Cryptopia should be working fine as well

I cross my stock and crypto lingo sometimes, and I actually have more respect for you for catching it and saying something. When I use stock terminology such as shareholder in crypto, I don't mean it as a security. The meaning behind my statement is that I am a holder of a portion / share of the valuation of GRWI by holding, purchasing, and or utilizing GRWI tokens. Because I hodl, purchase, or utilize GRWI tokens I have a stake / investment in which I still have an expectation of some sort of neutral or positive return on my utilization. Just as is the case with the US dollar, as fiat is similar to a utility token.

There is a difference between successful growth and development and maintenance of shareholder value. Let's take HEMP Inc for example. This is a budding company with huge growth potential that has only seen the occasional pump and dump. Although they are staged to be a leader in the hemp and CBD industries, they are lagging behind in shareholder value. This is because of widespread dilution in the shares of the company. Now I've personally met with Bruce Perlowin CEO of Hemp Inc, and I do believe that one day the dilution will end, but it will likely be because of a 100:1 reverse split or something of that nature unfortunately. Which in all honesty doesn't help the common shareholder.

Let's get real for a moment though, has GRWI maintained value in any way? yes the fiat value of GRWI has rarely dipped below ICO price. but the ICO was in BTC at 20k satoshis, fluctuating during ICO from about $.85-1.05. This from a minimalist understanding of the market is appealing, but when I say maintaining shareholder value I mean the currency that the ICO was in, in this case BTC which has seen substantial falls (at times when the rest the market faired ok) of 60-70% or more of the satoshi price. By my calculation and current market value, GRWI is sitting about $1 USD below what it should be if shareholder value had been maintained rather than diluted. with a current price of about $.84 on cryptopia or 9139 satoshi. This equates to over 50% loss in shareholder value GRWI - BTC. That's not a very promising outlook from my stock and crypto knowledge.

I've noticed that GRWI isn't big into marketing and hyped up claims, and I respect that, what I don't respect is the blind look at value. Dr Charles I reiterate that I want the GRWI to prove my evaluation to be too early and make me wrong in what I see. But I also want investors to assess the risk vs reward with proper information.

I appreciate that you are willing to discuss this without moderation. As we are both very passionate about Crypto, and I will continue to HODL my GRWI bags as  I know even if the project fails and the team exit scams, that I am good enough at what I do that I will recoup my investment. I mean i watched myself take $1k turn it into $12k and deplete it back down to 900$ when I was first learning. I won't mention what I sit on now, but I am playing on house money these days, and I am much more educated now than I was when I started. Once you're making the money it's easier to continue making it. My investments have become wiser over time, and my success ratio has greatly increased. My latest take was on Bitcoin Services Inc. Oh how I love being able to arbitrage stocks that's charts correlate to crypto Saw BTC falling in the late evening hours and placed my sell order prior to market open.

Honestly I do wish the team the best of luck, I just would like to see satoshi value maintained better than it has been.

I'm not upset, I'm well within the right direction on my widening investments. But I am concerned that shareholder value is of no concern to the team at GRWI. Not once did I put the roadmap and reaching those targets into question for GRWI, and yes I will give the team credit for their progress their, however a company that doesn't concern themselves with hodler value will fail in the end. I come from a background of trading penny stocks, and I caught the green rush in 2012 and 2014. Due to my educated picks, I have had holdings in many of the more profitable pot stocks at some of their lowest prices including MCIG, MJNA (how many remember it at $.02), ACBFF, THCBF , TWMJF (less than $2 familiar?), CBIS, and more. I was watching GWPH when it was $1.40 a share. Cryptocurrency is a huge opportunity for the budding industry, and as an advocate, I guess I just expected better from GRWI. I'm not here to bash you guys or spread FUD, I'm just pointing out some facts that are concerning to me and which I feel other investors should be aware of prior to making a decision. I would rather someone choose to buy on an educated decision than a whim. I'd like the team to prove my latest assessment wrong.

It was announced here that GRWI was partnering with Paragon. Of course I'm aware that the whole market has been in a downtrend for the last few months, but GRWI has rarely seen it's ICO price in Satoshi since the ICO, It would qualify as a lesser performer in the group of successful ICOs . In fact GRWI is closing in on historical lows since ICO in both Satoshi and USD. DopeCoin, PotCoin, CannabisCoin, HempCoin (THC), and CannaCoin have all outperformed GRWI, since inception both in growth and maintenance of value. It doesn't take a genius to look at a chart and see this. GRWI had the better framework, but is giving all of that up to swap to an ERC20 token, and in the span of my first comment to now, GRWI is down another 1489 satoshi dropping to 7204.
DPOS was a nice concept, but the coin is dying since harvest, the buds never flourished, and daily trading volume has been decreasing since inception. If you don't like me calling you out then let's see the true potential of the team.

Oh and if my facts aren't enough to show how far off the path GRWI currently is...I hold enough coins that I could drop the price of GRWI another 20% in a single sell, and I'm no whale.

Paragon is a shitcoin with a shady history and a class action lawsuit...they clearly bring down coins that they partner up with, like GRWI

I had so much hope for GRWI, but the move from their own chain to an ERC20 token is a disaster at the end of the day, and the constant trend under ICO price is utterly disappointing, I should have jumped ship the moment you got on board with Paragon, but I blindly waited in hopes that it wouldn't be all bad. Guess I've been wrong as the price continues to dip further below ICO. 8693 Satoshi at the time of posting on Cryptopia, ICO on Cryptopia 20,000 Satoshi. Great job losing value team...

2 winners to split 500K $IFLT if the twitter handle can reach 100 followers in the next 48 hours https://twitter.com/IFLTcoin/status/988589862407172096

Let's giveaway some free coins!

Look forward to this, and the future of InflationCoin. So much potential, and so undervalued. I will gladly let my holdings continue to stake.

IFLT - InflationCoin (very undervalued)
Verge (Growth potential)
XRP (Market viable / Use Case)
DragonChain (up and comer)
MANNA (Universal Basic Income Distribution)
QRL (Quantum Resistance - AKA the future Bitcoin)
GRWI (Cannabis Industry - Seed to Sale)
ETN - Electroneum (Daily Purchases)
STQ - Storiqa (Utility Token for Amazon like market)
BOS - BosCoin (random pick)

There's a lot more I would add to the list, but these are some of my personal favorites, not necessarily 2018, but 2018-2020. And yes I do hold some of them, but not all of them.

What exactly is the token migration, and if I don't do it do my QRL tokens become worthless?

Based on what I have seen from grantcoin and the merge to Manna, and the dev team including Brandon Venetta, this coin has a very bright future with an astounding amount of potential, slow stable, and steady growth, an expanding community, and consistent forward progress. I have watched the members grow over 4x since I got in on this project.

Guaranteed workaround would be to download the grantcoin wallet prior to manna launch and send coins to grantcoin desktop wallet. From there download the manna wallet and transfer the wallet.dat from grantcoin to manna, and your wallet should update automatically. I'm not sure if sending directly to manna wallet would work from the exchange.

Wow, looking more and more like Storiqa was a flop....guaranteed buy back shop rate at 10x what it has been trading at...if it doesn't come up soon, that rate will never be seen.

Airdrop received, thanks team. I wish the devs the best of luck moving forward and hope they see much success with this project.

Why Manna? Well the obvious first answer would be that they are a first mover as you have mentioned, but I don't think this is by any stretch the best answer. The rebranding from Grantcoin to Manna was a big move that in my opinion was very well done, and looks amazing. However i think the biggest factor that puts Manna as a frontrunner is the continual growth. If you look at the Grantcoin / Manna history you will see a steady growth in use, value and registrations. The last couple cycles for Manna distribution have seen over 20,000 participants. This I believe places Manna as one of, if not the largest UBI platform to date. On top of that, Manna is not restricted to a small region as other UBI social experiments have been, giving them a heads up advantage of data on a more global scale.

I'm not saying that Manna will be the frontrunner, but they are certainly positioned well to achieve it. I strongly believe in the platform, and the development team. I have personally had the opportunity to speak with Brandon Venetta, and I could tell there was some true passion for success from the Manna team.

Storiqa listed on CoinMarketCap...however, this doesn't look good, wondering if when they showed a shop buyback rate of $0.03 USD, if they forgot a zero...current market price is $0.00261 according to CMC....hope this one shines it's true light and starts swinging. Let's hope for a better exchange listing soon.

Yes, DarkStar is rather active on this project, although Discord is more active than here.

The more coins you hold staking, the more frequent the rewards. The estimated time to stake in all staking wallets that I have seen or used is completely inaccurate, and should never be followed. I know I get reasonable frequency on my holdings.