 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 »
|
|
And here is the information that I get from Block.io when retrieving private keys for address 3CdYdQcc79QywRbZsAToKJx3AC83GGr1Ke :
* Address: 3CdYdQcc79QywRbZsAToKJx3AC83GGr1Ke
* Address Type: P2WSH-over-P2SH
* Required Signatures: 2
* Redeem Script: 2 *** 2 OP_CHECKMULTISIG
* Redeem Script Hex: ***
* Public Keys: ["***", "***"]
* Private Keys: ["***", "***"]
I tried to open MultiSig wallet in Electrum but failed, because I don't have xpubs or xprvs. I only have the above information from Block.io and from coinb.in.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't understand.
In coinb.in site in "Verify" section, I entered the redeem script of address 3CdYdQcc79QywRbZsAToKJx3AC83GGr1Ke and got the following information:
Multi Signature Address, Required Signatures (2), and Signatures Required from (2 addresses and 2 public keys).
What to do next? I am stuck. Please help me.
|
|
|
|
|
Seems like the Private Keys feature of Block.io isn't working properly...
I will ask Block.io to manually drop that transaction from their mempool then.
|
|
|
|
I imported to my Electrum wallet my 2 Private Keys of the Bitcoin address (3CdYdQcc79QywRbZsAToKJx3AC83GGr1Ke) from which the transaction was sent, but it gave me 2 empty addresses with zero transactions....that's so strange.  |
|
|
|
Yes, it actually has 324 inputs... maybe that's why.
Yes. You should be able to import the private keys of block.io into electrum, and it should work just fine.
Ok, I will try to do that. But I prefer to get clear instructions if possible. I think that's easier to ask around to get your transaction accelerated. Just do a bit of search on this forum, some people do this, some even for free / tip. Or you can try yourself with ViaBTC https://pool.viabtc.com/tools/txaccelerator/ but you have to be in the first seconds after hour, else you won't get in. There are (too) many trying this every hour. Impossible. It will give an error that the transaction doesn't exist. It is possible to see it only in chain.so. |
|
|
|
Well that's strange, as I used medium priority for sending that transaction, not low. And the fee is 0.00519072 BTC, which is not small.
Well, your transaction is over 95KB and for that size, you would be looking at the very least, a fee of 0.07BTC. Block.io probably don't have that great of an estimation. So now I will have to wait another 3 days for it to drop again and I will have to be fast enough to send it again with high priority before it gets rebroadcasted again?
Yeah, the time may vary, if someone else rebroadcasts it continually. I'm not sure how Block.io works. If you'd like, you can search up on how to extract the private key(if possible) from Block.io. Using that, you can sign another transaction with a higher fee. Since the propagation isn't good, you're likely to get a confirmation really fast. How many times more it can get rebroadcasted by itself? Hope this is not an infinite loop. It is an infinite loop, till it gets confirmed or the inputs gets spent in another confirmed transaction. Thank you very much for your explanation. By the way, is it possible for Block.io to drop the transaction from their mempool manually? I mean, can I ask them to do it? Then I will be able to send another transaction from my Block.io wallet with a high priority so it will get confirmed fast. And Block.io not long time ago added the Private Keys feature for wallet holders. So it will be possible for me to extract the Private Key from my Block.io wallet into my Electrum wallet and then send another transaction with a high fee, even though the funds are not in my Block.io wallet now because of the rebroadcasted transaction? If it is possible, how to do it? |
|
|
|
it's possible to see the transaction details only in chain.so, as it doesn't exist in blockchain.
It's normal. Its either your transaction was not propagated well or your fees were too low. Today morning I noticed something very strange - the transaction got "deleted" and the funds were back to my Block.io wallet. Another very strange thing, is that few hours later, it was sent again by itself to the same Bitcoin address with the same transaction ID, and the situation is exactly the same now - unconfirmed transaction and not found in blockchain. Please let me know how could this happen and what should I do to solve this problem. Thank you.
When the transaction was "deleted", Block.io probably dropped it from their mempool since it was in there for so long. After that, it got rebroadcasted and the transaction appeared in the wallet again. Its completely normal and there is nothing to worry about. However, the transactions has paid a very low fee/byte and it is unlikely to be confirmed anytime soon. The next time it gets dropped, it would be better for you to create another transaction with a higher fee. Well that's strange, as I used medium priority for sending that transaction, not low. And the fee is 0.00519072 BTC, which is not small. So now I will have to wait another 3 days for it to drop again and I will have to be fast enough to send it again with high priority before it gets rebroadcasted again? How many times more it can get rebroadcasted by itself? Hope this is not an infinite loop. |
|
|
|
|
Hello, I have a problem. 3 days ago, I paid 3.9 BTC from my Block.io wallet with medium (default) priority to Bitcoin address 1HQrV3gCs8pNDHBiMcmyQJqmBZTd3JJQbZ. Transaction ID is f89b79d5222a2016d0d2e0059d8834a61da817fd9ad31b3d58e0770cba4ddd87. Until now, it has not been confirmed, and it's possible to see the transaction details only in chain.so, as it doesn't exist in blockchain. Today morning I noticed something very strange - the transaction got "deleted" and the funds were back to my Block.io wallet. Another very strange thing, is that few hours later, it was sent again by itself to the same Bitcoin address with the same transaction ID, and the situation is exactly the same now - unconfirmed transaction and not found in blockchain. Please let me know how could this happen and what should I do to solve this problem. Thank you.
|
|
|
|
Thanks God, situation is already getting better! Fees are gradually decreasing and there are less and less unconfirmed transactions!  |
|
|
|
Fees are lower now and 35k unconfirmed transactions, yesterday was more than double. Fingers crossed! |
|
|
|
Segwit is a scam. Bitcoin Cash is the real Bitcoin.
Bullshit! Bitcoin only! Are you Roger/Jihad? Please stop spamming the network! I just noticed that fees are gradually getting lower and also the unconfirmed transactions, and hopefully it will only get better and better! Fingers crossed! |
|
|
|
Wise people always posted that
SW is not a on-chain scaling solution
SW is a slow starter since infrastructure and users have to actively change - segwait bit is true.
A 2x (NYA) helps immediately for fee reduction and needed mass adoption block space and was the only way to get miners agree on the SW 1x at first step.
Bitcoin had 8+ years evolution+reputation time to be as safe as known today. Potential new 2nd layer scaling techs need many years too, to be save enough to be used, but might never be same trustless as bitcoin on-chain trx.
And AFAIK all that trouble, because of some potential centralization fears in some years, that might be wiped away by new massiv growth e.g. in big business world that would mean real decentralization, because these entities need to run lots of new separate big nodes on top.
Well, I just hope that the situation will get much better soon. |
|
|
|
Oh my God! In this case, Roger+Jihad are VERY bad people! We mustn't let them win here!
Roger+Jihad - PLEASE STOP! STOP SPAMMING! PLEASE!!!
Roger and Jihad, if you are reading this, please, stop your spam. You won't get anything from it. |
|
|
|
Hello guys, I really don't understand all the "excitement" about that SegWit thing. It already activated couple of days ago and still nothing - too many unconfirmed transactions, fees are very high, block sizes are still under 1 MB, and slow confirmations. Where is the promised lightning network? When (if at all) the current situation will change?
Roger Ver+Jihad is spamming the network heavily after segwit activation as the smart users predicted, actually very predictable. Now he is doing astroturfing everywhere, including thi forum. "See, segwit didn't work, we need a blocksize increase!" They want to push the SegWit2x dogshit in order to crash the BTC price so BCC can benefit. Don't fall for it. Pay the fucking fees or wait for the Roger Ver+Jihad Wu spam to cease. Oh my God! In this case, Roger+Jihad are VERY bad people! We mustn't let them win here! Roger+Jihad - PLEASE STOP! STOP SPAMMING! PLEASE!!! |
|
|
|
Just be patient, we are in a transition state. The activation is just a first step of numerous steps. An initial process where the actual solution to the scaling will be implemented. We can think of Segwit Activation being the foundation to enable other development to happen in Bitcoin System. So we just need to bear with it for a meantime together with those people who are spamming the network. They will get tired of it, I am sure.
I really hope so. |
|
|
|
|
I just hate it when I see such a huge load on the bitcoin network. I really hope that the unconfirmed transactions & fees will decrease a lot soon, and situation will at least return to what it was few weeks ago. Spammers - please stop!
|
|
|
|
To all the miners - please leave that Bitcoin Cash! Focus only on Bitcoin - the future!  |
|
|
|
Well, some say it is because of the bitcoin Cash. SInce bitcoin cash is getting easier to mine, the miners are shifting from Bitcoin to Bitcoin Cash and making the confirmations delayed. The block is not the problem but the miners who are confirming it.
Oh, that's very bad...I hope situation will improve a lot soon. |
|
|
|
|
Hello guys, I really don't understand all the "excitement" about that SegWit thing. It already activated couple of days ago and still nothing - too many unconfirmed transactions, fees are very high, block sizes are still under 1 MB, and slow confirmations. Where is the promised lightning network? When (if at all) the current situation will change?
|
|
|
|
If your wallets are well separed one from another, it is since your bitcoins are on block.io, there is no risk, at least from what I understood.
Yes they are, but i heard that its too risky to install electrun cash in the same pc that electrum was installed, and i have only one pc. So even if i delete electrum and all the funds are moved to block.io, there is still a risk using electrun cash to claim my bch? |
|
|
|
|
