What roadmap? For the last couple of pages we've been asking for one but can't find any

The only good thing in a while are the twitter updates. They show some activity in management. We needed this. Thank you.

Safe haven you say? Xaurum is currently positioned >200 on CC market. It's existance is questionable in case of FIAT or CC market crash. Melt can only be done via their webpage, until then they're the holders/owners of gold. Do you still think it's a safe haven? There's no third party that would be responsible and guarantee us gold backup in case everything goes sour.
Be more realistic... XAUR has a good chance but not so far down the list.

One more thing. I'm glad to see that marketing money isn't wasted on fancy cars at local events.

Everyone that's active in this thread and owns some xaurum coins knows that... That's what we've been explaining to management for the last 30 (at least) pages.

It's 17th of November. Their homepage still states: "Xaurum team will reveal its vision in a whitepaper 2.0 which will be presented to the public on November 7, 2017."

Zrjawkn, you're talking nonsense (again).

1. Xaurum IS NOT the only CC backed by gold. Soon OneGram, ZenGold and many others will be released and times might change. Guess that's the reason I'm pissed on Xaurums IDLE status (??)

2. Xaurum might be built on strong foundations (if you say so), but things are rather disturbing. They ignore asked questions that might influence the debate. One of them is the size of the reward share in mint process. Every other CC has published a graph and presented us with portions (management, marketing etc...), Xaurum management still ignores it (I asked it numerous times). Let's wait for the promised whitepapers (on 7th, on 17th of November)

I believe the dev team is working hard, but in the last three months there weren't a lot of seen results.

It's 7th of November. So, what's new except a new logo on ccex?

Don't bother. I asked the same question (page 173 i think) when financing was explained and rewards from mints were mentioned, but I haven't received an answer till this moment

What was the reason for such sudden rise in price? Webpage was published days ago, meetings went on continuosly during the last few months, no special marketing strategies were going on, there was no surge in marketcap which would mean one huge investor...

I am not looking for speculations, I'd just like to understand the movement behind all of this...

This was a question for XaurumQA. I'm not interested in private meetings. If I can save some time of devteam and others I will.

When will we reach our bottom? Xaurum's currently at $0,14...

Growing Xaurum price is a result of markets situation and not positive oriented attitude (which is still highly appretiated). Positive attitude is a result of some simple answers from DomenC, XaurumQA, kovanec and others, who're related to projects management or have some more intel informations. I agree with MP777 about the roadmap/projects longterm strategy

When are the meetings in Ljubljana? Could we have vlog? livestream?

@Mp777, thank you for a good reply for oldone.

When I kind of said the team lost their compass I meant it. I loved the original idea of Xaurum and I wanted it to grow bigger. With international magazines that were placing it amongst the biggest, Xaurum management had the perfect chance (and relatively easier job than today) for it to succeed and to stand in TOP10. The only thing they would have to do at that moment was to continue pushing Xaurum instead of bringing up XGamma too early. Now it's located as 144th on a CMC list and just as one of many others that copied their idea. Feels like they tried to shift gears @2000rpm. You're still talking about an influence?

Forum discussion is meant to bring up new questions or close them. If people are involved it creates a constructive discussions, brings topic upfront and invites new forum members that are curiously browsing the forum. Besides that, we're not speaking negatively, we're criticizing (there is a difference). We want the project to succeed not to fail (that's why we're mostly still holding Xaurums and not selling them). Situation is slowly becoming unbearable because the only Xaurum person actively involved is only XaurumQA who from time to time posts something instead of closing such sour discussion with diplomatic answer. Or seen results.

Price was never really an issue. If we'd seen some proper progress we'd have a guarantee the price would rise eventually instead of reading posts endings with "the only way is up", which seriously pisses me off. You call such quote a positive move?

Deadlines? We're talking about a project that if I'd gained a proper momentum would mean a secured retirement fund for the whole management. With great price comes great sacrifice. That's why we need results and hard labour.

Where is DomenC lately?

read the last two pages and you'll get all the answers needed.

I am still waiting for my answer regarding rewards...


....which brings me to my other question or concern... with no new mints there won't be any fresh money from rewards to charge Xaurums management mechanism. So, should new mints really wait till the price reaches its PP or not? or should "standards" be lowered? Someone was arguing me about other companies spending 70-80% of income mint values on management... I still can't figure out what's the percentage at Xaurum?! (waiting to be answered) I remember reading somewhere (paaaages back) that mint income is used only for gold backup and new coins, with no rewards mentioned. With rewards included people in charge are profiting from raising coin value (which they surely hold) + rewards (salaries). Were this rules changed in the meantime or am I wrong and missed the reward part?

@strongstorm, gold ratio doesn't mean a thing if you're not forced to burn your coins. Everyone's in this business to gain some profit, not invest and get 1/3 (or less) out of it. So your calculation makes no sense at all.

People are pissed because we were promised to see results in the beginning of August. Soon there will be November and there are still no results. Stop this agony or give us something.  

@zrjawkn... words words words... we're continuisely listening "tomorrow", "in the next days", "next month", "soon", etc... since August (or before).

Xaurum is getting locally oriented, that's why Koover is more right than you are, Ivanovski. Seems like the project wants to stay in it's micro location so it can be easily controlled and influenced. Or am I wrong? Such input will bring less mints with more steady growth, bigger backup in gold but no special recognition (or final value). You'll basically reach previously achieved $0.30 in the next year or so (speculations). If Xaurum wants to take such way it's pointless having meetings around the world. Why?

- they've build villas on Krk. It might be the nicest and easiest island to get to in Kvarner region, but you have Dalmatian region with Split, Makarska and Omiš 300km further south (nice highway connection). Krk has Baška, which is merely a village comparing to those gems. So why would anyone spend $$$/day in Villa that does not yet offer remote location (with silence), neither strong city backup (with it's beat and nightlife). Think of my writing as a critic.
- gold backing is a great idea, but in times of steady and boosting economy percentage should be lower comparing to the times of unstable economy when everyone would be glad to give bigger share for backup in case everything goes sour. Simple, right?
- autobroker is a local company that offers rental in XAUR or cash, while "XAUR only" is only for Lambo. You still need $$$ cover for the insurance. I assume they won't take XAUR as an insurance, right?
- burn percentage is microscopic... who's foolish enough to burn XAUR instead of selling it. Would you take 333€ if I offer you 1000€?
- Gamma won't operate all the time because there's no real mechanism behind it that won't allow exploitation of usage for potential investors/team/friends... I didn't invest in Gamma, but considering the fact the same team controls both projects this also concerns me

My previous question stays... how's with rewards... see page 170

Please guys, stop lying and fooling everyone. We're not as naive as some of you might think. I hope it won't be too late for team to realise why everyone believed in original Xaurum

What's the formula for determining minting reward? I checked http://www.xaurum.org/mint.html but I can't figure out what should represent the formula (?!)//size of reward share?

Hi XaurumQA,

Thank you for your explanation. Wice decision.

Question about funding still stands.

@gobbi Domen V. is not an issue at all. What concerns me is the fact that he was always represented as one of the three pillars of Xaurum team, when he suddenly represents a company called GN2 that carries out Xaurums marketing. Let's not forget he was also mentioned on photo concerning LONs ATMs as an owner of GN2 company, while Xaurum was mentioned more as a side info... (that eventually we'll be able to get Xaurums too)

The rest of question concerning funding stays.

PS: I'm not familiar with how much coding was behind Xaurums creation, that's why I'm not eligable to speak about the cost of creation. But considering my speculations are true difference between $0,30 and $0,16-0,18 is at least 40%. With current marketcap of $4,4mil. you can therefore calculate the difference they "gained". Furthermore you could speculate who're the biggest investors into Xaurum Gamma ICO, but that's way to ahead to speculate about. Although if I'm right it's been geniuselly done
+ I wouldn't mind if up to 20-30% of every mint would go for the devteam/management/PR.... It's a fair price. But still enough. Size of the company would grow with MC.

@Kastor, Xaurum still has the potential, but we'll have to see some different strategy

To note, I still hold a hefty amount of XAUR

@zrjawkn we already know you're a Xaurum fanatic. No need for another post of yours if you can't read and comprehend other posts that are not so positive and criticize Xaurum team. People are angry because all we see are only words (and of course photos of supporting events, which are not a true value for Xaurum and act more as a social respresentation of people involved) and no change in value. Informations of Xaurum team touring around, renting a fancy cars... are more a waste of money than its responsible handling.

I see some flaw in Xaurum, which I'd like to speak about... What's the main source of funding of Xaurums team?
If I can speculate a current price of Xaurum I'd say the price was pumped, a lot of coins sold at c 0,30 to make a fund from which management pays its employees. We've also seen Domen Vidergar isn't a part of Xaurum team anymore, but represents Xaurum thru his own company GN2. What was the main issue for that?
What I introduced is only an idea and speculation on which as a "shareholder" I'd like to have some answers. I'm not interested into internal arrangements, only an idea behind everything.

I see some prospects in Xaurum, but with current and past strategy I don't see it as a "gold star" anymore.

Agree with you 100%. With such PR and sales team this project is doomed. They're representing it to a casual people that are naive and lack a proper knowledge of trading. Or are they just building a huge pond of micro investors who're not familiar with daily trading and will keep Xaurum in their accounts? Either way, Xaurum isn't what I hoped it will be one day. Get rid of your sales manager, bring new people with fresh ideas to PR, and make some noticable progress finally. We need strong and big investors, not small fishes. Act big, become big!

Xaurum, might be unique in cryptoworld, but it's just a mere copy of idea that brought to life USD. Let's just hope it'll get as big as USD one day ?!

Agree with you but it looks like people are looking for pumped air and investing thousands of eur in cryptos they don´t know even the name.By the time people will realise how good xaurum is.
[/quote]

Asset don't mean a thing in a time of big cows. Realise that. While Xaurum was more or less standing still for the last three months (or even dumping its value), people made fortunes with other cryptos. With those "fortunes" they could easily buy more Xaurums if ever in need of backup asset, which is currently pretty low to be honest. Just like the ones who sold Xaurum for $0.30+ did...

If xaurum team is trying to stay out of a pump'n'dump sandbox they should change their gameplay and somehow faster achieve introduction to new markets.

There's no time-off/holidays in business world