Bitcoin Forum
October 04, 2024, 10:59:00 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.1 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 [100] 101 102 103 104 »
1981  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: New pool with proportional and pay-per-share reward distribution, ~30 Gh/s on: March 03, 2011, 04:43:05 PM
Whats the propability that my cpuminer got 0 shares in last 2 (edit: 3) blocks? They were solved in under an hour and my miner was running all day approx 700 khash/s.
The average time to generate a block at 700 Khps, given the supplied difficulty of 1, is 1 hour, 42 minutes, and 15 seconds.
Last two blocks visible to public were 30+32 minutes or 1 hour and 2 minutes, which is shorter than your expected 1 hour, 42 minutes
Try using GPU instead.
1982  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: New pool with proportional and pay-per-share reward distribution, ~30 Gh/s on: March 03, 2011, 04:27:20 PM
Thanks again for running the server!  Do you foresee any issues on the network/hardware side that might drive up the current 3% fee if we grow closer to the size of slush's pool?
You are welcome :)
My pool software is much more efficient, so i don't see any problems with number of clients.
1983  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: New pool with proportional and pay-per-share reward distribution, ~30 Gh/s on: March 03, 2011, 02:44:19 AM
First logged in, then after a few minute it turned out 'Unregistered'~
Any one with the same problem?
Did your IP address changed in those mins ? Are cookies keeped in your browser ?
1984  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: New pool with proportional and pay-per-share reward distribution, ~30 Gh/s on: March 02, 2011, 10:34:56 PM
[Tycho], could we have the number of shares received displayed somewhere, please?
It would be more transparent.
Sometimes I get the impression that stats are not updated.

Example:
Code:
[02/03/11 22:38:34] Block 1 found on GeForce 320M (#1)
[02/03/11 22:46:02] Block 2 found on GeForce 320M (#1)
[02/03/11 23:18:06] Block 3 found on GeForce 320M (#1)

Only after the third block my average time was updated. But there is no way to know if all of my shares were taken into account.
Average speed is updated once per minute, no shares are lost if they are correct.
I'll think about adding shares/hour stats in next pool update.
1985  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: New pool with proportional and pay-per-share reward distribution, ~30 Gh/s on: March 02, 2011, 09:34:54 PM
Same question here please. It's been 24 hours and i haven't received what i earned. It used to be every 6-12 hours.
Payments were delayed for a couple of hours due to additional checks (it's still beta and i want to be sure). Everything is paid now.

Seems I still have some coins in my account, and not received them in my wallet either?? Are you sure they are all paid out? Or else I just found a bug :P
Tell me your login name and i'll check.
Also you can look at your payments list on site to see if there was a payment.

If your balance is over threshold AND less than 24 hours passed since last payment - then there are no problems.

EDIT: only 14h 10m since last payment. Everything is fine.
1986  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: Professional Graphics Chips? on: March 02, 2011, 09:28:17 PM
https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Mining_hardware_comparison
don't forget to add your findings to the hw comparison table, please
See? This information could be useful if someone happens to have some data on these cards, It could save people the trouble. And so far there is NO data on these cards easily available. You can say it won't be better, but until we know for sure, I can't possibly believe you are right. And if they are better, you'd like to know before you drop $500+ on a 5970, right?
Pro cards use same GPUs. Just look at specs :)
Clock frequency may be even lower.
1987  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: New pool with proportional and pay-per-share reward distribution, ~30 Gh/s on: March 02, 2011, 09:19:14 PM
UPDATE: Server is up, everything working fine.
Pool's database was moved to separate HDD for best perfomance.
1988  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: New pool with proportional and pay-per-share reward distribution, ~30 Gh/s on: March 02, 2011, 09:04:10 PM
Server down?

HTTP Error 500 (Internal Server Error): An unexpected condition was encountered while the server was attempting to fulfill the request.
Looks like you i should repeat this again...

UPDATE: Today at 21:00 UTC pool will be paused for software maintenance. Expected downtime is less than 10 minutes.
1989  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: New pool with proportional and pay-per-share reward distribution, ~30 Gh/s on: March 02, 2011, 08:32:04 PM
I got in my statistic & clicking the time bring out a page with this address & it says no such block.
01.03.2011 21:04:22   3h 05m   - Invalid -    0.35259366
http://blockexplorer.com/block/000000000000d8614794ab6ff02df69a80bc48535955db387be6c76b17448ded
What it actually means?
some one must find out before deep or i dont understand.
Block was found almost simultaneously by my pool and by someone else and the bitcoin network decided that other block was found earlier. This means that my block was discarded and considered invalid. When mining solo you would loose those 50 BTC, but currently in my pool you are insured against such thing and will receive your ~0.35 part.
1990  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: New pool with proportional and pay-per-share reward distribution, ~30 Gh/s on: March 02, 2011, 07:47:18 PM
UPDATE: Today at 21:00 UTC pool will be paused for software maintenance. Expected downtime is less than 10 minutes.
1991  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: New pool with proportional and pay-per-share reward distribution, ~30 Gh/s on: March 02, 2011, 07:23:32 PM
Code:
$ ./DiabloMiner-OSX.sh -u […] -p  […] -o deepbit.net -r 8332 -g 5
[02/03/11 19:27:41] Started
[02/03/11 19:27:43] Added GeForce 320M (#1) (6 CU, local work size of 64)
4346/5078 khash/sec
And the average speed is still at "0.00 MH/s".
Am I doing something wrong?
My speed is ~4MH/s and I found 13 shares in the last 4 hours. That's will translate to around 0.6 BTC a day :)
You are using nVidia card insted of ATI's one.
1992  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: New pool with proportional and pay-per-share reward distribution, ~30 Gh/s on: March 02, 2011, 07:22:25 PM
Same question here please. It's been 24 hours and i haven't received what i earned. It used to be every 6-12 hours.
Payments were delayed for a couple of hours due to additional checks (it's still beta and i want to be sure). Everything is paid now.
1993  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: New pool with proportional and pay-per-share reward distribution, ~30 Gh/s on: March 02, 2011, 07:01:47 PM
Hey, it seems like it does work:

Code:
$ ./DiabloMiner-OSX.sh -u […] -p  […] -o deepbit.net -r 8332 -g 5
[02/03/11 19:27:41] Started
[02/03/11 19:27:43] Added GeForce 320M (#1) (6 CU, local work size of 64)
4346/5078 khash/sec

But there is no info on the website.
Last Share is still at "01.01 00:00:00"
And the average speed is still at "0.00 MH/s".
Am I doing something wrong?
Looks like you haven't found a share yet. 5 MH/s isn't so fast, you should wait a little longer.
1994  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: New pool with proportional and pay-per-share reward distribution, ~25 Gh/s on: March 02, 2011, 06:58:55 AM
You're correct if you plan on using a ssc, but that's a low risk at my house opposed to checking my stats at Starbucks. :)
Another option is to allow stats checking with just worker's password, without possibility to change anything.
1995  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: New pool with proportional and pay-per-share reward distribution, ~25 Gh/s on: March 02, 2011, 05:59:43 AM
I was wondering if you were planning on adding SSL to the website, at least for the login, but hopefully for it all.
That would be great since I know you have nothing better to do. :)
Yes, this is possible, i'll look into it tomorrow. May be i can also add option to lock bitcoin address or reqire e-mail confirmation for changing it.
By the way, if THEY are sniffing or MITMing your connection, how are you going to get correct SSL certs for my site ?
1996  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: Running two different cards on: March 02, 2011, 04:44:37 AM
The technique worked for me, thanks [Tycho]!

JWU42, try plugging in the DVI->VGA converter that came with the card. Maybe that'll make the card think it's a display?
Buy more displays, they are cheap nowadays :)
There can be a way to "emulate" display for card, but it's more complicated.
1997  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: New pool with proportional and pay-per-share reward distribution, ~25 Gh/s on: March 02, 2011, 04:19:14 AM
Suggestions:
1) Display the server time on the site. It is useful to know the relative time the last block was completed without have to do time zone conversions.
2) Make the "average speed" calculation the average over an hour or more. Currently, the statistic fluctuates 20MH/s every couple minutes for me, which is not useful at all. Perhaps make two or three averages? Current (7 minutes), Recent (couple hours), Lifetime (not including downtime).
1) Yes i was planning to do something about this. Server's time is GMT(UTC), so i didn't mentioned it before.
2) The point of the "luck meter" is to show current speed, so user can see if his miner is working correctly. I will think about adding hour average, just didn't wanted to stuff the pagee with too much info :)
1998  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: Running two different cards on: March 02, 2011, 01:56:01 AM
Same issue with my 5770 - poclbm w/ GUI won't let me select it but it shows in device manager and MSI Afterburner.

Will try to plug in a display as suggested
Rebooting is not necesary if you press "Detect Displays" is CCC. I used spare VGA->RCA converter as makeshift "display" for detection Smiley
1999  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: Running two different cards on: March 02, 2011, 01:35:24 AM
Hmm, I can't get it to work. Both cards show up in GPU Caps Viewer, both cards show up in HWMonitor, but poclbm only sees my 5870. The GUI version only shows my CPU and Cypress, which is the 5870. Any ideas?
Plug some display in the second card and reboot your PC.
2000  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: New pool with proportional and pay-per-share reward distribution, ~25 Gh/s on: March 02, 2011, 12:14:18 AM
Has anyone else had trouble connecting to deepbit.net?
I've done a bunch of cache clearing, router powercycling, and DNS juggling, but I still cannot ping or trace route to deepbit.net. Sad
Anybody have an idea as to what the problem is? Am I being blocked at the ISP level or something?
Send me your IP address in PM, i'll check it.
Pages: « 1 ... 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 [100] 101 102 103 104 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!