so you have no way of making money from gambling, unless you have an extremely great strategy that no one has come up with, but it's extremely rare.
You don't really need any strategies to win big through gambling. Luck is all that is required basically. For example, people who win big through slots and lotteries never use any sort of strategies. Luck favoured them. What can help you "make money" is bonuses, and things that give you an edge over the house - by using these things you might be able to gain something, but you still need a proper control over what you do, and to plan ahead as well.
It's getting harder and harder to make money through these bonuses thanks to higher wagering requirements etc.
|
|
|
I prefer BTC, but I am dependent on both to different extents. I use FIAT way more when compared to BTC for obvious reasons, but I still prefer BTC over it primarily due to its decentralised nature.
FIAT is my first preference for payments while BTC is my first preference for short-term and long-term investments.
|
|
|
Sad to see sky performing like crap these days, but it's just a bad phase which will pass. Fans of Samson are trying to take advantage of this opportunity, but it's truly pointless since Sky is an incredible talent in the ODI and T-20 formats.
The upcoming IPL season could help him recover his form which would help in the upcoming ODI World Cup.
|
|
|
isn't it interesting how sometimes an user can have a really bad win rate but still be profitable longterm? if he/she limits big losses and wins big sometimes even a strategy with as much as 80% of bad bets can be profitable
math is amazing
If we are talking about casino games, it all comes down to luck at the end of the day. One big win can surely help minimise losses, but that is only possible in the short-term as long as luck sides with you. You cannot win in the long-term due to the house edge factor in any casino honestly speaking.
|
|
|
There will never be a gambler who can have a win rate of up to 99% if there is just luck and you can't get it every time. Gamblers always have a level of losses not wins because in gambling winnings can only be owned by the dealer, not a gambler.
What the heck are you talking about? It is possible to gamble with a 99% win rate in games like dice, blackjack, baccarat etc where the house edge is 1% or lower. You clearly misunderstood what I stated. To him it's like nothing and he is not affected if he loses. It seems that he really knows what risk he is taking.
How are you so sure that he wasn't affected by the loss? That may or may not be the case.
|
|
|
Australia is back on top before the ODI World Cup after proving themselves across all formats in recent times.
Also, I don't think Smith will remain the captain once Cummins returns because he has more experience and due to Smith's bad history. However, if Cummins doesn't return for certain reasons, then Smith will remain as the captain.
|
|
|
But that's not the always gonna happen since people always get influence for the win accumulated by other that's why they want to get that also and try to win some big amounts of cash. This is really dangerous for people since their greediness will put them on bad situation that's why responsible gambling is good to be remembered by anyone and treat this place as source of entertainment and you will be in good condition for this.
None of this will ever change frankly speaking since most people are greedy as hell which is why they will try to keep winning more and more money leading to bigger losses in the long-term wreaking their lives in various ways. This is how gambling sites(FIAT and Crypto) stay in business in the long-term.
|
|
|
The gambler's mistake is greed, and seeing a profit of 0.5℅-1℅ is small. Even consider it a loss. If only they could think of taking small profits and playing in games with small risks. In fact, gambling can have higher interest than any financial instrument. But back again. The mindset of people is different
I disagree. Gambling is always risky even when you are gambling with a 99% win rate since you will eventually encounter the 1% loss due to the house edge which would blow your funds just like that. Investing in government instruments like fixed deposits etc are always a lot safer in comparison.
|
|
|
Earned decent profits by predicting the outright winners of the test and ODI series between India and Australia. Australia's performance in the test series made it easier to predict who would win the ODI series.
They are the frontrunners for the World Cup later on this year followed by India in my opinion.
|
|
|
Can't believe this imposter is still trying to get account numbers out of users... I imagine he'll also want passwords to go with it as well ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) 1xbit1 is a brainless fool who actually thinks that he can somehow withdraw victim funds by gaining access to their accounts when the reality is that 1xbit itself is a way bigger scam site that will not release the funds no matter what. He is a desperate person who is trying to do the impossible here. Crazy stuff! if 1xbit wants to clear its name here it has to do many things in a transparent way because what it does is generate more controversy and take more mistrust, actually when I was starting in the world of betting I saw this casino, and I almost played , but since I entered here regularly I realized that they were scammers, they should not continue doing that.
Lol. Clear their name? Seriously? They will never clear their name in this forum and anywhere else because they don't care about their reputation since money is all that matters to them.
|
|
|
I always salute rich gamblers because they are able to accept all the risks of losing money just to gamble. But this risk will pay off or be commensurate if you manage to get a win, which of course will be even bigger.
What the heck are you talking about? There are plenty of rich gamblers out there who regret gambling thanks to their crazy losses and some of them even take extreme steps in order to try and recover their losses. I know some of them whose lives changed drastically because of those decisions. Think!
|
|
|
Delhi is going to get an easy win in this match. My guess is Delhi Capital Women's team will be the champions unless there is an accident. The players of this team are in great form now.
I thought MI would end up on top of the table thanks to their win earlier, but I forgot about this DC match and it looks like DC will end up on top of the table now. Kapp, Capsey and Lanning were epic as usual. One weird thing that I noticed today is that MI and DC fumbled at the end thanks to pointless mistakes, but they still made it across the finish line. DC moves to the final while MI will face UPW in the eliminator. I will be stunned if UPW somehow screw MI and proceed to the final against DC.
|
|
|
If they arbitrarily and intentionally pull their KYC cards just to gain benefit for their casinos, even they currently are legit ones, their reputation will be damaged with time and it's hard for them to reclaim their reputation.
You need years to build up your legitimacy and reputation but only need one or a few cases to wipe it all. After that, even many years later it is hard to erase shady history in reputation and start to gain a clean legit reputation. Almost impossible. Therefore I don't think good teams behind good casinos will do that.
If they have holes in system that are compromised and they have deep pocket, they will accept it, pay the user and move on with improvement in their infrastructures.
Correct points, but they are a lot smarter than you think. For example, some sites block gambler funds claiming that they found something suspicious and request KYC hoping that the gambler will gamble away his/her winnings before releasing the funds. This is perfectly legal as stated in their TOS and their reputation stays unaffected.
|
|
|
After losing 5 matches consecutively, RCBW has now won two successive matches. On the other hand, Mumbai lost both of their last two.
A lot of drama in the current match between MI and RCB at the moment. MI will still win thanks to RCB's small score, but I have no idea why MI are hemorrhaging wickets even though they just need 6 more runs to win. Edit: MI just wrapped up the game thanks to Smriti helping them at the end. Looks like they directly qualified for the final.
|
|
|
hi 1xbit_official
can you solve my problem? Are you a real 1xbit official? Or is @1xbit1.com real?
1xbit closed my account.
id number:320223807
I don't think you will get your money back as some of the posters above mentioned because 1xbit is a scam site while 1xbit1 is an imbecile who is actually a thief trying to steal from way bigger thieves. I advise filing a scam accusations against them in this forum and other sites which is most probably your best option.
|
|
|
That maybe the case for decentralized gambling platform but when we are talking about legitimate centralized casino platform, the trend is getting KYC approved. So talking about the availability of non-kyc centralized casino, it will become rare and rarer and I think only those that are not operating legally will be left without KYC requirement in the coming days.
It is the trend for sure, but there are still plenty of legit centralised casinos that don't ask KYC unless absolutely necessary and I can attest to that. people always complain about KYC even though if they want they can just choose another casino that maintains their privacy, after all there is no compulsion to play at a casino that asks for KYC, everyone has a choice so before playing don't continue if you really don't like the existing rules including KYC .
The primary issue here is that many legit crypto gambling sites are enforcing KYC in an unfair manner and use their TOS as their shield which pissed off the anti-KYC crowd and their anger is justified.
|
|
|
DC, MI and UPW have qualified for the playoffs stage while RCB and GG got knocked out. MI and DC have pretty much dominated the first season of the WPL which is why I am expecting a tense final between them.
Am not expecting any surprises from UPW and I still think that DC will win the first season primarily thanks to Lanning.
|
|
|
Tough to tell whether this is good or not for the land of semiconductors, but it seems to have helped the market continue rallying if I am not mistaken. I support them not regulating NFTs since I do feel that 95% of them are pointless. Lets hope that China does not invade Taiwan. Because they definitely will mess up the growth of Taiwan's crypto adoption, as well as many other things, such as Taiwanese lives.
China invading Taiwan? Not happening because that could lead to WW3 which would screw the Chinese too royally in the process. Taiwan is safe as long as their allies continue supporting them in my opinion. Just look at how Russia is struggling to conquer Ukraine thanks to their allies.
|
|
|
India had also lost against England by 10 wickets in the T20WC semi final match. But this one is more pathetic as it is an ODI match and they played it on their home ground. The target was low and Australia has won the match by playing in T20 style. I'm still confused whether it was a batting friendly pitch or not. Travis Head and Mitchell Marsh played freely as the target was low. I'm expecting that India will win the 3rd ODI match.
India seriously got humiliated in the 2nd match. The entire team failed miserably while the Australians were spectacular. I predicted Australia to win this series(2-1) in their favor which is why I'm expecting them to win the decider too. The primary reason why I feel Australia has the upper hand is due to their reliable top order when compared to the Indian top order.
|
|
|
Days without KYC on centralized platforms will end soon. It is out of centralized platforms to control their policies on KYC and AML because they must obey government and regulation so that their platforms can legally operate without problems with governments. They must protect their companies first and customers will have two options that they don't like but have no choice left: staying and doing KYC or leaving and finding another platform to use.
I disagree. There will always be crypto gambling sites that will never request KYC unless they find something suspicious or if the withdrawal amount is huge if you ask me. History has taught us that. Same here. I recently do a KYC for participating bonus too often but I don’t hesitate to submit my KYC because I trust the casino and I knew that I will do this at some point in the future because it’s clearly stated in theirs terms that they might ask it without an exact time.
Understandable, but different people share different opinions which is why anti-KYC crowd avoid such promos.
|
|
|
|