Bitcoin Forum
June 25, 2024, 03:13:07 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 [2]
21  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: I think I might have had my BTC stolen? Really need advice on: June 17, 2011, 03:16:29 AM
So if it says it's gone, it's really gone and I can't do anything.. correct?
22  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / I think I might have had my BTC stolen? Really need advice on: June 17, 2011, 02:51:15 AM
I just opened the client, and I have a transaction of -23.20 to an unknown address (it is not recognized by block explorer), that I did not make. It has 0 confirmations. Will not downloading the block chain do anything? Is there anyway to stop this? Or should I just download it and see what happens? :|

EDIT: And I am running on a Mac.

EDIT2: Now it is showing up on block explorer. http://blockexplorer.com/address/1KqNXG7wVcuxhB56mCr7mcGG1FqF1RHs7n

Am I just screwed?
23  Economy / Trading Discussion / Does MtGox have a minimum? on: June 17, 2011, 02:22:59 AM
I am trying to buy .85BTC and I get this error: "Please enter a valid number." Is there a minimum? If so, why?
24  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin Worldwide Exclusive: New Competitor to MtGox: http://TradeHill.com on: June 09, 2011, 02:11:36 AM
Well... TH-R1534

Very interested in seeing first hand and real time how competition changes things.
25  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Garzik encourages regulation on: June 08, 2011, 06:46:09 PM
I'm pretty sure I understand the way things work, but can someone please tell me how true these 2 statements are:
  • No individual, not even Garzik or Gavin, can control/regulate the way the network and transactions actually function. Garzik and Gavin can only release a client with limited functionality.
  • Any 3rd party could come along and make a less restricted client if this were to happen.
26  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Transactions don't work? (Mac OS X) on: June 04, 2011, 08:11:29 PM
I'm confused. Don't the default fee rules I posted explain why you were forced to pay a fee?

As for why it took so long to transfer, I have no idea.
27  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Transactions don't work? (Mac OS X) on: June 04, 2011, 01:42:00 PM
Kyoo, this is news to me too, but after looking on the Bitcoin transaction fees page on the wiki, I found out that there are some default fee rules built into the client. One of them is this:

Quote
0.01 BTC fee per kilobyte of transaction, but:

  • If the blocksize (size of all transactions currently waiting to be included in a block) is less than 27 kB, transactions are free.
  • If the blocksize is more than 250 kB, transactions get increasingly more expensive as the blocksize approaches the limit of 500 kB. Sending a transaction when the blocksize is 400 kB will cost 5 times the normal amount; sending when it's 499 kB will cost 500x, etc.

That seems like it explains what happened to you, though I am not sure (I have no idea what the state of those two conditions listed are). However it is most likely some sort of default rule in the bitcoin client. To stop these fees, the wiki recommends the free transaction relay policy, but as you can see not many miners are participating.
28  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Transactions don't work? (Mac OS X) on: May 30, 2011, 09:02:31 PM
Well that shows there haven't been any transactions on that address, so if that's the one you entered on the faucet, then it was probably out and never sent them to you.
29  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Transactions don't work? (Mac OS X) on: May 30, 2011, 03:21:43 PM
Try searching http://blockexplorer.com/ for your address. If the faucet transaction shows up, then that would indicate it is indeed your client that has the problem. But if the block chain isn't even recognizing the transaction, it's probably the faucet's problem.
30  Economy / Trading Discussion / Re: MtGox Market Mover: How does a trade affect MtGox? on: May 21, 2011, 12:56:04 PM
Very cool script hendi. Good job.
31  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Saturation? on: May 19, 2011, 06:52:56 PM
It is divisible to 8 decimals, so that's actually 2,100,000,000,000,000 base units.

EDIT: got beat to it
32  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Who or what is this math being done for? on: May 18, 2011, 07:35:23 PM
Wait, so how will transactions be verified once all 21M are out?
33  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: A simpler explanation, please... on: May 18, 2011, 07:30:23 PM
Ugh, this thread gives me so much headache.

So many people have explained where the value comes from. Stop saying nobody has.

-_-
34  Economy / Trading Discussion / Re: RFC: Non-virtual to Bitcoin currency payment gateway on: May 17, 2011, 08:07:09 PM
I would also invest.
35  Economy / Trading Discussion / Re: MtGox - too many connections on: May 01, 2011, 02:48:23 AM
OK, thanks a lot for the reply.
36  Economy / Trading Discussion / Re: MtGox - too many connections on: May 01, 2011, 02:21:29 AM
I just transferred 5 BTC over to MtGox earlier today, then less than an hour later it started becoming impossible to go on. And they never showed up in my balance.

Am I going to lose those bitcoins?
Pages: « 1 [2]
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!