Dear fillippone, I would like to help to translate some of ur posts for the German Local Board. If its for okay u, I would start with a fairly well-known model, the Stock-to-Flow Model: Modeling Bitcoin's Value with Scarcity According to your overview in the start post, this text hasn't been translated into German yet. I would start with it asap if nothing speaks against it. Ok, no problem with that. Bear in mind there is a German translation of the original article you should point your reader to. |
|
|
|
fioccano i commenti per te fillippone, come vedi la community ti chiede di fare uno sconto al mega post che fai
(cosi hai meno sbatta)
quando hai la clientela cmq contenta malgrado il meno lavoro, direi di approfittare della situa
Mi ripropongo di finire, magari oggi, il report con il vecchio formato. Dal prossimo (giugno) iniziamo a rinnovare! |
|
|
|
Poi ci è piaciuta la notizia di una MicroStrategy che continua con il suo prezioso accumulo di btc. Personalmente però questa storia inizia a preoccuparmi un po', se non vado errato ora hanno quasi 150.000 bitcoin, sono una quantità veramente importante per essere in mano ad una sola persona/società, non mi piace troppo questa cosa, si rischia davvero una pesante manipolazione del mercato in futuro se andrà avanti così. Il problema semmai è reale. Molta gente ha comprato Microstrategy perché è considerata un proxy di Bitcoin. Ma se venisse approvato un ETF, allora questa funzione verrebbe meno. Questo significherebbe una forte pressione in vendita, con conseguente calo di prezzo dell’azione. Ora, data la struttura societaria di MSTR, questo non dovrebbe essere un problema troppo serio, dato che Micheal Saylor ha il 70% dei diritti di voto, ma comunque non sarebbe trascurabile in certo “incentivo” alla vendita. |
|
|
|
|
That has been done.
Survey completed.
Thank you @bitbollo for flagging this.
|
|
|
|
It was @ddmrddmr overloading the system with his merits sprees! Jokes apart, it's a weird thing having delayed merits, I thought it would have been immediate notification or lost forever notification! |
|
|
|
I thought DdmrDdmr repeated the same action again. Approx three hours ago, I got a notification from my telegram bot, and it seems I got another four more merits. I just logged in and figured out that no merits were credited. Now I am curious if it was a glitch from TryNinja's telegram bot. Is this happened only to me, or has someone else noticed the same thing? I thought it was another real spree, as he has done something similar. I am kinda upset now  I was really scared when this morning I got a bunch of notifications from @tryninja bot about other merits from @ddmrddmr. Luckily, it was sone kind of delay in the bot and not another spree! |
|
|
|
Thank you once again for your flawless timing!  |
|
|
|
Merit Spree #38 by @ddmrddrmr Official @ddmrddmr threadOfficial Description: Version 38 - 30/06/2023 (305 posts merited (by me) in just under 5 minutes) -> 305 sMerits
Merited all posts that:
- I have not merited before.
- Have received merits from at least five different people since january 2023.
- Are not in Services not WO.
The goal is to merit post I have either ignored or not come across in boards I do not visit, and that others seem to deem merit worthy, allowing me to unload a bunch of sMerits in the process.
My review: A simple merit spree. Efficient. I guess it was used to deplete his merit stash before the end of the month.  In the spreadsheet, you see it is a pretty routine job for our quasi-machine friend:  |
|
|
|
Merit spree incoming! Ddmrddmr is at full steam now!
Merit Spree #37 by @ddmrddrmr Official @ddmrddmr threadOfficial Description:
Version 37 - 30/06/2023 (20 posts merited (by me) in just under 1 minute) -> 42 sMerits
Remerited all my merited posts since my last spree (+ some backlogged pending ones), for non-banned users (from today backwards).
My review: A very small and fast one. It was by far the smallest on record but also the quickest. A ninja-style work is crushing the tx/second record. Probably he's testing how long he can break the one tx/second barrier on the forum without angering @theymos. As a consequence of bein a 3x merit spree, it also broke the record for metis/second. The cyborg bot is at it again.  You can see how fast it was in the spreadsheet:  Ops, I was quite off with my prediction: Can we also forecast the date: 8th of July. (of course now @ddmrddmr will read this and this is going to impact the answer... what if I set as dimension 1 so that it is written, but probably no one will ever notice? )
@ddmrddmr was almost one week in advance! Looking at the most merited users in this round. Here’s the TOP10: 1. Shawshank 4
1. d5000 4
3. Rikafip 3
4. fillippone 3
5. skarais 2
5. Silberman 2
5. seoincorporation 2
5. RickDeckard 2
5. PowerGlove 2
5. joker_josue 2
5. hosseinimr93 2
5. Hispo 2
5. famososMuertos 2
5. ETFbitcoin 2
5. edward500 2
5. darxiaomi 2
5. Crypto Library 2
5. Coin-1 2
The TOP10 is actually a Top5, as there were a few members in this round, each of them with a small number of merits. 41 merits are the highest on record (merit spree 30!) |
|
|
|
1. Rikafip recently hit 5000 merit. Congrats.
2. icopress also hit 5000 merit. Congrats.
3. fillippone hit an impressive milestone of 13,000 merit. Congrats.
I see what you did here… Edit: credits for Rikafip too! |
|
|
|
|
Sia messo agli atti che in questo momento mi ri-metto al lavoro sul report META.
Edit: sono arrivato alla figura 15. (qualcuno sta seguendo questo count-down?)
|
|
|
|
It is clear from their form-8k: On June 28, 2023, MicroStrategy announced that, as of June 27, 2023, MicroStrategy had issued and sold an aggregate of 1,079,170 Shares under the Sales Agreement for aggregate net proceeds to MicroStrategy (less sales commissions and expenses) of approximately $333.7 million. The holding forever intend my be genuine. MicroStrategy does however sell underlying stock to investors. (even attempting to time the market? as they did in the previous bull market when MSTR > $1k per share)Good spot. They also have roughly 95 million in cash equivalent. I suspect they will use those funds as well. |
|
|
|
|
Pure io sto scrivendo meno.
Ho uno stash di merits arretrati da distribuire abbastanza rilevante.
Diciamo che il concorso delle pizze, la debacle della mia bozza sul meta ed alcuni sbattimenti a livello personale, mi hanno un pò bloccato.
Ma non temete, non vi lascio soli.
|
|
|
|
Buongiorno, Qui l'articolo su repubblica: https://www.repubblica.it/economia/2023/06/27/news/ritratto_panetta_il_banchiere_che_parla_chiaro_contro_i_falchi_e_criptomonete-405948238/?ref=RHLF-BG-I405950825-P6-S1-T1Oltre al fatto che lo stesso giornale non si è fatta scappare l'occasione di definire le cryptovalute una "sola" in un articolo che dovrebbe parlare di altro (chi è Panetta? Il ttitolo dell'aticolo, che lascia intendere al currculum del medesimo), da quanto si legge si capisce subito che ci apsetta probabilmente una impostazione ancora più limitativa e restrittiva per quanto concerne i poteri di controllo esercitati da Bankit sulle cryptovalute. Daltronde li capisco pure : Be your own Bank significa per il sistema bancario perdere quel potere che condiziona la vita di tutti noi. Dalle scelte di politica economica a sostegno della guerra, all'usura legalizzata (compri una macchina ma ti fanno lo sconto solo se la prendi a debito), a tutte le altre nefandezze che non potrebbero mai esistere se Bitcoin fosse utilizzato quale valuta di scambio primario: bitcoin fa paura al sistema, e la guerra è appena cominciata. Panetta, che poi sarebbe il coordinatore europeo del progetto dell'Euro Digitale, ha idee piuttosto. confuse riguardo alle criprovalute. Speriamo che sia in malafede, perchè se davvero non riesce a distinugere le castronerie che dice dalla realtà, allora è davvero preoccupante. |
|
|
|
Ah anche io pensavo questo (sbagliato), imparo sempre cose nuove.
In effetti se aumenta hashrate e dopo una settimana si aggiusta la difficolta allora ovviamente non serve molto, serve al massimo per una settimana.
Non ci avevo mai pensato, grazie. Dalle domande altrui si imparano cosi
Beh, comunque l'hashrate ha una funzione: rendere più sicura la rete bitcoin. So che il "security budget" è un argomento controverso, ma anche se escono blocchi ogni 10 minuti, se per farlo si deve usare 100 volte l'hardware, vuol dire che la rete sarà, grossomodo, 100 volte più sicura. |
|
|
|
|
Be warned about the risky situation of Microstrategy.
Everyone is looking at Microstrategy as an "ETF proxy".
They are buying a lot of BTC, and investors have flocked to MSTR because of that.
In case of an ETF approval, Microstrategy would lose all those investors, as the ETF is such a more efficient way of holding BTC.
In case you want to bet on ETF approval: Long GBTC, short MSTR!
|
|
|
|
New buy!  |
|
|
|
There is no way for anyone to prove pizza was made by myself...
It can be made by my aunt, next door guy or custom made in pizzeria by proffesionals.
There is no way of proving it, of course, but I am sure I spotted a few professionally made pizzas in the contest. Having your auntie helping you bake a pizza is a thing, buying that and taking a picture is a different thing. Of course the pic in process help sort this kind of things, as for example professional oven should help clarify a pizza was not home baked… Wait...so that means no more lemon and potato ''pizza'' experiments?  NO Brand new, newbies and Junior members should not be allowed, but everyone else should.
You are proposing also members can vote? Well, I was trying to prevent farming accounts, but I guess farming a few Members account can be difficult as well, up to contest organisers. Of course higher ranks were always meant to vote… It's Italian thing... good thing if this year winner don't wake up one day with horse head in his bed   Who told you didn’t happen? What happens in the Italian board stay in the Italian board. |
|
|
|
By promotion, I mean not spamming the board but engaging the respective members of the local board to the participant's thread on the local board.
I don’t understand why you want promotion. You want an anonymous contest to avoid the pizza contest becoming a “popularity contest” or you want to put rules in the promotion because you want it to be a popularity contest? Also, I was thinking about the anonymous submissions: I have only one kitchen table, and I guess next year (unless very unrealistic price trajectory) I will be baking on the same table. This mean an astute eye will still be able to spot my pizza. Is it going to be my fault? |
|
|
|
Besides all above suggestions @fillippone just came up with another very interesting idea in the Italian section, which would be the anonymous submission in order to avoid people voting a certain pizza just because the user who made is "popular". I second that and I was also suggesting that the participants should take one picture with their username and one without so the winner(s) can later submit the same picture but this time with their username tag to confirm they actually made that pizza.
For the sake of clarity, when proposing that idea I also told that it could be easily gamed still, yet posing a significant burden on the contest organiser. Each choice has a trade-off. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
