 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 »
|
That Suppoman guy is a fuckin joke, doesn't understand any of the implications of this industry or what it's effects on society will be. He has no idea what makes a project valuable, he is just a dumbass chasing pumps. Ignore that loser.
Plus if he really were that good at trading, he wouldn't need to sell his bs course on Udemy.
I know many people may disagree with my post but still I think suppoman videos are way better than others because unlike others he won't simply talk on cryptos but also helps us to analyse the situation. If you think his videos are financial advice then you are a big idiot. Just take his opinion and do your own research. Infact many times he predicted the right coins like NEO(Formerly Antshares). His $10 course is one of my best investment this year. I literally learned alot from his videos thanks to him for that wonderful course on Udemy. You know what if you've enrolled in the course and didn't like it then you can get full refund from Udemy. Literally you won't lose anything!!! Suppoman was wrong 90% of the time, and everyone predicted NEO, not just him. All you gotta do is go back to his vids, look at the date, then check how his picks did after the fact, case closed. I've already done this fwiw. LOL It is probably his own account that made that advertising post. |
|
|
|
At the end of the day, everyone must take responsibility for their own choices and actions. I take all the Youtube Crypto videos as entertainment and actually I find Suppoman quite amusing and he actually makes a lot of sense. Even today in his video he was saying everyone in the end must make their own choices and people who trade have to be adults and not blame others for their decisions or for the retarded market manipulations from fake news and whales.
I can't stand the cunts face or voice, makes me want to put one on his chin. |
|
|
|
Many of them are just referral whores with no morals or real interest in Crypto other than making their wallets bigger and getting more and more people to sign up under them.
But on the other hand there are some very good channels that are both entertaining and informative.
Different strokes for different folks but here is my good and bad list. BAD CHANNELS Referral Beggars/Bullshit artists/Only interested in lining their own pockets Now for the good ones  GOOD CHANNELS Informative and or entertaining and also showing a genuine interest in Cypto/Straighshooters There are plenty more from both sides but that is my shortlist. |
|
|
|
|
Hi,
Anyone interested in doing a Genesis Mining upgrade of 40TH swap code for code with each of us putting 0.02BTC in Escrow, if one side does not keep up their part of the deal they forfeit their Escrow, if both do the deal we both pay the Escrower 0.01 BTC each for their service and get 0.01BTC back. If only one side keeps their part in the deal the other side gets their 0.1 BTC share.
The contracts are coming on-line again soon and previously 40TH was 5,200 USD so hopefully it is the same.
Only condition is the payment for the Mining contract must be in BTC so that it is instant.
Please either post here or PM me if interested then we can find an Escrow person we both agree on.
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
What is the current list of exchanges this is on please Dev?
|
|
|
|
unfortunately you can not call them scammers because they still continue to make payments
They deceived investors, if that is not a scam, then what is? I purchased a lifetime contract (never expecting to be lifetime due to difficulty increases) and yes they have every possible "get out" clause written into their contracts, but at the end of the day they deceived people, some people purchased lifetime contracts the day before, do you think they just woke up one morning and said to themselves, hey lets cancel every lifetime contract and make it a year? Answer to that is no, they would have known internally for weeks if not months that they were going to implement this, therefore they scammed anyone by keeping those lifetime contracts for sale while knowing they would be cancelled. Anyway, they have not only harmed the industry (not that cloud mining has a high reputation lol) but they have harmed themselves through sheer greed. I would rather buy a contract at Genesis for twice the price than give those greedy Mother Fuckers one cent of mine ever again. I will make a profit by the time the now 1 year contract expires but still, they did the wrong thing and should have at least Grandfathered all previously held contracts and only cancelled them when they no longer became profitable, which is not the case, instead they did the dirty on everyone, hope they rot in hell. Karma will catch up with those bitches.  |
|
|
|
|
Hashflare.com has just scammed all its investors by both upping the price of their packages AND has cancelled all lifetime contracts so that they all expire in 11 Months.
They are also still charging the regular fees despite turning the supposed lifetime contracts into 1 year contracts.
Have a small amount with them and will break even and actually show a profit but stay away, they have broken their contract, without justification, the difficulty is not that high and the price is rising so other than greed they have no reason to do this, they are a SCAM site. Be Warned!
|
|
|
|
Please can you share information about who is behind this project as I think it doesn't make any sense to buy premine coins while we can mine this coin later. You will provide any trusted escrow for security purpose?
Team - Please see team link. https://cryptoimprovementfund.io/Yes we will be working with Escrow - We will be negotiating escrow terms with BTT escrow to hold funds for project development. Mining is meant to promote after sale community involvement. Mining will not be available until after the ICO. Purchasing coins will be much more cost effective than mining due to the amount of coins available during the ICO. Coins will be purchased at a significantly discounted price. By the time users are able to mine the coin, the price and popularity and difficulty of mining will be significantly increased therefore payout will be relatively small. As the project continues to unfold, original bag holders will have largest majority of the coins and mining payouts will be minimal vs. equipment required - similar to mining BTC today. Wow, your founder is very popular! And he have many names. See:    What can you say about this? Hi Ivaf, I'm glad you took the time to research, transparency is key to making this project work. Please see my little note (I can't post pictures yet) If you could repost this for the rest of the forum to see it would be much appreciated! It looks like someone stole my LinkedIn photo. Hopefully I've helped put your mind at ease.  Upon further investigation it seems as though you did not do your research. The links you showed are NOT individuals who are using my picture however they are individuals who I am associated with on LinkedIn - did you bother to click the links? I am connected with them but they are not using my identity. https://www.linkedin.com/in/jonathantzogas/?ppe=1https://www.linkedin.com/in/fanny-genis-29a83a11/I would like you to note that I'm not deleting this post so there's no doubts about the authenticity of this project. Kindest Regards, Scott Douglas OK Way to admit you were wrong dude and apologize, so many humble people on the internet willing to admit their mistakes. LOL |
|
|
|
|
Just read the white paper, a lot of technical information but not much information about road-map as others have mentioned or practical usage.
The obvious selling point is that it has the word "Face" before the coin, so no doubt the devs would be looking to cash in on Facebook's popularity but without breaching any copyrights or trademarks.
So if people connect it somehow through its usage to Facebook, then it will be a winner winner chicken dinner but unless their is a road-map or a more detailed use for the coin and the team is prepared to be torn to shreds by Facebook's Lawyers then I don't see any advantage in purchasing this coin.
Can anyone else enlighten me on why it would be a good purchase?
|
|
|
|
Oh boy what am I seeing here, many noobs trying to promote their useless coins, it's like masternodes are something magical all of the coins mentioned here combined have less than 1000 active and real traders with horrible markets, not to mention pre-mined or insta-mined coins. none of them ever had any community experts reviewing their codes completely, as usual they hope for uneducated and noobs to fall for them and invest their money on their coins. Agreed Masternode is the new hype. So an analogy could be if I found a coin called bucket of shit coin with no practical or everyday use and it is cheap at 0.002 cents I could by a couple of hundred thousand bucket of shit coins (Simply because it has a Masternode) Then my buck of shit coins will become more valuable as more people buy them and HODL them for the Masternode rewards In 12 months time, my bucket of shit coins which still have no use in the real world I have made 30% more than I paid for them Now will there be a buyer of my bucket of shit coins in 12 months because other than having a magical Masternode they still have no use? What will the market price be? Masternode owners dumping so that new wanna-be Masternode owners can purchase, then rinse and repeat also with the risk of the price decreasing even further as more Masternode coins are made and my bucket of shit coin sits on top of the worst Masternode coin list. I guess the premise of what I am saying is, you can put lipstick on a pig, but it's still a fucken pig. Unless the coin has the potential for providing a service to replace fiat or provides something useful or beneficial then it is just another shit coin, but except it is a shit coin with a masternode. On the other hand though, a coin that has a Masternode feature that has a real world usage and increases in value would be a obviously good investment so my point is unless the coin is actually worth something or you can see it potentially being worth something, I would say stay away from it, don't let the fact that it has a masternode trick you into thinking the coin is going to show any signs of growth if fundamentally it is just another shit coin. Most of the coins I have seen on some of the Masternode lists here have about as much potential as an Ashtray on a Motorcycle. |
|
|
|
Please can you share information about who is behind this project as I think it doesn't make any sense to buy premine coins while we can mine this coin later. You will provide any trusted escrow for security purpose?
Team - Please see team link. https://cryptoimprovementfund.io/Yes we will be working with Escrow - We will be negotiating escrow terms with BTT escrow to hold funds for project development. Mining is meant to promote after sale community involvement. Mining will not be available until after the ICO. Purchasing coins will be much more cost effective than mining due to the amount of coins available during the ICO. Coins will be purchased at a significantly discounted price. By the time users are able to mine the coin, the price and popularity and difficulty of mining will be significantly increased therefore payout will be relatively small. As the project continues to unfold, original bag holders will have largest majority of the coins and mining payouts will be minimal vs. equipment required - similar to mining BTC today. Wow, your founder is very popular! And he have many names. See: What can you say about this? What can YOU say about this, maybe you owe the guy an apology? Everyone has a right to do their due diligence before purchasing anything and that applies x 10 in the Crypto world as we all know, due to the amount of scammers out there but I think people should stop and think before they put on their private detective hat and make false accusations without first getting their ducks in a row. Btw thanks for clarifying this false accusation dev, I like this project and have signed up for the bounties and will also get in on the ICO. Please keep us updated. Best of luck with the project. |
|
|
|
I earn just under 100 USD per day through cloud mining, and although there are pros and cons to it and good and bad companies if you choose well, it can be a good investment. I feel safer with a cloud mining company with physical infrastructure and a public team behind them than I do with a make xxx dollars per day website ponzie scheme. Either way, like anything, never invest what you cannot afford to lose, but for me, it is very profitable atm, especially since the price of BTC went up and the difficulty went down. Happy days. These words don't hold much value until you share details about what exactly you're mining, how much you have invested, and most importantly, when did you invest money into cloudmining. People quite often think that the payouts they generate are earnings, but this simply isn't true ~ the mining service is just paying you your money slowly back, that's pretty much it. Earning happens when you have made your initial capital back, where from that point everything you make can legitimately be considered earnings. As long as it isn't profit, there is no such a thing as earning. I see your point and agree for the most part, but those words hold no value but the BTC I am receiving everyday certainly is of value. Your comment about seeing the payouts as earnings is dependent on how you look at it. If you purchased say 10k worth of XXX coin and it dropped in value by 30 or 40 percent, would you sell it and take the loss or hodl it and hope it climbs up again? With mining you could use the same analogy except that the 10k you invested, you know is coming back, all be it in fractions but you have a steady income from it, whereas if you are sitting on 10k worth of coins that may drop even further which position would you rather be in? So my point is, as I stated in my earlier post, any investment involves risk, to me I would rather see my risk mitigated by a slow but constant return on my initial investment and if and when it reaches the break even point, as you said then you are making profit. But the guy who is sitting on his 10k of shit coins is either still sweating it or stagnating where he is, of course he may double his money too but that is also a risk. So if you went out and bought 3 BTC today, when would you expect see a "profit" from that purchase, when it increases by say 3% you have made some money but that's it, you either sell and take the profit or your HODL and ride the waves, unless you are a trader which I am not. So that 3 BTC will sit and just climb in value as the coin does, some people are happy doing that and good luck to them I say. With BTC mining you get paid back in BTC so as the price increases so does your pay out, yes there is the difficulty factor but you are still getting that steady income and at the same time able to HODL what you are earning back, so in effect depending on the size of your contract and mining fees and difficulty I see it as a great way to make money. The other thing to take into account is if you look at the Fiat cost of the mining purchase, that is also greatly depreciated by the increase in BTC price, so yes there is a waiting time until you "break even" but the longer your contract goes, it is likely the more the BTC price increases and therefore your ROI in Fiat value is coming back to you a lot faster than most would think. For example on Genesis from memory 40TH was around $5,400 USD or somewhere near that, 2 months ago that would have been 2.1/2 something BTC to purchase, now it is 1.2/3 so in Fiat terms instead of needing to earn 2.1 BTC to break even for that 40 TH now I only need to earn 1.2/3 btc to break even, which means your ROI is coming back to you the more the price of BTC rises, essentially the quicker you have already seen a ROI. That is my take on it anyway and it works for me. P.S Not going to go into full personal details here about my contracts but I am happy with them and enjoying the returns. Though you also have to factor in the effects of price increase. The increase of price will lead to more miners trying to mine and that would mean the difficulty will also increase. Which also translate to lesser coin mined by your miners. Yeah maybe prices went up by 100%, your chances of getting coins is halved. Which means you still will be breaking even by the same time. And then once you have "Broken even" who do you think is sitting in the better position, the person hodling btc who never took a risk and is just relying on price increase for profit or the person whose contract has paid for itself while they are still receiving an income stream in BTC as well as having already paid for their initial investment in Fiat value? |
|
|
|
I earn just under 100 USD per day through cloud mining, and although there are pros and cons to it and good and bad companies if you choose well, it can be a good investment. I feel safer with a cloud mining company with physical infrastructure and a public team behind them than I do with a make xxx dollars per day website ponzie scheme. Either way, like anything, never invest what you cannot afford to lose, but for me, it is very profitable atm, especially since the price of BTC went up and the difficulty went down. Happy days. These words don't hold much value until you share details about what exactly you're mining, how much you have invested, and most importantly, when did you invest money into cloudmining. People quite often think that the payouts they generate are earnings, but this simply isn't true ~ the mining service is just paying you your money slowly back, that's pretty much it. Earning happens when you have made your initial capital back, where from that point everything you make can legitimately be considered earnings. As long as it isn't profit, there is no such a thing as earning. I see your point and agree for the most part, but those words hold no value but the BTC I am receiving everyday certainly is of value. Your comment about seeing the payouts as earnings is dependent on how you look at it. If you purchased say 10k worth of XXX coin and it dropped in value by 30 or 40 percent, would you sell it and take the loss or hodl it and hope it climbs up again? With mining you could use the same analogy except that the 10k you invested, you know is coming back, all be it in fractions but you have a steady income from it, whereas if you are sitting on 10k worth of coins that may drop even further which position would you rather be in? So my point is, as I stated in my earlier post, any investment involves risk, to me I would rather see my risk mitigated by a slow but constant return on my initial investment and if and when it reaches the break even point, as you said then you are making profit. But the guy who is sitting on his 10k of shit coins is either still sweating it or stagnating where he is, of course he may double his money too but that is also a risk. So if you went out and bought 3 BTC today, when would you expect see a "profit" from that purchase, when it increases by say 3% you have made some money but that's it, you either sell and take the profit or your HODL and ride the waves, unless you are a trader which I am not. So that 3 BTC will sit and just climb in value as the coin does, some people are happy doing that and good luck to them I say. With BTC mining you get paid back in BTC so as the price increases so does your pay out, yes there is the difficulty factor but you are still getting that steady income and at the same time able to HODL what you are earning back, so in effect depending on the size of your contract and mining fees and difficulty I see it as a great way to make money. The other thing to take into account is if you look at the Fiat cost of the mining purchase, that is also greatly depreciated by the increase in BTC price, so yes there is a waiting time until you "break even" but the longer your contract goes, it is likely the more the BTC price increases and therefore your ROI in Fiat value is coming back to you a lot faster than most would think. For example on Genesis from memory 40TH was around $5,400 USD or somewhere near that, 2 months ago that would have been 2.1/2 something BTC to purchase, now it is 1.2/3 so in Fiat terms instead of needing to earn 2.1 BTC to break even for that 40 TH now I only need to earn 1.2/3 btc to break even, which means your ROI is coming back to you the more the price of BTC rises, essentially the quicker you have already seen a ROI. That is my take on it anyway and it works for me. P.S Not going to go into full personal details here about my contracts but I am happy with them and enjoying the returns. |
|
|
|
So the miners will be able to mine happiness. Interesting topic though. I have a name for the coin. Humonero  |
|
|
|
I earn just under 100 USD per day through cloud mining, and although there are pros and cons to it and good and bad companies if you choose well, it can be a good investment. I feel safer with a cloud mining company with physical infrastructure and a public team behind them than I do with a make xxx dollars per day website ponzie scheme. Either way, like anything, never invest what you cannot afford to lose, but for me, it is very profitable atm, especially since the price of BTC went up and the difficulty went down. Happy days. |
|
|
|
Thanks Dude, gonna buy me some now. |
|
|
|
Incomplete news, they didn't even write which exchange company they approve license for operation. But still Goodnews for every bitcoin user in the Philippines.
You would have to think, one of them would have been coins.ph as they are technically an exchange, they exchange BTC for PHP so they would be one of them. |
|
|
|
Thanks for the links, have both now, just waiting for it to go on markets so i can purchase. Anyone know which markets it is likely to be on, I want to get in early? |
|
|
|
http://www.philstar.com/business/2017/08/19/1730418/bsp-approves-registration-2-bitcoin-exchange-operatorsThe central bank of the Philippines has granted licenses to two local bitcoin exchanges, according to reports. Daily newspaper The Philippine Star reported the developments on Sunday, citing statements from central bank chief Nestor Espenilla Jr. The Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas first released its rules for domestic exchanges in February, seeking to lay down a foundation for the country's nascent cryptocurrency space. Yet the central bank has seen relatively little interest from prospective applicants, according to one official who commented to local media in late July. That said, Espenilla, who spoke during a financial technology event over the weekend, indicated that the central bank is being proactive about bringing exchanges under its regulatory auspices. "We see a rapid increase in the trajectory. It is coming from a small base but increasing – that is why we decided to require them to register," he told attendees. Espenilla also offered some figures on the local bitcoin trade, according to the news source, saying that exchanges are seeing as much as $6 million in volume a month – a figure that represents three times the $2 million per month seen last year. "We are moving to regulate them," Espenilla emphasized. -------------- Anyone interested in starting an exchange? Pm me please.
|
|
|
|
|
Makes me wonder is it a coincidence that only a couple of hours after the price of XMR skyrocketed Genesis stopped adding new BTC mining contracts.
Did they pump a few million into XMR to boost their XMR mining contracts or just pure coincidence?
|
|
|
|
|
