Just a heads up with this coin. Bittrex is delisting the coin April 14th, 2017 due to lack of interest. It trades on Yobit so there is an exchange to store the coins. Based on this tread, doesn't seem to be a reliable wallet- is that true? Any updates going on? https://bittrex.com/status The say that at least once a month and have since Sept.  |
|
|
|
....
what could be causing this 'problem'?
5 GB takes a while. with a 100/100mbit connection that would take like 15min, not 12+ hours and counting. With P2P, the determining factor is the UL speed of peers, not your DL speed. You can only download information as fast as someone can send it to you; if you could download at the speed of light and you're connected to someone on dial-up, you're still only going to get the information at 56 kbit/s.  |
|
|
|
....
what could be causing this 'problem'?
5 GB takes a while. |
|
|
|
...this is the transaction that was sent to the same adress afterwards , 1 crown - 0.2 fees, shows up as 0.8 crown a9b0c73dd51e1c5cb1e4218046b2e1beca4879e679da743e25543f7fa3c58534
20% in fees? OUCH! |
|
|
|
oh this pointless.
lets just fix TX malleability and incress blocks to 2 MB
But people can't push their ideological preferences on everyone else if we do something that simple. |
|
|
|
Is there any sort of penalty for running a throne and then stopping it ?...
The only "penalty" is that you don't get paid while it isn't running. |
|
|
|
I have asked the host to have a good look at it give it a blow out, which I
assume has been done, it is on the other side of the world from where i am.
Host thinks one blade was gone, until it came back, then says he thinks the
blade is on the way out, just thought this issue might have been encountered
already, its a bit strange
And therein lies the problem with paying for a piece of equipment and surrendering total control of it to someone else. |
|
|
|
...Appreciate any help Is the inside clean? Are both fans running? Is the PSU fully working? |
|
|
|
A version of Core 0.14 that took 2 weeks to edit out the segwit garbage.
Oh my ! LOL ! Yeah, I know it's funny; it should have taken me way less than 2 weeks to recode a wallet that took a team of devs 2 months to code, right? |
|
|
|
Oh, great douchebag of Bitcoinia... Please tell us which blessed software graces your full-node ?
A version of Core 0.14 that took 2 weeks to edit out the segwit garbage. |
|
|
|
i envy you guys wish i had the cash for a mn already! how will more or less mn's influence the payout and profit?
In theory,daily = (6480 + (1/2 of tx fees)) / (total thrones) |
|
|
|
Why not run a bitcoin unlimited node?
Yes, because the answer to stopping the centralization of Bitcoin around the Core dev's beliefs is to centralize Bitcoin around the BU dev's beliefs.... |
|
|
|
Yeah, a working explorer would be nice. |
|
|
|
A literal example of why autofreq doesn't "burn chips" and isn't "pressing the utmost hash out of each chip"... Chain 1(left out because it's redundant) and Chain 2 are from Batch 4 and Chain 3 is from a "preset" batch: read PIC voltage=940 on chain[2]
Chain:2 chipnum=63
...
Asic[ 0]:625
Asic[ 1]:625 Asic[ 2]:625 Asic[ 3]:625 Asic[ 4]:625 Asic[ 5]:625 Asic[ 6]:625 Asic[ 7]:625 Asic[ 8]:625
Asic[ 9]:625 Asic[10]:625 Asic[11]:625 Asic[12]:625 Asic[13]:625 Asic[14]:625 Asic[15]:625 Asic[16]:625
Asic[17]:625 Asic[18]:625 Asic[19]:625 Asic[20]:625 Asic[21]:625 Asic[22]:625 Asic[23]:625 Asic[24]:625
Asic[25]:625 Asic[26]:625 Asic[27]:625 Asic[28]:625 Asic[29]:625 Asic[30]:625 Asic[31]:625 Asic[32]:625
Asic[33]:625 Asic[34]:625 Asic[35]:625 Asic[36]:625 Asic[37]:625 Asic[38]:625 Asic[39]:625 Asic[40]:625
Asic[41]:625 Asic[42]:625 Asic[43]:625 Asic[44]:625 Asic[45]:625 Asic[46]:625 Asic[47]:625 Asic[48]:625
Asic[49]:625 Asic[50]:625 Asic[51]:625 Asic[52]:625 Asic[53]:625 Asic[54]:625 Asic[55]:625 Asic[56]:625
Asic[57]:625 Asic[58]:625 Asic[59]:625 Asic[60]:625 Asic[61]:625 Asic[62]:625
Chain:2 max freq=625
Chain:2 min freq=625
read PIC voltage=940 on chain[3]
Chain:3 chipnum=63
...
Asic[ 0]:568
Asic[ 1]:606 Asic[ 2]:568 Asic[ 3]:593 Asic[ 4]:606 Asic[ 5]:575 Asic[ 6]:593 Asic[ 7]:516 Asic[ 8]:612
Asic[ 9]:593 Asic[10]:556 Asic[11]:612 Asic[12]:593 Asic[13]:593 Asic[14]:533 Asic[15]:600 Asic[16]:606
Asic[17]:550 Asic[18]:600 Asic[19]:606 Asic[20]:533 Asic[21]:606 Asic[22]:606 Asic[23]:504 Asic[24]:606
Asic[25]:606 Asic[26]:500 Asic[27]:606 Asic[28]:606 Asic[29]:587 Asic[30]:606 Asic[31]:606 Asic[32]:600
Asic[33]:606 Asic[34]:606 Asic[35]:612 Asic[36]:606 Asic[37]:612 Asic[38]:612 Asic[39]:606 Asic[40]:612
Asic[41]:612 Asic[42]:587 Asic[43]:612 Asic[44]:612 Asic[45]:606 Asic[46]:612 Asic[47]:606 Asic[48]:606
Asic[49]:606 Asic[50]:612 Asic[51]:606 Asic[52]:612 Asic[53]:612 Asic[54]:606 Asic[55]:575 Asic[56]:612
Asic[57]:593 Asic[58]:612 Asic[59]:612 Asic[60]:606 Asic[61]:606 Asic[62]:612
Chain:3 max freq=612
Chain:3 min freq=500 Chain# ASIC# Frequency(avg) GH/S(ideal) Temp(Chip2)
1 63 625.00 4,488.75 87
2 63 625.00 4,488.75 84
3 63 594.57 4,270.21 73
|
|
|
|
...Then the transaction will often take bloody FOREVER - I don't remember the last time I had a Counterparty transaction complete in much less than a day, and I have seen them take 2-3 days twice now - which is totally insanely slow for the CRAZY transaction fee amounts they charge.
Not to mention that the last monthly FLDC distributions were pushed back for 3 days (from Mar 4 to Mar 7) because the Bitcoin mempool was "saturated" and the transaction would have sat too long to be processes and would have had to be resent had the devs not waited. When the coin devs can't even push transactions in less than 3 days, that should tell you the "value" of the platform. |
|
|
|
...i don't think that i have the exact numbers, but, anecdotally, non-autotuned S9 had at least 10-13% board failure rate, maybe even more initially...
That's right about in the margins we experienced. |
|
|
|
Yes, a transparent and alternative form of development, building on the strengths of btc, and arriving at the same desired result/solution with less overhead.
I'll try and find some time to educate myself about FLDC and how it relates to this discussion with CURE. In the meantime, can you tell me if you have a preferred platform over Counterparty and why? Interested in your insights. Thanks.
My preferred platform is none. There's no reason that PersonA shouldn't be able to directly give/send CoinX to PersonB on a platform of their choosing (not one designated by the "devs" of CoinX) using the protocols of CoinX. Setting that aside, we might as well agree to disagree and move on, because there's no way that you (or anyone else) will ever be able to form a convincing argument that will get me to want to buy CoinY to use CoinX (it just makes more sense to use CoinY alone). |
|
|
|
...A coin transfers to another user with transaction fee in the same way almost ALL crypto currency works...
No, 2 separate coins (Bitcoin and the asset you actually want to transfer) transfer between 3-4+ parties (depending on the asset). |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
