
|
|
That's simple : everything that exit the well-being have to exterminated, and this include, in this long list, LGBT, which is one of the worst abominations of the World.
Yeah! Let's destroy everything out of our culture so we don't have neither to change or evolve!!! |
|
|
|
But today Facebook scientifically proved God does exist with a little blue check mark. I dunno, that's kind of tough to refute.  Facebook? That's one of the biggest success of the European search institute  |
|
|
|
They don't give a fuck. They don't want to see the truth they just want reasons to accuse the Arabs and Muslims of everything. That's all they want because they're too dumb to see the big picture ^^ Since science has proven that God exists, nobody can get rid of religion. We need religion to find out more about God than the simple fact that He exists. Since the stupidity and misunderstanding of science by Badecker, he thinks he's proven something while it's flawed as hell. |
|
|
|
Yes I agree. God exists.
In your head.
This makes me very happy. Now that you understand that God exists, please start formulating some theories that we can use to prove some of His attributes. I will, as soon as you learn how to read and not skip the critical points. I know, I know. Since you don't even know how to attempt to disprove scientific points and laws scientifically, how could I really expect you to formulate any scientific theories? Silly me. But, of course, I was just teasing. However, nice to know that you finally understand that God exists, scientifically. You're talking about science? You consider the best and most precise theory in the history of mankind as a lesser theory that theories of gravity which were proven wrong already (by wrong I mean not perfectly and exactly right) |
|
|
|
...
Or take a car for example. The car is complex. But the people who made it are way more complex.
There are so extremely many of examples of less complexity coming from greater complexity, and no examples of greater complexity coming from lesser complexity, that this is a law of the universe... at least until someone proves it wrong. They need to start by finding even one example.
...
That is why paying attention in biology class pays off. I have two questions for you: Do you know we are mammals? yes or no, please? Do you know that we have a common ancestor with chimpanzees? yes or no, please? I'm assuming you acknowledge the evolution since you are claiming God programmed it. If you accept that live evolves from simpler live forms, you accept that life becomes more complex over time. These are not necessarily yes or no questions. We are considered mammalian by many. Nobody has scientific proof that we have common ancestry with chimpanzees.Life changes in some ways. The definition of evolve or evolution has only been assumed so far, but has not been given. You mean apart from genetics and physical caracteristics? Well what do you want as proofs. We've got all the evidence you need you just have to ask! The evidence can be interpreted in other ways. Because of this, it is not really evidence. LOL! Ok how do you interprete the fact that we got all those similarities with Chimpanze? When you look at the fossil record, there are even more, that are extinct today. Yet none of them is a crossover. Each of them are distinct in their DNA, with no DNA showing both of them. In fact, when you try adding DNA from one group to another, the added DNA is gradually "weeded out" of their system in their descendents. This is another great evidence for the fact that God made all the various kinds of plants and animals to be their own distinct species. Wtf are you even talking about? That's totally wrong! DNA is deeply shared between species! We even have 45% of DNA of common with a banana >< |
|
|
|
There is not tax up here in Canada. I vaguely remember however there being taxes currency in Brazil. I agree that Bitcoin is money and should not be taxed. I do think however governments should leave the currency alone. The fed is stealing a lot of money from the working class.
Seriously? How do they tax it in Brazil? Everytime you buy it? You spend it? How can you make this work? :p |
|
|
|
Nicely stated. Very good! Now see if you replace The Big Bang Theory (which is also a great show btw) with God and see how the pieces fall exactly the same way.
Scientific laws that, when combined, are proof for the existence of God: 1. Cause and effect; 2. Complex universe; 3. Universal entropy. Again we're coming back to that... How are those three laws proven for you? Why those particular aspects of science seem true for you? Because those laws are proven with less precision than quantum physics right now... These three laws are and have been proven for me just like they have for you. They are proven by science. And the fact that they have been proven is that they are called laws, not theories. Quantum anything is theory. This means that it has not been proven. This means that it is not law. Google it. That's where you're wrong. Those laws you're talking about are proven by experiment. The precision of those experiment are roughly at the 14th decimal. The experiment proving the quantum theory are precise and proving it at something like the 21th decimal. So quantum theory, or quantum law, is proven better than the others! Checkmate. |
|
|
|
Monkey reports in: Monkey thinks the next week could be uppish, but is generally skeptical out until mid-March, then bullish on the multi-month scale.
This time, I think I agree, but whatevs.
year of the monkey hasn't officially started yet has it?  Am I looking at what I think I am looking at?  |
|
|
|
Well it dropped a bit, it's true, but it's not like it went down 100$. It'll bounce back.
If it went down to 100 it would be dead for sure xD |
|
|
|
Ok ok! Jeez. No need to get mad. There is no God! There. Happy? We're agreed.
Meh? Not getting mad at you. And my problem is about how BADecker talks and decide arbitrarily that this is truth and this is not... He has to. He is like a cornered animal. People like that will hang on to their belief regardless of the evidence that completely refutes their claims. Look at Kurt Wise ( PhD in Geology from Harvard) He said that even if all the evidence in the universe flatly contradicted Scripture (which it does) , and even if he had reached the point of admitting this to himself, he would still take his stand on Scripture and deny the evidence. That is profound. This virus runs deep in his veins.... I know. Everytime I think I got him, he just ignores a fact and go on xD |
|
|
|
Since bitcoin is an internet currency that can be turn into a actual money. And Bitcoin too is known on Government but still government can't observe bitcoin that good. So I'm thinking if Bitcoin has tax??
Depends on your countries. Most countries don't even legitimate btc as a currency. But anyway there is no tax on bitcoin itself. But you'll pay any tax you have to each time you go from fiat to btc or btc to fiat. |
|
|
|
|
Well maybe I'm dumb, but what is a private torrent tracker?
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
